Re: Podling Report Reminder - November 2018

[Sergio Fernández]

LGTM

The only tooic I may extend it a bit would be the graduation: It's been
almost three years incubating. I don't see how the podling could graduate
given the current shape. Should be discuss alternatives? I'd love to see
that captured in the report.


On Thu, Oct 25, 2018, 03:01 daewon  wrote:

> Hi folks.
>
> Here I try to write the report for.
>
> Please feel free to comment.
>
> --
>
> S2Graph
>
> S2Graph is a distributed and scalable OLTP graph database built on Apache
> HBase to support fast traversal of extremely large graphs.
>
> S2Graph has been incubating since 2015-11-29.
>
> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>
>   1. Make a third release.
>   2. Attract more users and contributors.
>   3. Build the developer community in both size and diversity.
>
> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to beaware
> of?
>
>   None
>
> How has the community developed since the last report?
>
>   * In ACNA 2018, we announced S2Graph as the title of the Apache
> S2Graph(incubating) with the build data management platform and audience
> targeting online application system using Graph Database.
> -
> https://apachecon.dukecon.org/acna/2018/#/scheduledEvent/835a6adcab1ce83a0
>
>   * There were some questions from the community about the introduction of
> S2Graph.
>
> How has the project developed since the last report?
>
>   * We have received some inquiries from the community and created an issue
> that does not solve it yet.
> - 5 issues are created and 0 of them are resolved since the last
> report(Sep 2018).
>
> How would you assess the podling's maturity?
> Please feel free to add your own commentary.
>
>   [ ] Initial setup
>   [ ] Working towards first release
>   [X] Community building
>   [ ] Nearing graduation
>   [ ] Other:
>
> Date of last release:
>
>   2017-08-26
>
> When were the last committers or PPMC members elected?
>
>   None
>
> Signed-off-by:
>
>   [ ](s2graph) Andrew Purtell
>  Comments:
>   [ ](s2graph) Seetharam Venkatesh
>  Comments:
>   [ ](s2graph) Sergio Fernández
>  Comments:
>

Re: Podling Report Reminder - September 2018

[Sergio Fernández]

I guess community is gonna be hard. In three years most of the contributors
(if not all) come from the same company that donated the original source
base.

Would be an option to graduate as a subproject of an existing TLP? I don't
know, TinkerPop?

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 5:15 AM Hwansung Yu  wrote:

> As Doyung said in previous report emails, three things are important for
> graduation.
>
> 1. Make a third release.
> 2. Attract more users and contributors.
> 3. Build the developer community in both size and diversity.
>
> The third release is what we have to discuss and do in the community.
>
> Increasing user and contirubutor and activating community seem like the
> same issue on board.
>
> Previously (in November 2016, when I looked up the mail) there was a
> discussion to add a new committer, but the committer was not added. how you
> think about finishing this discussion and adding a committer.
>
> I think most graph database projects has small community compared to other
> major apache projects.
> So I think it is not easy to make new users or developers feel attractive.
> But small communities are not always meaningless projects.
>
> What are some ways to activate our community? Can you help me?
>
> 2018년 9월 10일 (월) 14:52, Sergio Fernández 님이 작성:
>
> > signed-off
> >
> > I think we should discuss the future of the podling sooner than later. I
> > can see the graduation farther than ever.
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 2, 2018, 20:33 DO YUNG YOON  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi folks.
> > >
> > > I was bit busy during the last 2 month and missed our podling report
> for
> > > August.
> > >
> > > Here I try to write the report for September.
> > >
> > > Please feel free to comment.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > S2Graph
> > >
> > > S2Graph is a distributed and scalable OLTP graph database built on
> Apache
> > > HBase to support fast traversal of extremely large graphs.
> > >
> > > S2Graph has been incubating since 2015-11-29.
> > >
> > > Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
> > >
> > > 1. Make a third release.
> > > 2. Attract more users and contributors.
> > > 3. Build the developer community in both size and diversity.
> > >
> > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> > > aware of?
> > >
> > > None
> > >
> > > How has the community developed since the last report?
> > >
> > > * not much activities on the mailing list.
> > > * few active committers spend their time working on opened issues.
> > >
> > > How has the project developed since the last report?
> > >
> > > * mostly still working on opened issues.
> > >   - 22 issues are created and 16 of them are resolved since the last
> > > report(June 2018).
> > >   - keep working on GraphQL integration/OLAP supports.
> > >
> > > How would you assess the podling's maturity?
> > > Please feel free to add your own commentary.
> > >
> > > [ ] Initial setup
> > > [ ] Working towards first release
> > > [x] Community building
> > > [ ] Nearing graduation
> > > [ ] Other:
> > >
> > > Date of last release:
> > >
> > > 2017-08-26
> > >
> > > When were the last committers or PPMC members elected?
> > >
> > > None
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by:
> > >
> > > [ ](s2graph) Andrew Purtell
> > > Comments:
> > > [ ](s2graph) Seetharam Venkatesh
> > > Comments:
> > > [ ](s2graph) Sergio Fernández
> > > Comments:
> > >
> > > IPMC/Shepherd notes:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 9:55 AM  wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dear podling,
> > > >
> > > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> > > > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time
> to
> > > > prepare your quarterly board report.
> > > >
> > > > The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 September 2018, 10:30 am
> > PDT.
> > > > The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> > > > report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2
> weeks
> > > > before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> > > > submission (Wed, September 05).
> > > >

Re: Podling Report Reminder - September 2018

[Sergio Fernández]

signed-off

I think we should discuss the future of the podling sooner than later. I
can see the graduation farther than ever.

On Sun, Sep 2, 2018, 20:33 DO YUNG YOON  wrote:

> Hi folks.
>
> I was bit busy during the last 2 month and missed our podling report for
> August.
>
> Here I try to write the report for September.
>
> Please feel free to comment.
>
>
>
> S2Graph
>
> S2Graph is a distributed and scalable OLTP graph database built on Apache
> HBase to support fast traversal of extremely large graphs.
>
> S2Graph has been incubating since 2015-11-29.
>
> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>
> 1. Make a third release.
> 2. Attract more users and contributors.
> 3. Build the developer community in both size and diversity.
>
> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> aware of?
>
> None
>
> How has the community developed since the last report?
>
> * not much activities on the mailing list.
> * few active committers spend their time working on opened issues.
>
> How has the project developed since the last report?
>
> * mostly still working on opened issues.
>   - 22 issues are created and 16 of them are resolved since the last
> report(June 2018).
>   - keep working on GraphQL integration/OLAP supports.
>
> How would you assess the podling's maturity?
> Please feel free to add your own commentary.
>
> [ ] Initial setup
> [ ] Working towards first release
> [x] Community building
> [ ] Nearing graduation
> [ ] Other:
>
> Date of last release:
>
> 2017-08-26
>
> When were the last committers or PPMC members elected?
>
> None
>
> Signed-off-by:
>
> [ ](s2graph) Andrew Purtell
> Comments:
> [ ](s2graph) Seetharam Venkatesh
> Comments:
> [ ](s2graph) Sergio Fernández
> Comments:
>
> IPMC/Shepherd notes:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 9:55 AM  wrote:
>
> > Dear podling,
> >
> > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
> > prepare your quarterly board report.
> >
> > The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 September 2018, 10:30 am PDT.
> > The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> > report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
> > before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> > submission (Wed, September 05).
> >
> > Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
> > PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
> > very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
> > meeting.
> >
> > Candidate names should not be made public before people are actually
> > elected, so please do not include the names of potential committers or
> > PPMC members in your report.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > The Apache Incubator PMC
> >
> > Submitting your Report
> >
> > --
> >
> > Your report should contain the following:
> >
> > *   Your project name
> > *   A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
> > the project or necessarily of its field
> > *   A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> > towards graduation.
> > *   Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> > aware of
> > *   How has the community developed since the last report
> > *   How has the project developed since the last report.
> > *   How does the podling rate their own maturity.
> >
> > This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
> >
> > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2018
> >
> > Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
> > this page is created from a template.
> >
> > Mentors
> > ---
> >
> > Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
> > the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
> > following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
> > for the Incubator PMC.
> >
> > Incubator PMC
> >
>

Re: State of S2Graph

[Sergio Fernández]

Hi John,

I apologise, last month report time was a very bad personal time for me, so
I missed it.

Overall IMO the podling is lacking community growing out of the original
company the source was donated. Very few active committers, a from the same
org. We have discussed few times what could be a viable plan, but we never
reached any conclusion. So maybe it's a goid time to put the topic on the
table for the good of the project.

Greetings,

On Sat, Jun 2, 2018, 05:23 John D. Ament  wrote:

> All,
>
> Last month the S2Graph podling provided a report, but did not receive
> mentor sign off.  I don't see any activity from mentors on list, but I do
> see some activity from the podling.
>
> I just want to check, is there enough activity on the podling?  Are the
> mentors available to review the actions of the podling?
>
> John
>

Re: Podling Report Reminder - November 2017

[Sergio Fernández]

LGTM. Signing it off.

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 6:06 PM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I tried to write November report and here it is. please review.
>
> S2Graph is a distributed and scalable OLTP graph database built on Apache
> HBase to support fast traversal of extremely large graphs.
>
> S2Graph has been incubating since 2015-11-29.
>
> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>
>   1. Make a third release.
>   2. Attract more users and contributors.
>   3. Build the developer community in both size and diversity.
>
> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> aware of?
>
>   None
>
> How has the community developed since the last report?
>
>   * We had our second official release 0.2.0 on Aug 26th 2017.
>   * There have been 2 PR from a new contributor
> How has the project developed since the last report?
>
>   * Discuss the scope of next release.
> - New Feature: Provide java client. (on going S2GRAPH-80)
> - New Feature: Support more storage backend implementation. (ongoing
> S2GRAPH-169, S2GRAPH-166)
> - New Feature: Support more Index Provider implementation. (not
> started)
> - New Feature: Implement TinkerPop`s Graph Compute for OLAP support
> (not started)
>
> How would you assess the podling's maturity?
> Please feel free to add your own commentary.
>
>   [ ] Initial setup
>   [ ] Working towards first release
>   [x] Community building
>   [ ] Nearing graduation
>   [ ] Other:
>
> Date of last release:
>
>   2017-08-26
>
> When were the last committers or PPMC members elected?
>
>   None
>
> Signed-off-by:
>
>   [ ](s2graph) Andrew Purtell
>  Comments:
>   [ ](s2graph) Seetharam Venkatesh
>  Comments:
>   [ ](s2graph) Sergio Fernández
>  Comments:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 9:11 PM <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Dear podling,
> >
> > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
> > prepare your quarterly board report.
> >
> > The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 15 November 2017, 10:30 am PDT.
> > The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> > report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
> > before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> > submission (Wed, November 01).
> >
> > Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
> > PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
> > very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
> > meeting.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > The Apache Incubator PMC
> >
> > Submitting your Report
> >
> > --
> >
> > Your report should contain the following:
> >
> > *   Your project name
> > *   A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
> > the project or necessarily of its field
> > *   A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> > towards graduation.
> > *   Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> > aware of
> > *   How has the community developed since the last report
> > *   How has the project developed since the last report.
> > *   How does the podling rate their own maturity.
> >
> > This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
> >
> > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2017
> >
> > Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
> > this page is created from a template.
> >
> > Mentors
> > ---
> >
> > Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
> > the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
> > following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
> > for the Incubator PMC.
> >
> > Incubator PMC
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] milestone for next release

[Sergio Fernández]

This is going to be your third incubator release. Since community growth is
not yet reached, do you want to discuss mid-term approaches to exit
Incubator?

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:37 PM, daewon  wrote:

> Every suggestion looks good. 1. Java Client Is `JavaClient` related to
> Admin Interface? If you exclude `Admin Interface`, use Tinkerpop Interface
> as main Java Interface. In this case, however, it is likely to lose the
> advantage of Asynchronous Traverse, a feature of S2Graph. If need to
> implement it separately for the above reason, we should use `S2Edge,
> S2Vertex` from Tinkerpop implemention as POJO. and JavaClient should
> include a query builder.
> Given the user base, the provision of JavaClient is likely to be
> meaningful.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:29 PM DO YUNG YOON  wrote:
>
> > Hi folks.
> >
> > I want to discuss milestone for next release.
> >
> > Here is a my list that I wish include in next release. Please feel free
> to
> > correct me or add more issues I missed.
> >
> > 1. Java Client
> >
> > even though it is possible to use scala code in java, using scala code in
> > java project is frustrating. since there are more java users than scala
> > users, I think it is reasonable to provide both java and scala client.
> >
> > Regarding client, tinkerpop related codes are currently mixed with
> > s2graph's core scala code. it would be better if we can separate these
> two.
> > I think chainging tinkerpop related codes into java could make things
> easy
> > but not sure before try out.
> >
> > 2. Storage Backend
> >
> > I think it would be great if we can provide more storage backend.
> > personally, I really liked tinker graph which store data in memory, for
> > development and test. I suggest providing local storage data so users
> > without HBase can try out s2graph more easily. Also by trying to add new
> > storage backend, we can identify what need to be improved on our storage
> > interface. I think redis, cassandra, mysql, postgresql can be integrated
> > with s2graph as storage backend in theory, but have to try implementing
> > them to make sure they are possible.
> >
> > 3. Index Provider
> >
> > current implementation only use local lucene for global index.
> distributed
> > index provider, such as solr, elastic search seems more practical and it
> > would be great addition also.
> >
> > 4. Graph Compute
> >
> > it would be great if we can explore integrate with existing OLAP
> framework
> > from TinkerPop so our users not only run OLTP query but also run OLAP
> query
> > with data alread stored in s2graph.
> >
> > About schedule for next release, I would suggest to build next release
> > candidate at end of september.
> >
> > I don't expect all of above to be included on our next release scope,
> but I
> > think they are at least worth to discuss.
> >
> > What you guys think?
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache S2Graph(incubating) 0.2.0 release RC3

[Sergio Fernández]

Hi,

+1 (binding)

So far I've successfully checked:

* signatures and digests
* source releases file layouts
* matched git tags and commit ids
* incubator suffix and disclaimer
* NOTICE and LICENSE files
* license headers
* clean build (Java 1.8.0_131, Scala, 2.11.8, SBT 0.13.12, Debian amd64)

With respect to my vote to RC2:

* S2GRAPH-159 has been fixed.
* S2GRAPH-160 has been minimized, not fixed, but looks much better.
* S2GRAPH-161 is not fully right, because new CHANGES file shows a version
without the incubating suffix. As the file is not part of the release
tarball it should be fine, but would be nice to keep that very clear.

Thanks for the work on this new release!

Cheers,



On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 4:38 PM, DO YUNG YOON  wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I tried RC3 on ubuntu 16.04, SBT 0.13.9, SCALA 2.11.7, OpenJDK 1.8.0_91.
>
> Checked followings.
>
> 1. Checksums and PGP signatures are valid
> 2. Release consists of source code only, no binaries
> 3. DISCLAIMER is correct, filenames include "incubating", top level NOTICE
> and LICENSE files.
> 4. Check license header on files by following DEVELOPMENT.md.
> 5. Test if I can run `bin/example.sh` after build using `sbt package`.
> 6. `sbt compile`, `sbt test:compile` to see any compile errors.
> 7. `sbt "project loader" assembly`, `sbt "project s2counter_loader"`
> assembly to see executable jar successfully built from source.
> 8. `sbt test` to see if all test cases passed.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 7:31 AM DO YUNG YOON  wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > This is a call for a releasing Apache S2Graph 0.2.0-incubating, release
> > candidate 3.
> >
> > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/0.
> 2.0-incubating-RC3
> >
> > The tag to be voted upon is v0.2.0-incubating-rc3:
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s2graph.
> git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.2.0-incubating-rc3
> >
> > The release hash is b66a56e39c250c8626286c4f4612c1f4b78adcf1:
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s2graph.
> git;a=commit;h=b66a56e39c250c8626286c4f4612c1f4b78adcf1
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/KEYS
> >
> > Once download source, please look into README.md to build from source.
> >
> > Notable changes from 0.1.0 is providing tinkerpop3
> integration(S2GRAPH-72,
> > S2GRAPH-151).
> >
> > Changes from rc2 is following.
> >
> > - S2GRAPH-159: Wrong syntax at a bash script under Linux
> > - S2GRAPH-161: Update CHANGES file for 0.2.0 release
> > - S2GRAPH-160: Remove warning while package
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless objection I will try
> > to close it Tuesday August 15 if we have sufficient votes.
> >
> > Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> > including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
> > please vote:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.2.0
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > DOYUNG YOON.
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache S2Graph(incubating) 0.2.0 release RC2

[Sergio Fernández]

Hi,

apologize for the late vote.

-1 (binding)

So far I've successfully checked:
* signatures and digests
* source releases file layouts
* matched git tags and commit ids
* incubator suffix and disclaimer
* NOTICE and LICENSE files
* license headers
* clean build (Java 1.8.0_131, Scala, 2.11.8, SBT 0.13.12, Debian amd64)

I still got quite some warnings on the build, as happened for
0.1.0-incubating.

But why I vote negatively to the release it isn't any formal requirement,
but a functional error I think should be easy to fix:

$ sh bin/start-s2graph.sh
bin/start-s2graph.sh: 22:
/home/wikier/tmp/s2graph/apache-s2graph-0.2.0-incubating-src/bin/s2graph-env.sh:
Bad substitution

Already reported as S2GRAPH-159. I'll provide a patch to fix it.

BTW, the file https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/0.
2.0-incubating-RC2/CHANGES claims changes for "Release 0.1.0 - unreleased".

Best,


On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 10:10 AM, DO YUNG YOON  wrote:

> Hi all
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache S2Graph 0.2.0-incubating, release
> candidate 2.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/0.
> 2.0-incubating-RC2
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.2.0-incubating-rc2:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s2graph.
> git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.2.0-incubating-rc2
>
> The release hash is 917475b62d68ac952716df5d8ce6465656ec1f25:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s2graph.
> git;a=commit;h=917475b62d68ac952716df5d8ce6465656ec1f25
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/KEYS
>
> Once download source, please look into README.md to build from source.
>
> Notable changes from 0.1.0 is providing tinkerpop3 integration(S2GRAPH-72,
> S2GRAPH-151).
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless objection I will try to
> close it Wednesday August 9 if we have sufficient votes.
>
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.2.0
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks,
> DOYUNG YOON.
>

Re: Need mentor sign off on the S2Graph report

[Sergio Fernández]

Doyung, release candidate would need to get at least 3 binding votes. If
you don't get them from dev@s2graph, you would need to go to
general@incubator. Mentors or not, every IPMC member counts here.

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 8:08 AM, DO YUNG YOON  wrote:

> Hi John.
>
> I was wondering what podlings supposed to do if we failed to get sign off
> from our mentors.
>
> Also we opened up vote for new release candidates(
> http://markmail.org/message/i7ix3rqk7ishp4r3) and we still need binding
> vote from our mentors. I am also wondering what RM should do to proceed
> incubator release process in case when mentors are not available.
>
> Best Regards.
> Doyung Yoon
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:58 AM John D. Ament 
> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Just a reminder, we need at least one mentor to sign off on the S2 Graph
> > report.  If no one can get to it in the next 24 hours I'll need to move
> the
> > podling to monthly and expect a report next month.
> >
> > John
> >
>

Re: Need mentor sign off on the S2Graph report

[Sergio Fernández]

Apologize for not being able to be around much lately. I'm moving to work
to another continent, so last weeks have been very difficult for me.

Thanks Andrew for signing the report.

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Andrew Purtell  wrote:

> Yes, s2graph is very stable. I would like to see community growth, but this
> project's focus is specialist. I think we'd just want to ensure there are
> enough active folks on the PPMC so they will be able to function.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:48 AM, John D. Ament 
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Andrew.  Just wondering, is S2Graph stable enough to graduate?
> >
> > John
> >
> > On 2017-08-10 13:53, Andrew Purtell  wrote:
> > > I signed off with the comment
> > >
> > >  "We need to find more mentors for this podling. In the past
> > >  Sergio was helpful but he hasn't been around much recently. I
> would
> > >  resign but am lurking as mentor of last resort."
> > >
> > > and removed s2graph from the list of podlings missing signoff. (This
> > time.)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Andrew Purtell 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I can sign off this time. Normally I would have resigned by now but
> am
> > > > lurking enough to be a last resort. Thanks for bringing this to my
> > > > attention. We should find more mentors for S2Graph. The current
> > situation
> > > > is quite unfair to them.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:58 PM, John D. Ament  >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> All,
> > > >>
> > > >> Just a reminder, we need at least one mentor to sign off on the S2
> > Graph
> > > >> report.  If no one can get to it in the next 24 hours I'll need to
> > move
> > > >> the
> > > >> podling to monthly and expect a report next month.
> > > >>
> > > >> John
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Andrew
> > > >
> > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from
> truth's
> > > > decrepit hands
> > > >- A23, Crosstalk
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > > Andrew
> > >
> > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
> > > decrepit hands
> > >- A23, Crosstalk
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrew
>
> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
> decrepit hands
>- A23, Crosstalk
>

Re: Podling Report Reminder - May 2017

[Sergio Fernández]

signed-off, thx!

On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 6:35 AM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Here is my draft for the report this time.
>
>
> S2Graph
>
> S2Graph is a distributed and scalable OLTP graph database built on Apache
> HBase to support fast traversal of extremely large graphs.
>
> S2Graph has been incubating since 2015-11-29.
>
> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>
>   1. Make a second release.
>   2. Attract more users and contributors.
>   3. Build the developer community in both size and diversity.
>
> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> aware of?
>
>   None
>
> How has the community developed since the last report?
>
>   * Mailing lists have been quiet.
> - one inquery on full text search feature support.
>
> How has the project developed since the last report(Feb 2017)?
>
>   * Development has been quiet.
> - Working on Integration with Apache TinkerPop3
>   - StructureStandardSuite has been passed.
>   - ProcessStandardSuite has been begun. 325/582 passed, 257 failed.
>
>   * Issues resolved/created: 0/1
>
> Date of last release:
>
>   Apache S2Graph 0.1.0-incubating on 2016-11-01.
>
> When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
>
>   None
>
> Signed-off-by:
>
>   [ ](s2graph) Andrew Purtell
>   [ ](s2graph) Seetharam Venkatesh
>   [ ](s2graph) Sergio Fernández
>
>
> Following is my random thought.
>
> Personally, I was not-active for a while and got back on April then started
> to work on ISSUE-136. As it turns out validating S2Graph's tinkerpop
> integration is way more than just one issue. I think making issue very
> specific and clear can help interested folks to start.
>
> For example, in ISSUE-136
>
> 1. I had to setup test environment for gremlin-tests which I spend lots of
> time to figure out what is expected schema for each tests.
> 2. Actually implement interfaces.
> 3. Validate if implementation is correct.
> 4. Check if test case assumption is also applicable to s2graph. there are
> lots of test cases, which are either dependents or independents.
>
> I think in this case, it would be much easier for interested folks to
> involve if each test cases separated as each independent issues.
>
> Also I feel that we have not set clear milestone for the release. what to
> be included must be discussed first, then we should focus on issues that
> related to upcoming release. tinkerpop3 support has been in my mind for
> milesone for 0.2.0 release, but never been decided and discussed through
> mailing list.
>
> I am happy to volunteer above if other folks agrees.
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:10 PM Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Who volunteers for reporting this time?
> >
> > I'd like to use this report to discuss where the podling is going. The
> > community looks very quite. And I don't see development since December:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-s2graph/commits/master Options on
> the
> > table are many, but I;'d like to gather more feedback.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 2:41 AM, <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Dear podling,
> > >
> > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> > > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
> > > prepare your quarterly board report.
> > >
> > > The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 17 May 2017, 10:30 am PDT.
> > > The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> > > report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
> > > before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> > > submission (Wed, May 03).
> > >
> > > Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
> > > PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
> > > very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
> > > meeting.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > The Apache Incubator PMC
> > >
> > > Submitting your Report
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Your report should contain the following:
> > >
> > > *   Your project name
> > > *   A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
> > > the project or necessarily of its field
> > > *   A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> > > towards graduation.
> > > *   Any 

Re: Podling Report Reminder - February 2017

[Sergio Fernández]

Thanks. Signed-off.

For the next report I'd like to see some discussion where the project and
the community are going. I fear graduation is now a hard goal given the
evolution of the community during incubation. But we may think about other
options...

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 1:06 PM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I just updated our podling report on wiki for Feb, 2017 and Here it is.
> Please review.
>
>
> S2Graph
>
> S2Graph is a distributed and scalable OLTP graph database built on Apache
> HBase to support fast traversal of extremely large graphs.
>
> S2Graph has been incubating since 2015-11-29.
>
> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>
>   1. Make a second release.
>   2. Attract more users and contributors.
>   3. Build the developer community in both size and diversity.
>
> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be aware
> of?
>
>   None
>
> How has the community developed since the last report?
>
>   * Participated in Apache Big Data and ApacheCon Europe, Sevilla, Spain.
> - Core:
> https://apachebigdataeu2016.sched.com/event/8U0O/graph-
> processing-with-apache-tinkerpop-on-apache-s2graph-doyung-yoon-kakao-corp
> - Use case:
> https://apachebigdataeu2016.sched.com/event/8U0P/apache-
> s2graph-incubating-as-a-user-event-hub-hyunsung-jo-daewon-
> jeong-hwansung-yu-kakao-corp
>
>   * Discussion regarding adding new committers is in progress.
>
> How has the project developed since the last report?
>
>   * Integration with Apache TinkerPop3 has begun.
>
>   * Discussion regarding second release is in progress.
>
>   * Issues created - resolved: 25 - 19
>
> Date of last release:
>
>   Apache S2Graph 0.1.0-incubating on 2016-11-01.
>
> When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
>
>   None
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:03 PM <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Dear podling,
> >
> > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
> > prepare your quarterly board report.
> >
> > The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 15 February 2017, 10:30 am PDT.
> > The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> > report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
> > before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> > submission (Wed, February 01).
> >
> > Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
> > PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
> > very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
> > meeting.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > The Apache Incubator PMC
> >
> > Submitting your Report
> >
> > --
> >
> > Your report should contain the following:
> >
> > *   Your project name
> > *   A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
> > the project or necessarily of its field
> > *   A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> > towards graduation.
> > *   Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> > aware of
> > *   How has the community developed since the last report
> > *   How has the project developed since the last report.
> >
> > This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
> >
> > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2017
> >
> > Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
> > this page is created from a template.
> >
> > Mentors
> > ---
> >
> > Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
> > the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
> > following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
> > for the Incubator PMC.
> >
> > Incubator PMC
> >
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: Board Report

[Sergio Fernández]

signed

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 5:57 PM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for reminding us John.
> I submit our board report and updated wiki yesterday.
>
>
> Following is our report for November.
>
> S2GraphS2Graph is a distributed and scalable OLTP graph database built
> on ApacheHBase to support fast traversal of extremely large
> graphs.S2Graph has been incubating since 2015-11-29.Three most
> important issues to address in the move towards graduation:  1. Make a
> release  2. Attract users and contributors  3. Foster more and diverse
> committersAny issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board
> wish/need to beaware of?  NoneHow has the community developed since
> the last report?  * Held two sessions on S2Graph: usecases *
> Deview: https://deview.kr/2016/schedule#session/160* TechPlanet:
> http://techplanet.skplanet.com/eng/speaker_track2.html#spk_trk2_5  *
> Started to discuss overhauling the website layout and contentsHow has
> the project developed since the last report?  * The first Apache
> release has been released on 2016-11-01.  * 30 issues are created, 32
> issues are resolved.Date of last release:  Apache S2Graph
> 0.1.0-incubating on 2016-11-01.When were the last committers or PMC
> members elected?  NoSigned-off-by:  [ ](s2graph) Andrew Purtell  [
> ](s2graph) Seetharam Venkatesh  [ ](s2graph) Sergio
> FernándezShepherd/Mentor notes:
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 7:18 AM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > S2Graph Podling,
> >
> > Please don't forget to submit your board report by end of day.
> >
> > John
> >
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache S2Graph 0.1.0-incubation RC6

[Sergio Fernández]

who manages the @s2graph account at twitter?
https://twitter.com/s2graph looks pretty abandoned
it'd be cool to have there 0.1.0-incubating announcement ;-)

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 7:48 AM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Sergio.
> Thanks for clarifying.
> Then I guess all we need to do is sending announce through mailing list for
> 0.1.0-incubating, then start work on next release ^^.
>
> I checked release on
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/s2graph/, and also
> checked if it is mirrored on
> http://apache.mirror.cdnetworks.com/incubator/s2graph/0.1.0-incubating/
>
> Finally I download release and follow steps on readme for build from
> source(`sbt package`) then test bin/example.sh and all seems good.
>
> Unless objection, I will send official announce tomorrow after read through
> https://lists.apache.org/list.html?annou...@apache.org tonight.
>
> Thanks
> DO YUNG
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 3:14 PM Sergio Fernández <
> sergio.fernan...@redlink.co> wrote:
>
> > (travelling with limited connectivity)
> >
> > Guys, I guess 0.1.0-incubating would be just a source release. You can't
> > modify the source that have been voted to release the Maven binary
> > artifacts. Therefore that needs to be done in a new release, 0.1.1 if you
> > just want to address the Maven packaging with no new features, 0.2.0 if
> you
> > want to wait for new stuff.
> >
> > BTW, repositoy.apache.org is synced with Maven Central. You should have
> > access with you ASF accounts, so you can start to push snapshots there
> > whenever the issue is fixed.
> >
> > On Oct 30, 2016 07:30, "Jong Wook Kim" <jongw...@nyu.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > S2GRAPH-115 is for the maven central upload, which is a separate
> problem
> > > with the binary release
> > >
> > > The binary release is what we make using ‘sbt package’, which should
> make
> > > easier for the first-time users to download and try out S2Graph; so I
> > > thought it would be nice to put this along with the announcement.
> > >
> > > Anyone can run ‘sbt package’, and it should be good to go, preferably
> > > after some testing on various OSX/linux platforms.
> > >
> > > BTW, as per S2GRAPH-115, I’m still figuring out how to do a Maven
> Central
> > > upload, any clarification would be appreciated.
> > >
> > > JW
> > >
> > > > On Oct 30, 2016, at 1:29 AM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I just uploaded RC6 into
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/s2graph/
> > > > I guess we need one day waiting while mirrors set up.
> > > >
> > > > @JW.
> > > >
> > > > I created tag 'v0.1.0-incubating', and removed RC tags.
> > > >
> > > > Depends on if how we are going to release binary to asf nexus, I
> think
> > we
> > > > need to change build.sbt so did not changed version in build.sbt yet.
> > > >
> > > > Regarding to binary release, can anyone(I think JW is already helping
> > > out)
> > > > help me figure out how to resolve S2GRAPH-115 ?
> > > >
> > > > One last question is should we announce 0.1.0 release or wait until
> > > binary
> > > > goes to asf nexus?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > > DOYUNG YOON
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 3:28 PM Jong Wook Kim <jongw...@nyu.edu>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I don’t think any further actions happened since the passing vote
> > email.
> > > >
> > > > So what comes in my mind for the next steps are:
> > > >
> > > > - tag v0.1.0 and remove the RC tags
> > > > - update the version in build.sbt to 0.1.1-SNAPSHOT
> > > > - upload the source release to ASF mirrors, and the binary release as
> > > well,
> > > > if possible. - the instructions are here <
> > > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#
> > > understanding-distribution
> > > >>
> > > > - publish the binary and source JAR to the Maven Central.
> > > > - announce the release and post the download links to mailing lists,
> at
> > > the
> > > > s2graph website, etc.
> > > >
> > > > As for the Maven Central release, we have S2GRAPH-115 <
> > > > https://issues.a

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache S2Graph 0.1.0-incubation RC6

[Sergio Fernández]

(travelling with limited connectivity)

Guys, I guess 0.1.0-incubating would be just a source release. You can't
modify the source that have been voted to release the Maven binary
artifacts. Therefore that needs to be done in a new release, 0.1.1 if you
just want to address the Maven packaging with no new features, 0.2.0 if you
want to wait for new stuff.

BTW, repositoy.apache.org is synced with Maven Central. You should have
access with you ASF accounts, so you can start to push snapshots there
whenever the issue is fixed.

On Oct 30, 2016 07:30, "Jong Wook Kim" <jongw...@nyu.edu> wrote:

> S2GRAPH-115 is for the maven central upload, which is a separate problem
> with the binary release
>
> The binary release is what we make using ‘sbt package’, which should make
> easier for the first-time users to download and try out S2Graph; so I
> thought it would be nice to put this along with the announcement.
>
> Anyone can run ‘sbt package’, and it should be good to go, preferably
> after some testing on various OSX/linux platforms.
>
> BTW, as per S2GRAPH-115, I’m still figuring out how to do a Maven Central
> upload, any clarification would be appreciated.
>
> JW
>
> > On Oct 30, 2016, at 1:29 AM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I just uploaded RC6 into
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/s2graph/
> > I guess we need one day waiting while mirrors set up.
> >
> > @JW.
> >
> > I created tag 'v0.1.0-incubating', and removed RC tags.
> >
> > Depends on if how we are going to release binary to asf nexus, I think we
> > need to change build.sbt so did not changed version in build.sbt yet.
> >
> > Regarding to binary release, can anyone(I think JW is already helping
> out)
> > help me figure out how to resolve S2GRAPH-115 ?
> >
> > One last question is should we announce 0.1.0 release or wait until
> binary
> > goes to asf nexus?
> >
> > Thanks.
> > DOYUNG YOON
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 3:28 PM Jong Wook Kim <jongw...@nyu.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I don’t think any further actions happened since the passing vote email.
> >
> > So what comes in my mind for the next steps are:
> >
> > - tag v0.1.0 and remove the RC tags
> > - update the version in build.sbt to 0.1.1-SNAPSHOT
> > - upload the source release to ASF mirrors, and the binary release as
> well,
> > if possible. - the instructions are here <
> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#
> understanding-distribution
> >>
> > - publish the binary and source JAR to the Maven Central.
> > - announce the release and post the download links to mailing lists, at
> the
> > s2graph website, etc.
> >
> > As for the Maven Central release, we have S2GRAPH-115 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/S2GRAPH-115> open for doing that,
> and
> > I have a few questions (@sergio):
> >
> > - I saw these instructions <
> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release-java.html>, which are largely
> > incomplete. We need to know how to get access for using
> org.apache.s2graph
> > groupId. Do we need to file a ticket to Sonatype OSSRH <
> > http://central.sonatype.org/pages/ossrh-guide.html>, or does ASF have a
> > separate mechanism for Maven Central publishing?
> > - What are the rules that the POMs and JARs should strictly follow? ASF’s
> > instruction <
> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release-java.html#jar-manifest> page
> is
> > just full of TODOs and doesn’t look very authoritative.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > JW
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Oct 27, 2016, at 9:23 AM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Do Yung, have you check the release has been already mirrored?
> >>
> >> Then it's time for announce it:
> >>
> >> * Minimum it should go to the mailing lists (dev@s2graph,
> > general@incubator,
> >> announce@apache); it's a good opportunity to reach a broader audience,
> so
> >> follow the example by others:
> >> https://lists.apache.org/list.html?annou...@apache.org
> >>
> >> * Also spread the work in Twitter or whatever creates some traction.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>> Good work, guys!
> >>>
> >>> Finally did you push binary maven artifacts to asf nexus? In that case
> >>> wait unti

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache S2Graph 0.1.0-incubation RC6

[Sergio Fernández]

Do Yung, have you check the release has been already mirrored?

Then it's time for announce it:

* Minimum it should go to the mailing lists (dev@s2graph, general@incubator,
announce@apache); it's a good opportunity to reach a broader audience, so
follow the example by others:
https://lists.apache.org/list.html?annou...@apache.org

* Also spread the work in Twitter or whatever creates some traction.

Thanks.


On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> wrote:

> Good work, guys!
>
> Finally did you push binary maven artifacts to asf nexus? In that case
> wait until they get mirrored http://search.maven.
> org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cs2graph before doing the official announcement.
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:56 AM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The vote for releasing Apache S2Graph 0.1.0-incubating passed with 3
>> binding +1s, 4 non-binding +1s, and no 0 or -1.
>>
>> Binding +1s:
>> Justin Mclean
>> Sergio Fernández
>> Michael Stack
>>
>> Thanks to everyone that tested our release and voted.
>>
>> DOYUNG YOON
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sergio Fernández
> Partner Technology Manager
> Redlink GmbH
> m: +43 6602747925
> e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
> w: http://redlink.co
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache S2Graph 0.1.0-incubation RC6

[Sergio Fernández]

Good work, guys!

Finally did you push binary maven artifacts to asf nexus? In that case wait
until they get mirrored http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cs2graph
before doing the official announcement.

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:56 AM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The vote for releasing Apache S2Graph 0.1.0-incubating passed with 3
> binding +1s, 4 non-binding +1s, and no 0 or -1.
>
> Binding +1s:
> Justin Mclean
> Sergio Fernández
> Michael Stack
>
> Thanks to everyone that tested our release and voted.
>
> DOYUNG YOON
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: [VOTE] Apache S2Graph(incubating) 0.1.0 release RC6

[Sergio Fernández]

+1 (binding)

So far I've successfully checked:
* signatures and digests
* source releases file layouts
* matched git tags and commit ids
* incubator suffix and disclaimer
* NOTICE and LICENSE files
* license headers
* clean build (Java 1.8.0_91, Scala, 2.11.7, SBT 0.13.9, Debian amd64)


I've got quite some new warning packing s2rest_play, just that you're aware.

Good work, guys!



On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:30 PM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache S2Graph 0.1.0-incubating, release
> candidate 6.
> This is the first release of S2Graph.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/0.
> 1.0-incubating-RC6/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.1.0-incubating-rc6:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s2graph.
> git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.1.0-incubating-rc6
>
> The release hash is 4325ff1303ce606909bc16b5cbee53c8a5b23653:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s2graph.
> git;a=commit;h=4325ff1303ce606909bc16b5cbee53c8a5b23653
>
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/KEYS
>
> Once download source, please look into README.md to build from source.
>
> Following issues are resolved.
>
> - S2GRAPH-117: Cleaner logging library usage.
> - S2GRAPH-118: Fix compile error on test cases on loader project.
> - S2GRAPH-120: Netty version is conflict with play 2.5.9.
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless objection I will try to
> close it Sunday September 25 if we have sufficient votes.
>
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks,
> DOYUNG YOON.
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: [VOTE] Apache S2Graph(incubating) 0.1.0 release RC5

[Sergio Fernández]

; StackOverflowError. See also
> > > > http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#log4jDelegationLoop for more
> details.
> > > >at
> > > >
> > org.apache.log4j.Log4jLoggerFactory.(Log4jLoggerFactory.java:51)
> > > >... 14 more
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 2:11 PM DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>
> > > >> I tried RC5 on ubuntu 16.04, SBT 0.13.9, SCALA 2.11.7, OpenJDK
> > 1.8.0_91.
> > > >>
> > > >> Checked followings.
> > > >>
> > > >> 1. Checksums and PGP signatures are valid
> > > >> 2. Release consists of source code only, no binaries
> > > >> 3. DISCLAIMER is correct, filenames include "incubating", top level
> > > NOTICE
> > > >> and LICENSE files.
> > > >> 4. Check license header on files.
> > > >> 5. Test if I can run `bin/example.sh` after build.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 2:13 PM DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi all
> > > >>>
> > > >>> This is a call for a releasing Apache S2Graph 0.1.0-incubating,
> > release
> > > >>> candidate 5.
> > > >>> This is the first release of S2Graph.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found
> > > at:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/0.
> 1.0-incubating-RC5/
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The tag to be voted upon is v0.1.0-incubating-rc5:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s2graph.
> git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.1.0-incubating-rc5
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The release hash is 4b6ffc2e357afc005b194d6d45710c2b041b00cb:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s2graph.
> git;a=commit;h=4b6ffc2e357afc005b194d6d45710c2b041b00cb
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/KEYS
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Once download source, please look into README.md to build from
> > source.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Notable changes from RC4 is removing custom repo for asynchbase
> > > >> dependency(
> > > >>> S2GRAPH-116 <https://github.com/apache/incubator-s2graph/pull/85
> >).
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless objection I
> will
> > > try
> > > >>> to close it Sunday September 25 if we have sufficient votes.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary
> > items
> > > >>> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
> > > >>> please vote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > > >>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > >>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>> DOYUNG YOON.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: [VOTE] Apache S2Graph(incubating) 0.1.0 release RC5

[Sergio Fernández]

+1 (binding)

So far I've successfully checked:

* signatures and digests
* source releases file layouts
* matched git tags and commit ids
* incubator suffix and disclaimer
* NOTICE and LICENSE files
* license headers * clean build (Java 1.8.0_91, Scala, 2.11.7, SBT 0.13.9,
Debian amd64)


BTW, I saw quite me warning during the build that I'm not sure if they are
cause by my local environment or it's something we should actually fix in
the code:

[warn] There may be incompatibilities among your library dependencies.
[warn] Here are some of the libraries that were evicted:
[warn] * com.typesafe.sbt:sbt-native-packager:0.7.4 -> 1.0.3
[warn] * io.netty:netty:(3.6.2.Final, 3.10.1.Final) -> 3.9.4.Final
[warn] * org.apache.kafka:kafka-clients:0.8.2.0 -> 0.8.2.1
[warn] * com.google.guava:guava:(18.0, 11.0.2) -> 12.0.1
[warn] * io.netty:netty-all:4.0.23.Final -> 4.0.33.Final
[warn] * com.google.guava:guava:(18.0, 11.0.2) -> 12.0.1
[warn] * com.google.guava:guava:(11.0.2, 18.0) -> 12.0.1
[warn] * org.apache.kafka:kafka-clients:0.8.2.0 -> 0.8.2.1
[warn] * com.google.guava:guava:(16.0.1, 18.0, 11.0.2) -> 12.0.1
[warn] * com.github.danielwegener:logback-kafka-appender:0.0.3 -> 0.0.4
[warn] * com.google.guava:guava:(16.0.1, 18.0, 11.0.2) -> 12.0.1
[warn] * com.google.guava:guava:(11.0.2, 16.0.1, 18.0) -> 12.0.
[warn] Run 'evicted' to see detailed eviction warnings

[warn] Multiple dependencies with the same organization/name but different
versions. To avoid conflict, pick one version:
[warn]  * com.google.guava:guava:(12.0.1, 16.0.1)
[info] Resolving org.scala-lang#scala-library;2.11.7 ...



On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 7:07 AM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache S2Graph 0.1.0-incubating, release
> candidate 5.
> This is the first release of S2Graph.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/0.
> 1.0-incubating-RC5/
>
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.1.0-incubating-rc5:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s2graph.
> git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.1.0-incubating-rc5
>
> The release hash is 4b6ffc2e357afc005b194d6d45710c2b041b00cb:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s2graph.
> git;a=commit;h=4b6ffc2e357afc005b194d6d45710c2b041b00cb
>
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/KEYS
>
> Once download source, please look into README.md to build from source.
>
> Notable changes from RC4 is removing custom repo for asynchbase dependency(
> S2GRAPH-116 <https://github.com/apache/incubator-s2graph/pull/85>).
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless objection I will try to
> close it Sunday September 25 if we have sufficient votes.
>
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks,
> DOYUNG YOON.
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: [VOTE] Apache S2Graph(incubating) 0.1.0 release RC4

[Sergio Fernández]

If with that we could get 0.1.0-incubating published to Maven central, then
it'd be worth.

If so, please Do Yung, cancel this vote.

On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 4:55 PM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi folks.
>
> As we have discussed on this vote thread, and here
> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/221df53842697da30c2def01221023
> 3a1b89cc4c0a3d267454713d4b@%3Cdev.s2graph.apache.org%3E>,
> I thought it would be better to resolve custom asynchbase dependency
> issue(S2GRAPH-115, S2GRAPH-116) before posting our RC4 on general mailing
> list.
>
> Thanks to JongWook's contribution, we have finally removed custom
> asynchbase dependency and now s2graph use only dependencies from maven
> central.
> I applied these changes and created RC5 at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/0.
> 1.0-incubating-RC5/
>
>
> Unless objection, I will close this vote for RC4 and create new RC5 vote
> thread.
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:59 PM Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:48 AM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > 2. asynchbase dependency in the POM
> > >
> > > Like you point out, users who want to download S2Graph as dependency
> from
> > > Maven central will fail.
> > >
> > > During incubating process, we only release our source code, not binary,
> > so
> > > I don't think it is a blocker(Please correct me if I am wrong).
> > >
> >
> > Well, that's not completely right, because: Although it is true the
> source
> > is the single binding release, normally projects also publish binary
> > artifacts to help on its usage/adoption. That's valid for top-level
> > projects as well as for incubating podlings: incubating releases should
> be
> > 100% what you'll do after graduation, just its voting process requires
> some
> > more intervention by IPMC.
> >
> > Therefore that's a non-blocking for releasing 0.1.0 RC4, because source
> > release can be build without using such custom dependency.
> >
> > BTW, what is org.hbase:asynchbase:1.7.2-S2GRAPH? Where does it come
> from?
> > Why is not on Maven Central? If it's a fork from AL2 code that it's only
> > relevent for S2Graph, you could donate it to the S2Graph podling to have
> an
> > easier way to deal with that dependency.
> >
> >
> >
> > > Of course It would be great to find out work around for this issue, but
> > > since my lack of knowledge and experience, I have no idea how to
> resolve
> > > this except sending PR to asynchbase upstream and hope PR get merged
> and
> > > next release of asynchbase contains it.
> >
> >
> > Yes, it would be nice that upcoming releases would provide Maven
> artifacts
> > too. I've registered S2GRAPH-115 for tracking that.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sergio Fernández
> > Partner Technology Manager
> > Redlink GmbH
> > m: +43 6602747925
> > e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
> > w: http://redlink.co
> >
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: Including asynchbase in the sourcetree

[Sergio Fernández]

As far as I understood, such changes affect mainly configuration (timeouts,
limits, offsets, etc), right?
Would not be better to submit a PR to the upstream project to allow to
customize such configurations without modifying the code?

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Jong Wook Kim <jongw...@nyu.edu> wrote:

> Related to the recent comments raised in the vote thread, I’d like to
> revisit the asynchbase issue.
>
> Now their fixes on NSRE are tagged in the recently fixed 1.7.2 on Maven
> Central, the remaining differences between our custom version and the
> official version are:
>
> - RPC-wise timeout setting in Scanner
> - limit and offset setting in GetRequest
>
> I made a small patch, as seen in here <https://github.com/jongwook/
> incubator-s2graph/commit/ad5c7f89e46ddbd5dfd9b8721737aa22f94b4002>, which
> includes GetRequest.java and Scanner.java in the s2core tree along with a
> utility that forces loading the bytecode from s2core’s classpath.
>
> Having two ~1000-line java files which are duplicates might be a bad
> practice, but it eliminates the need to maintain a separate codebase and
> maven repository for those small patches.
>
> To be more aesthetically satisfying, I’ve fiddled a little bit with
> bytebuddy <http://bytebuddy.net/#/> to make runtime modification of the
> behaviors of those classes, but the modifications are kindof scattered
> making it harder to write the dynamic proxy.
>
> I’d appreciate any comments on the patch above.
>
> JW




-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: [VOTE] Apache S2Graph(incubating) 0.1.0 release RC4

[Sergio Fernández]

Hi,

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:48 AM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2. asynchbase dependency in the POM
>
> Like you point out, users who want to download S2Graph as dependency from
> Maven central will fail.
>
> During incubating process, we only release our source code, not binary, so
> I don't think it is a blocker(Please correct me if I am wrong).
>

Well, that's not completely right, because: Although it is true the source
is the single binding release, normally projects also publish binary
artifacts to help on its usage/adoption. That's valid for top-level
projects as well as for incubating podlings: incubating releases should be
100% what you'll do after graduation, just its voting process requires some
more intervention by IPMC.

Therefore that's a non-blocking for releasing 0.1.0 RC4, because source
release can be build without using such custom dependency.

BTW, what is org.hbase:asynchbase:1.7.2-S2GRAPH? Where does it come from?
Why is not on Maven Central? If it's a fork from AL2 code that it's only
relevent for S2Graph, you could donate it to the S2Graph podling to have an
easier way to deal with that dependency.



> Of course It would be great to find out work around for this issue, but
> since my lack of knowledge and experience, I have no idea how to resolve
> this except sending PR to asynchbase upstream and hope PR get merged and
> next release of asynchbase contains it.


Yes, it would be nice that upcoming releases would provide Maven artifacts
too. I've registered S2GRAPH-115 for tracking that.

Cheers,


-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: [VOTE] Apache S2Graph(incubating) 0.1.0 release RC4

[Sergio Fernández]

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 4:04 PM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Good to know the process.
>

We're here to help ;-)

The process should be fully documented at
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
but I guess there are too many TODOs in that guide...


> I am going to move this vote to general@incubator.
>

Exactly,  call now for a IPMC vote summarizing the status of the podling
vote.

-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: [VOTE] Apache S2Graph(incubating) 0.1.0 release RC4

[Sergio Fernández]

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Kim, Min-Seok <mskim@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> To Sergio,
>
> The commands will work on
> `/path/to/incubator-s2graph/target/apache-s2graph-0.1.0-incubating-bin`
> after `sbt package`.
>

Of course!

Then the README needs to remark that to avoid people to get confused, like
it happened to me.

Thanks!

-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: [VOTE] Apache S2Graph(incubating) 0.1.0 release RC4

[Sergio Fernández]

Thanks Do Yung for putting together a new RC.

So far I've successfully checked:
* signatures and digests
* source releases file layouts
* matched git tags and commit ids
* incubator suffix and disclaimer
* NOTICE and LICENSE files
* license headers
* clean build (Java 1.8.0_91, Scala, 2.11.7, SBT 0.13.9, Debian amd64)

Regarding the source release everything looks fine. Therefore my vote is +1
(binding). Great work, guys!

But I have issues running it:

$ ./bin/start-s2graph.sh
Starting hbase...
Service hbase might have failed to start; see
/home/wikier/tmp/s2graph/incubator-s2graph/logs/hbase.log
Starting s2rest_play...
Service s2rest_play might have failed to start; see
/home/wikier/tmp/s2graph/incubator-s2graph/logs/s2rest_play.log

$ cat /home/wikier/tmp/s2graph/incubator-s2graph/logs/s2rest_play.log
/usr/bin/java -cp
/home/wikier/tmp/s2graph/incubator-s2graph/conf:/home/wikier/tmp/s2graph/incubator-s2graph/lib/*
-Ds2graph.home=/home/wikier/tmp/s2graph/incubator-s2graph -Xms1g -Xmx1g
play.core.server.NettyServer
Error: Could not find or load main class play.core.server.NettyServer

Any idea what I'm doing wrong?

BTW, I found now documentation about how to run RAT; so inspecting the
script I've created some minimal documentation, see
https://github.com/apache/incubator-s2graph/pull/84

Cheers,

P.S.: you can remove all old RCs from https://dist.apache.org/r
epos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/



On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 3:19 AM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache S2Graph 0.1.0-incubating, release
> candidate 4.
> This is the first release of S2Graph.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/0.
> 1.0-incubating-RC4/
>
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.1.0-incubating-rc4:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s2graph.
> git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.1.0-incubating-rc4
>
> The release hash is c50d43a06a2044320c4e695b487fe5ee3fc48f91:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s2graph.
> git;a=commit;h=c50d43a06a2044320c4e695b487fe5ee3fc48f91
>
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/KEYS
>
> Once download source, please look into README.md to build from source.
>
> There are 3 issues has been resolved since RC3.
>
> 1. Added missing license headers on files (S2GRAPH-113, S2GRAPH-114).
> 2. Add more committer's public keys on KEYS file (S2GRAPH-110).
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless objection I will try to
> close it Sunday September 25 if we have sufficient votes.
>
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks,
> DOYUNG YOON.
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: [VOTE] Apache S2Graph(incubating) 0.1.0 release RC3

[Sergio Fernández]

-1 (binding): there are files (e.g., bin/example.sh) without proper license
headers.

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 3:41 AM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache S2Graph 0.1.0-incubating, release
> candidate 3.
> This is the first release of S2Graph.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/0.1
> .0-incubating-RC3/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.1.0-incubating-rc3:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s2graph.
> git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.1.0-incubating-rc3
>
> The release hash is b32c74242cbe4fcde05f77000989df2f1f0f36c0:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s2graph.
> git;a=commit;h=b32c74242cbe4fcde05f77000989df2f1f0f36c0
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/KEYS
>
> Once download source, please look into README.md and BUILD.md to build from
> source.
>
> Please refer sub-tasks of S2GRAPH-86(
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/S2GRAPH-86) to check addressed
> issues
> from RC2(S2GRAPH-104/105/106/109/12/112/111).
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks,
> DOYUNG YOON.
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: [VOTE] Apache S2Graph(incubating) 0.1.0 release RC3

[Sergio Fernández]

Just arrived back from my vacations; I'm gonna check RC3 later, once I got
under control some more urgent things at work.
I wonder why nobody has checked this vote in one week...
Remember that both mentors (binding) and committers (non-binding) have
responsibilities within the project releases.
Checking a release (including the RM) helps you to make better releases in
the future.


On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 3:41 AM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache S2Graph 0.1.0-incubating, release
> candidate 3.
> This is the first release of S2Graph.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/0.1
> .0-incubating-RC3/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.1.0-incubating-rc3:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s2graph.
> git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.1.0-incubating-rc3
>
> The release hash is b32c74242cbe4fcde05f77000989df2f1f0f36c0:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s2graph.
> git;a=commit;h=b32c74242cbe4fcde05f77000989df2f1f0f36c0
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/KEYS
>
> Once download source, please look into README.md and BUILD.md to build from
> source.
>
> Please refer sub-tasks of S2GRAPH-86(
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/S2GRAPH-86) to check addressed
> issues
> from RC2(S2GRAPH-104/105/106/109/12/112/111).
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks,
> DOYUNG YOON.
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: [VOTE] Apache S2Graph(incubating) 0.1.0 release RC2

[Sergio Fernández]

Hi,

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 4:14 PM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Vote close with one -1(binding).
>
> Hi Sergio.
> Thanks again all your feedback.
> I think I am going to work on followings for RC3.
>
> 1. S2GRAPH-104
> 2. S2GRAPH-105
> 3. remove lots of warning while package.
> 4. add other committers signing key on KEYS file.
> 5. document release process.
>
> Other than above, can you please suggest anything else?
>

No, for what I've checked, that should be enough.

I'll be available tomorrow (Friday 2nd) until 14.00 GMT, in case you manage
to case a new RC before. If not. don't pause the release until I'll be
back, all the other mentors could help you in the process.

Cheers,






>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:02 PM Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Please Do Yung, cancel RC2 vote accordingly.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Do Yung,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:07 PM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for the quick feedback.
> > >>
> > >
> > > The quicker the better, specially the timing for me.
> > >
> > > After look up, I found out following dependency version are missing
> from
> > >> maven central.
> > >> I tried to add these lines on commonSettings in root project's
> > build.sbt.
> > >>
> > >> libraryDependencies ++= Seq(
> > >> "org.scalaz.stream" % "scalaz-stream_2.11" % "0.7.2",
> > >> "com.typesafe.netty" % "netty-http-pipelining" % "1.1.4"
> > >>   )
> > >>
> > >> Can you please check if this works?
> > >>
> > >
> > > Yes, patching the build.sbt  with that made the package task work for
> me:
> > >
> > > [info] Done packaging.
> > > [info] Package for distribution located at
> /home/wikier/tmp/s2graph/apach
> > > e-s2graph-0.1.0-incubating/target/apache-s2graph-0.1.0-incubating-bin
> > > [info] creating a tarball...
> > > tar: Removing leading `/' from member names
> > > [info] Tarball is located at /home/wikier/tmp/s2graph/apach
> > > e-s2graph-0.1.0-incubating/target/apache-s2graph-0.1.0-incub
> > > ating-bin.tar.gz
> > > [success] Total time: 171 s, completed Sep 1, 2016 3:18:10 PM
> > >
> > >
> > > In addition to S2GRAPH-104 to fixed the reported issue, checking this
> > > release I also found another issue in the generated tarball
> > (S2GRAPH-105).
> > >
> > > Hope that helps.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 7:43 PM Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi Do Yung,
> > >> >
> > >> > thanks for casting a new release candidate. As I said during the
> > >> previous
> > >> > RC, I want to insist the very first release is very important
> > milestone
> > >> for
> > >> > a podling.
> > >> >
> > >> > Here my vote: -1 (binding)
> > >> >
> > >> > I can't build from the sources given a missing dependency:
> > >> >
> > >> > [info] Packaging
> > >> >
> > >> > /home/wikier/tmp/s2graph/apache-s2graph-0.1.0-incubating/s2r
> > >> est_netty/target/scala-2.11/s2rest_netty_2.11-0.1.0.jar
> > >> > ...
> > >> > [info] Done packaging.
> > >> > sbt.ResolveException: unresolved dependency:
> > >> > org.scalaz.stream#scalaz-stream_2.11;0.7a: not found
> > >> >
> > >> > For want I've check
> > >> >
> > >> > http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.scalaz
> > >> .stream%22%20AND%20a%3A%22scalaz-stream_2.11%22
> > >> > only version 0.8.4a looks to be available from Maven Central.
> > >> >
> > >> > I tried to build the RC sources in a clean environment: SBT 0.13.9,
> > >> Scala
> > >> > 2.11.6, OpenJDK 1.8.0_91 64-Bit, Debian amd64
> > >> >
> > >> > So far I've successfully checked:
> > >> >
> > >> > * signatures and digests
> > >> > * source releases file layouts
> > >> > * matched git tags and commit ids
> > >>

Re: [VOTE] Apache S2Graph(incubating) 0.1.0 release RC2

[Sergio Fernández]

Please Do Yung, cancel RC2 vote accordingly.

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Do Yung,
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:07 PM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the quick feedback.
>>
>
> The quicker the better, specially the timing for me.
>
> After look up, I found out following dependency version are missing from
>> maven central.
>> I tried to add these lines on commonSettings in root project's build.sbt.
>>
>> libraryDependencies ++= Seq(
>> "org.scalaz.stream" % "scalaz-stream_2.11" % "0.7.2",
>> "com.typesafe.netty" % "netty-http-pipelining" % "1.1.4"
>>   )
>>
>> Can you please check if this works?
>>
>
> Yes, patching the build.sbt  with that made the package task work for me:
>
> [info] Done packaging.
> [info] Package for distribution located at /home/wikier/tmp/s2graph/apach
> e-s2graph-0.1.0-incubating/target/apache-s2graph-0.1.0-incubating-bin
> [info] creating a tarball...
> tar: Removing leading `/' from member names
> [info] Tarball is located at /home/wikier/tmp/s2graph/apach
> e-s2graph-0.1.0-incubating/target/apache-s2graph-0.1.0-incub
> ating-bin.tar.gz
> [success] Total time: 171 s, completed Sep 1, 2016 3:18:10 PM
>
>
> In addition to S2GRAPH-104 to fixed the reported issue, checking this
> release I also found another issue in the generated tarball (S2GRAPH-105).
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 7:43 PM Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Do Yung,
>> >
>> > thanks for casting a new release candidate. As I said during the
>> previous
>> > RC, I want to insist the very first release is very important milestone
>> for
>> > a podling.
>> >
>> > Here my vote: -1 (binding)
>> >
>> > I can't build from the sources given a missing dependency:
>> >
>> > [info] Packaging
>> >
>> > /home/wikier/tmp/s2graph/apache-s2graph-0.1.0-incubating/s2r
>> est_netty/target/scala-2.11/s2rest_netty_2.11-0.1.0.jar
>> > ...
>> > [info] Done packaging.
>> > sbt.ResolveException: unresolved dependency:
>> > org.scalaz.stream#scalaz-stream_2.11;0.7a: not found
>> >
>> > For want I've check
>> >
>> > http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.scalaz
>> .stream%22%20AND%20a%3A%22scalaz-stream_2.11%22
>> > only version 0.8.4a looks to be available from Maven Central.
>> >
>> > I tried to build the RC sources in a clean environment: SBT 0.13.9,
>> Scala
>> > 2.11.6, OpenJDK 1.8.0_91 64-Bit, Debian amd64
>> >
>> > So far I've successfully checked:
>> >
>> > * signatures and digests
>> > * source releases file layouts
>> > * matched git tags and commit ids
>> > * incubator suffix and disclaimer, NOTICE and LICENSE files
>> > * license headers,
>> >
>> > Thanks for addressing all my comments to RC1 <https://s.apache.org/oarA
>> >.
>> > In addition, some minor comments that would be great to improve:
>> >
>> > * I can see quite many warning ("discarding unmoored doc comment", "a
>> type
>> > was inferred to be `Any`; this may indicate a programming error",
>> "Adapting
>> > argument list by creating a 4-tuple: this may not be what you want",
>> > etc) during build that would be better to solve.
>> > * More people should add theirs GPG keys to the project file, just in
>> case
>> > anybody else acts as RM in new releases
>> >
>> > If you point me how to sort-out the issue with the missing dependency,
>> I'm
>> > more than happy to revise my vote. But, as I pointer in another email,
>> > remember I'd only have 24 hours from now until I'll go on vacations.
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:53 AM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > This is a call for a releasing Apache S2Graph 0.1.0-incubating,
>> release
>> > > candidate 2.
>> > > This is the first release of S2Graph.
>> > >
>> > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
>> at:
>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/0.
>> > > 1.0-incubating-RC2/
>> &g

Re: [VOTE] Apache S2Graph(incubating) 0.1.0 release RC2

[Sergio Fernández]

Hi Do Yung,

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:07 PM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the quick feedback.
>

The quicker the better, specially the timing for me.

After look up, I found out following dependency version are missing from
> maven central.
> I tried to add these lines on commonSettings in root project's build.sbt.
>
> libraryDependencies ++= Seq(
> "org.scalaz.stream" % "scalaz-stream_2.11" % "0.7.2",
> "com.typesafe.netty" % "netty-http-pipelining" % "1.1.4"
>   )
>
> Can you please check if this works?
>

Yes, patching the build.sbt  with that made the package task work for me:

[info] Done packaging.
[info] Package for distribution located at /home/wikier/tmp/s2graph/apach
e-s2graph-0.1.0-incubating/target/apache-s2graph-0.1.0-incubating-bin
[info] creating a tarball...
tar: Removing leading `/' from member names
[info] Tarball is located at /home/wikier/tmp/s2graph/apach
e-s2graph-0.1.0-incubating/target/apache-s2graph-0.1.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz
[success] Total time: 171 s, completed Sep 1, 2016 3:18:10 PM


In addition to S2GRAPH-104 to fixed the reported issue, checking this
release I also found another issue in the generated tarball (S2GRAPH-105).

Hope that helps.

Cheers,


On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 7:43 PM Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Do Yung,
> >
> > thanks for casting a new release candidate. As I said during the previous
> > RC, I want to insist the very first release is very important milestone
> for
> > a podling.
> >
> > Here my vote: -1 (binding)
> >
> > I can't build from the sources given a missing dependency:
> >
> > [info] Packaging
> >
> > /home/wikier/tmp/s2graph/apache-s2graph-0.1.0-incubating/s2r
> est_netty/target/scala-2.11/s2rest_netty_2.11-0.1.0.jar
> > ...
> > [info] Done packaging.
> > sbt.ResolveException: unresolved dependency:
> > org.scalaz.stream#scalaz-stream_2.11;0.7a: not found
> >
> > For want I've check
> >
> > http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.scalaz
> .stream%22%20AND%20a%3A%22scalaz-stream_2.11%22
> > only version 0.8.4a looks to be available from Maven Central.
> >
> > I tried to build the RC sources in a clean environment: SBT 0.13.9, Scala
> > 2.11.6, OpenJDK 1.8.0_91 64-Bit, Debian amd64
> >
> > So far I've successfully checked:
> >
> > * signatures and digests
> > * source releases file layouts
> > * matched git tags and commit ids
> > * incubator suffix and disclaimer, NOTICE and LICENSE files
> > * license headers,
> >
> > Thanks for addressing all my comments to RC1 <https://s.apache.org/oarA
> >.
> > In addition, some minor comments that would be great to improve:
> >
> > * I can see quite many warning ("discarding unmoored doc comment", "a
> type
> > was inferred to be `Any`; this may indicate a programming error",
> "Adapting
> > argument list by creating a 4-tuple: this may not be what you want",
> > etc) during build that would be better to solve.
> > * More people should add theirs GPG keys to the project file, just in
> case
> > anybody else acts as RM in new releases
> >
> > If you point me how to sort-out the issue with the missing dependency,
> I'm
> > more than happy to revise my vote. But, as I pointer in another email,
> > remember I'd only have 24 hours from now until I'll go on vacations.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:53 AM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This is a call for a releasing Apache S2Graph 0.1.0-incubating, release
> > > candidate 2.
> > > This is the first release of S2Graph.
> > >
> > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> at:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/0.
> > > 1.0-incubating-RC2/
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.1.0-incubating-rc2:
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s2graph.
> > > git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.1.0-incubating-rc2
> > >
> > > The release hash is c2f3fc21b40bf21611e242c63146e847de28f5e5:
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s2graph.
> > > git;a=commit;h=c2f3fc21b40bf21611e242c63146e847de28f5e5
> > >
> > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/KEYS
> > >
> > 

Re: [VOTE] Apache S2Graph(incubating) 0.1.0 release RC2

[Sergio Fernández]

Hi Do Yung,

thanks for casting a new release candidate. As I said during the previous
RC, I want to insist the very first release is very important milestone for
a podling.

Here my vote: -1 (binding)

I can't build from the sources given a missing dependency:

[info] Packaging
/home/wikier/tmp/s2graph/apache-s2graph-0.1.0-incubating/s2rest_netty/target/scala-2.11/s2rest_netty_2.11-0.1.0.jar
...
[info] Done packaging.
sbt.ResolveException: unresolved dependency:
org.scalaz.stream#scalaz-stream_2.11;0.7a: not found

For want I've check
http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.scalaz.stream%22%20AND%20a%3A%22scalaz-stream_2.11%22
only version 0.8.4a looks to be available from Maven Central.

I tried to build the RC sources in a clean environment: SBT 0.13.9, Scala
2.11.6, OpenJDK 1.8.0_91 64-Bit, Debian amd64

So far I've successfully checked:

* signatures and digests
* source releases file layouts
* matched git tags and commit ids
* incubator suffix and disclaimer, NOTICE and LICENSE files
* license headers,

Thanks for addressing all my comments to RC1 <https://s.apache.org/oarA>.
In addition, some minor comments that would be great to improve:

* I can see quite many warning ("discarding unmoored doc comment", "a type
was inferred to be `Any`; this may indicate a programming error", "Adapting
argument list by creating a 4-tuple: this may not be what you want",
etc) during build that would be better to solve.
* More people should add theirs GPG keys to the project file, just in case
anybody else acts as RM in new releases

If you point me how to sort-out the issue with the missing dependency, I'm
more than happy to revise my vote. But, as I pointer in another email,
remember I'd only have 24 hours from now until I'll go on vacations.

Thanks.

Cheers,


On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:53 AM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache S2Graph 0.1.0-incubating, release
> candidate 2.
> This is the first release of S2Graph.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/0.
> 1.0-incubating-RC2/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.1.0-incubating-rc2:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s2graph.
> git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.1.0-incubating-rc2
>
> The release hash is c2f3fc21b40bf21611e242c63146e847de28f5e5:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s2graph.
> git;a=commit;h=c2f3fc21b40bf21611e242c63146e847de28f5e5
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/KEYS
>
> Once download source, please look into README.md and BUILD.md to build from
> source.
>
> Please refer sub-tasks of S2GRAPH-86(
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/S2GRAPH-86) to check addressed
> issues
> from RC1.
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks,
> DOYUNG YOON.
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: [VOTE] Apache S2Graph(incubating) 0.1.0 release RC1

[Sergio Fernández]

a=commit;h=d52881e2deb6d16f815ebf4f018a23edaf11575a
> > >>>
> > >>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/KEYS
> > >>>
> > >>> Once download source, please look into README.md and BUILD.md to
> build
> > from
> > >>> source.
> > >>>
> > >>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >>> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary
> items
> > >>> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
> > >>> please vote:
> > >>>
> > >>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > >>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> DOYUNG YOON.
> >
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: Podling Report Reminder - August 2016

[Sergio Fernández]

np, thx!

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 8:03 AM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Sergio.
> sorry for being late, I have been busy these days.
> I will try to update wiki tonight!
> Thanks for heads up!
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 2:56 PM Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > ping
> > the report should be online in the wiki in two days...
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > volunteers?
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 1:47 PM, <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Dear podling,
> > >>
> > >> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> > >> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
> > >> prepare your quarterly board report.
> > >>
> > >> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 17 August 2016, 10:30 am PDT.
> > >> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> > >> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
> > >> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> > >> submission (Wed, August 03).
> > >>
> > >> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
> > >> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
> > >> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the
> board
> > >> meeting.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> The Apache Incubator PMC
> > >>
> > >> Submitting your Report
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Your report should contain the following:
> > >>
> > >> *   Your project name
> > >> *   A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
> > >> the project or necessarily of its field
> > >> *   A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> > >> towards graduation.
> > >> *   Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to
> be
> > >> aware of
> > >> *   How has the community developed since the last report
> > >> *   How has the project developed since the last report.
> > >>
> > >> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
> > >>
> > >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2016
> > >>
> > >> Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
> > >> this page is created from a template.
> > >>
> > >> Mentors
> > >> ---
> > >>
> > >> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off
> on
> > >> the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
> > >> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
> > >> for the Incubator PMC.
> > >>
> > >> Incubator PMC
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sergio Fernández
> > > Partner Technology Manager
> > > Redlink GmbH
> > > m: +43 6602747925
> > > e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
> > > w: http://redlink.co
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sergio Fernández
> > Partner Technology Manager
> > Redlink GmbH
> > m: +43 6602747925
> > e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
> > w: http://redlink.co
> >
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: Podling Report Reminder - August 2016

[Sergio Fernández]

ping
the report should be online in the wiki in two days...

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> wrote:

> volunteers?
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 1:47 PM, <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear podling,
>>
>> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
>> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
>> prepare your quarterly board report.
>>
>> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 17 August 2016, 10:30 am PDT.
>> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
>> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
>> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
>> submission (Wed, August 03).
>>
>> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
>> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
>> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
>> meeting.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> The Apache Incubator PMC
>>
>> Submitting your Report
>>
>> --
>>
>> Your report should contain the following:
>>
>> *   Your project name
>> *   A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
>> the project or necessarily of its field
>> *   A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
>> towards graduation.
>> *   Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
>> aware of
>> *   How has the community developed since the last report
>> *   How has the project developed since the last report.
>>
>> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2016
>>
>> Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
>> this page is created from a template.
>>
>> Mentors
>> ---
>>
>> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
>> the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
>> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
>> for the Incubator PMC.
>>
>> Incubator PMC
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sergio Fernández
> Partner Technology Manager
> Redlink GmbH
> m: +43 6602747925
> e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
> w: http://redlink.co
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: s2graph asf branding

[Sergio Fernández]

Hi Hwansung,

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Hwansung Yu <deejayf...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank you for your adivice.
>

That's why I'm here ;-)


> I'll make logo to contain the Apache Incubator Project logo, as soon as
> possible.
>

No, in this case is not about embedding ASF's logo in S2Graph's logo, which
could be also a good idea...

That guidelines s more about putting the Incubator stamp
http://incubator.apache.org/images/egg-logo2.png somewhere in the podling
site while incubating. So much easier, no logo re-working needs to be done
at all.

Cheers,



On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> wrote:

> Those who follow general@incubator, IPMC has started (led by John D.
> Ament) to audit podlings' branding:
>
>   https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BrandingAuditJune2016
>
> The audit still didn't arrive to S2Graph (I think it goes alphabetical).
>
> S2Graph should be fine, because disclaimer is there. But "Podlings
websites
> SHOULD contain the Apache Incubator Project logo as sign of affiliation".
> Since it's a "SHOULD" is fine; but I'd recommend to add the Incubator logo
> somewhere in the site template.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> --
> Sergio Fernández
> Partner Technology Manager
> Redlink GmbH
> m: +43 6602747925
> e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
> w: http://redlink.co
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

s2graph asf branding

[Sergio Fernández]

Those who follow general@incubator, IPMC has started (led by John D.
Ament) to audit podlings' branding:

  https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BrandingAuditJune2016

The audit still didn't arrive to S2Graph (I think it goes alphabetical).

S2Graph should be fine, because disclaimer is there. But "Podlings websites
SHOULD contain the Apache Incubator Project logo as sign of affiliation".
Since it's a "SHOULD" is fine; but I'd recommend to add the Incubator logo
somewhere in the site template.

Thanks!


-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: Tutorial within tens of minutes.

[Sergio Fernández]

Please, notice that ASF has an organization at Docker Hub (@apache) where
you could setup automated builds from the s2graph repo.

On Jun 24, 2016 9:27 AM, "Kim, Min-Seok"  wrote:

> Thanks to https://github.com/apache/incubator-s2graph/pull/57, S2Grpah is
> able to run on a single instance.
> However, Installing scala/sbt and resolving dependencies to build S2graph
> still take lots of time (several hours on my laptop).
>
> So I build a Docker image for the tutorial-purpose and simple description
> to https://hub.docker.com/r/mskim/s2graph
> (The Dockerfile can be found in
> https://github.com/emeth-kim/docker-s2graph)
>
> The instruction of `docker-compose` based installation already exists in `
> https://steamshon.gitbooks.io/s2graph-book/content/getting_started.html`.
> I'm not sure what is better. However, It is worth considering to provide a
> docker image.
>
> Anyway, I'd like to write a tutorial based on this image.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Minseok
>
>
>
>
>
> Minseok
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Hyunsung Jo 
> wrote:
>
> > Min-Seok,
> > Sounds like a great idea.
> > A tutorial will help S2Graph reach more users.
> > I'd love to help.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jo
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:30 AM Min-Seok Kim  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, folks!
> > >
> > > I'm going to write a tutorial(with dataset) like:
> > >  - neo4j: https://neo4j.com/blog/analyzing-panama-papers-neo4j/
> > >  - orientDB: http://orientdb.com/orientdb-game-of-graphs/
> > >  - dgraph: https://dgraph.io/
> > >
> > > This tutorial will aim that newbies are getting familiar with S2Grpah
> > > within tens of minutes
> > > to provide simple installation(using Docker?), core instructions with
> > > dataset, and visualization.
> > >
> > > Any comment please.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > Minseok
> > >
> >
>

Re: [Discussion] first release plan.

[Sergio Fernández]

guys, you should not forget this plan of working on your first release
sooner than later ;-)

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 3:09 AM, Hwansung Yu <deejayf...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree  to Hyunsung's opinion.
> Doyoung is suitable person.
>
> Hwansung Yu
>
> 2016년 5월 9일 월요일, Hyunsung Jo<hyunsung...@gmail.com>님이 작성한 메시지:
>
> > Doyoung,
> > I'm sure you're the right person for RM.
> > Looking forward to see the first release.
> >
> > Jo
> >
> > On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 8:36 AM DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > Seems like there is no volunteer for RM yet. then I would like to
> > volunteer
> > > as RM.
> > > I would not be the right person for RM since I have no experiences,
> but I
> > > am willing to follow process and learn it.
> > > If everyone agree, then I will go ahead reading
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SQOOP/How+to+Release+Sqoop2
> > > and
> > > do what needs to be done.
> > >
> > > What do you guys think?
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 8:29 AM DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for guide, Venkatesh and Sergio.
> > > > I will definitely read through it to understand the general
> processes.
> > > >
> > > > So first thing to decide, Any volunteer as RM for this release?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 1:43 AM Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Good to finally hear about that :-)
> > > >>
> > > >> Be patient, the first incubating release is quite hard regarding
> many
> > > >> legal
> > > >> details. But focus on the technical scope, we'll support you with
> the
> > > >> rest.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:05 PM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi folks.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > We have not discussed how and when we are going to release our
> first
> > > >> > version.
> > > >> > I think we should discuss on scope of first release and list up
> > issues
> > > >> that
> > > >> > need to be resolved.
> > > >> > Not sure how to start, but just wanted to open up thread so we can
> > > share
> > > >> > our opinion on release plan.
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Sergio Fernández
> > > >> Partner Technology Manager
> > > >> Redlink GmbH
> > > >> m: +43 6602747925
> > > >> e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co <javascript:;>
> > > >> w: http://redlink.co
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: Podling Report Reminder - May 2016

[Sergio Fernández]

Volunteers?

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 4:33 AM, <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:

> Dear podling,
>
> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
> prepare your quarterly board report.
>
> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 15 June 2016, 10:30 am PDT.
> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> submission (Wed, June 1st).
>
> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
> meeting.
>
> Thanks,
>
> The Apache Incubator PMC
>
> Submitting your Report
>
> --
>
> Your report should contain the following:
>
> *   Your project name
> *   A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
> the project or necessarily of its field
> *   A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> towards graduation.
> *   Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> aware of
> *   How has the community developed since the last report
> *   How has the project developed since the last report.
>
> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2016
>
> Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
> this page is created from a template.
>
> Mentors
> ---
>
> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
> the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
> for the Incubator PMC.
>
> Incubator PMC
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: Website for s2graph.

[Sergio Fernández]

Now you have to work on its content ;-)
On May 10, 2016 10:43 PM, "Jun Ki Kim" <wishop...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Great job guys!
> Especially thanks to Hwansung and Sergio.
>
> We finally have our Web Site!
>
>
> Best regards.
>
> 2016년 5월 11일 (수) 오후 2:31, Luke Han <luke...@gmail.com>님이 작성:
>
> > Congratulations, nice website:)
> >
> >
> > Best Regards!
> > -
> >
> > Luke Han
> >
> > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Hwansung Yu <deejayf...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thank you for Sergio!!!
> > >
> > > Finally, we got the site.
> > >
> > > In the future we need to participate.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best Regards.
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Hyunsung Jo <hyunsung...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Congratulations S2Graph!
> > > > Thank you Hwansung and Sergio!
> > > > On 2016년 5월 10일 (화) at 오전 10:54 Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > site is now online https://s2graph.incubator.apache.org/ :-)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Hyunsung Jo <
> hyunsung...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks, Sergio!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 7:42 AM Sergio Fernández <
> wik...@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > OK, so far:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > * copied content into
> > > > > > >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/s2graph/site/index.html
> > > > > > > (r1742960)
> > > > > > > * filed a cms request to use svnpubsub (r987805)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In the meantime I try to figure out the permission issue, you
> > > should
> > > > > > reads
> > > > > > > the guidelines for a podling site. For instance you miss the
> > > > incubator
> > > > > > > disclaimer among some other things.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 7:25 AM, Sergio Fernández <
> > > wik...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > OK, I'll take a look to the permissions issue.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In the meantime check the different options provided by ASF
> to
> > > > > publish
> > > > > > > > project sites (aka Apache CMS
> > http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html
> > > )
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > decide what option you want to pick for the project.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Hwansung Yu <
> > > deejayf...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Thank you for help.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> But I have no permission.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> I created simple static website.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Source code located at
> https://github.com/djfwan/s2graph-site
> > .
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> I want publish s2graph website.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> How could I publish site?
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Best Regards
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Sergio Fernández <
> > > > wik...@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> > From INFRA-11806:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > &g

Re: Website for s2graph.

[Sergio Fernández]

site is now online https://s2graph.incubator.apache.org/ :-)



On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Hyunsung Jo <hyunsung...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks, Sergio!
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 7:42 AM Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > OK, so far:
> >
> > * copied content into
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/s2graph/site/index.html
> > (r1742960)
> > * filed a cms request to use svnpubsub (r987805)
> >
> > In the meantime I try to figure out the permission issue, you should
> reads
> > the guidelines for a podling site. For instance you miss the incubator
> > disclaimer among some other things.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 7:25 AM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > OK, I'll take a look to the permissions issue.
> > >
> > > In the meantime check the different options provided by ASF to publish
> > > project sites (aka Apache CMS http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html) and
> > > decide what option you want to pick for the project.
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Hwansung Yu <deejayf...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Thank you for help.
> > >>
> > >> But I have no permission.
> > >>
> > >> I created simple static website.
> > >>
> > >> Source code located at https://github.com/djfwan/s2graph-site.
> > >>
> > >> I want publish s2graph website.
> > >>
> > >> How could I publish site?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Best Regards
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > From INFRA-11806:
> > >> >
> > >> > I created https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/s2graph/site/
> in
> > >> > r1742723: https://svn.apache.org/r1742723
> > >> >
> > >> > Please, check if you have the necessary karma to commit there; If
> not,
> > >> I'd
> > >> > need to check the group.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Hwansung Yu <deejayf...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Thank you for your help.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I created JIRA issue.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11806
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Regards.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Hyunsung Jo <
> hyunsung...@gmail.com
> > >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Hwansung,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Please take a look at the following JIRA:
> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8972
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > It seems like we should
> > >> > > > 1. request for a SVN directory
> > >> > > > 2. check in the source code to the SVN repo
> > >> > > > 3. request for deployment via
> > >> https://infra.apache.org/officers/webreq
> > >> > > > (only
> > >> > > > officers and members seem to have access for this)
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > So why don't you go ahead and open a JIRA request for creation
> of
> > >> SVN
> > >> > > > directory
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/s2graph/site/
> > ?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Regards,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Jo
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:26 AM Hwansung Yu <
> deejayf...@gmail.com
> > >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > I want create website for s2graph.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > According to the guide(
> http://www.apache.org/dev/infra-contact
> > ),
> > >> I
> > >> > > > should
> > >> > > > > upload code to svn and request to webreq(
> > >> > > > > https://infra.apache.org/officers/webreq).
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > However I have no access.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Webreq is opened to only officer and commiter.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > So, I need help about belows.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > 1. How can I create svn repo?
> > >> > > > > 2. Please, reqeust to webreq.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Best regrards.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Sergio Fernández
> > >> > Partner Technology Manager
> > >> > Redlink GmbH
> > >> > m: +43 6602747925
> > >> > e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
> > >> > w: http://redlink.co
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sergio Fernández
> > > Partner Technology Manager
> > > Redlink GmbH
> > > m: +43 6602747925
> > > e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
> > > w: http://redlink.co
> > >
> > > --
> > > <http://redlink.co/>
> > > <http://redlink.co/>
> > > Sergio Fernández
> > > Partner Technology Manager
> > > Redlink GmbH
> > > m: +43 6602747925
> > > e:  <http://redlink.co/>sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
> > > w: http://redlink.co
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: Slides for Apache Big Data North America

[Sergio Fernández]

I'm right now in the ASF desk at 3rd floor. I have a session to chair in
the next slot, so let's try to meet now or during lunch.

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Hyunsung Jo <hyunsung...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sergio and Luke,
>
> Actually, we've been ditching the whole morning sessions ; ) chatting with
> Jason Pluard from TinkerPop/ IBM.
> We're at a round table in the 2nd floor lobby, so feel free to join!!
> Or we could do coffee break together if that works for you.
>
> Jo
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:50 AM Luke Han <luke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Looks great.
> > BTW, I'm here too, would like to meet you in person.
> >
> >
> > Regards!
> > Luke Han
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:54 AM -0700, "Hyunsung Jo" <
> > hyunsung...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> > Doyoung is scheduled to give a talk at Apache Big Data North America
> > (2016.05.12 Vancouver, BC).
> > Here are the slides so feel free to pitch in any ideas:
> >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1RqAvEChtQV0JwAut8EwKNFALqsBiQcuweboX-fD1YsQ/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jo
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: Podling Report Reminder - May 2016

[Sergio Fernández]

volunteer(s) for drafting May report? ;-)

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 3:59 PM, <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:

> Dear podling,
>
> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
> prepare your quarterly board report.
>
> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 18 May 2016, 10:30 am PDT.
> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> submission (Wed, May 4th).
>
> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
> meeting.
>
> Thanks,
>
> The Apache Incubator PMC
>
> Submitting your Report
>
> --
>
> Your report should contain the following:
>
> *   Your project name
> *   A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
> the project or necessarily of its field
> *   A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> towards graduation.
> *   Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> aware of
> *   How has the community developed since the last report
> *   How has the project developed since the last report.
>
> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2016
>
> Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
> this page is created from a template.
>
> Mentors
> ---
>
> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
> the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
> for the Incubator PMC.
>
> Incubator PMC
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: concerned about s2graph community

[Sergio Fernández]

OK, clear. Kakao has to find a balance between the community-driven code
and their particular needs.

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 3:27 AM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Sergio.
>
> Kakao repo was not fork out of Apache in parallel.
> Just to be clear, there are many specific codes only for kakao's
> deployment, so the code has been different to Apache.
> what I meant earlier was we found bug and improvements through our
> deployment and open up issues to Apache Jira based on our finding.
> The actual code we pushed into Apache is actually different so I don't
> think there is any problem.
>
> But I agree with your point on two issues. so we deprecated kakao repo from
> last week. it is reset to the commit we imported to Apache. also we updated
> our read me to redirect visitor into apache repo. so from now on, we can
> only works on Apache repo.
>
> Thanks for let us know about issues.
>
> Best Regards.
> Doyung Yoon
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 7:23 PM Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Ok, I think the message has got through. Thanks.
> >
> > But...
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 4:24 AM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > There has been lots of code changes on kakao repo since initial code
> > import
> > > and I wanted apache repo to catch up this changes.
> > > Honestly I felt bad on initial code base since it is not organized at
> all
> > > and there has been critical bug, so I was in a hurry to conceal my bad
> > > code.
> > > In this catch up period, most of committers at Kakao already know what
> > each
> > > issues are about so there is no explanations and I think this was worst
> > > part.
> > >
> >
> > So, if I understood correctly, you're keeping your own fork our of Apache
> > in parallel?!?
> >
> > There are two issues with that:
> >
> > 1) Technically it's quite confusing then what the project target.
> > 2) Legally Kaka has done a code donation that is just valid for that
> > concrete code, not for any code the company has put there afterwards.
> >
> > So we need to sort this our ASAP!
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sergio Fernández
> > Partner Technology Manager
> > Redlink GmbH
> > m: +43 6602747925
> > e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
> > w: http://redlink.co
> >
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: concerned about s2graph community

[Sergio Fernández]

Ok, I think the message has got through. Thanks.

But...

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 4:24 AM, DO YUNG YOON <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> There has been lots of code changes on kakao repo since initial code import
> and I wanted apache repo to catch up this changes.
> Honestly I felt bad on initial code base since it is not organized at all
> and there has been critical bug, so I was in a hurry to conceal my bad
> code.
> In this catch up period, most of committers at Kakao already know what each
> issues are about so there is no explanations and I think this was worst
> part.
>

So, if I understood correctly, you're keeping your own fork our of Apache
in parallel?!?

There are two issues with that:

1) Technically it's quite confusing then what the project target.
2) Legally Kaka has done a code donation that is just valid for that
concrete code, not for any code the company has put there afterwards.

So we need to sort this our ASAP!



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

concerned about s2graph community

[Sergio Fernández]

Hi,

I've been thinking for a while about this issue... because my current
feeling in that the community has not really landed in ASF. Yes, you are
creating issues, pull requests, commiting code, etc. But there is no much
discussion in the mailing list. For instance, checking the mail archives of
dev@s2graph.a.o
http://markmail.org/search/?q=list%3Aorg.apache.s2graph.dev it's
clear something is happening behind the scenes. I can't find any other
reason how I can be the second most active person (excluding jira and
github bots) in this mailing list.

So that leads me to think that you still meet face-to-face on regular
basis, you privately agree on the next steps and then you behave as you did
before as a company, but just on public coding infrastructure. And that's
not supposed to happen in the Apache Way, where decisions are taken in the
community. Actually there is a common say in Apache: "If it didn't happen
on a mailing list, it didn't happen".

I may be wrong, and I hope to be wrong, but that's my current feeling. So,
my advice as mentor, and actually it's one of the points I stressed when
the project entered incubation, is that you have to focus to grow your
community outside Kakao. For instance, I miss the discussion about the
first release. Such kind of thing, you know.

Cheers,

-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2016 is coming

[Sergio Fernández]

FYI

TL;DR: label with gsoc2016 your issues you want to submit as ideas to the
program.

GSoC is a great opportunity to grow your community and/or find someone to
do a concrete tasks nobody can find time.

I've been mentoring for the last couple of years; so feel free to ask me
any further question.





-- Forwarded message --
From: Ulrich Stärk <u...@apache.org>
Date: Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 9:16 PM
Subject: Google Summer of Code 2016 is coming
To: ment...@community.apache.org


Hello PMCs (incubator Mentors, please forward this email to your podlings),

Google Summer of Code [1] is a program sponsored by Google allowing
students to spend their summer
working on open source software. Students will receive stipends for
developing open source software
full-time for three months. Projects will provide mentoring and project
ideas, and in return have
the chance to get new code developed and - most importantly - to identify
and bring in new committers.

The ASF will apply as a participating organization meaning individual
projects don't have to apply
separately.

If you want to participate with your project we ask you to do the following
things as soon as
possible but by no later than 2016-02-19:

1. understand what it means to be a mentor [2].

2. record your project ideas.

Just create issues in JIRA, label them with gsoc2016, and they will show up
at [3]. Please be as
specific as possible when describing your idea. Include the programming
language, the tools and
skills required, but try not to scare potential students away. They are
supposed to learn what's
required before the program starts.

Use labels, e.g. for the programming language (java, c, c++, erlang,
python, brainfuck, ...) or
technology area (cloud, xml, web, foo, bar, ...).

Please use the COMDEV JIRA project for recording your ideas if your project
doesn't use JIRA (e.g.
httpd, ooo). Contact d...@community.apache.org if you need assistance.

[4] contains some additional information (will be updated for 2016 shortly).

3. subscribe to ment...@community.apache.org; restricted to potential
mentors, meant to be used as a
private list - general discussions on the public d...@community.apache.org
list as much as possible
please). Use a recognized address when subscribing (@apache.org or one of
your alias addresses on
record).

Note that the ASF isn't accepted as a participating organization yet,
nevertheless you *have to*
start recording your ideas now or we will not get accepted.

Over the years we were able to complete hundreds of projects successfully.
Some of our prior
students are active contributors now! Let's make this year a success again!

Cheers,

Uli

[1] https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/
[2] http://community.apache.org/guide-to-being-a-mentor.html
[3] http://s.apache.org/gsoc2016ideas
[4] http://community.apache.org/gsoc.html





-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: January 2016 Report

[Sergio Fernández]

Report looks enough good; signed-off. Thanks, Hyunsik.

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hyun...@apache.org> wrote:

> Sergio,
>
> I just wrote the first draft. I would appreciate it if someone gives
> feedback about the draft.
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2016
>
> Yes, I also agreed. Other PPMC members also need to learn how to deal
> the community works.
>
> Best regards,
> Hyunsik
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Sergio Fernández
> <sergio.fernan...@redlink.co> wrote:
> > Any progress on this, Hyunsik?
> >
> > As a community, you have to start to learn to deal with these formalities
> > of the foundation as a team; if someone has time for doing it, just share
> > the draft and others will provide feedback.
> > On Jan 5, 2016 10:51 AM, "Hyunsik Choi" <hyun...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Sergio,
> >>
> >> Thank you for reminding it. It's the first report of S2Graph. I'll
> >> write the first draft of the report. Then, I'll ask you guys to review
> >> it.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Hyunsik
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 2:31 AM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > As this is the first time the project report, I think this needs some
> >> > help...
> >> >
> >> > On a regular basis (monthly for the first three months, quarterly
> >> > thereafter), each incubating project reports to Incubator PMC. The
> report
> >> > contains the status of the podling at reporting date, including the
> most
> >> > important things. The PPMC doesn't have to fill out the report itself;
> >> > reports are aggregated in the wiki and all  later sent to the ASF
> Board.
> >> > You have further details at
> >> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html#Incubator+ASF+Board+Reports
> >> >
> >> > With the notice from IPMC, you will always get a template to fill in
> your
> >> > report in the wiki: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2016
> Since
> >> the
> >> > project is just starting incubation, the report is very simple to
> write.
> >> > Check examples from other podlings if you need, or ask your mentors.
> If
> >> by
> >> > Tuesday 5th afternoon (CET) nobody has drafted it, I'll propose an
> >> initial
> >> > version.
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Greetings, {podling} developers!
> >> >>
> >> >> This is a reminder that your report is due next Wednesday, January
> >> >> 6th.  Details below.
> >> >>
> >> >> Best,
> >> >>
> >> >> Marvin Humphrey, Report Manager for January, on behalf of the
> >> >> Incubator PMC
> >> >>
> >> >> ---
> >> >>
> >> >> Dear podling,
> >> >>
> >> >> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> >> >> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time
> to
> >> >> prepare your quarterly board report.
> >> >>
> >> >> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 20 January 2016, 10:30 am
> PDT.
> >> >> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> >> >> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2
> weeks
> >> >> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> >> >> submission (Wed, January 6th).
> >> >>
> >> >> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
> >> >> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
> >> >> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the
> board
> >> >> meeting.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >>
> >> >> The Apache Incubator PMC
> >> >>
> >> >> Submitting your Report
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >>
> >> >> Your report should contain the following:
> >> >>
> >> >> *   Your project name
> >> >> *   A brief description of your project, which assumes no

Re: Jira notification is not working.

[Sergio Fernández]

contact INFRA
either open an issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA
or chat with them http://infra.chat/

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Min-Seok Kim <ms...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi
>
> AFAIK, if someone creates an issue, it will be sent to
> dev@s2graph.incubator.apache.org.
>
> But I've never received any mail from Jira through
> dev@s2graph.incubator.apache.org.
>
> I looked at
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/project-config/S2GRAPH/notifications
> ,
> and several events send email to
>
>- Single Email Address (dev@s2graph.incubator.apache.org)
>
>
> But it seems not be working.
>
> How can I​ resolve this problem?
>
> Sincerely yours
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: January 2016 Report

[Sergio Fernández]

Any progress on this, Hyunsik?

As a community, you have to start to learn to deal with these formalities
of the foundation as a team; if someone has time for doing it, just share
the draft and others will provide feedback.
On Jan 5, 2016 10:51 AM, "Hyunsik Choi" <hyun...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Sergio,
>
> Thank you for reminding it. It's the first report of S2Graph. I'll
> write the first draft of the report. Then, I'll ask you guys to review
> it.
>
> Best regards,
> Hyunsik
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 2:31 AM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > As this is the first time the project report, I think this needs some
> > help...
> >
> > On a regular basis (monthly for the first three months, quarterly
> > thereafter), each incubating project reports to Incubator PMC. The report
> > contains the status of the podling at reporting date, including the most
> > important things. The PPMC doesn't have to fill out the report itself;
> > reports are aggregated in the wiki and all  later sent to the ASF Board.
> > You have further details at
> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html#Incubator+ASF+Board+Reports
> >
> > With the notice from IPMC, you will always get a template to fill in your
> > report in the wiki: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2016 Since
> the
> > project is just starting incubation, the report is very simple to write.
> > Check examples from other podlings if you need, or ask your mentors. If
> by
> > Tuesday 5th afternoon (CET) nobody has drafted it, I'll propose an
> initial
> > version.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Greetings, {podling} developers!
> >>
> >> This is a reminder that your report is due next Wednesday, January
> >> 6th.  Details below.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >> Marvin Humphrey, Report Manager for January, on behalf of the
> >> Incubator PMC
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Dear podling,
> >>
> >> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> >> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
> >> prepare your quarterly board report.
> >>
> >> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 20 January 2016, 10:30 am PDT.
> >> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> >> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
> >> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> >> submission (Wed, January 6th).
> >>
> >> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
> >> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
> >> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
> >> meeting.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> The Apache Incubator PMC
> >>
> >> Submitting your Report
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Your report should contain the following:
> >>
> >> *   Your project name
> >> *   A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
> >> the project or necessarily of its field
> >> *   A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> >> towards graduation.
> >> *   Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> >> aware of
> >> *   How has the community developed since the last report
> >> *   How has the project developed since the last report.
> >>
> >> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
> >>
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2016
> >>
> >> Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
> >> this page is created from a template.
> >>
> >> Mentors
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
> >> the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
> >> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
> >> for the Incubator PMC.
> >>
> >> Incubator PMC
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sergio Fernández
> > Partner Technology Manager
> > Redlink GmbH
> > m: +43 6602747925
> > e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
> > w: http://redlink.co
>

Re: January 2016 Report

[Sergio Fernández]

As this is the first time the project report, I think this needs some
help...

On a regular basis (monthly for the first three months, quarterly
thereafter), each incubating project reports to Incubator PMC. The report
contains the status of the podling at reporting date, including the most
important things. The PPMC doesn't have to fill out the report itself;
reports are aggregated in the wiki and all  later sent to the ASF Board.
You have further details at
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html#Incubator+ASF+Board+Reports

With the notice from IPMC, you will always get a template to fill in your
report in the wiki: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2016 Since the
project is just starting incubation, the report is very simple to write.
Check examples from other podlings if you need, or ask your mentors. If by
Tuesday 5th afternoon (CET) nobody has drafted it, I'll propose an initial
version.

Cheers,


On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@apache.org> wrote:

> Greetings, {podling} developers!
>
> This is a reminder that your report is due next Wednesday, January
> 6th.  Details below.
>
> Best,
>
> Marvin Humphrey, Report Manager for January, on behalf of the
> Incubator PMC
>
> ---
>
> Dear podling,
>
> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
> prepare your quarterly board report.
>
> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 20 January 2016, 10:30 am PDT.
> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> submission (Wed, January 6th).
>
> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
> meeting.
>
> Thanks,
>
> The Apache Incubator PMC
>
> Submitting your Report
>
> --
>
> Your report should contain the following:
>
> *   Your project name
> *   A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
> the project or necessarily of its field
> *   A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> towards graduation.
> *   Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> aware of
> *   How has the community developed since the last report
> *   How has the project developed since the last report.
>
> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2016
>
> Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
> this page is created from a template.
>
> Mentors
> ---
>
> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
> the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
> for the Incubator PMC.
>
> Incubator PMC
>
>


-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co