Do you still have commit acces to the repo?
Robby
On Monday, May 30, 2011, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote:
> I think even one sentence in the docs about the implications of these
> statements there would be a great idea. To someone who doesn't
> already know Scheme, the distinction between "one va
DrRacket has more control than Racket does over how the repl interacts
with it's environment so it is not broken in this manner. (unless you
think this is desireable, to be more faithful?)
Robby
On Wednesday, June 1, 2011, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> DrRacket behaves differently here. It silen
If you are going to make a new, more general function you could make
all of the arguments keyword based.
Robby
On Saturday, June 4, 2011, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> So the request to get subgroups from `regexp-match*' is not new, and
> since I've seen it twice in a week I'm going to add it. What I'm
Just on general principle, I think that making take in lazy match take
in regular racket is more important than matching Haskell, but I don't
really have a firm enough grasp on the details to have a strong
opinion either way on the below.
Sorry,
Robby
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Eli Barzilay
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> About a minute ago, Robby Findler wrote:
>> Just on general principle, I think that making take in lazy match
>> take in regular racket is more important than matching Haskell, but
>> I don't really have a firm enou
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> In any case, I do take compatibility as a priority, so I'm suggesting
> allowing both orders for this case.
I did not mention this (remaining silent in response to your comment
with the word 'flame' in the original message), but I am strongly
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Stephen Bloch wrote:
>
> On Jun 8, 2011, at 9:55 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
>> ... the
>> justification for the argument order in Haskell is not laziness but
>> its implicit currying -- so of course it shouldn't be a reason to make
>> lazy racket follow it.]
>
> Ano
Man, I recall a slightly different sentiment when you edit papers we
co-author. :)
Robby
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> "Take from the sequence of primes the first five numbers and add them up."
> This is at most slightly mangled :-)
>
>
> On Jun 8, 2011, at 11:38
Why did you sanitize the name? Is this language different than brainfuck?
Robby
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:
> Just in case this is interesting (or humorous) to the other devs.
> I'll be writing up tutorial text for it soon.
>
> ---
>
> I'm starting to work on a small examp
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
>> Why did you sanitize the name? Is this language different than brainfuck?
>
>
> No real reason: I just didn't want to swear like a sailor.
>
How about
Yes. You want to set the current-print handler. You probably want to
use pretty-print to do the actual printing and it has hooks to let you
control how things like booleans are printed when they are embedded in
larger things.
Robby
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Matias Eyzaguirre wrote:
> Thi
FWIW, some of this stuff is okay to just put into the docs you're
building directly. IMO, it is okay to wait until you've needed these
little things more than once to put them into scribble proper.
Also, you didn't commit any tests.
Robby
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
how the highlighted error in that case, but keep the focus in the
> interactions.)
>
>
> Earlier today, ro...@racket-lang.org wrote:
>> 8357629 Robby Findler 2011-06-17 11:13:11 +0800
>> :
>> | if we're highlighting something in the defs window, make sure the
&g
gt; time... I think that making the focus change without explicit
> intention to do so is usually a bad idea.
>
> But since it's been this way for a while I knew that it's unlikely to
> change. (Also, since it's been this way your fix makes more sense as
> things curre
I think we should not remove anything from the net/url library
(including the unitized interface) as I believe that will break old
code.
Robby
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Does anyone have any objection to dropping the unitized interface for
> `net/url'? Specifically,
That sounds reasonable to me. You could even mention this rationale in
the documentation (avoiding backwards incompatibility and the
hopefully-coming-soon redesign and how this is a stop-gap).
Robby
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Two minutes ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>>
>
+1 to that sentiment.
I think this whole conversation is meant to be about how do we best
get from here to there. The question pending is how much is it
reasonable to break code that might use more obscure parts of the
current api. I'm taking the relatively hard-line stance that we should
not brea
e
the unitized interface, but if someone were to, I think a survey of
planet would be in order.
Robby
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Three minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
>> +1 to that sentiment.
>>
>> I think this whole conversation is meant to be a
To really know what is going on, one has to trace thru the re-provides
for each of these identifiers and match them up to the
declare-exporting declarations.
In the declaration below, you're essentially saying "any identifiers
documented in this module should appear to come from the
typed/scheme/b
Did you find the compiler/cm library? I think that's what you want.
Robby
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> I'm trying to hook into the part of racket that loads files so I can
> automatically create .zo files when they don't exist (and no, I don't
> want to type raco make).
Is the with-handlers that typed/racket exports the same identifier as
the one exported by racket, or is it a different binding?
Robby
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
>> To really know what is g
I think I'd need to actually look at the code next. I didn't seem to
find it, tho; can you give me a pointer?
Thanks,
Robby
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>
> On Jun 23, 2011 6:39 PM, "Robby Findler"
> wrote:
>>
>> I think I'd need to actually look at the code next. I didn't seem to
>> find it, tho; can you give me a pointer?
>
>
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 23, 2011 6:39 PM, "Robby Findler"
>>>
I'm not seeing something wrong. Maybe it would help if you could make
a smaller example.
Robby
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
>>
>> So I think the fix is to do the renaming for
7;s able to find the docs for the same
> identifier provided from typed/racket.
>
> It's the same problem as with with-handlers, but if appears not to have the
> same cause.
>
> On Jun 24, 2011 8:53 PM, "Robby Findler"
> wrote:
>>
>> I'm not
Thanks. I think that'll help us figure out where the problem is.
Robby
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> Ah, I see. Well, that makes two of us.
>
> I'll try to make a small example collection.
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Robby Fi
I suspect we should fix this at least for appearances same, but do you
think that that really helps avoid spam? I tried to keep my
@cs.uchicago.edu email address "secret" for a while, but then I gave
up and it didn't seem to matter. What ended up working for me was
using gmail to read my email.
Ro
With the setup you've put into that patch, this file demonstrates the
problem at the next lower layer. The first call to
xref-binding->definition-tag returns #f, but it should return
something similar to the second one, I believe.
#lang racket/base
(require setup/xref scribble/xref)
(define xref (
We're talking about relative requires only, right?
How are you proposing to signal the error?
Robby
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> On Jun 27, 2011, at 7:37 PM, John Clements wrote:
>
>> I'm fixing require in the stepper, and I want to make sure that the existing
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:52 AM, John Clements
wrote:
>
> On Jun 27, 2011, at 4:45 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
>
>> We're talking about relative requires only, right?
>>
>> How are you proposing to signal the error?
>
> My guess about how this works--correc
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:19 AM, John Clements
wrote:
>
> On Jun 27, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:52 AM, John Clements
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 27, 2011, at 4:45 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
>>>
>&g
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:47 AM, John Clements
wrote:
> I'm confused by the documentation for Planet's "install-pkg" function. First,
> it appears to me that this is what I'd use to simulate "raco planet
> fileinject"--is that correct?
Yes, I believe so.
> (I'm on a windows system, and I'm not
Yes, please do separate the stepper tests out into another file.
Robby
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> An hour and a half ago, John Clements wrote:
>> In certain places, I know that we're trying to be careful to
>> minimize 'require's that occur as part of DrRacket startup
I think Eli is saying that it would create a "bad" dependency where
"badness" isn't something that is easy to say precisely what it is,
but the rough idea is that there is a hierarchy of modules (ie a
grouping of modules into levels of a tree) and dependencies should go
one direction. Making drrack
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>>
>> [*] As an example, rackunit might become dependent on drr in the
>> future, if it becomes a drr plugin. The cost of that is obvious: you
>> need drr to use rackunit. A possib
Hi all: it has been a little more than two months since I did that
wholesale checkin of some documentation testing scripts. Below
are the tests that have only been touched by me, so unless I hear
otherwise, I'm going disable these tests so they stop polluting the
drdr output.
There are a handful o
Excellent! Thanks, Matthew and Ryan for figuring out what appears to
be a promising approach to a gaping hole in our security picture.
Robby
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I've pushed a change to Racket's macro system that throws out the
> syntax-certificate system and a
Sounds like a good change to me.
Robby
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Four minutes ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>> Now that there is no longer a "Help Desk", can that menu item in
>> DrRacket be renamed to something like "Documentation" or "Racket
>> Documentation"?
>>
>> I
This looks great to me.
Minor thing: "Low-Level APIs" => "Low-Level API" and the last section
actually can have a name other than "misc" I think.
Robby
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> I just pushed a commit intended to improve the usability of the main
> documentation pa
ural then.
> re "misc": Do you mean "Other"? Would you prefer "Other Languages and
> Libraries" or "Other Manuals"?
At the moment it contains two "experimental" languages so "other"
seems like a bad title.
Robby
> Ryan
>
&g
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Four minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
>> > re "Low-Level API": the other category labels are generally
>> > plural, and other manuals might get in
Yes, I understood you. I'm observing that making it plural is not helping.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Three minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>> > Four minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
&g
I don't think you can demote either of these:
The Racket Drawing Toolkit
The Racket Graphical Interface Toolkit
Robby
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Guillaume Marceau wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
>> I just pushed a commit intended to improve the usabilit
I don't see how Matthew's commit could have changed things, so I worry
that drdr may have had a broken build somehow. Lets see if this stays
for a few more builds.
Robby
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Stephen Bloch wrote:
> As of this evening's DrDr build, test-docs-complete is complaining of a
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Stephen Bloch wrote:
>> As of this evening's DrDr build, test-docs-complete is complaining of a
>> gazillion "undocumented exports" from picturing-programs. In fact, these
>> identifiers are all required
And, more importantly, it does appear to have been a problem with
drdr, not a problem with Stephen's files, as the complaint has now
gone away.
Robby
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 4
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Michael Sperber wrote:
>
> Eli Barzilay writes:
>
>>> Yeah, well, except you run into trouble almost immediately because
>>> that code contains references, and Scribble is sensitive to all
>>> kinds of side conditions involving references.
>
> I'm talking about the
As to 3), yes.
Robby
On Monday, July 11, 2011, John Clements wrote:
> I tried to make some keybindings available using PLaneT today, and ran into
> two problems--I suspect that this mechanism is not frequently used.
>
> 1) I can't use the slash-form in this require. That is, I have to type
>
>
I would say to put it in the framework. Probably scheme.rkt.
Thanks!
Robby
On Monday, July 11, 2011, John Clements wrote:
>
> On Jul 11, 2011, at 11:32 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
>
>> As to 3), yes.
>
> Where would I put it? It looks like this could be done as a tool, but
In racket/pretty, pretty-print is like print and pretty-write is like
write. In scheme/pretty, pretty-print is like write.
So probably the better change is to stick with racket/pretty and use
pretty-write instead of pretty-print.
Robby
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Guillaume Marceau wrote:
>
Oh! Sorry about that. Thanks, Matthew.
Robby
On Saturday, July 16, 2011, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I'll push a repair soon (after I confirm that a clean build now
> completes for me).
>
> There were two problems:
>
> * A new test file in "collects/tests/drracket" shouldn't be compiled,
> since
Thanks for fixing the bug!
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Casey Klein
wrote:
> I tried to add a test case to
> collects/tests/racket/contract-test.rktl, but that file seems broken.
> In particular, `test/pos-blame' and `test/neg-blame' pass strings when
> `test/spec-failed' expects a symbol. Fi
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Jakub Piotr Cłapa wrote:
> [1]:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/96882/how-do-i-create-a-nice-looking-dmg-for-mac-os-x-using-command-line-tools
Mecki's answer here sounds just perfect for us, since we only really
need one (or three, I suppose).
Robby
___
FWIW, I believe we build these things on a mac, so figuring out how to
do that under linux is not necessary (for us).
Robby
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> Jakub Piotr Cłapa wrote at 07/17/2011 08:25 AM:
>>
>> Uncompressed HFS+ images may be mounted on Linux but I am not
Oh, I see. Yes, indeed, the whole test suite was broken. I've pushed
fixes for it and for the things that weren't caught by the old test
suite.
Thanks,
Robby
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Casey Klein
wrote:
> Here's what I tried:
>
> 1. I added this test, which should fail for identifying the
What dd they do to get to the docs?
On Monday, July 18, 2011, Danny Yoo wrote:
> Currently doing Program-by-Design workshop.
>
> One issue so far: Help Desk is not giving language-specific help. One
> of the users searched for "width", and hit basically every width
> function except the one he w
I tried this too and it seems to work for me, even under windows with firefox.
So, I suspect that there is something subtle about the UI that Eli and
I are doing one way but others are doing another way that is
interacting badly with the way some internal state somewhere works.
So, perhaps more c
Also, when I disable cookies, I see that the context sensitive search
just silently doesn't work.
Would it be possible to always have the search set a (separate) cookie
and give a warning if it doesn't find the (constant) cookie?
Robby
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:
>>> > I t
I see that the teaching language error messages now have things like
this in them (where the . is an image literal):
Welcome to DrRacket, version 5.1.2.3--2011-07-19(4b77a0fc/d) [3m].
Language: Beginning Student; memory limit: 128 MB.
> (+ 1 (list .))
+: expects a number as 2nd argument, given (co
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Guillaume Marceau wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
>>
>> I see that the teaching language error messages now have things like
>> this in them (where the . is an image literal):
>>
>>
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Yesterday, Robby Findler wrote:
>> Also, when I disable cookies, I see that the context sensitive
>> search just silently doesn't work.
>>
>> Would it be possible to always have the search set a (separate)
&g
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 25 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>> > Yesterday, Robby Findler wrote:
>> >> Also, when I disable cookies, I see that the context sensitive
>>
I think that the dmg's size is proportional to the amount of data in
it not the size it claims to have as a disk so we can probably just
use 3 (or even maybe one).
Robby
On Tuesday, July 19, 2011, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Two days ago, Robby Findler wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at
t;/Users/spdegabrielle/Documents/Development/make alias test" as text
> make new alias file to Src at folder Dest
> end tell
> EOT
>
> mv Applications "Drag into your Applications folder(here)"
>
> -
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Robby Findler
&g
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Stephen De Gabrielle
wrote:
> The script please, that way if I get the first draft wrong, I won't be
> asking you for a new one.
Sure. Attached.
Robby
rising-plt.rkt
Description: Binary data
_
For list-related
I believe that I made this commit:
fbccf38d50e5f622c0c96a8c09b423decbd01269
on July 6th and that is the diff for that commit:
http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/blobdiff/b98e1b189a2afab1ba9c67f1e1432fb2cd28a552..fbccf38d50e5f622c0c96a8c09b423decbd01269:/collects/tests/planet/cmdline-tool.rkt
but in
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> * Robby Findler
> - DrRacket Tests
> - Framework Tests
> - Contracts Tests
> - Games Tests
> - Teachpacks Tests: image tests
> - PLaneT Tests
> Updates:
> - DrRacket Updates: update HISTORY
> (upd
so I didn't ask about it later...
>
> Should it be included? If so, then should planet tests be done again?
>
>
>
> 50 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
>> I believe that I made this commit:
>>
>> fbccf38d50e5f622c0c96a8c09b423decbd01269
>>
What is the data you're using to represent the shorts in Racket?
Robby
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 1:42 PM, John Clements
wrote:
> This C code adds the content of one buffer to another one, with no checking.
> The corresponding racket code runs about 10x slower. Do you folks think that
> it shoul
It will be a bit before I can look into this, but I guess that if you
throw away your prefs it will start up (or even just edit them and
throw out the language level setting). Or it may even start up on a
second try, depending on what is actually going wrong there.
Robby
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1
I couldn't make this happen on my own, but I've pushed a fix for the
likely problem.
Robby
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> built from scratch this morning
>
> error messages:
>
> [1] 847
> [:~/Git/Ingenious] matthias% send: target is not an object: #f for method:
Bullet point 2 seems like it may overlap (in a practical, "what do I
use today" sort of a way) with Matthew's modulelet construct. Both
group modules together, both provide independently loadable things.
Do we really want/need both of these?
Robby
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Jay McCarthy w
kages
> also allow module privacy in a way we don't provide now, because some
> modules may not be provided from the package, even though they are
> inside it.
>
> So... do you think those two understandings overlap? Or do you
> understand them differently?
>
> Jay
>
&
On Monday, August 1, 2011, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>> About a minute ago, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
>>> - Typed Racket now optimizes at the REPL and inside typed regions.
>>
>> This sounds too uninteresting for most users.
>
> Have we run out
Ah. That does help. And seems Borderline for the release notes.
Robby
On Monday, August 1, 2011, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, August 1, 2011, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 1, 20
No, not mine. (the bibtex lib sounds worth including to me)
On Monday, August 1, 2011, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> The release announcement sketch that I have so far is below. Please
> mail me new items and/or edits.
>
> Robby and Jay -- two pending items:
>
> ? New racket/contract/combinator library
Yes I agree.
On Tuesday, August 2, 2011, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>>
>> --
>> * The download page includes 64-bit installers for Mac OS X,
>> Windows, and two Debian flavo
On Tuesday, August 2, 2011, Neil Toronto wrote:
> Re-routing this email exchange to [racket-dev] for comments.
>
> Long story short: Jay roped me into replacing the current `plot' module by
wrapping a plot library I was working on for my own use. (FWIW, I'm happy to
finally contribute something!)
I think a convention is good. I also think that this kind of
organizational principle (where do tests go? How do you name the
"main" file in some package? etc) is completely appropriate for a
style guide somewhere, so maybe I'm missing something, tho.
Robby
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Matthi
OK.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> I feel challenged to write this up. So I will put it on my wish list and
> assign your name to it.
>
>
> On Aug 4, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
>
>> I think a convention is good. I a
I think that we can accommodate all of that by simply standardizing a place
where an entire test can be run from. That is, I expect the interesting
question this answers is "I have just food and fixed a bug in some unknown
code: where do I go to find the relevant tests to add more and run all the
e
I too tried it (ages ago) and ended up roughly where Eli is, but I
didn't want to judge since I wasn't actually trying to use it for
something useful (and, as we all know, that can change how you use
things and how well they work for you). So I wonder if anyone has a
positive experience with this k
How about
#:mode (sum I I O)
for the mode spec where the #:mode keyword is optional but, if present must
be followed by what looks like a use of the relation but with a
Mode?
Robby
On Friday, August 5, 2011, Casey Klein
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:13 AM, wrote:
>> clklein has updated
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> 3. Why is this in github and not in the docs?
I think you're mistaken here. It is in the head on our git servers.
Robby
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lan
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Casey Klein
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Matthias Felleisen
> wrote:
>>
>> 1. I like Robby's mode suggestion.
>> 2. I prefer shorter keywords, e.g., define-judgment.
>
> I'm having trouble reconciling these comments. Robby's suggestion, if
> I understa
I like it.
Robby
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Casey Klein
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Casey Klein
>> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Matthias Felleisen
>>> wrote:
>>
There isn't a way to do that, no.
But I think in Racket we have better ways of avoiding such danger
(namely using the sandbox library or the pieces it builds upon). In
general, in fact, you'd have to do that anyways, since a contract can
be some arbitrary predicate (and don't forget do-dads like #
; Three hours ago, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
>> On 2011-08-06 4:41 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
>> > But I think in Racket we have better ways of avoiding such danger
>> > (namely using the sandbox library or the pieces it builds
>> > upon). In general, in fact, you'
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Two minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
>> We've just got to figure out some clever caching/incrementalization
>> thing and then get one of google's or amazon's or whoever's trucks
>> to drive up
Oh, yes. In particular, one that always gives me trouble: what is the
name of the method that sets the focus to a snip that's embedded
inside some editor?
Robby
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> Throwing out state is fine though I will confess that I rarely look for
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> [Moved to the dev list.]
>
> At Sat, 06 Aug 2011 07:25:00 -0400, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>> Feature request... I'd *really* like to see compile-time checking of
>> keyword arguments whenever that is possible.
>>
>> If compiler knows what procedu
Ah, right. Rats.
Robby
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Mon, 8 Aug 2011 10:12:36 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
>> > Another possibility is to redirect the `set!' on `f' to the
>> > underlying `proc', and somehow make the optimiz
I like the two-times-in-a-row thought.
FWIW, please try to avoid race conditions of the second kind.
I think the drracket test suites are special because they fail
not-so-often and I don't actually know how to fix them. If either of
those weren't true then I'd say they should just not run in drd
PS: I'm also happy if this class of tests only emails the responsible
person, and not the pusher.
Robby
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> I like the two-times-in-a-row thought.
>
> FWIW, please try to avoid race conditions of the second kind.
>
> I thi
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
> At Mon, 8 Aug 2011 10:59:24 -0500,
> Robby Findler wrote:
>> FWIW, please try to avoid race conditions of the second kind.
>
> Some of these I can try to fix. But I don't think all intermittent
> failures fit in
This is a rare event (playing catchup like this) so I think it is
probably best if we just let it catch up. Should be just a couple of
more days (maybe a week) by my sketchy guesstimationizing.
Robby
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> Another request: could DrDr process the la
Somewhere between July 2006 and Dec 2007, the linkage table in planet
broke in such a way that it has been just ignored for around 4 years
now. I just noticed this today [*] as I was spending some time trying
to make the planet module name resolver thread safe.
So, my question to you: should we br
Why would it damage more people?
I think it makes sense to put on the first page some kind of an
indication that "this is what we guess your machine is; if you don't
know, try this one first". Perhaps not Guillaume's exact words, but
something that would help this person.
Robby
On Thu, Aug 11, 2
ts.
>
> Jay
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
>> Why would it damage more people?
>>
>> I think it makes sense to put on the first page some kind of an
>> indication that "this is what we guess your machine is; if you don't
601 - 700 of 1676 matches
Mail list logo
