Hi Leonard,
Just returned from vacation, hence the silence..
On Friday, 2009-09-11 00:43:09 +0200, Leonard Mada wrote:
> I might be too late,
Yes, too late, UI string changes aren't allowed anymore.
> but the following small correction
> sounds slightly better:
>
> Calculates the probability
Hello Eike,
I might be too late, but the following small correction
sounds slightly better:
Calculates the probability of observing a z-statistic
greater than the one computed based on *the* sample.
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: 3 Sep 2009 12:34:44 -
> Von: e...@openoffice.or
a z-statistic as extreme or more
extreme than that observed with our real sample. It is
the probability of drawing such a sample, not of comparing
2 samples.]
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:35:29 +0200
> Von: Eike Rathke
> An: dev@sc.openoffice.o
Hi Regina,
On Wednesday, 2009-08-26 18:02:44 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
>> "calculates the probability of observing a value as large
>> or larger for the z-statistic"
>
> There is a comparison "observing a value larger" but it does not
> contain, to what it is compared. There must be someth
Hi Eike, hi Leonard,
Eike Rathke schrieb:
Hi Leonard,
On Tuesday, 2009-08-25 15:45:42 +0200, Leonard Mada wrote:
I would therefore stick with the one sample definition,
and adapt only the text to correspond to what actually
the function computes.
"The p-value is the probability, under the nu
Hi Leonard,
On Tuesday, 2009-08-25 15:45:42 +0200, Leonard Mada wrote:
> I would therefore stick with the one sample definition,
> and adapt only the text to correspond to what actually
> the function computes.
>
> "The p-value is the probability, under the null hypothesis,
> of observing a val
ncern, then compacting
"as large or larger" will result in:
"calculates the probability of observing a value larger
than the z-statistic"
Sincerely,
Leonard Mada
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:23:33 +0200
> Von: Regina Henschel
>
Hi Leonard,
Leonard Mada schrieb:
Dear Calc team,
the following wording is ambiguous and it may be wrong altogether:
function description:
calculates the probability of a *sample* mean greater than the mean of
the given *sample*.
[EMPHASIS ADDED]
A long phrase for the application help woul
Dear Calc team,
the following wording is ambiguous and it may be wrong altogether:
> function description:
> calculates the probability of a *sample* mean greater than the mean of
> the given *sample*.
[EMPHASIS ADDED]
So, does it compute the probabilities based on 2 samples?
I doubt it.
I may
