Development
Asunto: Re: Apache Royale with DevExpress
Hi Maria,
I haven't check that one - didn't found earlier. However the reason why we
choose DevExspress was:
1) DG is super sophisticated, have export to PDF etc
2) As a company we have payed support in our license if we wanted to
3) It's
Hi Maria,
I haven't check that one - didn't found earlier. However the reason why we
choose DevExspress was:
1) DG is super sophisticated, have export to PDF etc
2) As a company we have payed support in our license if we wanted to
3) It's under heavy development
4) Thanks to the license there are
Do you know https://datatables.net/? the grid is similar.
Hiedra
-Mensaje original-
De: Piotr Zarzycki
Enviado el: miércoles, 10 de noviembre de 2021 10:31
Para: Apache Royale Development
Asunto: Apache Royale with DevExpress
Hello Guys,
Lately in our internal project MyAccount [1]
I'm off the list for a few days and you revolutionize EVERYTHING.
This will be a great contribution to royal-extras.
I'm really looking forward to seeing this implementation, I'm sure with it I
could improve a lot the ones I've done so far.
Thank you.
Hiedra.
-Mensaje
Makes sense.
Harbs escreveu no dia quarta, 10/11/2021 à(s) 11:21:
> There’s two reasons I’m suggesting royale-extras:
>
> 1. It avoids dealing with the legalities of linking to commercial code. We
> could probably work it out, but it adds overhead.
> 2. I’d like to get some content on
There’s two reasons I’m suggesting royale-extras:
1. It avoids dealing with the legalities of linking to commercial code. We
could probably work it out, but it adds overhead.
2. I’d like to get some content on royale-extras. I’m thinking I should migrate
my Spectrum components to there as well.
Ho,
Fantastic.
I will wait for your extra (or standard) to be concluded.
Thank you.
Piotr Zarzycki escreveu no dia quarta,
10/11/2021 à(s) 10:31:
> When you buy license from DevExpress you are getting in your account on
> their website download link for whole sdk - which contains license
When you buy license from DevExpress you are getting in your account on
their website download link for whole sdk - which contains license already.
śr., 10 lis 2021 o 11:27 Hugo Ferreira napisał(a):
> And I suppose that there will be a static method to use on the application
> startup to inject
Well this discussion is all about expression whether it should be part of
SDK or in separate repository. So far Harbs expressed that I should put it
as a separate entity as part of Royale Extras. I cannot answer to that
question yet.
śr., 10 lis 2021 o 11:26 Hugo Ferreira napisał(a):
> That
And I suppose that there will be a static method to use on the application
startup to inject the license string.
Hugo Ferreira escreveu no dia quarta, 10/11/2021
à(s) 10:26:
> That means that when the component is finished, I just need to update the
> sdk, build and use the component
That means that when the component is finished, I just need to update the
sdk, build and use the component out-of-the-box ?
Piotr Zarzycki escreveu no dia quarta,
10/11/2021 à(s) 10:07:
> Hugo,
>
> You will use DG and other components in the same way as it is currently in
> Royale - in mxml. I
Hugo,
You will use DG and other components in the same way as it is currently in
Royale - in mxml. I haven't check yet your Office Web Add-In, but I'm
assuming we are doing it similarly. Just an example with current state of
my code how I'm using DevExpress DG: -> https://paste.apache.org/wdn01
Hi Piotr,
I didn't think that at first.
Each component must be implemented, studied and tested individually.
But yes, the DataGrid is probably the most valuable one. I know I will use
it.
Are you doing a normal wrapper like I did for Office Web Add-In or it's
something else that I don't know ?
Hi Hugo,
Could you elaborate a bit more for your question of usage ? What are you
exactly asking for ?
At the beginning you will see in potential repository only DG
implementation. I hope when others would like to use DevExpress will join
with PR or implementation of other components.
Thanks
I just checked out the devexpress js component and this solved the
AdvancedDataGrid missing.
I even say that the one that they have it's better than the original from
Flex.
The FileManager component it's also so great.
I'm looking forward for your development.
Hugo Ferreira escreveu no dia
Hi Piotr,
Uou, that would be a great addition.
I'm satisfied with the Jewel base component, however there is always
something that requires advanced components.
By the way, how do you use these advanced components ?
I suppose that is not integrated with the base Royale source code.
Piotr
I think this is a good fit for https://github.com/royale-extras
> On Nov 10, 2021, at 11:30 AM, Piotr Zarzycki
> wrote:
>
> Hello Guys,
>
> Lately in our internal project MyAccount [1] we have started to express
> needs of having more sophisticated DataGrid than it's available as part of
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
