Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache RocketMQ from podling to TLP

n > > > On Sep 5, 2017 6:31 PM, "Bruce Snyder" <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Now we must wait for the IPMC next steps to make its recommendation to > the > > board. > > > > Bruce > > > > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 6:05 AM, Von

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache RocketMQ from podling to TLP

gt; 4 +1 (binding) votes: > * John D Ament > * Bruce Snyder > * Willem Jiang > * Justin Mclean > > 11 +1 (non-binding) votes: > * Von Gosling > * Xin Wang > * Huxing Zhang > * Kevin Ratnasekera > * lollipop > * liuxue > * John Fang > * Dia Lin > * yukon >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache RocketMQ from podling to TLP

on holding such office to serve at the > direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache RocketMQ > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the > projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache RocketMQ > Project; and be it further > RES

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache RocketMQ from podling to TLP

+1 (binding) Bruce On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Von Gosling wrote: > Hi, > > Following the discussion in Apache RocketMQ PPMC on graduating Apache > RocketMQ from incubation to a Top Level Project, starting this voting > thread within the RocketMQ community. > >

Re: Podling Report Reminder - July 2017

Thank you, Von. Nice work picking up this task! Bruce On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Von Gosling wrote: > Hi, > > I have created a new page as before[1], to track the July podling report > for Apache RocketMQ. Once we finished it. i sincerely request mentors to >

Re: Website improvements to help drive community

view, Simple Message Example，Order Message > > Example，Broadcast Example, Schedule Message Example, Batch Message > Example) > > 2. Architecture > > 3. Deployment(Configuration, CLI and HA parts) > > 4. Best Practice > > 5. Ecosystem Integration > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Import Maintainer Mechanism for Apache RocketMQ

Agreed, this is my point actually. The flatter the project structure, the easier it is for anyone to step up. This has been proven for years at the ASF. Installing hierarchy will only slow things down. Bruce On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi,

Re: [DISCUSS] Import Maintainer Mechanism for Apache RocketMQ

Hi yukon, I haven't heard of this concept at the ASF before, so I guess it's something that only a few projects are using. It seems kinda heavy-handed, but maybe this is just my perspective in not having worked on the RocketMQ code base. Is the RocketMQ code base currently divided up with certain

Re: Podling Report Reminder - April 2017

I have just published this report to the Incubator wiki. Bruce On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi guys, > > This report is due on Wednesday, shall I publish it now or do you need > more time for editing? > > Bruce > >

Re: Podling Report Reminder - April 2017

Hi guys, This report is due on Wednesday, shall I publish it now or do you need more time for editing? Bruce On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Von Gosling wrote: > Hi, > > > > First off there's no need to list completed items under the important > issues section. The

Re: The new branching model has been put into effect.

This may seem too formal if you are new to the process, but the ASF takes very seriously the topic of copyright and ownership of digital assets. This is why linking to the page is a much safer path than simply lifting the images. Bruce On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:38 AM, yukon

Re: The new branching model has been put into effect.

I just caught this myself as well and called it out in my suggestions for improving the website. At a minimum, attribution to the original author must be provided. As Justin mentions, it's probably also a better idea to link to the Gitflow page that contains the images rather than lift them and

Website improvements to help drive community

Today someone emailed me directly about their interest in becoming a committer to the RocketMQ project. I explained that committership is based on the merit of their contributions to the project and I encouraged them to join the dev@rocket mailing list to start some discussions. Upon looking for

Website docs still linking to Github project

This morning I discovered a link on the website that leads to the old Github project. See the following Team page and the link to the Contributing document that still resides on the old Github project's wiki: http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/about/team/ Clearly the Contributing document on

Re: Is extracting some source codes from one apache project to another one appropriate?

Taking code instead of some sort of collaboration is not in the spirit of The Apache Way: http://theapacheway.com/ Here's any idea -- how about working with the ActiveMQ project to extract its SQL92/XPATH implementation of message selectors into some sort of modular component that could be used

Re: The sub projects' migration work has been completed

very inconvenient. > > [1]. https://github.com/rocketmq > [2]. > http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/activity/launch- > rocketmq-code-marathon/ > > Regards, > yukon > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:49 AM, Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thank you, Yukon.

Re: [DISCUSS] How to handle sub projects of RocketMQ

gt; > > http://jnn.iteye.com [http://jnn.iteye.com] (Chinese) > > > Twitter: willemjiang > > > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Von Gosling < vongosl...@apache.org > [ > > > vongosl...@apache.org] > wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] How to handle sub projects of RocketMQ

Hi Yukon, The git repo has been created: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-rocketmq-externals.git Bruce On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Yukon, > > I have submitted the request and the response told me that

Re: Podling Report Reminder - March 2017

The commit mode (RTC vs. CTR) is up to the PPMC. As Justin mentioned, RTC can cause scalability issues. We should discuss it in the PPMC to come to a decision as a community. Bruce On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:48 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > we hope to one

Re: Podling Report Reminder - March 2017

t; Thanks Bruce and John :-) > > Looking forward to mentor review the report and sign off it. > > > 在 2017年2月27日，02:44，Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> 写道： > > > > Hi All, > > > > I have updated the report format and questions a bit in the wiki. > &

Re: Podling Report Reminder - March 2017

Hi All, I have updated the report format and questions a bit in the wiki. MENTORS: Please take a look at the new questions requiring commentary and sign-off. Bruce On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, John. I've added th

Re: Podling Report Reminder - March 2017

r: > > Date of last release: > > -XX-XX > > When were the last committers or PPMC members elected? > > > > Signed-off-by: > > [ ](rocketmq) Bruce Snyder > Comments: > [ ](rocketmq) Brian McCallister > Comments: > [ ](rocketmq) Willem

Re: [DISCUSS] How to handle sub projects of RocketMQ

When it comes to neatly organizing each sub-project, you must consider if you will release all sub-projects at once or individually. Also, consider whether or not these are extensions to RocketMQ or external (as in not part of or extensions to RocketMQ) in some way. Also consider how users will

Re: [DISCUSS] How to handle sub projects of RocketMQ

All projects should have a separate git repo to keep things as separate as possible. This will also help to simply the delivery of each one independently. If, at some point, you want to provide some sort of distribution that includes multiple projects, that's not a problem. But the source for

Re: Podling Report Reminder - March 2017

Hi All, As you can see the message above from the Incubator PMC, it's time to prepare another report for March. Please take a few moments to contribute to the report that I have started on the following wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROCKETMQ/Podling+Report+March+2017

Re: Podling Report Reminder - February 2017

for rocketmq podling process. BTW, Do we need every > mentors to sign off? I found only justin mentor have done it.:-) Thanks > mentors help for the last 2 board reports. > > > Best regards, Von Gosling > > > > > 在 2017年2月5日，00:50，Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.c

Re: [RESTART][VOTE][#3]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating)

+1 (binding) Bruce On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 8:44 PM, yukon wrote: > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > This is the vote for 4.0.0 of Apache RocketMQ (incubating). > > The RC3 artifacts: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/rocketmq/4. > 0.0-incubating-rc3/ > > Git tag

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating)

Hi All, None of the items that I've found are showstoppers and I know that these items have been mentioned before, but I will bring them up since I still see them: * It's definitely odd to point to Maven central and Github for incubating project releases * Also, the URL

Re: 【HELP】JIRA Agile Tools usage

t; IMO, Service Desk is a design for customer support. So, we have not apply > this feature. We just want to make some works on use of Agile board. > > I have a permission to create a sprint now. I think that's ok for use. > Thanks bruce again :-) > > 2017-02-15 6:25 GMT+08:00 Bru

Re: 【HELP】JIRA Agile Tools usage

in the way of the Agile boards functioning properly. Can you please try to start the Agile activities now and let me know the result? Bruce On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Von, > > I glanced at this and I do not see any perm

Re: [REVIEW]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating)

Looks good, Von. Thank you. Bruce On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Von Gosling <vongosl...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > I have polished it as you suggest, please review it :-) > > > > 在 2017年2月9日，22:09，Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> 写道： &g

Re: [REVIEW]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating)

tarted a vote thread yesterday :-) > > Actually, i am not sure the necessity of the existence of the Github > RocketMQ. Bruce, could we just leave it until the graduation of the > RocketMQ TLP stage coming. May be it can provide some vestiges of RocketMQ > project. > > > > >

Re: 【HELP】JIRA Agile Tools usage

Hi Von, I glanced at this and I do not see any permissions related to the boards I created. So, I'm going to create a JIRA issue with ASF Infra to look into this matter to get the problem solved. Bruce On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:26 AM, Von Gosling wrote: > Dear Bruce, > >

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating)

373 > > Regards, > yukon > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > As mentioned by Willem, because the project is still in the Incubator, > > discussion regarding the release preparation should take place on the &g

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating)

As mentioned by Willem, because the project is still in the Incubator, discussion regarding the release preparation should take place on the dev@rocketmq list. When all discussions have settled and concerns have been quelled, only then should a vote be called and the vote should take place on the

Re: Podling Report Reminder - February 2017

Apologies for going dark, I had a hectic week. Thank you for stepping up, Justin. Bruce On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Looks like Bruce who was dealing with it is currently MIA I’ll put > something together. > > BTW it up to the PPMC to

Re: Can't create or modify issues on JIRA

To my knowledge, this feature should not be enabled. Bruce On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 5:25 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:05 PM Justin Mclean > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > Just wondering, was RocketMQ intended to have Service

Re: Podling Report Reminder - February 2017

John, A report was provided for January, so does a report need to be provided for February as well? Bruce On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 3:51 AM, wrote: > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC. It is an initial

Re: Mailing lists on the website

Thank you! Bruce On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:30 PM, chandresh pancholi < chandreshpancholi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I will update. > > Thanks > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:19 AM, Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Now that the users@rock

Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017

://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Signup!default.jspa Bruce On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 3:41 AM, Von Gosling <vongosl...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > vintagewang and lollipop are real confluence name. At the same time, they > are ASF usernames ;-) > > > > 在 2017年1月3日

Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017

Thank you, Justin. I'm not sure if the IP review is complete. I have submitted the podling report via the Incubator wiki page. Bruce On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > - A list of the three most important issues to address in the move >

Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017

believes is important for graduation. Can you guys please provide some advice on this item? Bruce On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have updated the January podling report on the following wiki page: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/con

Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017

Review Board is really nice if the project decides to adopt the RTC model because it can hook directly into the git commit process preventing commits until the review has completed successfully. I have used it with great success in the past on a project with more than 30 team members committing

Re: About Code Dump

Von, What is the status of migrating the commit history from the Github repo? We need a JIRA issue to track this task so that it does not get overlooked. Bruce On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> wrote: > Von, > > The JIRA issue for whi

Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017

John, Why does this message keep getting sent to the dev@rocketmq list? Bruce On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 11:12 AM, wrote: > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of

Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017

t; https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017 > You'll notice a section for RocketMQ's report. Podling reports are > submitted under the IPMC's monthly report. > > John > > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 4:08 PM Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I pl

Re: How to subscribe Github pull requests to this list

em > > On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Does anyone know how to whitelist Github pull requests being sent to this > > list? I'm suddenly getting a ton of pull request messages to be manually > > mode

Re: About Code Dump

I actually agree with this request. Not only is a new major release is a good time to change the package name, but given that this would be the first release from the Incubator, it's a good idea to make this change now. Bruce On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Willem Jiang

Re: Podling Report Reminder - December 2016

Thank you for the information, Von. Much of the status is already communicated via the Incubator website updates, so no need to provide this information here. I am planning to handle the board report this week, so I will let you know if I have any questions. Bruce On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 2:36

First message to the RocketMQ dev list

This is just a test message to be sure that the dev@rocketmq mailing list has been set up. Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E Twitter: