Migrating existing FlexJS documentation to Royale

Hi, all: I want to start upgrading the very useful documentation we have that currently refers to FlexJS [1]. At the very least every document needs edits to make sure it refers to Royale. However, there are some other considerations: - Is there material that needs to be rewritten because

Re: Apache Royale website is live!!

This is great. I have verified all the fixes and have updated the tracking document. This task is complete...for now! a On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 6:12 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > Thanks Andrew, I did all changes except one. The one about the digest, I > took this tables

Re: [Royale] DataGrid default configuration proposal

Well if the Above example of usage is not working, we need to figure out how to have it working. I can of course copy everything what is inside DynamicDataGrid style and add my things, but this is not the solution. Thanks! 2018-01-17 22:10 GMT+01:00 Peter Ent : > I'm not

Re: [Royale] DataGrid default configuration proposal

I'm not sure; it is a good question. I will have to experiment. The DataGridModel works with ArrayList now. What I would do is change it to work with Array and then make a new model for the ArrayList or ICollectionView, which to me, is a better choice over ArrayList since its an interface and

Re: [Royale] DataGrid default configuration proposal

Hi Peter, To me it is a good change. I was always wondering why DG is working with ArrayList default. However let's say that I wanted to switch some of the beads for that DataGrid or add some custom class. How am I supposed to add second css class ? If I have this: and I have something in my

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

Hi, > Are you now claiming this content is under CC-BY-SA instead of just CC-BY? > I did not see that. Where did you get that? Share-Alike (SA) has more > restrictions than just CC-BY, AIUI. Sorry my mistake it’s CC-BY not CC-SA. Full name "Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

Here is the relevant license text: = All code in any directories or sub-directories that end with *.html or *.css is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License, which full text can be found here:

Re: [Royale] DataGrid default configuration proposal

IMO, the DataGrid in Basic should work with Arrays and a different set of beads allow it to work with ArrayList and another set of beads provides detection of changes to the ArrayList. As long as we have those beads (and maybe some tests/examples to prove it all works), the default set of beads

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

The legal email is here: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/22458fb5e7e73adaff5345744ba16842c57352 eab72fd89ae0423327@%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E -Alex On 1/17/18, 11:30 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >Hi Alex, > >Thanks for the explanation. Can you share link to

[Royale] DataGrid default configuration proposal

Hi, I'm proposing a change to DataGrid default configuration. Right now DataGrid is designed to work with ArrayList; its does not work with Array. I propose that the default configuration for DataGrid is to use Array as its dataProvider and provide no dynamic abilities. We would include in

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

Hi Alex, Thanks for the explanation. Can you share link to the legal email/jira - I cannot find it. Legal-VP - It means that you have asked one person ? Option 1) I personally don't have enough free time to make such changes in those examples. Option 2) If Legal answer that because of current

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

On 1/16/18, 9:16 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Royale is not going to operate like Flex. We want to be more responsive >> to our users. So instead of conducting detailed searches for IP issues >>at >> release time, they should be done at commit time or at

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

Piotr, Carlos, Please read and respond. Others are welcome to give their thoughts as well. Just to be clear, MDLBlogExample is an attempt to exactly replicate an example from Google's MDL repo. Google's example contains HTML and CSS files and the example uses text content from the HTML files

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

We have to also exclude MDLBlogExample from ANT build, because ANT is producing distribution package for IDE usage not Maven. Thanks for explanation, so by deprecation you mean rather recommendation to the users some other UI module instead of MDL. Not removing it completely from the framework

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

Hi Piotr 2018-01-17 13:29 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki : > Hi Carlos, > > I think removing MDLBlogExample completely will be better, cause we don't > need to remember in every release about exclusion of that example. > exclusion in maven is only not to list in modules

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

Hi Carlos, I think removing MDLBlogExample completely will be better, cause we don't need to remember in every release about exclusion of that example. What do you mean by "deprecate that library" in terms of open source project ? Thanks, Piotr 2018-01-17 13:24 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

Hi, I think MDLExample is one of the most referred examples out there. I couldn't follow all the discussion since I was busy with work and other task in this project, but I read that we had some problems with images. We can change the images for place holders. If there's some more problem I don't

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

Olaf, I'm against even for that. MDLExample should be always in release package. If I understand Alex's idea the things should be fixed in the commit time, so now we have release time. We had that issue for several releases, we can leave with it one more release. Thanks, Piotr 2018-01-17 10:24

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

Hi Piotr, just to make sure you don't get it wrong: The idea is to just remove it from the RC2 (So from the first Royale release at the end) just in order to have some more time to fix the IP/license issues and so don't delay the release any longer. This does not mean that those examples aren't

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

If there is unresolvable license issue which do not allow us to keep those examples - I will get them to my private repository, than we can remove from this project. 2018-01-17 10:02 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki : > Hi Guys, > > I'm definitely against of removing MDL

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

Hi Guys, I'm definitely against of removing MDL examples. I could agree only on removing MDLBlogExample, because it's not finished and I'm not going to invest time to finish it. Unless Carlos have such pans. If we cannot resolve something now let's resolve it for the next release. Let's start