Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Thanks. The structure there and a lot of the content is great. We should definitely copy it into docs. We should probably figure out the best way to write the docs and get started… ;-) I just added a link to his wiki from the docs page for now. Does anyone think we need a wiki for the docs repo? Harbs > On Oct 4, 2017, at 10:07 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Here you go -> https://github.com/ok-at-github/flexjs-docs/wiki > > Thanks, > Piotr > > 2017-10-04 9:04 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > >> I can’t find Olaf’s wiki. Remind me of the URL? >> >>> On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:59 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Alex. I'm just asking cause I was thinking where I can start with >>> all of that. I believe that documentation is our true weak point. >>> >>> Harbs do you have some plans in case of the docs ? Do you think that >> Olaf's >>> work can be used ? >>> >>> Piotr >>> >>> 2017-10-04 8:54 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com > harbs.li...@gmail.com>>: >>> >>>> I believe we can have it available at a different URL (i.e. >>>> royalesdk.org/docs <http://royalesdk.org/docs> < >> http://royalesdk.org/docs <http://royalesdk.org/docs>>) using CNAME >> entries: >>>> https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom- >> domain-with-github-pages/ <https://help.github.com/ >> articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/> >>>> <https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom- >> domain-with-github-pages/ >>>>> >>>> >>>>> On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'm not sure we have that choice. I think we are part of an >> organization >>>>> and have to use a separate repo. Maybe that's better because we have >>>>> several code repos. >>>>> >>>>> The repo is: >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/royale-docs >>>>> >>>>> When you push it becomes available here: >>>>> >>>>> https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/ >>>>> >>>>> Of course, I could be wrong... >>>>> -Alex >>>>> >>>>> On 10/3/17, 4:46 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash >>>> Muppirala" >>>>> <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> This should make things simpler: >>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co >>>>>> m%2Fblog%2F2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing= >>>> 02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e446 >>>>>> 61f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364 >>>>>> 26850111393184=6FAJXFa81NJY%2FG7FHdKpbnZq3N8arcYV1reW1uDWl >>>> VQ%3D >>>>>> rved=0 >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Om >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Get Outlook for >>>>>>> Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook. >>>> com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F >>>>>>> aka.ms%2Fghei36=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e44661f04aca4c1a08d50ad9 >>>> 2538%7Cfa7b >>>>>>> 1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426850111393184& >>>> sdata=0KYVTdYNd >>>>>>> hKvtS%2B3Ny28BrSOUjdZWdxFcLXkyO4T3wY%3D=0> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM >>>>>>> To: dev@royale.apache.org >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Royale-
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Here you go -> https://github.com/ok-at-github/flexjs-docs/wiki Thanks, Piotr 2017-10-04 9:04 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > I can’t find Olaf’s wiki. Remind me of the URL? > > > On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:59 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Thanks Alex. I'm just asking cause I was thinking where I can start with > > all of that. I believe that documentation is our true weak point. > > > > Harbs do you have some plans in case of the docs ? Do you think that > Olaf's > > work can be used ? > > > > Piotr > > > > 2017-10-04 8:54 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com harbs.li...@gmail.com>>: > > > >> I believe we can have it available at a different URL (i.e. > >> royalesdk.org/docs <http://royalesdk.org/docs> < > http://royalesdk.org/docs <http://royalesdk.org/docs>>) using CNAME > entries: > >> https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom- > domain-with-github-pages/ <https://help.github.com/ > articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/> > >> <https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom- > domain-with-github-pages/ > >>> > >> > >>> On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> > wrote: > >>> > >>> I'm not sure we have that choice. I think we are part of an > organization > >>> and have to use a separate repo. Maybe that's better because we have > >>> several code repos. > >>> > >>> The repo is: > >>> > >>> https://github.com/apache/royale-docs > >>> > >>> When you push it becomes available here: > >>> > >>> https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/ > >>> > >>> Of course, I could be wrong... > >>> -Alex > >>> > >>> On 10/3/17, 4:46 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > >> Muppirala" > >>> <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> This should make things simpler: > >>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co > >>>> m%2Fblog%2F2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing= > >> 02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e446 > >>>> 61f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364 > >>>> 26850111393184=6FAJXFa81NJY%2FG7FHdKpbnZq3N8arcYV1reW1uDWl > >> VQ%3D > >>>> rved=0 > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Om > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions. > >>>>> > >>>>> Get Outlook for > >>>>> Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook. > >> com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > >>>>> aka.ms%2Fghei36=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e44661f04aca4c1a08d50ad9 > >> 2538%7Cfa7b > >>>>> 1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426850111393184& > >> sdata=0KYVTdYNd > >>>>> hKvtS%2B3Ny28BrSOUjdZWdxFcLXkyO4T3wY%3D=0> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> From: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> > >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM > >>>>> To: dev@royale.apache.org > >>>>> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis) > >>>>> > >>>>> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch? > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial > >>>>> content? > >>>>>> I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH > >>>>> Pages. > >>>>>> Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> -Alex > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> OK, put in a request for royale-docs. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 10/3/17, 1:
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
I can’t find Olaf’s wiki. Remind me of the URL? > On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:59 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Alex. I'm just asking cause I was thinking where I can start with > all of that. I believe that documentation is our true weak point. > > Harbs do you have some plans in case of the docs ? Do you think that Olaf's > work can be used ? > > Piotr > > 2017-10-04 8:54 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com > <mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>>: > >> I believe we can have it available at a different URL (i.e. >> royalesdk.org/docs <http://royalesdk.org/docs> <http://royalesdk.org/docs >> <http://royalesdk.org/docs>>) using CNAME entries: >> https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/ >> <https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/> >> <https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/ >>> >> >>> On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >>> >>> I'm not sure we have that choice. I think we are part of an organization >>> and have to use a separate repo. Maybe that's better because we have >>> several code repos. >>> >>> The repo is: >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/royale-docs >>> >>> When you push it becomes available here: >>> >>> https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/ >>> >>> Of course, I could be wrong... >>> -Alex >>> >>> On 10/3/17, 4:46 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash >> Muppirala" >>> <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> This should make things simpler: >>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co >>>> m%2Fblog%2F2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing= >> 02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e446 >>>> 61f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364 >>>> 26850111393184=6FAJXFa81NJY%2FG7FHdKpbnZq3N8arcYV1reW1uDWl >> VQ%3D >>>> rved=0 >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Om >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions. >>>>> >>>>> Get Outlook for >>>>> Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook. >> com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F >>>>> aka.ms%2Fghei36=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e44661f04aca4c1a08d50ad9 >> 2538%7Cfa7b >>>>> 1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426850111393184& >> sdata=0KYVTdYNd >>>>> hKvtS%2B3Ny28BrSOUjdZWdxFcLXkyO4T3wY%3D=0> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM >>>>> To: dev@royale.apache.org >>>>> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis) >>>>> >>>>> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch? >>>>> >>>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial >>>>> content? >>>>>> I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH >>>>> Pages. >>>>>> Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> -Alex >>>>>> >>>>>> On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> OK, put in a request for royale-docs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Alex, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1] >>>>>>>> started >>>>>>>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure >>>>> where >>>>> in >>>>>>>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or >>>>
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Thanks Alex. I'm just asking cause I was thinking where I can start with all of that. I believe that documentation is our true weak point. Harbs do you have some plans in case of the docs ? Do you think that Olaf's work can be used ? Piotr 2017-10-04 8:54 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > I believe we can have it available at a different URL (i.e. > royalesdk.org/docs <http://royalesdk.org/docs>) using CNAME entries: > https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/ > <https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/ > > > > > On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > > > I'm not sure we have that choice. I think we are part of an organization > > and have to use a separate repo. Maybe that's better because we have > > several code repos. > > > > The repo is: > > > > https://github.com/apache/royale-docs > > > > When you push it becomes available here: > > > > https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/ > > > > Of course, I could be wrong... > > -Alex > > > > On 10/3/17, 4:46 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > Muppirala" > > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> This should make things simpler: > >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co > >> m%2Fblog%2F2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing= > 02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e446 > >> 61f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364 > >> 26850111393184=6FAJXFa81NJY%2FG7FHdKpbnZq3N8arcYV1reW1uDWl > VQ%3D > >> rved=0 > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Om > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions. > >>> > >>> Get Outlook for > >>> Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook. > com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > >>> aka.ms%2Fghei36=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e44661f04aca4c1a08d50ad9 > 2538%7Cfa7b > >>> 1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426850111393184& > sdata=0KYVTdYNd > >>> hKvtS%2B3Ny28BrSOUjdZWdxFcLXkyO4T3wY%3D=0> > >>> > >>> > >>> From: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> > >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM > >>> To: dev@royale.apache.org > >>> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis) > >>> > >>> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch? > >>> > >>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial > >>> content? > >>>> I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH > >>> Pages. > >>>> Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> -Alex > >>>> > >>>> On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> OK, put in a request for royale-docs. > >>>>> > >>>>> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Alex, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1] > >>>>>> started > >>>>>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure > >>> where > >>> in > >>>>>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or > >>> into > >>>>>> royale-asjs as Wiki ? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [1] > >>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c > >>>>>> o > >>>>>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki=02%7C01%7C% > >>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed > >>>>>> 2 > >>>>>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > >>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757 > >>>>>&g
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
> (i.e. royalesdk.org/docs <http://royalesdk.org/docs>) That should have been docs.royalesdk.org <http://docs.roaylesdk.org/>. > On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:54 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I believe we can have it available at a different URL (i.e. > royalesdk.org/docs <http://royalesdk.org/docs>) using CNAME entries: > https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/ > <https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/> > >> On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID >> <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote: >> >> I'm not sure we have that choice. I think we are part of an organization >> and have to use a separate repo. Maybe that's better because we have >> several code repos. >> >> The repo is: >> >> https://github.com/apache/royale-docs >> <https://github.com/apache/royale-docs> >> >> When you push it becomes available here: >> >> https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/ >> <https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/> >> >> Of course, I could be wrong... >> -Alex >> >> On 10/3/17, 4:46 PM, "omup...@gmail.com <mailto:omup...@gmail.com> on behalf >> of OmPrakash Muppirala" >> <omup...@gmail.com <mailto:omup...@gmail.com> on behalf of >> bigosma...@gmail.com <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >>> This should make things simpler: >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co >>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co> >>> m%2Fblog%2F2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e446 >>> 61f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364 >>> 26850111393184=6FAJXFa81NJY%2FG7FHdKpbnZq3N8arcYV1reW1uDWlVQ%3D >>> rved=0 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Om >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions. >>>> >>>> Get Outlook for >>>> Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F >>>> aka.ms%2Fghei36=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e44661f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b >>>> 1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426850111393184=0KYVTdYNd >>>> hKvtS%2B3Ny28BrSOUjdZWdxFcLXkyO4T3wY%3D=0> >>>> >>>> >>>> From: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM >>>> To: dev@royale.apache.org >>>> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis) >>>> >>>> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch? >>>> >>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial >>>> content? >>>>> I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH >>>> Pages. >>>>> Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> -Alex >>>>> >>>>> On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> OK, put in a request for royale-docs. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Alex, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1] >>>>>>> started >>>>>>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure >>>> where >>>> in >>>>>>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or >>>> into >>>>>>> royale-asjs as Wiki ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c >>>>>>> o >>>>>>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki=02%7C01%7C% >>>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed >>>
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
I believe we can have it available at a different URL (i.e. royalesdk.org/docs <http://royalesdk.org/docs>) using CNAME entries: https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/ <https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/> > On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > I'm not sure we have that choice. I think we are part of an organization > and have to use a separate repo. Maybe that's better because we have > several code repos. > > The repo is: > > https://github.com/apache/royale-docs > > When you push it becomes available here: > > https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/ > > Of course, I could be wrong... > -Alex > > On 10/3/17, 4:46 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This should make things simpler: >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co >> m%2Fblog%2F2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e446 >> 61f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364 >> 26850111393184=6FAJXFa81NJY%2FG7FHdKpbnZq3N8arcYV1reW1uDWlVQ%3D >> rved=0 >> >> Thanks, >> Om >> >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions. >>> >>> Get Outlook for >>> Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F >>> aka.ms%2Fghei36=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e44661f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b >>> 1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426850111393184=0KYVTdYNd >>> hKvtS%2B3Ny28BrSOUjdZWdxFcLXkyO4T3wY%3D=0> >>> >>> >>> From: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM >>> To: dev@royale.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis) >>> >>> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch? >>> >>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial >>> content? >>>> I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH >>> Pages. >>>> Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> -Alex >>>> >>>> On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >>>> >>>>> OK, put in a request for royale-docs. >>>>> >>>>> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Alex, >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1] >>>>>> started >>>>>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure >>> where >>> in >>>>>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or >>> into >>>>>> royale-asjs as Wiki ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ? >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] >>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c >>>>>> o >>>>>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki=02%7C01%7C% >>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed >>>>>> 2 >>>>>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757 >>>>>> 2 >>>>>> >>> 6455=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D=0 >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Piotr >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> royale-docs is good. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala >>>>>>> <bigosma...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I prefer royale-docs >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Om >>&
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
I'm not sure we have that choice. I think we are part of an organization and have to use a separate repo. Maybe that's better because we have several code repos. The repo is: https://github.com/apache/royale-docs When you push it becomes available here: https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/ Of course, I could be wrong... -Alex On 10/3/17, 4:46 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >This should make things simpler: >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co >m%2Fblog%2F2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e446 >61f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364 >26850111393184=6FAJXFa81NJY%2FG7FHdKpbnZq3N8arcYV1reW1uDWlVQ%3D >rved=0 > >Thanks, >Om > >On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >wrote: > >> Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions. >> >> Get Outlook for >>Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F >>aka.ms%2Fghei36=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e44661f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b >>1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426850111393184=0KYVTdYNd >>hKvtS%2B3Ny28BrSOUjdZWdxFcLXkyO4T3wY%3D=0> >> >> >> From: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM >> To: dev@royale.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis) >> >> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch? >> >> > On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >> wrote: >> > >> > Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial >>content? >> > I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH >>Pages. >> > Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > -Alex >> > >> > On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >> > >> >> OK, put in a request for royale-docs. >> >> >> >> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi Alex, >> >>> >> >>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1] >> >>> started >> >>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure >>where >> in >> >>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or >> into >> >>> royale-asjs as Wiki ? >> >>> >> >>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ? >> >>> >> >>> [1] >> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c >> >>> o >> >>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki=02%7C01%7C% >> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed >> >>> 2 >> >>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757 >> >>> 2 >> >>> >>6455=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D=0 >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> Piotr >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: >> >>> >> >>>> royale-docs is good. >> >>>> >> >>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala >> >>>> <bigosma...@gmail.com> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I prefer royale-docs >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>> Om >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to >> >>>> point >> >>>> to. >> >>>>>> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or >> >>>> whatever >> >>>>>> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in >>'master' >> >>>> branch >> >>>>>> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on >> >>>>>> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)" >&g
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Hmm, can you try doing a reply-all to the moderation email? That should fix this issue. If that doesnt work, I can switch. Thanks, Om On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > Om, this email is ending up in moderation. Can you subscribe this email > or switch to one that is subscribed? > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 10/3/17, 4:46 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >This should make things simpler: > >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co > >m%2Fblog%2F2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing= > 02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e446 > >61f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364 > >26850111393184=6FAJXFa81NJY%2FG7FHdKpbnZq3N8arcYV1reW1uDWl > VQ%3D > >rved=0 > > > >Thanks, > >Om > > > >On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > >wrote: > > > >> Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions. > >> > >> Get Outlook for > >>Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook. > com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F > >>aka.ms%2Fghei36=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e44661f04aca4c1a08d50ad9 > 2538%7Cfa7b > >>1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426850111393184& > sdata=0KYVTdYNd > >>hKvtS%2B3Ny28BrSOUjdZWdxFcLXkyO4T3wY%3D=0> > >> > >> > >> From: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> > >> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM > >> To: dev@royale.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis) > >> > >> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch? > >> > >> > On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial > >>content? > >> > I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH > >>Pages. > >> > Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > -Alex > >> > > >> > On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > >> > > >> >> OK, put in a request for royale-docs. > >> >> > >> >> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Hi Alex, > >> >>> > >> >>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1] > >> >>> started > >> >>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure > >>where > >> in > >> >>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or > >> into > >> >>> royale-asjs as Wiki ? > >> >>> > >> >>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ? > >> >>> > >> >>> [1] > >> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c > >> >>> o > >> >>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki=02%7C01%7C% > >> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed > >> >>> 2 > >> >>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757 > >> >>> 2 > >> >>> > >>6455=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D=0 > >> >>> > >> >>> Thanks, > >> >>> Piotr > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > >> >>> > >> >>>> royale-docs is good. > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala > >> >>>> <bigosma...@gmail.com> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> I prefer royale-docs > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Thanks, > >> >>>>> Om > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>> Per Infra: "
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Om, this email is ending up in moderation. Can you subscribe this email or switch to one that is subscribed? Thanks, -Alex On 10/3/17, 4:46 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >This should make things simpler: >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co >m%2Fblog%2F2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e446 >61f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364 >26850111393184=6FAJXFa81NJY%2FG7FHdKpbnZq3N8arcYV1reW1uDWlVQ%3D >rved=0 > >Thanks, >Om > >On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >wrote: > >> Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions. >> >> Get Outlook for >>Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F >>aka.ms%2Fghei36=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e44661f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b >>1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426850111393184=0KYVTdYNd >>hKvtS%2B3Ny28BrSOUjdZWdxFcLXkyO4T3wY%3D=0> >> >> >> From: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM >> To: dev@royale.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis) >> >> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch? >> >> > On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >> wrote: >> > >> > Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial >>content? >> > I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH >>Pages. >> > Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > -Alex >> > >> > On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >> > >> >> OK, put in a request for royale-docs. >> >> >> >> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi Alex, >> >>> >> >>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1] >> >>> started >> >>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure >>where >> in >> >>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or >> into >> >>> royale-asjs as Wiki ? >> >>> >> >>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ? >> >>> >> >>> [1] >> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c >> >>> o >> >>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki=02%7C01%7C% >> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed >> >>> 2 >> >>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757 >> >>> 2 >> >>> >>6455=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D=0 >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> Piotr >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: >> >>> >> >>>> royale-docs is good. >> >>>> >> >>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala >> >>>> <bigosma...@gmail.com> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I prefer royale-docs >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>> Om >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to >> >>>> point >> >>>> to. >> >>>>>> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or >> >>>> whatever >> >>>>>> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in >>'master' >> >>>> branch >> >>>>>> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on >> >>>>>> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)" >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should >>have >> >>>> some >> >>>>>> other name? "roya
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
IMO, flex-docs is for user-facing documentation. IOW, how to use Royale. The repo wikis are for how to be a developer of the code in the wiki. Build instructions, release guides, etc. The wikis won't have very much polish. Most of what is in the Flex Wiki for FlexJS can end up in the repo wikis except the places where we tried to write user-facing documentation. My 2 cents, -Alex On 10/3/17, 7:57 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi, > >I see that we have repo for docs [1] and gh-pages working [2]. I would >like >to start putting somewhere information in the Olaf's structure [3], of >course let's change whatever you think to have better one. > >The question is - Where such things should landed in royale-docs or in >royale-asjs - WIKI tab ? > >[1] >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co >m%2Fapache%2Froyale-docs=02%7C01%7C%7C1cc23b20500f41e8c76b08d50ad3a65 >c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426826503113618=WZ >Osb89uXL3s8nrHjRVSaSkmsuWUyQSxMMJS%2BN9O4Xo%3D=0 >[2] >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapache.gi >thub.io%2Froyale-docs%2F=02%7C01%7C%7C1cc23b20500f41e8c76b08d50ad3a65 >c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426826503113618=wl >p%2BocJ1mKV6%2BXy8ELZP2u4cWLLSe8NMhmLrFIUMR0g%3D=0 >[3] >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co >m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki=02%7C01%7C%7C1cc23b20500f41e8c7 >6b08d50ad3a65c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63642682650311 >3618=ZKmxBa7gPxIxZof0c4MlzOZktzXDmyj6bgEJmN%2FA0%2BE%3D=0 > >Thanks, >Piotr > >2017-10-03 23:57 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > >> Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions. >> >> Get Outlook for >>Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F >>aka.ms%2Fghei36=02%7C01%7C%7C1cc23b20500f41e8c76b08d50ad3a65c%7Cfa7b >>1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426826503113618=eJZnrMxUG >>kvlKJxZJZq9COzf2zW4D3%2FpZZuSojPzXy0%3D=0> >> >> ________ >> From: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM >> To: dev@royale.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis) >> >> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch? >> >> > On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >> wrote: >> > >> > Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial >>content? >> > I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH >>Pages. >> > Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > -Alex >> > >> > On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >> > >> >> OK, put in a request for royale-docs. >> >> >> >> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi Alex, >> >>> >> >>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1] >> >>> started >> >>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure >>where >> in >> >>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or >> into >> >>> royale-asjs as Wiki ? >> >>> >> >>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ? >> >>> >> >>> [1] >> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c >> >>> o >> >>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki=02%7C01%7C% >> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed >> >>> 2 >> >>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757 >> >>> 2 >> >>> >>6455=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D=0 >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> Piotr >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: >> >>> >> >>>> royale-docs is good. >> >>>> >> >>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala >> >>>> <bigosma...@gmail.com> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I prefer royale-docs >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Thanks, >> >>&
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
This should make things simpler: https://github.com/blog/2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing Thanks, Om On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions. > > Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> > > > From: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> > Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM > To: dev@royale.apache.org > Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis) > > Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch? > > > On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> > wrote: > > > > Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial content? > > I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH Pages. > > Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages. > > > > Thanks, > > -Alex > > > > On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > > >> OK, put in a request for royale-docs. > >> > >> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Alex, > >>> > >>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1] > >>> started > >>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure where > in > >>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or > into > >>> royale-asjs as Wiki ? > >>> > >>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ? > >>> > >>> [1] > >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c > >>> o > >>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki=02%7C01%7C% > 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed > >>> 2 > >>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757 > >>> 2 > >>> 6455=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D=0 > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Piotr > >>> > >>> > >>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > >>> > >>>> royale-docs is good. > >>>> > >>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala > >>>> <bigosma...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I prefer royale-docs > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Om > >>>>> > >>>>> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to > >>>> point > >>>> to. > >>>>>> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or > >>>> whatever > >>>>>> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in 'master' > >>>> branch > >>>>>> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on > >>>>>> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)" > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should have > >>>> some > >>>>>> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our > >>>> non-ASDoc > >>>>>> user documentation. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thoughts? > >>>>>> -Alex > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> > wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per > >>>> Apache > >>>>>>> Project. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product. Combining > >>>> repos > >>>>>>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples in > >>>> the > >>>>>>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release > >>>> schedule. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> My 2 cents, > >>>>>>> -Alex > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 10/2/
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Hi, I see that we have repo for docs [1] and gh-pages working [2]. I would like to start putting somewhere information in the Olaf's structure [3], of course let's change whatever you think to have better one. The question is - Where such things should landed in royale-docs or in royale-asjs - WIKI tab ? [1] https://github.com/apache/royale-docs [2] https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/ [3] https://github.com/ok-at-github/flexjs-docs/wiki Thanks, Piotr 2017-10-03 23:57 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions. > > Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> > > > From: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> > Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM > To: dev@royale.apache.org > Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis) > > Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch? > > > On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> > wrote: > > > > Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial content? > > I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH Pages. > > Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages. > > > > Thanks, > > -Alex > > > > On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > > >> OK, put in a request for royale-docs. > >> > >> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Alex, > >>> > >>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1] > >>> started > >>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure where > in > >>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or > into > >>> royale-asjs as Wiki ? > >>> > >>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ? > >>> > >>> [1] > >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c > >>> o > >>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki=02%7C01%7C% > 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed > >>> 2 > >>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757 > >>> 2 > >>> 6455=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D=0 > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Piotr > >>> > >>> > >>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > >>> > >>>> royale-docs is good. > >>>> > >>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala > >>>> <bigosma...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I prefer royale-docs > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Om > >>>>> > >>>>> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to > >>>> point > >>>> to. > >>>>>> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or > >>>> whatever > >>>>>> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in 'master' > >>>> branch > >>>>>> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on > >>>>>> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)" > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should have > >>>> some > >>>>>> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our > >>>> non-ASDoc > >>>>>> user documentation. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thoughts? > >>>>>> -Alex > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> > wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per > >>>> Apache > >>>>>>> Project. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product. Combining > >>>> repos > >>>>>>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples in >
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions. Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> From: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis) Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch? > On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial content? > I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH Pages. > Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages. > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > >> OK, put in a request for royale-docs. >> >> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Alex, >>> >>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1] >>> started >>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure where in >>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or into >>> royale-asjs as Wiki ? >>> >>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ? >>> >>> [1] >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c >>> o >>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed >>> 2 >>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757 >>> 2 >>> 6455=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D=0 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Piotr >>> >>> >>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> royale-docs is good. >>>> >>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala >>>> <bigosma...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I prefer royale-docs >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Om >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to >>>> point >>>> to. >>>>>> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or >>>> whatever >>>>>> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in 'master' >>>> branch >>>>>> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on >>>>>> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)" >>>>>> >>>>>> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should have >>>> some >>>>>> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our >>>> non-ASDoc >>>>>> user documentation. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>> -Alex >>>>>> >>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per >>>> Apache >>>>>>> Project. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product. Combining >>>> repos >>>>>>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples in >>>> the >>>>>>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release >>>> schedule. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My 2 cents, >>>>>>> -Alex >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website (i.e. >>>> Github >>>>>>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to tourjs >>>> in a >>>>>>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on >>>> how to >>>>>>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the components. >>>> They >>>>>>>> seem separate and complimentary. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Harbs >>>>>
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch? > On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial content? > I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH Pages. > Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages. > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > >> OK, put in a request for royale-docs. >> >> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Alex, >>> >>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1] >>> started >>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure where in >>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or into >>> royale-asjs as Wiki ? >>> >>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ? >>> >>> [1] >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c >>> o >>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed >>> 2 >>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757 >>> 2 >>> 6455=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D=0 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Piotr >>> >>> >>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> royale-docs is good. >>>> >>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala >>>> <bigosma...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I prefer royale-docs >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Om >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to >>>> point >>>> to. >>>>>> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or >>>> whatever >>>>>> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in 'master' >>>> branch >>>>>> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on >>>>>> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)" >>>>>> >>>>>> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should have >>>> some >>>>>> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our >>>> non-ASDoc >>>>>> user documentation. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>> -Alex >>>>>> >>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per >>>> Apache >>>>>>> Project. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product. Combining >>>> repos >>>>>>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples in >>>> the >>>>>>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release >>>> schedule. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My 2 cents, >>>>>>> -Alex >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website (i.e. >>>> Github >>>>>>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to tourjs >>>> in a >>>>>>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on >>>> how to >>>>>>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the components. >>>> They >>>>>>>> seem separate and complimentary. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Harbs >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <p...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have been thinking t
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial content? I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH Pages. Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages. Thanks, -Alex On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >OK, put in a request for royale-docs. > >On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>Hi Alex, >> >>+1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1] >>started >>and move all his already gathered information in that structure where in >>your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or into >>royale-asjs as Wiki ? >> >>Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ? >> >>[1] >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c >>o >>m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed >>2 >>b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757 >>2 >>6455=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D=0 >> >>Thanks, >>Piotr >> >> >>2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: >> >>> royale-docs is good. >>> >>> > On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala >>><bigosma...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > I prefer royale-docs >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Om >>> > >>> > On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >>>wrote: >>> > >>> >> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to >>>point >>> to. >>> >> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or >>> whatever >>> >> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in 'master' >>> branch >>> >> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on >>> >> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)" >>> >> >>> >> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should have >>>some >>> >> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our >>>non-ASDoc >>> >> user documentation. >>> >> >>> >> Thoughts? >>> >> -Alex >>> >> >>> >> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per >>> Apache >>> >>> Project. >>> >>> >>> >>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product. Combining >>> repos >>> >>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples in >>>the >>> >>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release >>> schedule. >>> >>> >>> >>> My 2 cents, >>> >>> -Alex >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website (i.e. >>> Github >>> >>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to tourjs >>>in a >>> >>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on >>>how to >>> >>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the components. >>>They >>> >>>> seem separate and complimentary. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Harbs >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <p...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from >>>royale-asjs >>> and >>> >>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that >>>would >>> >>>>> work >>> >>>>> well. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> ‹peter >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs"
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
OK, put in a request for royale-docs. On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi Alex, > >+1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1] >started >and move all his already gathered information in that structure where in >your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or into >royale-asjs as Wiki ? > >Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ? > >[1] >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co >m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2 >b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63642614837572 >6455=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D=0 > >Thanks, >Piotr > > >2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > >> royale-docs is good. >> >> > On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > I prefer royale-docs >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Om >> > >> > On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >>wrote: >> > >> >> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to >>point >> to. >> >> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or >> whatever >> >> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in 'master' >> branch >> >> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on >> >> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)" >> >> >> >> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should have >>some >> >> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our >>non-ASDoc >> >> user documentation. >> >> >> >> Thoughts? >> >> -Alex >> >> >> >> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >> >> >> >>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per >> Apache >> >>> Project. >> >>> >> >>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product. Combining >> repos >> >>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples in >>the >> >>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release >> schedule. >> >>> >> >>> My 2 cents, >> >>> -Alex >> >>> >> >>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website (i.e. >> Github >> >>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to tourjs >>in a >> >>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on >>how to >> >>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the components. >>They >> >>>> seem separate and complimentary. >> >>>> >> >>>> Harbs >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <p...@adobe.com.INVALID> >> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from >>royale-asjs >> and >> >>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that >>would >> >>>>> work >> >>>>> well. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> ‹peter >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option and >>they >> >>>>>> want >> >>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1] >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website? >>Does >> >>>>>> anyone >> >>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those? >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> At what point d
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Hi, I started work on a Quick Start guide [1] to bridge the gap between the README (source setup and build) and any in-depth documentation. It will simply be the steps I took to get a project compiling on my machine. I had to gather the information from various places and I thought it'd be nice if other newbies like me didn't have to dig as deep, but could set up and execute their local dev installation in a reasonable amount of time. EdB 1: https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Alex, > > +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1] started > and move all his already gathered information in that structure where in > your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or into > royale-asjs as Wiki ? > > Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ? > > [1] https://github.com/ok-at-github/flexjs-docs/wiki > > Thanks, > Piotr > > > 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > > > royale-docs is good. > > > > > On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > I prefer royale-docs > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Om > > > > > > On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > wrote: > > > > > >> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to point > > to. > > >> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or > > whatever > > >> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in 'master' > > branch > > >> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on > > >> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)" > > >> > > >> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should have > some > > >> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our > non-ASDoc > > >> user documentation. > > >> > > >> Thoughts? > > >> -Alex > > >> > > >> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > >> > > >>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per > > Apache > > >>> Project. > > >>> > > >>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product. Combining > > repos > > >>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples in > the > > >>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release > > schedule. > > >>> > > >>> My 2 cents, > > >>> -Alex > > >>> > > >>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website (i.e. > > Github > > >>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to tourjs > in a > > >>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on how > to > > >>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the components. > They > > >>>> seem separate and complimentary. > > >>>> > > >>>> Harbs > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <p...@adobe.com.INVALID> > > wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from royale-asjs > > and > > >>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that > would > > >>>>> work > > >>>>> well. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> ‹peter > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option and > they > > >>>>>> want > > >>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1] > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> What about royale-typed
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Hi Alex, +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1] started and move all his already gathered information in that structure where in your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or into royale-asjs as Wiki ? Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ? [1] https://github.com/ok-at-github/flexjs-docs/wiki Thanks, Piotr 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > royale-docs is good. > > > On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > I prefer royale-docs > > > > Thanks, > > Om > > > > On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > > > >> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to point > to. > >> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or > whatever > >> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in 'master' > branch > >> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on > >> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)" > >> > >> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should have some > >> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our non-ASDoc > >> user documentation. > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> -Alex > >> > >> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > >> > >>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per > Apache > >>> Project. > >>> > >>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product. Combining > repos > >>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples in the > >>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release > schedule. > >>> > >>> My 2 cents, > >>> -Alex > >>> > >>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website (i.e. > Github > >>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to tourjs in a > >>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on how to > >>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the components. They > >>>> seem separate and complimentary. > >>>> > >>>> Harbs > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <p...@adobe.com.INVALID> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from royale-asjs > and > >>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that would > >>>>> work > >>>>> well. > >>>>> > >>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples. > >>>>> > >>>>> ‹peter > >>>>> > >>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option and they > >>>>>> want > >>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website? Does > >>>>>> anyone > >>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples² repo? A > >>>>>> wiki > >>>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Harbs > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >> https%3A%2F%2Fiss > >>>>>> u > >>>>>> es > >>>>>> > >>>>>> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138% > >> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401 > >>>>>> % > >>>>>> 26 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels% > >> 3Acomment-tabpan > >>>>>> e > >>>>>> l% > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 23comment-16188401=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1 > >> 76d8%7 > >>>>>> C > >>>>>> fa > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688& > >> sdata=%2FSB > >>>>>> h > >>>>>> %2 > >>>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D=0 > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > -- Piotr Zarzycki mobile: +48 880 859 557 skype: zarzycki10 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> GitHub: https://github.com/piotrzarzycki21
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
royale-docs is good. > On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I prefer royale-docs > > Thanks, > Om > > On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > >> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to point to. >> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or whatever >> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in 'master' branch >> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on >> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)" >> >> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should have some >> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our non-ASDoc >> user documentation. >> >> Thoughts? >> -Alex >> >> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >> >>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per Apache >>> Project. >>> >>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product. Combining repos >>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples in the >>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release schedule. >>> >>> My 2 cents, >>> -Alex >>> >>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website (i.e. Github >>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to tourjs in a >>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on how to >>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the components. They >>>> seem separate and complimentary. >>>> >>>> Harbs >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <p...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from royale-asjs and >>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that would >>>>> work >>>>> well. >>>>> >>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples. >>>>> >>>>> ‹peter >>>>> >>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option and they >>>>>> want >>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1] >>>>>> >>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers. >>>>>> >>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website? Does >>>>>> anyone >>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those? >>>>>> >>>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples² repo? A >>>>>> wiki >>>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Harbs >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >> https%3A%2F%2Fiss >>>>>> u >>>>>> es >>>>>> >>>>>> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138% >> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401 >>>>>> % >>>>>> 26 >>>>>> >>>>>> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels% >> 3Acomment-tabpan >>>>>> e >>>>>> l% >>>>>> >>>>>> 23comment-16188401=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1 >> 76d8%7 >>>>>> C >>>>>> fa >>>>>> >>>>>> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688& >> sdata=%2FSB >>>>>> h >>>>>> %2 >>>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D=0 >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
I prefer royale-docs Thanks, Om On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to point to. > Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or whatever > name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in 'master' branch > or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on > apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)" > > Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should have some > other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our non-ASDoc > user documentation. > > Thoughts? > -Alex > > On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > >I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per Apache > >Project. > > > >It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product. Combining repos > >for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples in the > >IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release schedule. > > > >My 2 cents, > >-Alex > > > >On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website (i.e. Github > >>Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to tourjs in a > >>way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on how to > >>use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the components. They > >>seem separate and complimentary. > >> > >>Harbs > >> > >> > >>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <p...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > >>> > >>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from royale-asjs and > >>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that would > >>>work > >>> well. > >>> > >>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples. > >>> > >>> ‹peter > >>> > >>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option and they > >>>>want > >>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1] > >>>> > >>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers. > >>>> > >>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website? Does > >>>>anyone > >>>> see a reason for a wiki in those? > >>>> > >>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples² repo? A > >>>>wiki > >>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Harbs > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>[1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > https%3A%2F%2Fiss > >>>>u > >>>>es > >>>> > >>>>.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138% > 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401 > >>>>% > >>>>26 > >>>> > >>>>page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels% > 3Acomment-tabpan > >>>>e > >>>>l% > >>>> > >>>>23comment-16188401=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1 > 76d8%7 > >>>>C > >>>>fa > >>>> > >>>>7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688& > sdata=%2FSB > >>>>h > >>>>%2 > >>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D=0 > >>> > >> > > > >
Re: Github wikis
Hi, I don't see to much reason for having royale-website wiki - as long as we decide where actually documentation goes. Another repo for examples, does examples which we already have ? I believe that is good that we are shipping examples along with our framework repo - How we will ship that ? Piotr 2017-10-02 20:32 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website (i.e. Github > Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to tourjs in a way, > but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on how to use > Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the components. They seem > separate and complimentary. > > Harbs > > > > On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <p...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > > > I have been thinking that examples should be moved from royale-asjs and > > put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that would work > > well. > > > > Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples. > > > > ‹peter > > > > On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option and they want > >> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1] > >> > >> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers. > >> > >> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website? Does > anyone > >> see a reason for a wiki in those? > >> > >> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples² repo? A wiki > >> would probably be appropriate on something like that. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Harbs > >> > >> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > https%3A%2F%2Fissues > >> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138% > 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401%26 > >> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels% > 3Acomment-tabpanel% > >> 23comment-16188401=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1 > 76d8%7Cfa > >> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688& > sdata=%2FSBh%2 > >> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D=0 > > > > -- Piotr Zarzycki mobile: +48 880 859 557 skype: zarzycki10 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> GitHub: https://github.com/piotrzarzycki21
Re: Github wikis
I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per Apache Project. It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product. Combining repos for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples in the IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release schedule. My 2 cents, -Alex On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website (i.e. Github >Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to tourjs in a >way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on how to >use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the components. They >seem separate and complimentary. > >Harbs > > >> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <p...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >> >> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from royale-asjs and >> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that would >>work >> well. >> >> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples. >> >> ‹peter >> >> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option and they >>>want >>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1] >>> >>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers. >>> >>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website? Does >>>anyone >>> see a reason for a wiki in those? >>> >>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples² repo? A >>>wiki >>> would probably be appropriate on something like that. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Harbs >>> >>> >>>[1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissu >>>es >>> >>>.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401% >>>26 >>> >>>page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpane >>>l% >>> >>>23comment-16188401=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c176d8%7C >>>fa >>> >>>7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688=%2FSBh >>>%2 >>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D=0 >> >
