Re: VSCode Build Taking Really Long

What are you using to compile? If you’re compiling using the VS Code extension, try installing asconfigc separately. > On Feb 21, 2019, at 4:29 PM, Yishay Weiss wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > We have a really simple app which takes Piotr and Olaf less than half a > minute to compile using VSCode. T

Re: Heads-up on coming updates to reflection and AMF

What’s the reason you are using ArrayBuffer instead of Uint8Array on the JS side? If you’d use Uint8Array instead, the method could be used like so: bd2.writeData(bd1.array); > On Feb 21, 2019, at 6:40 PM, Greg Dove wrote: > > Hi Harbs, > > Part of the reason for post

Re: Heads-up on coming updates to reflection and AMF

ing the readBytes method because > these things in js are fixed length compared to ByteArray which grows as > needed. > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 6:03 AM Harbs wrote: > >> What’s the reason you are using ArrayBuffer instead of Uint8Array on the >> JS side? >

Re: TypeError: this.generateMXMLAttributes is not a function

like this, I tend to use AS files anyway because they are lighter. HTH, Harbs P.S. I would advocate for a compiler error when using a class which doesn’t impelement IMXMLDocument as a base for MXML. > On Feb 25, 2019, at 2:33 PM, Olaf Krueger wrote: > > Hi, > I am trying to cre

Re: WebComponents and WebAssembly, a game changer!?

DOM elements directly, so there’s no (or very little) HTML parsing required.) Either way, Royale is free to use the DOM as an engine in any way it likes. If Web Components turn out to be the best, Royale can take advantage of that. My $0.02, Harbs [1]https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46431688

Re: Apache Royale on Stackoverflow

Good idea, but I don’t know that I personally will have time to answer SO questions. Harbs > On Mar 4, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > > Hi, > > I think one of our pending subjects is to be present on Stackoverflow. > Starting to have questions and answers th

Failing build on Windows

. I’ve tried ignoring the ASDateTests which just causes an error somewhere else. I’m kind of stumped. Anyone have ideas? Harbs

Re: Jewel StyledUIBase positioner

That’s surprising to me too. All you should need to do for separate positioners is to override the positioned getter. > On Mar 5, 2019, at 11:50 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > Hi Carlos, > > I'm not sure I understood the question, mainly because I'm surprised that > setting position=element in a

Re: Jewel StyledUIBase positioner

The positioner needs the royale_wrapper set. > On Mar 6, 2019, at 6:19 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > > This could be solved in this way: > > private var _div:Group = null; > > public function get div():Group >{ > if(_div == null) > _div = new Group(); > return _div; > } > > COMPILE::JS >

Re: AMF updates

with stringification. I am part-way through porting all the trace outputs > in the XMLTest project to UnitTests to verify that everything else will > work as before, after my (small) changes. The change I am making will allow > for identical byte match tests between flash and javascript f

Issue with initialization

The latest compiler changes exposed a problem: for(var i:int=0;i

Re: Issue with initialization

you’d do that… I’d personally like the ability to turn off initialization for non built-in types. That could just be an additional compiler option: -js-initialize-null. Basically I’d want all initialization *except* null. My $0.02, Harbs > On Mar 19, 2019, at 8:24 PM, Alex Harui wrote: >

Re: Plain public variables complain they don't have getters / setters (Was "CreationComplete event question")

You can set warn-public-vars to false. > On Mar 27, 2019, at 12:39 PM, Olaf Krueger wrote: > > Hi, > I want to extract one side note from Marks post [1] to this new thread: > >> VO's with plain public variables now complain they don't have getters / >> setters > > We always go with private va

Re: Plain public variables complain they don't have getters / setters (Was "CreationComplete event question")

More specifically, you shouldn’t use public variables as references *within* the MXML. The reason for that is that the references in the MXML are saved as text which might not match the renamed variables when the code is minified. > On Mar 28, 2019, at 11:45 AM, yishayw wrote: > >> Does this h

Re: Plain public variables complain they don't have getters / setters (Was "CreationComplete event question")

FWIW, I use a method to convert classes to JSON which allows me to define exactly which properties get written and using what names. i.e. myFoo.toData() > On Mar 28, 2019, at 1:26 PM, Olaf Krueger wrote: > > I would just like to mention that resolving this "public vars" issue by > replacing th

Re: text vs html

The HTML elements have text and innerHTML which correspond to the HTML element properties. I’m not sure what the logic of the basic components is. > On Apr 4, 2019, at 3:18 PM, Kessler CTR Mark J > wrote: > >The "text" property is probably just for compatibility with the flex > component

Re: text vs html

@langversion 3.0 > * @playerversion Flash 10.2 > * @playerversion AIR 2.6 > * @productversion Royale 0.9.4 > */ >public function get html():String >{ > return (element as HTMLButtonElement).innerHTML; >} > > /** > * @private > */ >

Re: text vs html

$0.02, Harbs > On Apr 5, 2019, at 12:42 PM, Kessler CTR Mark J > wrote: > > My guess is the bottom line would be, no matter what is chosen, do we allow > them an easy way to get at the html properties directly. That would make a > big difference to have to use a longer pa

Re: includedInLayout

Why not just use “visible”? > On Apr 7, 2019, at 2:15 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > > Hi, > > we can get flex "includedInLayout" using css "visibility" property (with > visible/hidden) > > I suppose it's not in UIBase for if PAYG reasons, so I can add it as a bead > if there's no other proposal.

Re: includedInLayout

hers. > > Maybe since we did visible not equal to flex, now "includeInLayout" has no > sense.. but still a bead for "visibility" can be useful > > @Piotr: don't think I understand correctly your message. You say > Disable/Enable is for visibility? >

Re: For each iteration in ArrayList and ArrayCollection

You can also iterate over the arrayList.source. > On Apr 11, 2019, at 5:16 AM, spiros wrote: > > Hi Alex , > > You have right the mx.collection.Arraylist and > org.apache.flex.collections.ArrayList in flex didn’t iterate in flex. > I already included the js code for the three cases ( it is on

Re: Create and build a library project

ompile-config.xml and the js-compile-config.xml files. Also take note of the package.json and republish.js files which download playerglobal. You need the full Royale SDK (and o just the js-only version) to compile the swc. To use the swc, you’d just copy the swc to your lib folder. HTH, Harbs >

Re: The start of a FullCalendar Royale component...

instead of inject_html. Harbs > On May 4, 2019, at 8:28 AM, Frost, Andrew wrote: > > Hi > > Responding (belatedly!) to a few of these points: > > - I need to look at how to get those typedefs working! as yes, it would be > great to not have to use the obj["property&q

Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: new Date().getTimenis too big for an int

git repository. > > harbs pushed a commit to branch develop > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/royale-asjs.git > > > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/develop by this push: > new 1c29abd new Date().getTimenis too big for an int >

Problems with Java 12

than trying to figure out how to download an older version of Java)? Harbs

Re: Problems with Java 12

ote: > > I can't figure out why your build is trying to use 1.5. My build.xml for > compiler-build-tools is using 1.6. > > -Alex > > On 5/14/19, 3:46 AM, "Harbs" wrote: > >I’m setting up a new Windows machine and I installed Java 12. I can’t get &

Re: Problems with Java 12

> local.properties or env.properties. > > -Alex > > On 5/14/19, 8:44 AM, "Harbs" wrote: > >Most of the build files were set to 1.6. There was one set to 1.5 (I don’t > remember off-hand which one. > >Changing all of them did not help. > &g

Re: Problems with Java 12

x. > > That said, I'm not sure that flex-compiler-oem will work with Flash Builder > if the target is not 1.6. If that's true, we'll need some way to not build > that jar on Java 12. > > -Alex > > On 5/14/19, 11:49 PM, "Harbs" wrote

Re: Problems with Java 12

uire use of > env.properties and/or local.properties files. > > It occurs to me that regarding Flash Builder, the source compatibility is > less important than the target compatibility. Does Java 12 have Java 1.6 > target compatibility? > > -Alex > > On 5/15/19, 12

Re: About having an Apache Royale page on Wikipedia

Here’s one: https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php > On May 17, 2019, at 1:27 AM, Andrew Wetmore wrote: > > I believe there are a couple of live applications using Royale. Do we have > links to them I could reference on the Wikipedia

Re: About having an Apache Royale page on Wikipedia

That sucks… :-( One thing I like about git based wikis is that you can edit locally on a text editor and these things don’t happen (as long as your text editor does automatic saves). > On May 17, 2019, at 1:24 PM, Andrew Wetmore wrote: > > @Harbs: thank you! > > Slight

Re: Problems with Java 12

s. > > It occurs to me that regarding Flash Builder, the source compatibility is > less important than the target compatibility. Does Java 12 have Java 1.6 > target compatibility? > > -Alex > > On 5/15/19, 12:32 AM, "Harbs" wrote: > >Yeah. Looks li

Re: Language improvements

arting point and something like this https://github.com/nfarina/xmldoc <https://github.com/nfarina/xmldoc> might be useful to either use or modify. Harbs > On May 23, 2019, at 10:18 AM, Greg Dove wrote: > > All, I started porting some adhoc XML tests to UnitTests and eventually > e

Re: Language improvements

I read through this, but I might be missing the background. I’ve missed quite a few discussions on the list lately. (Life has been busy…) Can you summarize what you were working on fixing in Vector? Thanks, Harbs > On May 5, 2019, at 11:00 AM, Greg Dove wrote: > > So... just an ov

Re: Language improvements

uses. Thanks, Harbs > On May 26, 2019, at 12:59 PM, Greg Dove wrote: > > Hi Harbs, a real quick answer inline below. > > > On Sun, 26 May 2019, 20:39 Harbs, wrote: > >> I read through this, but I might be missing the background. I’ve missed >> quite a few disc

Re: Post on how to create a desktop app with Apache Royale

Wow. Jude that’s really nice! Thanks for the effort putting that together! Harbs > On May 27, 2019, at 12:34 AM, QA wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I've compiled a guide for creating a desktop app with Electron and Apache > Royale on the blog here > <https://royale.co

Re: New article on how to create a desktop app with Apache Royale and ElectronJS

The XML is likely not well formed. Is the opening tag or ? > On May 27, 2019, at 8:47 PM, Antonis Kalodimos > wrote: > > Yes i had this tag > . > . > . > > > > > > > > > > > I found that i was trying to compile it with apache-royale-0.9.6-bin-js-swf > when i changed that with apach

Re: Language improvements

integers, so there’s not usually a practical advantage to writing that optimization explicitly. My $0.02, Harbs > On May 27, 2019, at 9:43 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > I live outside of Seattle. I'm in my house right now, and my cellphone says > I have a 4G co

Re: Language improvements

I looked into this some time ago. Working from memory, non-typed arrays might have been even faster than TypedArrays. Why that would be, I can’t guess and I could be wrong about that. I’d be interested in seeing some test results. Thanks, Harbs > On May 28, 2019, at 10:39 AM, Greg Dove wr

Re: Language improvements

Vectors. Some of the issues might have been from arrays which originate in web apis too. Sorry for being so vague… Harbs > On May 28, 2019, at 11:12 AM, Greg Dove wrote: > > "When I was porting a javascript library for use with Royale, array > incompatibility with Vector

Re: Language improvements

> On May 28, 2019, at 11:12 AM, Greg Dove wrote: > >> "I personally have never used length checking in Vector. Nor was runtime >> type checking on Vectors important to me. " > length checking is automatic in flash. I don't know that you 'use' it... it > is just there. True. What I meant is that

Re: Error on mailing list page

Looks like a problem with https on Nabble: http://support.nabble.com/problem-with-security-certificate-with-nabble-forum-td7597896.html > On May 29, 2019, at 10:42 PM, QA wrote: > > Is anyone else ge

Re: Error on mailing list page

More details in this link: http://support.nabble.com/HTTPS-SSL-urgent-td7594627.html#a7594635 <http://support.nabble.com/HTTPS-SSL-urgent-td7594627.html#a7594635> Simply put: Nabble does not support https. We can either keep those links as http, or get rid of Nabble… Harbs > On May

Re: Language improvements

the implementation is fine. Do I understand correctly? Harbs > On May 30, 2019, at 1:26 AM, Josh Tynjala wrote: > > I definitely want the default choice to have as few surprises as possible > when it comes to how ActionScript behaves in Royale. We'll never have a > p

Re: Language improvements

confusing for users. Harbs > On May 30, 2019, at 9:36 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > It is pretty simple to me. The proposed Vector implementation is heavy > enough that we all agree that we don't want to use it for just one use case > in the Strand. And so we will stop using V

AIR and Royale

I just heard about this announcement.[1] I went over to the Harman site and was reading this page.[2] I was particularly struck by this statement: HARMAN’s offerings also include consultancy, support and migration services for companies looking to move their applications away from Flash technol

Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: Added Async tasks

} > On Jun 4, 2019, at 2:55 PM, ha...@apache.org wrote: > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > harbs pushed a commit to branch develop > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/royale-asjs.git > > > The following commit

Re: AIR and Royale

> El mar., 4 jun. 2019 a las 9:36, Piotr Zarzycki () > escribió: > >> Hi Harbs, >> >> I was exactly think the same about that, so I'm keeping finger crossed to >> that effort. >> >> Thanks, >> Piotr >> >> wt., 4 cze 2019 o 09:34

Re: Embedded Assets (was Re: AIR and Royale)

ng the Base64 string. That could be either in CSS or in code. Details on data uris here: https://css-tricks.com/data-uris/ <https://css-tricks.com/data-uris/> Harbs > On Jun 7, 2019, at 12:12 AM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > > ok Om thanks for sharing. > Do you have some url

Re: Compiler Build Failing on Windows

Is it PLAYERGLOBAL or PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME? > On Jun 7, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Shiffy wrote: > > Thanks everyone for helping me out here. > > These are my environment variables. > > AIR_HOME ..\github\adobe\frameworks\AIRSDK_Compiler > PLAYERGLOBAL ..\github\adobe\frameworks\libs\player > FLASHPLAYER

Re: Problem with Vectors

Practical question for me is: How do we disable to Vector runtime checking? I was having trouble following the full discussion. My understanding was that there’s a compiler flag, but I’m not sure what it is. > On Jun 11, 2019, at 7:10 AM, Yishay Weiss wrote: > > Language.js:868 [1] is > >

Re: Problem with Vectors

been somewhat of a pain point and working on that is probably a good idea. Harbs > On Jun 14, 2019, at 2:11 PM, Josh Tynjala wrote: > > I asked because I don't understand your question either. > > Harbs wants something similar to a Vector, with two important features. >

Re: inject_html does not work in modules

You can use loadJavascript instead. https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/utils/js/loadJavascript.as

Re: Implicit casts and skipAsCercions

The code has /* implicit cast */ and we do not have the complex-implicit-coresions set. FYI, XML is also broken due to empty nodes which did not used to be there, but I’ll let Yishay comment on the details. > On Jun 19, 2019, at 11:29 PM, Greg Dove wrote: > > Hi Yishay, > > If there's a prob

Implicit casts for typedefs

ecipher('aes-256-ctr',KEY) as Decipher; and it’ll work as long as I ignore as coercions as a compiler option, but this feels like a step backwards. Thoughts? Harbs

Re: Compiler Performance (was Re: Problem with Vectors)

ntln() instead). You can check the isVerbose() method in the > project's Configuration object. > > - Josh > > On 2019/06/15 06:32:52, Alex Harui wrote: >> Just off the top of my head in my chat with Harbs last night, the two >> biggest pieces of fruit are no

Re: Trying to run a function on a class that is not instantiated

Have you looked at addDynamicSelector()? > On Jun 26, 2019, at 6:16 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > > I created as well "loadCSS" (still not commited).

Re: Trying to run a function on a class that is not instantiated

constants. I hope we eventually optimize away all constants in the compiler. Harbs > On Jun 27, 2019, at 10:29 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > I'm pretty sure in related threads I mentioned that a preloader is needed. > > -Alex > > On 6/26/19, 8:16 AM, "Carlos Rovira

Re: Compiler Performance (was Re: Problem with Vectors)

and you want to add a > System.out.println() call, make sure that it's only displayed in verbose mode > (unless it's related to an error, but then you might want > System.err.println() instead). You can check the isVerbose() method in the > project's Configuration

Re: Compiler Performance (was Re: Problem with Vectors)

I’ve noticed this too. > On Jun 28, 2019, at 6:24 PM, Josh Tynjala wrote: > > Another thing I've noticed is that the compiler will randomly decide to do > a release build every now and then, even though I've always asked for debug > builds. Maybe a threading issue or something while the configur

Re: Trying to run a function on a class that is not instantiated

t;> ModuleLoaderWithPreloader that loads an additional file that >> loads >>> the >>>> third-party JS. >>>> >>>> Also, it appears that it should be relatively simple to alter >> the >>> compiler >>>> to take

Minification changes

FYI, The latest builds of the compiler changes something related to minification. I have a library with many untyped references and I’m getting new null reference RTE errors because public vars are undefined.

Re: Minification changes

I found the source of the problem. js-default-initializers needs to be set to false. > On Jul 1, 2019, at 1:36 PM, Harbs wrote: > > FYI, > > The latest builds of the compiler changes something related to minification. > > I have a library with many untyped references and

Vector coercion

like to turn off the runtime checking. I’m still not clear on how I turn that off. Any pointers? Harbs

Re: Vector coercion

I’m using a custom build of TLF. I added that argument, but. I’m still getting: this._handlers[this._handlers[org.apache.royale.utils.Language.CHECK_INDEX](idx)] = handler; How do I get rid of the index checking? > On Jul 1, 2019, at 7:40 PM, Greg Dove wrote: > > Harbs, I set

Re: Vector coercion

Yes. Not sure how to reproduce t for you. > On Jul 1, 2019, at 8:37 PM, Greg Dove wrote: > > Are you seeing the index checking code being generated with > '-js-vector-emulation-class=Array' set for all your builds? If so, that's > a bug, and I'd be keen to repro it and fix.

Re: Vector coercion

duce t for you.' > > OK, thanks for confirming. Hopefully switching off the index checking works > for you for now. I will see if I can repro that either later today or > tomorrow. > > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 6:44 AM Harbs wrote: > >> Yes. Not sure how to rep

Re: Vector coercion

I’ve been doing a lot of that. Right now, I’m trying to figure out why an object has renamed properties when it didn’t used to. One thing I discovered is that initializing properties causes Google Closure to mess up renaming much more than uninitialized ones. Not sure why that is. Harbs >

Re: Vector coercion

o help figure > it out. I'll keep an eye open for anything like that today. > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 8:01 AM Harbs wrote: > >> I’ve been doing a lot of that. >> >> Right now, I’m trying to figure out why an object has renamed properties >> when

Re: [royale-asjs] 01/04: Fix for top-level reset variation in SimpleBinding

Not sure I’m understanding the reason for this, but would undefined be better than null? > On Jul 3, 2019, at 11:55 AM, gregd...@apache.org wrote: > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > gregdove pushed a commit to branch develop > in repository https://gitbo

Re: Apache Royale Animations framework

Not sure what you mean by “us”. If you mean Royale, we I guess we can’t include it because it does not have compatible licensing. If you mean your company, I don’t know why you can’t wrap it and use it in a Royale app. Harbs > On Jul 8, 2019, at 5:21 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > >

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #3219

repo, so I’m assuming one of them would need to be modified in > order for the type to be updated. Maybe Harbs can comment on this, as he set > up the repo. > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/royale-typedefs/blob/develop/js/build.xml > > > > _

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #3219

way to go… > On Jul 9, 2019, at 11:41 AM, Yishay Weiss wrote: > > I’m not sure. Looking at the js build [1] I can see the externs file being > read from that repo, so I’m assuming one of them would need to be modified in > order for the type to be updated. Maybe Harbs can comment

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #3219

Take a look at the following files in the typedef repo: Lines 108-166 in build.xml Line 67 and later in pom.xml Notice the different paths in externc-config.xml > On Jul 9, 2019, at 11:57 AM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > > So I can add Web Animations API externs there, but this will trigger some > bu

Jewel CSS winding up in non-Jewel apps

I have no jewel components in my app, but I’m suddenly seeing TONS of jewel css in my app. Similarly, I’m seeing Basic CSS (such as Button) which did not used to be included (and is messing up the visuals in my app). Has something changed with the logic which includes CSS? Harbs

Re: Jewel CSS winding up in non-Jewel apps

Like I mentioned, it seems to be a problem with Basic as well. That leads me to believe it’s a compiler problem. > On Jul 9, 2019, at 1:26 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > > Hi Harbs, > > there are no changes at least that I know. The way Jewel CSS was done is > stable and didn&#x

Re: Jewel CSS winding up in non-Jewel apps

: 1px solid #808080; padding: 4px; background-color: #e8e8e8; } Button:active { border: 1px solid #808080; padding: 4px; background-color: #d8d8d8; } > On Jul 9, 2019, at 1:35 PM, Harbs wrote: > > Like I mentioned, it seems to be a problem with Basi

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #3219

I see you added that line. It does not look like url.js was modified in royale-extras. Why are you downloading it from there? > On Jul 9, 2019, at 2:26 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > > Hi Harbs, > > Unfortunately I don't see different. externc-config.xml has url.js in > t

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #3219

+1. > On Jul 9, 2019, at 6:43 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > IMO, adding an API for missing.js should only be done for APIs that are truly > cross-browser. If an API requires a polyfill, then if we add it to > missing.js and someone tries to use it on the browser that doesn't support > it, it won

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #3219

wnload it to have > URLSearchParams available ? > > wt., 9 lip 2019 o 13:33 Harbs napisał(a): > >> I see you added that line. It does not look like url.js was modified in >> royale-extras. Why are you downloading it from there? >> >>> On Jul 9, 2019, a

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #3219

ficial externs, we add it to missing.js in the appropriate library in >>royale-typedefs. >> >>- Josh >> >>On Tue, Jul 9, 2019, 4:39 AM Piotr Zarzycki >> >>wrote: >> >>> I thought this is the right place, from where I shoul

Re: Maven build and URLSearchParams

https://github.com/apache/royale-typedefs/blob/develop/js/src/main/config/externc-config.xml#L89 Which should be created by: https://github.com/apache/royale-typedefs/blob/develop/js/build.xml#L99

Re: Uploading files with parameters

Do you mean multipart or something else? > On Jul 12, 2019, at 3:44 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > > Hey Guys, > > We are progressing with port Flex app to Royale. One of the feature in that > app is uploading File to server sigh along with couple of additional > parameters. I see that uploading i

Re: Uploading files with parameters

You can use a URLBinaryLoader with the file reference from the FileBrowser as one of the parameters in the URLRequest. > On Jul 12, 2019, at 4:02 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > > Hi Harbs, > > I mean something like here [1] - I'm not sure if it answers to your > q

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #3219

e can get some direction >> there. >> >> >> >> [1] https://github.com/google/closure-compiler/issues/2134 >> >> >> >> >> From: Harbs >> Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 11:58:10 AM >> To:

Re: library-path and external-library-path fixes

Thanks for this. :-) I just wanted to let you know that I successfully compiled all my libraries and app (after making the necessary changes). It all seems to work correctly. Good work! :-) Harbs > On Jul 15, 2019, at 10:32 PM, Josh Tynjala wrote: > > Hey folks, > > I j

Re: library-path and external-library-path fixes

ary-path led to "fat" SWCs that contained all > of their dependencies. Low-level classes in SWCs like CoreJS were > duplicated in higher-level SWCs. This led to the compiler getting confused > about exactly where a class was defined. > > This has resulted in some minor is

Re: library-path and external-library-path fixes

I quick look seems to indicate that these are coming from Jewel (which I'm not using). > On Jul 16, 2019, at 6:58 PM, Harbs wrote: > > These warnings look new: > > Jul 16, 2019 6:55:16 PM com.google.javascript.jscomp.LoggerErrorManager > println > WARNING: ex

Re: library-path and external-library-path fixes

jala > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 9:06 AM Harbs wrote: > >> I quick look seems to indicate that these are coming from Jewel (which I'm >> not using). >> >>> On Jul 16, 2019, at 6:58 PM, Harbs

Re: library-path changes

Make sure you have for the JS config: The append wil make sure you keep the default values. Here’s where I updated some of the libs I’m using: https://github.com/unhurdle/cep-royale/commit/35d45906035e3d1997d70a67893cc096307a3842

Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: add license header so maven can build

Oops. Thanks. :-) > On Jul 25, 2019, at 5:21 PM, carlosrov...@apache.org wrote: > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > carlosrovira pushed a commit to branch develop > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/royale-asjs.git > > > The following co

Container change

seems like a gratuitous breaking change for no good reason. Harbs

Re: Container change

org.apache.royale.html.beads.controllers.ItemRendererMouseController was changed to the core package as well (which also broke my app) I did not notice discussion about this. Why the package name change? How many more changes were there like this? Harbs > On May 6, 2018, at 10:07 AM, Ha

Re: Container change

Actually my whole app is broken now… :-( > On May 6, 2018, at 10:14 AM, Harbs wrote: > > org.apache.royale.html.beads.controllers.ItemRendererMouseController was > changed to the core package as well (which also broke my app) > > I did not notice discussion about this. Wh

Re: Container change

do it? Thanks, Harbs > On May 9, 2018, at 12:18 PM, yishayw wrote: > > If we want HTML elements to contain other elements they need to extend Group > or something similar. We depend on that in various places in our app. > > Carlos, how are we supposed to nest HTML element

Re: Apache Royale new app

sh app ever was. Some of that is inherent to Royale and some of it was enabled by browser performance measuring tools. It’s way more performant than a much simpler Angular HTML app too. HTH, Harbs > On May 9, 2018, at 1:13 PM, Angelo Lazzari wrote: > > and the final BIG question: do y

Re: Container change

> On May 9, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > > was Harbs how told me that NodeElementBase was not need to extend Group. > Then I changed it and looking into examples for this change didn't see > problems. I said that I wasn’t sure why it extended Group. I didn’t

Re: Container change

I don’t understand this. HTML needs Group which is in Basic. That’s not a separation (and I don’t see why it should be). > On May 9, 2018, at 7:15 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > > In the way I solved, now HTML works as expected and still we're maintaining > the separation with Basic.

Re: Container change

, but the second part is. I don’t see the benefit of pulling out the “core” part of Basic and put it into the Core library. I definitely don’t see a benefit to duplicating these core pieces in other component sets. My $0.02, Harbs > On May 9, 2018, at 7:15 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > >

Re: Container change

eeded only for making it a base for an MXML file? Should HTML Element components have the ability to be used as a base for MXML? I don’t know the answers to this. Harbs > On May 10, 2018, at 2:19 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > On the other hand, I don't agree with Yishay's and H

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >