Hi,
The vote is not based on the majority of the active PMC, nor does it pass if
more than half of the PMC vote. You can get non-binding votes from users that
might bring up important issues and be useful to take into consideration.
The words SHOULD, MUST etc are used as defined in RFC 2119
Hi,
It is customary to wait 72 hours on votes release, and a vote is not over when
you get 3 +1 votes. See [1][2], note "Release votes SHOULD remain open for at
least 72 hours.” You want to give people time to review the release in case
issues are found. You may use less time if there is an
Hi,
If you want to go down this path as far as the ASF is concerned you need to
comply with [1] and [2]. There’s been some recent conversations on legal dicuss
and the incubator list about making releases available on these platforms that
you may also want to pay attention to.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
No it’s not been published yet or distributed to the mirrors. [1]
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/
Hi,
Re the modified non binary inclusion of CC BY-SA 3.0 licensed content I’ve
asked on legal discuss as the resolved answered asks to do. [1]
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#cc-sa
Alex Harui It isn't code, it is text media.
>
> Thanks for trying though. Remember, you are supposed to be watching the
> commits, not the vote threads.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 11/14/18, 5:47 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> -1 (non-binding)
Hi,
-1 (non-binding)
The release includes CC-SA licensed content [1] which is not unmodified media
[2].
I know this content [1] was copied from TourDeFlex in the Flex project so it
may also have an issue. It looks like policy has changed (or been clarified)
since the last TourDeFlex release
Hi,
> But I'm very confused that after remove all "Basic" pom dependencies all is
> compiling correctly.
Try mvn dependency:tree, it may be being pulled in by one of the other
dependancies.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
You may also want to consider changing the readme [1] so it doesn’t seem to
imply this to be part of Apache Royale project. Perhaps [2] is relevant? You
could of course check it in and/or donate it but currently it’s an external
project. Is my understanding correct on that? I’m only
Hi,
If you look at the guidelines it suggests that you only give thanks to people
who provide tools / infrastructure. IMO if you want to start listing
contributors companies then you would need to list the all of them and I would
also suggest you run this past fundraising. I’m not 100% sure
Hi,
> I contacted Browserstack to use the open source plan and it's ok to do so.
> They only ask for us to put on our Github Readme page:
>
> * an hyperlink to their site with his logo [1]
> * and a line about how we use BrowserStack to help our project
>
> It's ok to do so? Can I add it to our
Hi,
Good to see the files were renames as I suggested. You may also want to remove
older releases 0.9.0 and 0.9.1 from the release area. [1]
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/
HI,
> Thanks for the explanation. I think I see where the disconnect is now.
> Here is what I based my decision on:
>
> The artifact I used [1] is based on the author's own earlier work available
> at [2]
The original author of [1] is “Theshibboleth” while the author of [2] is
Hi,
> I have done the necessary due diligence on this issue. I think this issue
> has been taken care of as per legal requirements.
> If you think there are issues, please discuss this with the Legal PMC.
Alex also pointed out there is an issue here - do you also disagree with him?
Of course
Hi,
> What is the issue you are seeing? Please describe in detail.
The Royale license currently states:
The map coordinates in examples/native/USStatesMap/src/MapCoords.as
were placed into the Public Domain by its author. See:
Hi,
> The nightly builds have been SHA-512 since Feb 12, so yes 0.9.2 will be
> SHA-512 instead of MD5.
Good to hear the change has been made. [1] However I noticed that the
extension on the hash file is required to be “.sha512” not “.SHA-512”. [2] I
believe this is to do with how the hash
Hi,
> I don’t know what the text in the LICENSE file means because the data does
> not seem to be the same. Is the LICENSE file out of date?
Perhaps but unlikely as the URL in the LICENSE was changed a few weeks ago [1].
I’d guess that perhaps the URL in the LICENSE was changed but the change
Hi,
AFAIK there’s still an outstanding license issue [1]. The license [3] links to
this [4] which doesn't look compatible with the Apache 2.0 license.
Also not everyone may be aware are some new considerations around hashes for
releases. [2] But it is easily to comply, compared to the last
Hi,
> OK, just be certain, the compiler will only do this for a folder
> specifically named "assets". Not every file in the SWC or other folder
> names. And the destination folder will be "assets" as well.
By default maven looks for “resources” why not support that as well?
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
See also this related issue I mentioned some time back. [1] It seems
inconsistent to be handling swf one way (copies the resources) and JS another
(it doesn’t).
Thanks,.
Justin
1.
Hi,.
> That URL seems to go to an SVG file that is not public domain and is CatX.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blank_US_map_1860.svg also looks to be
problematic license wise to me. Assuming that is where the data in MapCoords.as
come from. It’s either that or the LICENSE text still
Hi,
> Part of [2] says "For small amounts of source that is directly consumed by
> the ASF product at runtime in source form, and for which that source is
> unmodified and unlikely to be changed anyway" That doesn't sound like
> "only in binary form”.
Yep there are some edge case exceptions for
Hi,
> It occurred to me that if you fix up the licensing of these files, we
> could still bundle it in future releases. The main issue was that the
> examples contain modified CC-BY-4.0 content from CSS and HTML files. IMO,
> if you personally publish the modifications under CC-BY-4.0 in your
Hi,
> I only found one copyright. Where are the others?
There’s 2 in the ASFCopyrightAttributionAndLinks.as file I believe. Might be
another I would need to double check.
Found via:
find . -type f -exec grep "2017" {} \; -print
> Is it just coincidence that you look for this stuff when we
HI,
A very minor issue I noticed the new web site example has a number of copyright
2017 notices be good to update them to 2018. It also contains links to assets
on http://royale.codeoscopic.com they should probably be replaced with to links
to http://royale.apache.org or relative links to
Hi,
Or if you want to use slack for Royale then create a channel on the “official”
ASF slack group.
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://the-asf.slack.com
Hi,
> It’s a private Slack channel I belong to. Nothing to do with Royale.
Then it seems a little odd to a link to the Royale site there :-) Perhaps it
would of been better to post that link to the mailing list?
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> I was not aware of this. I think I solved it. If you try now to link on
> slack you should see right values (if there's no catching...)
How does someone sign up to this slack channel?
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
I have a live screen recording of my talk (via screen flow) including sound
from the laptops mic and also better quality sound from a lapel mic. I had
intended to put a version together cutting out my um and errs, audience
questions etc etc but didn’t get around to it. You're welcome to
Hi,
Or possibly you could just link the markdown content to "src/site/markdown”
(ln -s ../../../royale-docs markdown from /src/site is royale-asjs) [1] and do
a “mvn site site:stage” to test locally and a "mvn site-deploy” to deploy if
you have permission. I believe Chris set this all of this
Hi,
I also have a couple of Royale examples on GitHub that might be useful. [1][2]
They are not complex applications but they are a little more that a basic hello
world app. You can see them working here. [3][4]
For the Quiz (I just put up today) I may of made mistakes and it likely some
Hi,
Was it recorded anywhere? I often use autosub [1] and Aegisub [2] to generate
captions from talks.
The talks at the FlexJS summit were recorded and might be useful [3][4]
Justin
1. https://github.com/agermanidis/autosub
2. http://www.aegisub.org
3. https://us.apacheflexjs.org
4.
Hi,
Related to environment variables it looks like this check in may of broken
running of the tests? [1]
Looking at the code it looks like that if you don’t have PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME set
it returns null but if you do set it it ignores what you have set it to and
because of that it looks like the
Hi,
I’ve run into a issue with this release, if you use the HTML component and
style them some of the styles (in particular font and font size) are being
overridden.
You can see this with the HTML example in
royale-asjs/examples/royale/HTMLElements all of the H1 - H6 headers end up
being the
Hi,
All three repos are now being included in the src release but it looks like the
top level LICENSE file wasn’t updated to take this into account.
1. Paths to files mentioned in the top level license are incorrect and missing
"royale-asjs” from the front of them.
2. Top level license is
Hi,
Not sure what might be wrong (and could be something on my end) but in trying
out the staged release I’m getting the following error when trying to compile a
simple project:
Downloading:
https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/royale/framework/Basic/0.9.0/Basic-0.9.0.pom
[WARNING]
Hi,
> I think this looks very good and seems to be responsive
>
> [1]http://mistic100.github.io/jekyll-bootstrap-doc
> [2] https://github.com/allejo/jekyll-docs-theme
From a quick look this contains CSS code licensed under CC-BY-3.0 (looks like
it comes from bootstrap docs). That may or may
Hi,
One option you might want to look into is using this [1] and using maven to
build the site and auto publish when changes are made in GitHub via jenkins.
We’re doing this on the PLC4X incubating project [2] (so it’s still a work in
progress), it's not using markdown but is using asiidoc
Hi,
> please check this link for licenses [1] and let me know if is ok for us to
> use this theme as base
I would double check carefully from a quick look it contains a number of
differently licensed components including ALv2, MIT and BSD licensed
files.(Which should all be all fine) There
Hi,
> Are you now claiming this content is under CC-BY-SA instead of just CC-BY?
> I did not see that. Where did you get that? Share-Alike (SA) has more
> restrictions than just CC-BY, AIUI.
Sorry my mistake it’s CC-BY not CC-SA. Full name "Creative Commons Attribution
International 4.0
Hi,
> Can you provide a link to that discussion?
Sure here [1] As discussed in that thread I asked them to clarity what license
the files are under [2] (way back in October 2016) and got no response. Other
people since then have asked the same question (including Om yesterday) and not
got any
Hi,
> After Justin pointed out that there is CSS under CC-BY-4.0 in
> MDLBlogExample, I took a closer look
> and realized that really, I think these two examples are just ports of
> Google's examples and thus should remain under Google's copyright
Yep I agree with that.
> There is also a
Hi,
> Those files come from here [1]
>
> [1] https://getmdl.io/templates/index.html
Thanks, do you know how they are licensed?
I can see there’s an open issue reguarding licensing of these files. [1] The
original check in doesn’t help much [2] other than the icons seem to be under
an CCSA
Hi,
Does any one know where these files come from and how they are licensed? [1]
I quick reverse image search shows several of them to be part of commercial web
templates, but those templates could of got them from else where.
Thanks,
Justin
1,
Hi,
> Finaly legal said that was not necessary. I must to revise the ticket to
> see if that is how it was left there.
Can you point to where they said that AFAICS it’s still required as per
discussion in the JIRA raised. [1]
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-341
Hi,
> Fonts are perfectly legal! They are available in Google Fonts! :)\
Most of the fonts used (e.g. Hind Siliguri, Open Sans Condensed, Oswald,
Signika and Source Sans Pro) are available from google fonts and under either
the open font license or the APv2 license so there’s no issue with
Hi,
> Maybe you can get it here but it seems to me that licensing is not really
> clear [1].
It’s reasonably clear that it's GPL as I said the other day. See [1] (see point
6 under registration) and [2] which states "As always, these icons are
completely free to use, and have been released
HI,
Look like the new slider code has introduced a few new issues and one in
particular in easily discoverable by users [1]. Can someone take a look at this
PR please. [2]
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues/102
2. https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/pull/104
Hi,
> The PR was made against the wrong branch (master instead of develop)
> As a result, it is showing all the previous PRs and conversations that are
> missing from master, that are in develop already.
>
> Looks like the PR was closed, so we should be good.
Yep my mistake I made the PR
HI,
A while back I raised several issues with the slider component, if you happen
if fix any of these issues please close them. [1][2][3][4][5]
I note for instance the slider still incorrectly gives the value NaN when you
click on the track.
The issue arises in this line in the
Hi,
BTW the principle at play here is that you need to propagate content from
another projects NOTICE file if it’’s Apache licensed. [1]
There is also one other licensing issue that I’m aware of and that's regarding
the bundling of FlatUI code. The FlatUI project has recently added MIT
Hi,
> thinking that when you add DataProviderItemsChangeNotifier to a List strand,
> you could also replace the itemRenderer factory that is more "capable":
>
> DataItemRendererFactoryForArrayListSupportsItemsAdded
> DataItemRendererFactoryForArrayListSupportsItemsRemoved
>
Hi,
> Great job. I think we have all links on the mailing list web page. The one
> thing which I really really miss is place on the download site where I will
> be able to download Nightly Build -
Please read this [1] about linking to nightly builds.
Justin
1.
Hi,
> What is the point of fighting on probably fraction of performance here?
Because it’s just as easy to not have that performance penalty and then their’s
no need to worry about it.
As only one month is displayed at once it would be far better to change the
code to what’s below (not
Hi,
Could you check the performance of this.
Changing the code to use date strings ands call toDateString 40+ times with a
similar number of string comparisons is likely to be a lot slower than simple
month and day numeric comparisons.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> I just made a change to the maven configuration. Let's see if it works.
I assume you mean in the Jerkins job? What was that change and will it help
people compile locally?
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
BTW Jenkins is also reporting failures to compile the develop branch of
royale-asjs [1] for the last two builds. That’s since the rename branch has
been merged.
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://builds.apache.org/job/Royale-asjs/
Hi,
Looks like the rename branches on the royale-compile and royale-typedefs repos
haven’t been merged into develop but the royale-asjs has. Any ETA when this may
happen?
However looks like there’s still some issues with the renamed branches.
The rename royale-compiler branch is currently
Hi,
I looked at the placeholder for the new site. [1] My understanding is that it’s
intended to be moved to Word Press or be hosted at a VM at the ASF.
The theme that is being used is under a commercial license [2] do we know if
infra/the ASF would be OK in hosting that / having the main site
Hi,
The recently back ported AMF code [1] looks to have a license issue. It seems
on the surface to be Apache licensed [2] but is in fact based on this code [3]
which is Artistic License/GPL licensed. [4] There’s been some discussion on the
artistic license on various lists/JIRA but it's not
60 matches
Mail list logo
