External UI sets like Spectrum and MDL works ok, but I found when I did MDL
library that we need to build our own set in Royale, since while things
provided natively by MDL worked ok, many times I was without solutions for
many typical use cases like we had in Flex, for that reason I started
'I don’t think we’ve dealt with a lot of children changing sizes (other
than Images loading late and a few other things) so it may be time to
listen to widthChanged/heightChanged/sizeChanged as children get added if
there isn’t already code doing that.'
That would be another way of doing it.
Sure not Alex,
I am creating issues one by one. I just wanted to respond Greg's question.
Thanks,
Serkan
4.06.2020 18:32 tarihinde Alex Harui yazdı:
Serkan, is there a bug tracking your layout issue?
There should be a difference between first layout if all children have known
sizes and what
>
> Yes, I’ve seen that as well. Alex’s advice when I pointed it out to him
> was to just add a parent.dispatchEvent(new Event(‘layoutNeeded’)) if it
> solves a concrete bug. It’s true that this could result in a performance
> hit. If that’s your issue then I guess we can discuss emulation of the
Yes. The most painful point we had when working with Royale was layouts.
FWIW, in Spectrum, I am not using any layout beads at all (or hardly). The
layout is basically all handled by the Spectrum css.
> On Jun 4, 2020, at 7:05 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote:
>
> If you get a better way, that will be
Hi Harbs
please take a look when you have time. I didn't find any other way to deal
with this issue.
For now, if not doing that, you can layout right when using % measures.
Maybe I'm missing something there
If you get a better way, that will be a great improvement so far, since I
think Royale has
Serkan, is there a bug tracking your layout issue?
There should be a difference between first layout if all children have known
sizes and what Greg is describing which is responding to children changing
sizes. I don’t think we’ve dealt with a lot of children changing sizes (other
than Images
I wonder how this effects performance.
I’d need to look at exactly the flow (which I don’t have time for now), but one
thing to keep in mind is that if reads and writes are not carefully plan, it
could cause forced layouts which is a performance killer.
Not sure if this effects what you did or
Hi,
as part of the Jewel Tile Layout improvement, I want to let you know about
an important addition.
until now I had very hard time dealing with width/height of a component in
layout classes when the width or height are a percentage
or not set.
Since that depends on other containers, I found
Cool. Thanks!
> On Jun 4, 2020, at 5:26 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote:
>
> Hi Harbs,
>
> as I mentioned earlier this thread, I already fixed it, just is still not
> in production, I did it on pre site, will be published soon :)
>
> El jue., 4 jun. 2020 a las 13:30, Harbs () escribió:
>
>> I just
Hi Harbs,
as I mentioned earlier this thread, I already fixed it, just is still not
in production, I did it on pre site, will be published soon :)
El jue., 4 jun. 2020 a las 13:30, Harbs () escribió:
> I just checked.
>
> The thanks page[1] correctly has nofollow links but the support page[2]
>
Nope. Missing the nofollow was a good catch. It needs to be fixed. Thanks. :-)
> On Jun 4, 2020, at 3:07 PM, Christofer Dutz wrote:
>
> I hope this wasn't perceived as nitpicking from my side
Hi all,
I hope this wasn't perceived as nitpicking from my side ... I like that page
and would like to adopt it similarly for PLC4X.
And the only reason I posted the code was that you said: If it's not that way,
it's a bug ... so I checked and it wasn't so just consider that a bug report.
I
I think you missed my later email where I agreed with you. “noopener
noreferrer” is wrong.
Not sure how it got messed up on that page. When we discussed it 2 years ago I
thought we all understood that it needs to be nofollow like it is on the
"thanks” page.
Thanks,
Harbs
> On Jun 4, 2020, at
Hi Harbs,
they are all like this:
Bowler Hat
LLC
So no nofollow.
Chris
Am 04.06.20, 13:00 schrieb "Harbs" :
Yeah. AFAIK, they already are. If there’s a link without a nofollow, it’s a
bug.
> On Jun 4, 2020, at 1:31 PM, Christofer Dutz
wrote:
>
> and also you should
Hi all,
the discussion I was talking about was multiple casual discussions on our PLC4X
slack channel.
The link I was referring to was this one:
https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/linking
Chris
Am 04.06.20, 13:30 schrieb "Harbs" :
I just checked.
The thanks page[1]
I just checked.
The thanks page[1] correctly has nofollow links but the support page[2] has
"noopener noreferrer” links.
That is not correct.
Carlos, please fix them to be “nofollow".
Thanks,
Harbs
[1]https://royale.apache.org/thanks-to/
Call me lazy but this is a bit difficult to parse. If you can spare some time,
maybe come up with a GitHub issue that describes a concrete case so we can
discuss this.
> I think the layouts work downward for this, but changes in the children
don't seem to trigger the parent layout.
Yes, I’ve
> On Jun 4, 2020, at 2:08 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote:
>
> Anyone remember discussion where we asked about it?
It was April 2018.
>
> No follow - it means that even email cannot open in a default email
> software? :)
No. email link is fine. nofollow is instructions to search engines to not
Chris,
Your doubts related to that page are based on discussion with someone or
some document? Please share - especially those related to no follow links.
If I remember correctly we have asked somewhere about that page when it was
created. You can search the archive if you are concerned about
Yeah. AFAIK, they already are. If there’s a link without a nofollow, it’s a bug.
> On Jun 4, 2020, at 1:31 PM, Christofer Dutz wrote:
>
> and also you should make all links nofollow links.
Well we were having doubts.
It seems that Apache sort of tolerates these pages (All links should be
"nofollow" ... I think you should perhaps adjust your page a bit regarding this)
Guess the problem is that commercial-support is "commercial" and Apache is a
non-profit organization. We would be
If we were getting thousands of requests to be listed, setting up a voting
structure might make sense. At the moment, however, it would be more
structure than we need.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 4:08 AM Piotr Zarzycki
wrote:
> We didn't have any vote if someone wanted to be added. I think our
Exactly it should be still part of prominic entry. You will see:
Prominic.NET
Moonshine IDE
czw., 4 cze 2020 o 10:15 Carlos Rovira napisał(a):
> Hi Piotr,
>
> do you want to let the actual Prominic.NET info and add the new one below,
> but as part of Prominic.NET. Right?
>
--
Piotr
Hi Piotr,
do you want to let the actual Prominic.NET info and add the new one below,
but as part of Prominic.NET. Right?
Hi,
Just wondered if anyone else is dealing with layout issues in Flex
emulation. I have some layout issues that are slowing my progress on a
project, and I'd like to resolve them as quickly as I can.
In particular, I see issues with BoxLayout-based containers which have
percentWidth or
We didn't have any vote if someone wanted to be added. I think our project
is bad example to think in a way of voting. It would be very individual. We
knew all people who wanted to be on that page, we didn't expect that there
will be someone from totally outside specialized in migration to Royale,
Hi Piotr,
I was more asking if there is any vote on this ... or is anyone added without
checks or discussion?
I'm not asking cause I want to be added ... I'm asking cause I would be
interested on how you folks decided to do this.
As I mentioned, we want to implement something similar for PLC4X.
Hi Chris,
I'm not entirely sure what do you ask. However in case of adding entries
you need to take on the list as I asked for a change. Our website is
unfortunately based on WordPress so someone has to add that. Carlos is
pretty quick with that, so I asked him.
Thanks,
Piotr
On Thu, Jun 4,
Sending this again as my last one didn't seem to make it through ...
Hi folks,
glad you brought this up .. I didn't know there was this page (Found it quite
hard to reach)
We were discussing doing something similar in PLC4X.
We currently decided to add an "adopters" page ... perhaps it
30 matches
Mail list logo
