Release Apache Royale 0.9.4 RC2
Hi Alex,
Fortunately I have sources, so I tried and in the logs you can see what
version of SWC I'm using. [1]
[1] https://paste.apache.org/1I3p
Piotr
wt., 20 lis 2018 o 20:18 Alex Harui napisał(a):
> Piotr,
>
> I just pushed changes to royale-asj
Hi Alex,
I don't have enough time to check and answer to all of your questions. I
will do this during/after the weekend. However I did quick check with Flash
Player and opening FlexUnitRoyaleApplication.swf. I couldn't do that - I was
getting an error.
Hi Piotr,
Does the Flash Player Debugger window show up? Try going to File Explorer and
double-clicking on the FlexUnitRoyaleApplication.swf. And see if you can
figure out what version of Flash Player Debugger you are running.
Have you rebooted your system? Maybe something is using port
Hi Alex,
Fortunately I have sources, so I tried and in the logs you can see what
version of SWC I'm using. [1]
[1] https://paste.apache.org/1I3p
Piotr
wt., 20 lis 2018 o 20:18 Alex Harui napisał(a):
> Piotr,
>
> I just pushed changes to royale-asjs develop branch to be explicit about
>
Hi Alex,
maybe this was that what affect some of us when trying to generate a local
SDK.
I think I put a line to remove the flex version of flex unit that was
giving us trouble, I can try to remove the line and see if now all work ok,
hopefully tomorrow when rebuild all
thanks
El mar., 20 nov.
Piotr,
I just pushed changes to royale-asjs develop branch to be explicit about which
FlexUnit swcs get used (instead of relying on timestamps in the SWCs). If you
still have the source package for 0.9.4 and can overlay the four build.xml
files onto your source package and see if the build
> In PowerShell, you need to wrap arguments that contain the . character with
quotes:
Yees, it is running now, Thanks Josh!!
Olaf
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/
In PowerShell, you need to wrap arguments that contain the . character with
quotes:
ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml "-Drelease.version=0.9.4" -Drc=2
- Josh
On 2018/11/16 22:49:44, Olaf Krueger wrote:
> Hi,
> I run the approval script, but it fails immediately [1].
> Do I miss something?
> (I
Hi,
I run the approval script, but it fails immediately [1].
Do I miss something?
(I am using ant 1.10.1)
Thanks,
Olaf
[1]
PS C:\local\apache-royale\vote_0_9_4_RC2> ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml
-Drelease.version=0.9.4 -Drc=2
Buildfile:
Hahaha you set traps to catch lazy ppl. Although in my defense I checked
everything the first time, but the build failed after that. The second I
kept hitting enter without reading. TIL.
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 11:41 AM Alex Harui
wrote:
> The default answer for some of the rat
The default answer for some of the rat checks is "n". So that means you can't
just hit "Enter" all the way through the script. I had a good reason for doing
that, but I can't remember why. Maybe it was just to make sure people were
actually looking at the output instead of just hitting
In theory, the SWF it compiled should still be in a folder. Plus you should be
able to change current directory to that folder and run Ant in that folder.
-Alex
On 11/16/18, 11:33 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote:
Sources where downloaded by ApprovalScript.
Ok in the other words I'm
Hi -
All is good. I made some edits to the page to be more specific that this is a
Maven issue. If they cannot find airglobal.swc then I suggest either switching
to Ant or downloading Adobe Air.
Regards,
Dave
> On Nov 16, 2018, at 10:55 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Something unique to my id.
Sources where downloaded by ApprovalScript.
Ok in the other words I'm ok with that failing example.
I just need to get to the stage where FlexUnit tests are working. I'm
wondering is there any chance to run only part which are failing for me?
Trying everything from scratch is a time consuming.
Hmm interesting. I am getting this output from the approval script:
approve:
-1
Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.4/rc2/apache-royale-0.9.4-src.tar.gz
Java 1.8
OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.13.6
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
Hi Piotr,
If you build one of the Royale examples, like
examples/royale/DataBindingExample, the POM tries to use artifacts from
examples-tests. If you are building your own app, your POM probably doesn't
care about examples-tests.
Where did you download sources from?
When the artifacts are
Something unique to my id. I missed a step in the past on gitbox setup.
I’ll see soon about it.
> On Nov 16, 2018, at 10:45 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> Hmm. Have you been active on Royale's GitHub before? I wonder if there is a
> per-project permission we have to provide, or if you have to go
Hi Alex,
Once my build failed with that timeout I went to downloaded sources
directly in order to run Maven build and see whether it's working. I was
able to build it - with similar issue as other with airglobal. - I have
manually add that part to my Maven cache.
Part 2 of the test was simply
Hmm. Have you been active on Royale's GitHub before? I wonder if there is a
per-project permission we have to provide, or if you have to go through some
sync up via GitBox per project.
-Alex
On 11/16/18, 10:28 AM, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
> On Nov 16, 2018, at 10:05 AM, Alex
> On Nov 16, 2018, at 10:05 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> I updated the online release notes (which are referenced from the packaged
> RELEASE_NOTES) with your suggestions. Feel free to make edits.
> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki/Release-Notes-0.9.4
I feel free to do
Piotr,
Did you build the examples/examples-tests folder first?
If you used the ApproveRoyale script then it would have done all of that for
you. If you plan to be an RM, it is worth your time to find out why the
approval script is not working for you, as it is expected that the RM has run
Hi Dave,
I updated the online release notes (which are referenced from the packaged
RELEASE_NOTES) with your suggestions. Feel free to make edits.
https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki/Release-Notes-0.9.4
There are two Ant convenience binary packages. One is for SWF and JS output,
and
> On Nov 16, 2018, at 12:28 AM, Greg Dove wrote:
>
> I had that issue when I first set up again on my new machine last month. At
> the time I manually installed the swcs in my local .m2
My org/adobe/air/framework/airglobal/20.0 repository was messed up and I
manually installed the src and
Here is the steps:
1) You are preparing Maven settings file which pointing to staged artifacts
[1]
2) Pickup one of the example and for simplicity place there prepared file
3) Build example with following command: mvn -s settings-template.xml
clean install
[1] https://paste.apache.org/MUAD
> Do you mean trust folder for Flash Player ?
Yes.
I’m able to compile a project using the ant build locally.
I have no idea how to build using the Maven artifacts, so I can’t test that…
> On Nov 16, 2018, at 2:18 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote:
>
> Hi Harbs,
>
> Do you mean trust folder for
Hi Harbs,
Do you mean trust folder for Flash Player ? Maybe trusting whole folder is
a good idea, but I got Maven build working. However building simple project
is not working so that is the issue which I'm more concern right now.
Cause you guys proof that Ant is working on your machines, Maven
What do you have in the trust files? I generally build from the same parent
folder as the repo and I have the whole folder trusted. The auto-generated
trust files do not always work for me.
> On Nov 16, 2018, at 10:32 AM, Piotr Zarzycki
> wrote:
>
> I got again the same timeout, so no option
If you think that above error is rather minor and I can overcome it somehow
I can vote for that release maximum +0 - If not I'm -1 due to above
problems.
pt., 16 lis 2018 o 11:28 Piotr Zarzycki
napisał(a):
> I was able to build sources using Maven. It did failed for me for the
> first time with
I was able to build sources using Maven. It did failed for me for the first
time with missing airglobal, but I have added it manually to maven cache
and second attempt went fine.
Later I decided to give a try and use staged artefacts to build one of the
example. I have prepared settings file [1]
I run those tests when I was trying to be RM previously and they were
working as far as I remember - From the repo.
pt., 16 lis 2018 o 09:55 Alex Harui napisał(a):
> Do the FlexUnit tests run when you build from the repo?
>
> Compare the FlexUnit being downloaded by the release with the one
Do the FlexUnit tests run when you build from the repo?
Compare the FlexUnit being downloaded by the release with the one used by the
repo tests.
-Alex
On 11/16/18, 12:32 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote:
I got again the same timeout, so no option for me build project by ant [1].
I will
Replacing my adobe folder did the trick. I’m not sure which were the files
which did it though. I’ll send you my original folder privately. Maybe that’ll
help pinpoint the problem…
Harbs
> On Nov 16, 2018, at 9:30 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> I looked at MavenTestAdapter. It looks like it uses
I got again the same timeout, so no option for me build project by ant [1].
I will try Maven.
[1] https://paste.apache.org/6UPt
pt., 16 lis 2018 o 09:28 Greg Dove napisał(a):
> I had that issue when I first set up again on my new machine last month. At
> the time I manually installed the swcs
I had that issue when I first set up again on my new machine last month. At
the time I manually installed the swcs in my local .m2
If I recall correctly I also looked at the MavenTestAdapter to try to
figure out what was wrong at the time. I think if it has one thing defined
and not another it
I think publish Apache Royale release artifacts is a must. In my case maven
is a must and I think to have success in the IT world (that is where Flex
had success) will be a must as well.
Just my 2...
El vie., 16 nov. 2018 a las 1:02, Alex Harui ()
escribió:
> As many of you know, Maven makes a
I looked at MavenTestAdapter. It looks like it uses environment variables for
FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER, but it is expecting to find playerglobal as an artifact
in the local maven repo.
I put a link to the files I think you need on private@. I can't put it on dev@
because Adobe wants folks to
Harbs,
Maybe it's not the Maven who uses variables. Maybe tests itselfs are using
it.
It would be great that you finally get the moment where Maven build is
working for you it's been years since your reporting problems with that.. :/
Piotr
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018, 7:41 AM Harbs wrote:
> There
There are the env variables I’m using for all my builds:
#!/bin/sh
export ROYALE_COMPILER_REPO=/Apache/royale-compiler
export FLEX_SDK_HOME=/FlexSDK/4.14.1
export AIR_HOME=/Apache/frameworks/AIRSDK_Compiler
export PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME=/Apache/frameworks/libs/player
export
It appears that there is something mixed up with your environment variables.
The tests check for PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME, AIR_HOME, and FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER. I
think all 3 have to be set or none have to be set. If some are set, it can
confuse the tests. If all 3 are set, the tests should use
https://paste.apache.org/yBNf
> On Nov 16, 2018, at 2:27 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> Look in compiler/target/failsafe-reports and see what tests failed. I have
> to step away from my computer for about 3 hours.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 11/15/18, 4:18 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>The ant build passed,
Look in compiler/target/failsafe-reports and see what tests failed. I have to
step away from my computer for about 3 hours.
-Alex
On 11/15/18, 4:18 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
The ant build passed, but the Maven build failed:
[INFO] --- maven-dependency-plugin:3.0.0:analyze-only
The ant build passed, but the Maven build failed:
[INFO] --- maven-dependency-plugin:3.0.0:analyze-only (analyze) @ compiler ---
[WARNING] Used undeclared dependencies found:
[WARNING]org.antlr:antlr-runtime:jar:3.3:compile
[WARNING]antlr:antlr:jar:2.7.7:compile
[WARNING] Unused declared
As many of you know, Maven makes a lot of assumptions and does a fair amount of
work in each assumption. So, for example, when you run "mvn install", it runs
several steps including the build and copies it to the local repo. Imagine the
number of lines of Ant code required to do the same.
I
I think this file is missing from the source kit. I didn't catch it because I
think it is only needed for first-timers.
https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/.mvn/extensions.xml
Dave, try putting that file in a .mvn folder in the royale-asjs folder and see
if things start to
Dave,
You just made me realize that I probably saw that issue a while back. You
should be asked during source build to for license approve and download
playerglobal. I saw that sometimes it doesn't work and you got something
like you. I don't know why. I will try tomorrow on my sight.
Piotr
On
I am on Maven 3.5.0
I get this error:
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.royale.compiler:royale-maven-plugin:0.9.4:compile-as
> (default-compile-as) on project Core: Could not resolve dependencies for
> project org.apache.royale.framework:Core:swc:0.9.4: Failure to find
>
It's also part of the ApprovalScript so if run it on this RC you can get some
early info.
-Alex
On 11/15/18, 2:44 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
It’s been a while and I don’t remember off-hand.
I’ll probably take a stab at being RM in a few weeks and I imagine I’ll
need to figure it out
It’s been a while and I don’t remember off-hand.
I’ll probably take a stab at being RM in a few weeks and I imagine I’ll need to
figure it out then… ;-)
Harbs
> On Nov 16, 2018, at 12:32 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> What errors do you get with Maven?
Sorry, I missed a ">". 3.3.x or greater. There is some older versions that
will not pick up the Mavenizer. I'd have to go through the archives to find
out which one, which I'd rather not do.
What errors do you get with Maven?
-Alex
On 11/15/18, 2:19 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
Why is that?
Why is that?
I have 3.5.2 installed. Is that why Maven never works for me?
Harbs
> On Nov 16, 2018, at 12:17 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> Dave,
>
> What version of Maven are you running? I think it has to be 3.3.x.
>
> -Alex
Dave,
What version of Maven are you running? I think it has to be 3.3.x.
-Alex
On 11/15/18, 2:07 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
Hi -
> On Nov 15, 2018, at 1:59 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> 1) Thanks for checking. You are right about lots of downloads,
Hi -
> On Nov 15, 2018, at 1:59 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> 1) Thanks for checking. You are right about lots of downloads, but we have
> reports that it does succeed in non-US places.
>
> 2) That usually means you don’t' already have Flex artifacts. Try building
> with:
>
Ahh! You have tried to build sources :) My mistake, so it should probably
work with Alex's suggestion.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018, 11:03 PM Piotr Zarzycki
wrote:
> Hi Dave, Alex,
>
> I think it is important to remember that in order to test those artifacts
> you need to put link in the settings in
Hi Dave, Alex,
I think it is important to remember that in order to test those artifacts
you need to put link in the settings in Maven to staging area.
Piotr
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018, 10:59 PM Alex Harui wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> 1) Thanks for checking. You are right about lots of downloads, but we
Hi Dave,
1) Thanks for checking. You are right about lots of downloads, but we have
reports that it does succeed in non-US places.
2) That usually means you don’t' already have Flex artifacts. Try building
with:
mvn -s settings-template.xml clean install
Thanks,
-Alex
On 11/15/18,
Hi -
I did some validation on the release and have some observations particularly on
the Maven build.
(1) It downloads a huge number of files from repository.apache.org and
maven.repo.apache.org. This could be a source of trouble for people on
different continents.
(2) It fails in asks with:
To report back to the community. This is a very trivial issue and can be
addressed easily in the NEXT release. Please do not let it distract you.
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bb24f08024e55a0e99da4a113dab438fe81a9eef5e3550b748e940c0@%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E
Regards,
Dave
> On Nov
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 2:02 AM Alex Harui wrote:
> To be clear: the process DOES NOT upload artifacts to Maven Central. It
> uploads to the ASF staging repo. Only after we approve the release do the
> artifacts get pushed to Maven Central. One of the RMs got an error
> DOWNLOADING a Maven
Ok seems reasonable.
Thanks Alex
El jue., 15 nov. 2018 a las 18:50, Alex Harui ()
escribió:
> If we don't need another RC, then I hope someone volunteers to be the RM
> for 0.9.5 in December, before so many changes go in that the scripts may
> need fixing.
>
> On 11/15/18, 2:20 AM, "Carlos
If we don't need another RC, then I hope someone volunteers to be the RM for
0.9.5 in December, before so many changes go in that the scripts may need
fixing.
On 11/15/18, 2:20 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
Ok Alex,
so if Piotr, Om, or Yashay could try next RC maybe we could check
I don't know if plugins remain on Apache's maven repo after they are pushed to
Maven Central, but for me, I was having trouble pushing the artifacts to
Apache's maven repo if my network was too busy. No matter what, we have to get
the bits from the developer's machine to some server, and that
I tried build RC, but got timeout [1] during tests run. I will try tomorrow
again.
[1] https://paste.apache.org/vQps
Thanks,
Piotr
czw., 15 lis 2018 o 08:01 Justin Mclean
napisał(a):
> Hi,
>
> Re the modified non binary inclusion of CC BY-SA 3.0 licensed content I’ve
> asked on legal discuss
Any dependency on a public repository, even just for downloading, is
problematic from a consistency POV because the repo could be down/slow
or suddenly resolve to wrong/missing artifacts.
Maybe all plugins needed by the build could just be mirrored from
Apache's maven repository?
On
Ok Alex,
so if Piotr, Om, or Yashay could try next RC maybe we could check it works
for all. As soon as we have 2 different persons running successfully in two
different machines I think will got it. Although maybe we don't need other
RC... maybe could be good to try a new RC just for the purpose
To be clear: the process DOES NOT upload artifacts to Maven Central. It
uploads to the ASF staging repo. Only after we approve the release do the
artifacts get pushed to Maven Central. One of the RMs got an error DOWNLOADING
a Maven plugin from Maven Central. There is nothing wrong with
Hi,
Re the modified non binary inclusion of CC BY-SA 3.0 licensed content I’ve
asked on legal discuss as the resolved answered asks to do. [1]
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#cc-sa
Hi Om,
(again talking from my no experience in the process), can this be the
problem that make RMs fail on the process? From the external point of a
viewer, this seems more related to scripting/manual issues. Normally Maven
steps are hard to get working, but once you got it, use to work for all
Personally, I am not sure why we are uploading stuff to maven central as
part of the RC process. Can we simply bundle the source files and create a
release candidate? Folks who want to test maven can run the maven scripts
locally which would copy stuff to the local .m2 repo instead.
That way we
Hi Alex,
first congrats to reach to this point. After many months is great to
finally can release :)
I forked the thread to avoid mixing topics and let the discuss thread to
just discuss the RC2
I'll try RC2 soon, but first I want to talk about the inherent problem. I
know we are all here
69 matches
Mail list logo
