Hi, folks. Here are some of the upcoming dates for the 0.12 release
of Qpid.
- 3 March - 0.12 trunk opened
- 15 June - 0.12 alpha (in a little over 2 weeks)
- 28 June - 0.12 beta
- 27 July - Target date for the final 0.12 release candidate
The alpha date is the deadline for landing
:
Justin,
Wondering if you could move the beta date to 17th of June (friday) instead
of the 15th?
Regards,
Rajith
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi, folks. Here are some of the upcoming dates for the 0.12 release
of Qpid.
- 3 March - 0.12 trunk opened
-Original Message-
From: Justin Ross [mailto:jr...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 10:47 AM
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: 0.12 release update - upcoming dates
I agree, and that's why I prefer to set the deadlines to the
middle of the week. That way if we slip
Hi, everyone. I cut the alpha Monday this week, at revision 1137034.
It's available at the release page[1]. I didn't encounter any problems
with the distribution or release script.
That means that the time for accepting any deep or disruptive changes into
0.12 has passed. The beta deadline
Good idea. I'll use that for the upcoming version number changes.
Justin
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
This is just an idea. Instead of using NO-JIRA we could create a JIRA
for 0.12 and then use that for all administrative commits related to
0.12
Ex. creating the branch,
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Justin, I also added your JIRA account to the Cmmitters role while I
was in there.
Robbie
Ah, thanks! I was about to request that.
Justin
Robbie
Robbie
On 30 June 2011 15:25, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote:
This is just an
Hi. I created the release branch this morning at revision 1141543. Some
testing revealed a problem in the C++ source distribution, so I fixed
that (with Mick's help) and cut the beta from revision 1141708 on the
release branch. Get it at
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.12-beta/
I
Hello. This is a reminder that I will be producing the first 0.12 release
candidate this week, probably Wednesday evening or Thursday morning (my
time, US east coast).
I haven't seen any requests to merge to the release branch so far. I know
of one pending fix for a windows distribution
. It fails because
of a missing file. The beta needs to include 1143995 to get the source file
into the C++ source distribution. The file was added in 1104662.
-Chuck
- Original Message -
From: Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 5:39:15 PM
Subject
Rajith, I'm confused by this one. All the commits associated with QPID-3302
fall before the 0.12 branch point, 1141543. I figure we've already got these
in 0.12.
Justin
- Original Message -
From: Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, July 14,
Greetings, everyone. Today I produced RC1 from revision 1146605:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.12-rc1/
Thanks to everyone who has tested and prodded. RC2 is due this time next
week, and the final RC is planned for the end of this month. See all
the details at the release page.
Hey, man, no problem.
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote:
Rajith, I'm confused by this one. All the commits associated with QPID-3302
fall before the 0.12 branch point, 1141543. I figure we've already got
Message - From: Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: 0.12 release update - release branch created, beta available
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote:
Rajith, I'm confused by this one. All
July 2011 20:11, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings, everyone. Today I produced RC1 from revision 1146605:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.12-rc1/
Thanks to everyone who has tested and prodded. RC2 is due this time next
week, and the final RC is planned for the end
Hi, folks. I'm encouraged by the RC1 feedback that we've seen so far.
Big thanks is due to our responsive testers: Chuck, Cliff, Gordon, Keith,
Robbie, and Steve.
RC2 contains just two changes versus RC1:
- A fix for a threading problem in windows, QPID-3256 (Cliff and Steve)
- Corrected
Hi, everyone. There have been no changes to the 0.12 release branch since
our last RC. There is, however, a new blocker issue.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3394
The proposed fix passes initial inspection, so I anticipate this will be
resolved in the next few days, and I will
Howdy, all. The last-minute blocker, QPID-3394, has been fixed, and there
are no open blocker jiras against 0.12. The proposed final RC, from
revision 1154981 of the 0.12 release branch, is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.12/
If you favor releasing this distribution
While Qpid 0.12 is still hanging out for a few more votes, I thought I'd
send out a pointer to our 0.14 release page.
https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/014-release.html
There's not much there yet apart from the proposed schedule. Over time
this page will host more content.
0.14 itself has
Last call. I'll check tomorrow and consider this vote closed if there's
no new discussion.
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, Justin Ross wrote:
Howdy, all. The last-minute blocker, QPID-3394, has been fixed, and there
are no open blocker jiras against 0.12. The proposed final RC, from revision
1154981
Sorry, I'm responsible for the delay. It's staged on apache dist, and
I've got the web site diff nearly ready.
Justin
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Bump. Any updates?
Robbie
On 16 August 2011 19:10, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote:
Last call. I'll check tomorrow
The Apache Qpid community is pleased to announce the immediate
availability of Apache Qpid 0.12.
Apache Qpid (http://qpid.apache.org) is a cross-platform enterprise
messaging solution which implements the Advanced Message Queuing
Protocol (AMQP, http://www.amqp.org). It provides brokers written
No, no good reason. I simply forgot. It's there now:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/qpid/tags/0.12/
Thanks for pointing that out.
Justin
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Paul Colby wrote:
Hi,
Is there any particular reason that there's no 0.12 tag in subversion yet?
(ie under
Sure, no problem. I'll watch for the commit and spin the alpha after.
Justin
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Steve Huston wrote:
Hi Justin,
I tried to land the QPID-2519 branch yesterday but ended up fighting
subversion til now. Assuming I can finish retesting the merge today, is it
ok to commit to
Hi, Andrew. I don't object at all. I'll have a chance to test it this
week before I prepare the final beta.
Justin
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Andrew Kennedy wrote:
On 21 Oct 2011, at 21h11, jr...@redhat.com wrote:
The 0.14 alpha is now cut at trunk revision 1187499:
Hi, all. This week we produce 0.14 beta and branch for release. I
expect to produce the beta Thursday morning US east coast time.
I'd also like to thank Keith and Chuck (and anyone else I missed!) for
their additional testing of the alpha.
Thanks,
Justin
---
0.14 release page:
Hi, Keith. I've created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3566
Let me know if there's anything more I should extract from my environment.
Thanks,
Justin
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Keith W wrote:
Hi Justin,
Re: the ConnectionCloseTest#testSendReceiveClose test failure.
That's seems
, but it has been
modified since then by Alex to reflect new info as he and Keith worked
on it and probably just not had the version updated. I'm not sure
there is actually any intention of putting that into the release
branch.
Robbie
On 7 November 2011 18:32, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote:
I have
Hi, Jose. Thanks for the detailed request. I approve the first request
(04_reorganize-automake...), but not the second.
Taking the first patch represents a little risk, since it affects the
overall cpp distribution and make install. I'd like to ask that you
ensure make install, make dist,
Hi, Robbie. All approved. Thanks for the well described request.
Justin
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Hi Justin,
I would like to request the following changes for the Java
client+broker be considered for 0.14:
QPID-3611, QPID-3610, QPID-3446, QPID-3592.
- IoReceiver calls
Ken just created a jira for deprecation of the old C++ broker producer
throttling (replaced by producer flow control in 0.10). The feature would
remain deprecated for one release, 0.14, and then removed in 0.16.
Are there other candidates for this treatment?
Justin
Hi, folks. This is a reminder that we will be producing our first 0.14
release candidate this week. I'll likely generate it Thursday morning, US
east coast time.
I know of one change still outstanding, Jose's perl binding autotools
patch.
Thanks,
Justin
---
0.14 release page:
Yes, certainly.
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Could we also put this SSL cert update into 0.14?
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1203235view=rev
Robbie
On 17 November 2011 12:47, Keith W keith.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Justin
Can the following JIRAs be considered for
Hi, Keith. I've approved 2703. I'm currently hunting for a reviewer for
3617. If anyone has a moment to look, please voice your approval in a
jira comment, and I'll approve it for 0.14. The change appears to be
trivial.
Justin
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Keith W wrote:
Hello Justin
Can the
A number of new inclusion requests have come in today, and I'd like our
first release candidate to have a real chance at being final. I'm going
to postpone creating the RC1 distribution to tomorrow so all the approved
changes can land.
Thanks,
Justin
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011, Justin Ross wrote
branch can be seen at the URL
below. One file I didnt touch which possibly needs attention is:
qpid/cpp/src/qpid.pc.in
http://people.apache.org/~robbie/qpid/0.14/0.14PreRC1_rat_output.txt
Robbie
On 17 November 2011 18:16, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote:
A number of new inclusion requests have
Approved for 0.14.
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011, Ken Giusti wrote:
I +1 this change
- Original Message -
Justin,
I'd like to get this commit backported to the 0.14 branch. Can you
take
a quick look at it?
Thanks,
-Ted
Original Message
Subject:svn commit:
Greetings, everyone. I've produced our first release candidate at
revision 1203721:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.14-rc1/
I haven't completed my normal smoke testing, so I'll follow up later
with my results. Try it out!
Thanks,
Justin
---
0.14 release page:
0.16 opened up for development when we branched 0.14 for release at the
start of November. I've now created the 0.16 release page at
https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/016-release.html
It has the schedule and links to various jira queries describing the
release content so far. It will grow to
okay
I ran all my tests using Fedora 15 x86_64, GCC 4.6.1, Java 1.6.0_22, and
Python 2.7.1.
Justin
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, Justin Ross wrote:
Greetings, everyone. I've produced our first release candidate at revision
1203721:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.14-rc1/
I
After some more discussion, let's take a straw poll. I know many people
are using git already. If many accounts for most of our contributors,
we should really consider making the transition.
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
As Robbie mentioned, most of the git fans are already
Sorry, Rajith. Obviously, I agree!
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011, Justin Ross wrote:
After some more discussion, let's take a straw poll. I know many people are
using git already. If many accounts for most of our contributors, we
should really consider making the transition.
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011
Hi, folks. Here's our second release candidate:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.14/
It contains three changes versus RC1:
r1209041 | robbie | 2011-12-01 06:37:04 -0500 (Thu, 01 Dec 2011) | 4
QPID-3582:
is cut since nobody generally cares about the
installer-building scripts. But I will hopefully have the scripts finished
testing by Monday.
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: Justin Ross [mailto:jr...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 9:43 AM
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Subject: 0.14
Hello, everyone. There have been no new changes on the release branch
since our proposed final RC, available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.14/
If you favor releasing this distribution as Qpid 0.14, vote +1. If
instead you think there are problems that should prevent this
2011 14:58, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello, everyone. There have been no new changes on the release branch since
our proposed final RC, available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.14/
If you favor releasing this distribution as Qpid 0.14, vote +1. If instead
you think
/
Justin
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Justin Ross wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
The maven artifacts folder doesnt seem to contain everything I
expected it should. Only the client and common artifacts are present,
whereas Andrew had previously added additional artifacts which
happened and avoid
it for future releases.
I also tried to upload the maven artifacts to a staging repo on the
Nexus instance but couldnt as as the signature files are required
artifacts.
Robbie
On 15 December 2011 19:09, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote:
I went ahead and produced the fixed
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Justin Ross wrote:
I must apologize for the delay. I went on vacation right where this thread
left off.
A quick note before I prepare the full release update. Here's the plan:
* Fix the issue Robbie mentioned below if it's easy (punt if not)
* Produce signed artifacts
Another Apache contributor helpfully pointed out that I had used the wrong
key to sign these. That's now corrected.
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Justin Ross wrote:
I'd like to declare this release approved. Robbie, were you able use the
maven artifacts in the updated (and signed) 0.14 distribution
, and 0.14 will
be done.
Thanks everyone for your continued efforts.
Justin
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Justin Ross wrote:
Another Apache contributor helpfully pointed out that I had used the wrong
key to sign these. That's now corrected.
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Justin Ross wrote:
I'd like to declare
release artifacts were
already mirrored I dont suppose theres much to be done now except not
release them if they arent ok)
Robbie
On 19 January 2012 22:16, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote:
To the best of my knowledge, the artifacts as published are correct and
ready for release. I declare
from the SVN
source?
-Ted
On 12/12/2011 09:58 AM, Justin Ross wrote:
Hello, everyone. There have been no new changes on the release branch
since our proposed final RC, available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.14/
If you favor releasing this distribution as Qpid 0.14, vote +1
The Apache Qpid community is pleased to announce the immediate
availability of Apache Qpid 0.14.
Apache Qpid (http://qpid.apache.org) is a cross-platform enterprise
messaging solution which implements the Advanced Message Queuing
Protocol (AMQP, http://www.amqp.org). It provides brokers written
Thank you and congratulations, everyone. Let me know if you encounter any
kind of problem.
Justin
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012, Justin Ross wrote:
The Apache Qpid community is pleased to announce the immediate
availability of Apache Qpid 0.14.
Apache Qpid (http://qpid.apache.org) is a cross
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Keith Wall (Commented) (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13197121#comment-13197121
]
Keith Wall commented on QPID-3175:
Hi, folks. Important 0.16 dates are approaching:
15 Feb - Alpha, test distribution, freeze for major features
29 Feb - Beta, branch for release, 0.16 commits require approval
The 0.16 release page has more details about the dates and the content of
the release:
Hi! The alpha, from revision 1292524, is now available at
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.16-alpha/
Thanks to Ted and Andrew for helping me clear up some distribution issues.
I did test builds of the source components on Fedora 15 x86_64 and
encountered no problems.
Beta
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, Gordon Sim wrote:
On a more minor point, the qpid-cpp release tarball still uses 0.15 as do
those for qmf and tools and for the separate java client and broker
downloads. The python tarball uses 0.16.
That's down to the various methods used to put version numbers in the
I've created the 0.16 branch from revision 1297794:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/branches/0.16
The beta distribution is forthcoming. Trunk is now open for development
toward 0.18.
Thanks,
Justin
---
0.16 release page: https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/016-release.html
Hi, everyone. The beta distribution, from revision 1298344 of the 0.16
branch, is now available:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.16-beta/
I smoke tested the python, cpp, java, qmf, and tools components on Fedora
16 x86_64. I encountered trouble only with the cpp tests: the cmake
Reviewed by Andrew on the list and approved for 0.16.
(Note on protocol: this one is super small and isolated, but in general
you'll need to create a jira to get stuff to 0.16.)
Thanks!
Justin
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012, mick wrote:
Please include svn rev 1301153 in 0.16
It is small fix to
Ted, would you create a jira for it?
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Ted Ross wrote:
Justin,
I'd like the following commit to be considered for inclusion in 0.16:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1303596view=rev
The bug causes qpid-config to error-out when displaying queues that have
alternate
to produce RC1.
Justin
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Justin Ross wrote:
Hi, everyone. The beta distribution, from revision 1298344 of the 0.16
branch, is now available:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.16-beta/
I smoke tested the python, cpp, java, qmf, and tools components on Fedora 16
x86_64. I
Okay, thanks Robbie and Rob. I've marked it approved on the jira. (Just in
time for the belated RC1, I figure.)
- Original Message -
From: Rob Godfrey rob.j.godf...@gmail.com
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Cc: Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2012 8:48:26 PM
Subject: Re
Hi, folks. RC1 from revision 1309390 of the 0.16 branch can be got here:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.16-rc1/
It includes the following fixes since the beta:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3877
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3893
:18, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi, folks. RC1 from revision 1309390 of the 0.16 branch can be got here:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.16-rc1/
It includes the following fixes since the beta:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3877
https://issues.apache.org/jira
I'd like to see this one go to trunk first so we have a chance to discover
any issues during CI runs.
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3940
This patch adds the features and spec directories to the gemfile created
by the make gemfile
I've checked and the suggested fix below has indeed worked in my test
distributions. RC2 will have this resolved.
Justin
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012, Justin Ross wrote:
Yep, sigh. Last time I resolved this by running the release script as you
indicated. I suspect the release.sh invocation under
I think this is worth doing for 0.16. Andy and Gordon, does the trunk
change test out in your environments?
Justin
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
Justin,
Can we get QPID-3944 into 0.16?
Andrew
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 23:16 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 04/11/2012 11:09 PM,
Here's a preview of the 0.16 release notes:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/release_notes_0.16.html
I'll regenerate this before GA. Until then, you can adjust jira
titles and categories to spruce up the release notes.
Note to developers: jiras 3937, 3938, 3901, and 3919 don't appear in
Hi, folks. RC3 is available at the link below:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.16-rc3/
The following issues have been resolved since RC2:
jross@nicaea qpid-0.16$ svn log -r 1324656:HEAD | fgrep QPID
QPID-3944: Autotools build system doesn't correctly detect python
developer
Hi. I've now produced 0.16-rc4 at the following location:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.16-rc4/
It has just one change beyond RC3, r1336378, which disables the HA tests
if required test tools are not in the environment (Thanks, Alan).
There was one other issue with RC3 that Cajus
raised a request for
inclusion relating to updating the ruby gem name which still seems
open, is that being deferred to 0.18?
Robbie
On 10 May 2012 01:57, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi. I've now produced 0.16-rc4 at the following location:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.16
Hi, folks. To conclude our vote to release 0.16, there were 10 votes in
favor and none against. I've now pushed the RC4 bits (minus the maven
part) to dist for mirroring. I've also published the final release notes
here:
http://qpid.apache.org/release_notes_0.16.html
Note, I'm going to
Hi, Steve. Reading QPID-3914, it seems there are some questions about the
patches' readiness. Do you think it's ready for inclusion? (If so,
please indicate in the jira's comments so point and counterpoint are in
one place.)
As to timing in general, I'd be willing to accept a patch for
Hi, Rob. I don't have any objections. Since I feel better if I ask at
least one question: does the console branch contain any important changes
to the broker model or its operation? If not, I consider it safe to
include up to beta.
Justin
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Rob Godfrey wrote:
Hi
The new alpha is available from revision 1351519 of trunk:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.18-alpha/
I performed builds and ran the standard test suites for the cpp and java
components. I ran into only one failure in my environment, Fedora 16
x86_64, in one of the logging tests.
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Rob Godfrey wrote:
On 25 June 2012 20:06, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Rafael Schloming wrote:
The fundamental issue here is that Qpid now needs to serve two
audiences. A very horizontal audience made up of pretty much anything
that might
Hi, everyone. I've branched trunk for release at revision 1359193:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/branches/0.18/
That means trunk is now open for development toward our next release,
0.20. Commits to the release branch require prior review and approval,
recorded in a jira.
The
Hi, Alex. Approved for 0.18.
Justin
- Original Message -
From: Oleksandr Rudyy oru...@gmail.com
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 8:12:31 AM
Subject: 0.18 inclusion request
Hi Justin,
Could you please consider inclusions of trunk commits
Okay, I defer to you. Last call: does anyone with a java-broker focus
wish to object?
Justin
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Although it is an extension, since it is a fairly useful but trivial change
(good chunks of the diff are actually due to removing an unecessary
Here's a preview of the 0.18 release notes. If you'd like to change the
content, you can either edit the jira content or send me any additional
notes you'd like me to include.
http://people.apache.org/~jross/release_notes_0.18.html
Thanks,
Justin
I've heard rumblings about things we may wish to deprecate as of 0.18. If
there are some, and we agree to deprecate them, I would add them to our
release notes.
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi, everyone. I've produced RC2 at revision 1368514. Get it here:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.18-rc2/
I'm going to be away on vacation until the 13th of August. If no changes are
requested before then, I'll propose RC2 (after I've signed it) for our release
vote when I return.
Hi, Robbie. Thanks for the excellent update.
I've tested a pre-RC3 with the release.sh changes and encountered no
problems. I've pinged Mick to get QPID-4194 merged, and Chuck is all set
to merge QPID-4142.
Assuming we get those soon, I'll generate a signed RC3 tomorrow and
corresponding
Hi, everyone. All of the outstanding inclusion requests have been
settled, and I've cut RC3 at revision 1373004. Get it here:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.18-rc3/
This is a proposed final release candidate. At the end of this week, if
no new blockers have emerged, I'll open the
This one comes too late, so we'll have to get it in 0.20.
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
This enhancement set:
1. installs the Swig .i files to /usr/include,
2. provides a Perl API on top of the Swig APIs, and
3. adds a new target to release.sh to create a Perl tarball
Hi, folks. It's time again to vote on our release. The proposed final RC
(same revision as RC3, minus the -rc3 version suffix) is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.18/
If you favor releasing the RC3 bits as 0.18, vote +1. If you have a
reason to think that RC3 is not
I had planned to close the vote last week, but so far I've receieved only
four votes. Anyone else care to cast his or her ballot?
Justin
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Justin Ross wrote:
Hi, folks. It's time again to vote on our release. The proposed final RC
(same revision as RC3, minus the -rc3
staged for release, and hadn't voted simply
because I coudlnt before the mentioned Friday deadline and you already had
the required three +1s to release it if you wanted anyway :P)
Robbie
On 20 August 2012 16:53, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi, folks. It's time again to vote on our
Yep, no problem.
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Steve Huston wrote:
Justin,
Could this note be added to the 0.18 release notes for the C++ broker?
-Original Message-
From: mark...@gmail.com [mailto:mark...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mark J Cox
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 5:28 AM
To: Steve
I'm happy to say that Qpid 0.18 is ready for broad consumption. A big
thanks to all the testers and contributors.
I've updated the Qpid web site, release page, and release notes.
Assuming no surprises, I'll send the announce mail tomorrow.
Thanks!
Justin
---
0.18 release page:
Hi, everyone. 0.20 has been open for development for about two months.
Here are some upcoming dates to keep in mind:
Alpha - 17 October, in just under five weeks
Beta - 31 October, in just under seven weeks
Alpha is the deadline for major feature inclusiion. If you miss it,
you'll have
Hi. Just a quick reminder that alpha, the deadline for including major
features in 0.20, is next week. Beta follows two weeks after that, at
which point trunk will open again for forward development.
Thanks,
Justin
---
https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/020-release.html
Hi, folks. I have updated our schedule on the release page to reflect the
previously discussed postponement. The 0.20 beta date is now November
14th.
I've produced a second alpha. Thanks, Robbie, for the helpful
suggestion. It's from revision 1404590 of trunk, and you can get it here:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7810/#review13092
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Justin Ross
On Oct. 31, 2012, 7:22 p.m
Sorry about the delay. Alan mentioned the same problem. I've reverted
the change and asked Ernie for an improved patch.
Justin
On Fri, 9 Nov 2012, Gordon Sim wrote:
I'm seeing several of the c++ tests failing on trunk (sasl_fed,
cli_test, run_msg_group_tests) and have tracked it down to
I've reviewed this and spoken to Andrew about it. I favor including this
for 0.20.
Justin
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
As you might see from my message to the user list I've been working on
restricting the broker from always listening on every network interface.
The work is
Hi, folks. I've branched for the 0.20 release at trunk revision 1411210
and updated trunk and release-branch versions to 0.21 and 0.20
respectively.
This means, of course, that trunk has officially opened for major feature
inclusion and other improvements on the way to 0.22.
Bug fixes on
Hi. The beta distribution is available now from revision 1411386 of the
release branch.
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.20-beta/
I did some simple build and test runs of the cpp and java components on
Fedora 16 x86-64. There was only one failure, concerning ssl_test in the
cpp
1 - 100 of 3940 matches
Mail list logo
