On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:39:36 +0200
Eike Rathke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Takashi,
>
> On Tuesday, 2007-08-21 13:34:18 +0900, Takashi Nakamoto wrote:
>
> > > > Switching routine that choose one class from the four
> > > > classes for creating an instance of a cell would be complex.
> > >
>
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:50:15 +0200
Eike Rathke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Kohei,
>
> On Tuesday, 2007-08-21 08:35:41 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
>
> > IIRC, if the text cell doesn't contain any phonetic text, it will
> > back-translate it into ruby using the IME if the main text contains an
Hi Eike,
Your idea, a factory pattern and Run-Time Type Information (RTTI),
will certainly work well.
Another idea, a phonetic guide text included in OUString, may be
one of the possible ideas. Kohei gave us a practical, experimental
way of implementation at
http://sc.openoffice.org/servlets/Read
Hi,
Thanks to the Kohei's good example, I have made a similar example
of Excel 2003 binary format. See an example of i80764.
A base text is followed by a phonetic guide text.
When a user fills a cell with a text, Excel Japanese version seems to
always append a phonetic guide text even though a t
Hi,
I have filed 2 issues describing two reworked/refactored
Spreadsheet-Dialogs:
- *Sort*-Dialog: see issue 80661
(http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80661)
- *Print*-Dialog: see issue 80588
(http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80588)
I miss the '*Range contains c
Hi Thomas,
Nice specification. I think it covers all major use-cases and most
important it covers them well.
[One can argue about phone-numbers (+nn-nnn-nn...nn) but I have no
single idea how to handle them consistently. Maybe IF the cell-type
(from 'Format cells' -> 'Numbers' -> 'Category'
Please note, that I updated the specification at
http://specs.openoffice.org/calc/ease-of-use/Enhanced_Formula_Input.odt
Although the question which user input is converted into a formula
is quite controversial, I tried to include the most important comments
into the specification.
In a nutshel
Eike Rathke schrieb:
Hi Kohei,
On Tuesday, 2007-08-21 08:12:13 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
What I meant to say was that Excel embeds the ruby text directly into
string data in the shared string table, instead of storing it as a cell
attribute.
As part of the string? How is it distinguished?
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 14:56 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi Kohei,
>
> On Tuesday, 2007-08-21 08:12:13 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
>
> > What I meant to say was that Excel embeds the ruby text directly into
> > string data in the shared string table, instead of storing it as a cell
> > attribute.
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 14:53 +0200, Niklas Nebel wrote:
> Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > What I meant to say was that Excel embeds the ruby text directly into
> > string data in the shared string table, instead of storing it as a cell
> > attribute.
>
> Just like text formats within the cell. :-)
I have
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 14:50 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi Kohei,
>
> On Tuesday, 2007-08-21 08:35:41 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
>
> > IIRC, if the text cell doesn't contain any phonetic text, it will
> > back-translate it into ruby using the IME if the main text contains any
> > Kanji character
Hi Kohei,
On Tuesday, 2007-08-21 08:12:13 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> What I meant to say was that Excel embeds the ruby text directly into
> string data in the shared string table, instead of storing it as a cell
> attribute.
As part of the string? How is it distinguished?
Eike
--
OOo/S
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
What I meant to say was that Excel embeds the ruby text directly into
string data in the shared string table, instead of storing it as a cell
attribute.
Just like text formats within the cell. :-)
Niklas
Hi Kohei,
On Tuesday, 2007-08-21 08:35:41 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> IIRC, if the text cell doesn't contain any phonetic text, it will
> back-translate it into ruby using the IME if the main text contains any
> Kanji characters, then return that ruby text to replace the Kanji
> characters in t
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 08:22 +0200, Daniel Rentz wrote:
> While I am playing with that... If a text cell does not contain phonetic
> text, the PHONETIC function call returns the main text instead of an
> empty string.
IIRC, if the text cell doesn't contain any phonetic text, it will
back-transl
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 08:12 +0200, Daniel Rentz wrote:
> The formula =A1 will return the
> main text only,
Correct.
> and the formula =PHONETIC(A1) will return the phonetic
> text only.
This is incorrect. It will return the ruby text and the text that is
raw Japanese alphabet (
Hi Takashi,
On Tuesday, 2007-08-21 13:45:53 +0900, Takashi Nakamoto wrote:
> > > 3) Store that as a cell attribute. If I understand correctly, Writer
> > > uses this approach.
> >
> > That sounds easiest from a first glance, but it dissects content into
> > attribution, which sooner or later wi
Hi Takashi,
On Tuesday, 2007-08-21 13:34:18 +0900, Takashi Nakamoto wrote:
> > > Switching routine that choose one class from the four
> > > classes for creating an instance of a cell would be complex.
> >
> > I don't think so. You need to distinguish anyway, and subclassing may
> > actually eas
Hi, Kazunari Hirano
I have checked the attachment(47646 and 47649).In the 47649,I tried in the cell
and in the box on the formular bar but I found something different.
In the cell(C5, C6, C7,C8, C12, C13, C14, C15, C16and C17) I can locate the
cursor by mouse .But in the box on the formular bar t
19 matches
Mail list logo
