Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.2 RC2

FYI - About 6 hours prior to this email Alex asked Henk on users@infra about the ant tooling that produces nonconforming extensions. I’m not sure that’s the correct list, but he is looking into correcting the issue that Justin brought to our attention. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.2 RC2

Correction; KEYS file MUST be in the distribution directory as well. On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > It may be that everyone is ignoring Justin, so I thought I would provide > the link; http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution.html#sigs-and > -sums > > > The nam

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.2 RC2

It may be that everyone is ignoring Justin, so I thought I would provide the link; http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution.html#sigs-and-sums The names of signature and checksum files *MUST* be formed by adding to the name of the artifact the following suffixes: .asc for a (ASCII armored)

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.2 RC2

Hi, The sha files have the wrong extension, I mentioned that some time ago here. [1] The extension maters due to how hashes and the mirror system interact. They can be easily renamed to be correct (i.e.ending in .sha512 not .SHA-512) and there’s no need to revote/make another RC due to this. T

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.2 RC2

Maven reported 3 unknown licenses in the asjs sources: 3 Unknown Licenses * Files with unapproved licenses: lib/external/antlr-LICENSE.html lib/external/lzma-sdk-LICENSE.html templates/swfobject/swfobject.js Thanks, Piotr 2018-03-13 19

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.2 RC2

B-) > On Mar 13, 2018, at 6:33 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > Hopefully we can do it without too many emails.

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.2 RC2

On 3/13/18, 5:12 AM, "Harbs" wrote: >The top-level release notes seem to be missing a lot of improvements. > >What populates the main RELEASE_NOTES file? > >Do we care that it seems to be incomplete? A human populates both release notes files. I didn't want to duplicate and aggregate all 3 re

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.2 RC2

Hi Piotr, No idea. You might try removing the apache-rat jars from the lib folder in wherever ANT_HOME is pointing and the script will download them again. HTH, -Alex On 3/13/18, 1:19 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >Hi Alex, > >I got first shot with ApprovalScript and got this [1]. I have ant ra

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.2 RC2

The top-level release notes seem to be missing a lot of improvements. Here’s what I get in the top-level RELEASE_NOTES: https://paste.apache.org/WumV And here’s what’s in Royale-asjs RELEASE_NOTES.md: https://paste.apache.org/JEgq W

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.2 RC2

Guys, In order to test Maven artifacts in actions I have prepared settings template. [1] 1) Place link to staged artifacts in url tags - Link is available in VOTE thread 2) In your application pom change version of your dependencies to "0.9.2" 3) Run mvn clean install -s settings-rc-vote.xml [1]

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.2 RC2

Hi Alex, I got first shot with ApprovalScript and got this [1]. I have ant rat jar in place, do you have any idea what am I missing ? [1] https://paste.apache.org/Ld1G Thanks, Piotr 2018-03-13 8:49 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > > > >This is the discussion thread. RC1 never happened due to a bad >

[DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.2 RC2

> >This is the discussion thread. RC1 never happened due to a bad >RELEASE_NOTES file. > >Changes in this RC include: >- Updating the top-level RELEASE_NOTES from royale-asjs/releasemgr > >The MenuExample fails to build, so the Approval Script will not run >examples. > >Thanks, >Alex Harui >