An hour ago, J. Ian Johnson wrote:
> Okay, stamourv made your response make sense. I added parameterize
> ([current-namespace (make-base-namespace)]) inside the thunk, [...]
If you're going down that road (which makes sense, of course), then it
would probably be much easier to just use the full sa
emory limit
> is not respected. Why wouldn the globals from a dynamic-require be
> considered reachable outside the sandbox that calls dynamic-require?
> There's no other way to get it.
>
> -Ian
> - Original Message -
>
>
> From: "J. Ian Johnson" &l
ad, though?
Thanks,
-Ian
- Original Message -
From: "J. Ian Johnson"
To: "Robby Findler"
Cc: "dev" , "J. Ian Johnson"
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 3:49:50 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [racket-dev] call-with-limits memory bo
)
(require 'B)
-Ian
- Original Message -
From: "Robby Findler"
To: "J. Ian Johnson"
Cc: "dev"
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 3:34:55 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [racket-dev] call-with-limits memory bound isn't actually bounding
quire in the thunk, rather than require in the module
> using call-with-limits?
> -Ian
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Vanderson"
> To: "J. Ian Johnson"
> Cc: "dev"
> Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 1:50:13 PM GMT -05:00 US/
m: "J. Ian Johnson"
To: "David Vanderson"
Cc: "dev" , "J. Ian Johnson"
Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 2:01:02 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [racket-dev] call-with-limits memory bound isn't actually bounding
memory usage
Ah, that would pro
y, September 9, 2013 1:16:51 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [racket-dev] call-with-limits memory bound isn't actually bounding
memory usage
The framework will, sometimes do stuff that queues callbacks and, depending on
how you've set up other things, the code running th
David Vanderson"
To: "J. Ian Johnson"
Cc: "dev"
Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 1:50:13 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [racket-dev] call-with-limits memory bound isn't actually bounding
memory usage
Just to make sure, is the memory being allocated
s. Or are you talking about the sandbox queuing up
callbacks?
-Ian
- Original Message -
From: "Robby Findler"
To: "J. Ian Johnson"
Cc: "dev"
Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 1:16:51 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [racket-dev] call-with-limits m
J. Ian Johnson"
Cc: "dev"
Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 1:50:13 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [racket-dev] call-with-limits memory bound isn't actually bounding
memory usage
Just to make sure, is the memory being allocated reachable from outside
the sandbox?
h
lobal
> hash-tables and vectors. Or are you talking about the sandbox queuing up
> callbacks?
> -Ian
> - Original Message -
> From: "Robby Findler"
> To: "J. Ian Johnson"
> Cc: "dev"
> Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 1:16:51 PM GMT -05:0
The framework will, sometimes do stuff that queues callbacks and, depending
on how you've set up other things, the code running there might escape from
the limit. Did you try putting the eventspace under the limit too?
Robby
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:54 AM, J. Ian Johnson wrote:
> I'm running
--
> From: "Carl Eastlund"
> To: "J. Ian Johnson"
> Cc: "dev"
> Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 12:05:21 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [racket-dev] call-with-limits memory bound isn't actually
> bounding memory usage
>
the usage
over the limit.
-Ian
- Original Message -
From: "Carl Eastlund"
To: "J. Ian Johnson"
Cc: "dev"
Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 12:05:21 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [racket-dev] call-with-limits memory bound isn't actually
Does have the form (lambda () )?
Because if not, that's the problem.
Carl Eastlund
--
WARNING! Poorly-typed cell phone email precedes.
On Sep 9, 2013 11:55 AM, "J. Ian Johnson" wrote:
> I'm running my analysis benchmarks in the context of (with-limits (* 30
> 60) 2048 ), and it's been good at
15 matches
Mail list logo
