[VOTE] Create a new project servicecomb-istio

Hello All. This is a call for a Vote to create a new project servicecomb-istio. It's a tool that synchronizes servicecomb-service-center microservice registration information to Istio. Discussion thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/ok1q1bdd2tcr8ynx7p27mkg6bj80p9t0 Voting will start now (

new committer: Yasheng Tang

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache ServiceComb has invited Yasheng Tang[1] to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. [1] https://github.com/aseTo2016 Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the

[ANNOUNCE] Apache ServiceComb Service-Center version 2.0.0 Released

Hello All, Apache ServiceComb Team is glad to announce the release of Apache ServiceComb Service-Center 2.0.0 Apache ServiceComb Service-Center(https://github.com/apache/servicecomb-service-center) is a Restful based service-registry that provides micro-services discovery and

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center version 2.0.0

Hi All, We are glad to announce that ServiceComb community has approved the Apache ServiceComb Service-Center 2.0.0 release with the following results: +1 Approve the release: 4 binding (bismy, little-cui tianxiaoliang, Willem Jiang) +0 No opinion: 0 -1 Do not release: 0 Thanks all for

Re:[VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center version 2.0.0

+1 (binding), I checked: 1. RAT headers is OK 2. sha512sum is OK 3. PGP verify OK 4. Build from source is OK 5. All use cases are PASS -- Original -- Hi all, Please review and vote on Apache ServiceCenter 2.0.0 release. The release candidate has been tagged in

[VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center version 2.0.0

Hi all, Please review and vote on Apache ServiceCenter 2.0.0 release. The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 2.0.0, available here: https://github.com/apache/servicecomb-service-center/releases/tag/v2.0.0 Release Notes are here:

[VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center version 2.0.0

Hi all, Please review and vote on Apache Service-Center 2.0.0 release. The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 2.0.0, available here: https://github.com/apache/servicecomb-service-center/releases/tag/v2.0.0 Release Notes are here:

Re: [PROPOSAL] ServiceComb MetaConfig

Tian ??2019??3??29?? 5:27?? > sure, mainly forcus on management , ease of use, rollback, key value > version control. value validation. > > first we support API, later UX. > > bismy ??2019??3??29?? 4:08?? > > > Provide a centered configuration

?????? [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Pack version 0.4.0 (RC-02)

+1 -- -- ??: "zzzwjm"; : 2019??4??2??(??) 3:48 ??: "dev"; : Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Pack version 0.4.0 (RC-02) +1 checked release notes. Zheng Feng ??2019??4??2?? 2:13?? > +1 Release this

?????? [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center version 1.2.0

in previous list-watch loop -- -- ??: "willem.jiang"; : 2019??4??2??(??) 4:04 ??: "dev";"Sure"; : Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center version 1.2.0 It looks like little cui j

??????[ANN] New ServiceComb committer: Zhang Lei (??????

Congratulations! -- -- ??: Willem Jiang : 2019??4??1?? 23:19 ??: dev : ??[ANN] New ServiceComb committer: Zhang Lei (?? Sorry, there is a typo in the first mail. The first sentence should be: Please join me and the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center version 1.2.0

+1 binding the gpg verify is PASS the use cases run in windows and linux are PASS licenses are OK readme is OK -- Original -- From: Mohammad Asif Siddiqui Date: Fri,Mar 29,2019 3:35 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center

Re: Release of ServiceComb

ServiceComb > > > > I will update the document about alpha support consul later today > > coolbeevip > > BOCO > > > > > ?? 2019??3??194:54??Willem Jiang ?? > > > > As we talked, it'

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 1.1.0

+1 I checked: 1. license is ok 2. demos is work -- Original -- From: Willem Jiang Date: Wed,Nov 28,2018 10:37 AM To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 1.1.0 +1. I checked: - signatures and hashes correct - LICENSE is

Re: [Discuss]Adding Etcd as a config center for Java-Chassis

ine for it. > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 9:50 AM bismy wrote: > > > Do you have any evaluation document by using etcd as config center? Now > > config-cc supports using Huawei Config Center as the backend. And this > > implementation is based on ectd with an extra a

??????[VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center version 1.1.0 [RC-02]

+1 binding Checks I did: - hashes and signatures is good - NOTICE/LICENSE exists - can make release kit from source - checked for archive matching git tag - Ran the java-chassis demo's -- -- ??: "Mohammad Asif Siddiqui"; :

?????? [DISCUSS]Discovery API support filter instances by properties

gt; > > -- -- > > > ??: "willem.jiang"; > > > : 2018??11??9??(??) 8:50 > > > ??: "dev"; > > > > > > : Re: [DISCUSS]Discovery API support filter instances by pr

?????? [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center version 1.1.0

Done! here is the link https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCB-1040 -- -- ??: "willem.jiang"; : 2018??11??22??(??) 9:30 ??: "dev"; : Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center version 1.1.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Saga version 0.2.1

+1 binding -- Original -- From: Willem Jiang Date: Fri,Nov 23,2018 5:44 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Saga version 0.2.1 Hi Walker, Thanks for you time to verify the kit. If you are the PMC[1] member, you can send a binding

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center version 1.1.0

quick fix for this and > also if possible please add few IT/UT for this type of scenario so that these > bugs can be identified by the CI itself. > > Regards > Asif > > On 2018/11/21 00:24:16, "Sure" wrote: > > Hi, asif. I have checked the RC and found a bug. > &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center version 1.1.0

Hi, asif. I have checked the RC and found a bug. In multiple DC aggregate case, sdk can??t get the instance event from SC. I think it??s a major bug. -- Original -- From: Mohammad Asif Siddiqui Date: Wed,Nov 21,2018 0:34 AM To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE]

Re: Release of ServiceComb 1.1.0

The Service-Center will also start a new release in 11.19~11.23 -- Original -- From: wjm wjm Date: Tue,Nov 13,2018 5:08 PM To: dev Subject: Re: Release of ServiceComb 1.1.0 we can start release process between 11.19~11.23 for java chassis Bin Ma

??????[ANN] New ServiceComb committer: Yao Haishi (??????)

Congratulations ! -- -- ??: wjm wjm : 2018??11??13?? 17:06 ??: dev : ??[ANN] New ServiceComb committer: Yao Haishi (??) Congratulation Mohammad Asif Siddiqui ??2018??11??13?? 4:19?? > Congratulations Yao

?????? [Heads Up ]Git repository names are changed

Hi guys, the ServiceCenter docs and codes are fixed! ??: "zzzwjm"; : 2018??11??9??(??) 10:55 ??: "dev"; : Re: [Heads Up ]Git repository names are changed Great, thanks~ Zheng Feng ??2018??11??9?? 10:43?? > Nice work ! I just open the PR to fix in

[DISCUSS]Discovery API support filter instances by properties

https://github.com/apache/incubator-servicecomb-service-center/issues/482 Hi guys, Our system has 20+ services, and each service has 2k instances at most. All the instances are grouped by some labels(in Properties). We are now querying all the instances from SC, and then filtering them by

Re: [DISCUSS]SC Push Instance Event Through Kafka

This a optional way to deploy sc There is a scenes can be supported, user want to listen the instance properties change order for the next business logic. Sure, this is an advance way -- Original -- From: wjm wjm Date: Wed,Nov 7,2018 10:30 AM To: dev

[DISCUSS]SC Push Instance Event Through Kafka

Now, the way sc push instance event to Microservices is based on websocket. This will lose events when connection is broken. So, I think we can add a new optional way that push events into the MQ like kafka, and Microservices can subscribe it and no longer lose the messages from sc. It has

?????? Release of ServiceComb 1.1.0

Sure! There are many important features done in SC: 1. Service-Center command line client. 2. Support multiple data center deployment. 3. Support deployment of Service-Center on multiple Infrastructure. I think we should release SC as soon as possible, and prepare for external advertising

Re: Release of ServiceComb 1.1.0

SC is ready to release -- Original -- From: wjm wjm Date: Sat,Oct 27,2018 10:59 AM To: dev Subject: Re: Release of ServiceComb 1.1.0

Re:[VOTE] Graduate Apache ServiceComb (incubating)

+1 binding -- Original -- From: <15889502...@163.com> Date: Mon,Sep 17,2018 11:13 AM To: dev Subject: Re: Re:[VOTE] Graduate Apache ServiceComb (incubating) +1 non-binding At 2018-09-14 15:58:32, "Willem Jiang" wrote: >Please vote on the proposal for

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ServiceComb (incubating)

+1 binding -- Original -- From: wjm wjm Date: Sat,Sep 15,2018 9:25 AM To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ServiceComb (incubating) +1 (binding) Sukesh A C ??2018??9??14?? 4:58?? > +1 Binding > > Thanks, > Sukesh. > > -Original

Re: Invitation of the ServiceComb PMC

Yes -- Original -- From: Zen Lin Date: Thu,Sep 6,2018 10:17 AM To: dev Subject: Re: Invitation of the ServiceComb PMC Yes Best Regards, --- Zen Lin zenlintechnofr...@gmail.com Focused on Micro Service and Apache ServiceComb wjm wjm ??2018??9??6??

Re: [DISCUSS] Heading to graduation

+1 -- Original -- From: wjm wjm Date: Tue,Sep 4,2018 11:20 AM To: dev Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Heading to graduation +1 ?? <342906...@qq.com> ??2018??9??4?? 10:54?? > +1 > > > > -- -- > ??:

Re?? [DISCUSS]Add Vendor Sources Code In SC project

10:48?? > > > > > > > +1 Agree > > > > the truth is go project can easily go into a dep hell and there is no > > dep > > > > tool can manage the complicated deps > > > > > > > > checkout how go project does > > > > https://gi

[DISCUSS]Add Vendor Sources Code In SC project

Developers from China complain it is hard to go get the 3rd depends source code of sc. I suggest add these source code in vendor directory in sc project, like Istio and etcd project do.

Re: [VOTE] Holding an Apache ServiceComb (incubating) Meetup as aCo-located Event in HC 2018 Shanghai, China, OCT 12.

+1 binding -- Original -- From: zhongyuan zhou Date: Thu,Aug 23,2018 8:42 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Holding an Apache ServiceComb (incubating) Meetup as aCo-located Event in HC 2018 Shanghai, China, OCT 12. +1 non-binding. Zen Lin ??2018??8??23??

[DISCUSS]add The Sources Panel In Schema Test

Now, shema test in the sc frontend does not contain the schema source, then the developer can not debug it coveniently. So, I suggest add a source panel to shema test

Re: [VOTE] Proposal for holding an Apache ServiceComb (Incubating)Meetup in Bangalore, India

+1 binding iPhone -- Original -- From: wjm wjm Date: Wed,Aug 1,2018 0:18 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposal for holding an Apache ServiceComb (Incubating)Meetup in Bangalore, India +1 binding. 2018-08-01 10:18 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang : > +1

?????? [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating) version 1.0.0 (RC-03)

+1 binding 1. check the UI topology BUG is fixed 2. the use cases ars passed -- -- ??: "Mohammad Asif Siddiqui"; : 2018??7??26??(??) 3:45 ??: "dev"; : Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating)

?????? Cannot find the instance in ServiceComb Discovery

tance in ServiceComb Discovery Oh, it's my bad change the saga discovery servicecenter to development mode. Thx Sure for your help. From the log, I cannot tell it's the development issue, can we polish the logger file to make it easy for user to dig the issue? Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo

?????? Cannot find the instance in ServiceComb Discovery

sorry, not the car service env mismatch, it is saga-service env mismatch -- -- ??: "Sure"; : 2018??7??26??(??) 3:37 ??: "dev@servicecomb.apache.org"; : ?? Cannot find the instance in S

?????? Cannot find the instance in ServiceComb Discovery

this is the environment isolation problem. i have check the ci log and found that the car-rental-service is registered in development environment but other services are registered in ''(default) environment. so it will fail when car service discovery hotal service instances from SC.

?????? [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating) version 1.0.0

-1 binding i have check the UI, but there are two problems: 1. when i click the statistics, it change the page to service list not instance list of the instance status 2. the top graph does not work at all, there are no error in brower console. i use the chrome Version 67.0.3396.62 (Official

Re: [DISCUSS] Service-Center Docker images version numbering

i think we can new a integrated test job per day and this test can use the latest sc image version, and reuse the java chassis test cases. Then sc and chassis test cases can be maintained together iPhone -- Original -- From: Willem Jiang Date: Thu,Jul

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Re-Design of Service-Center Frontend

-1 we will publish the cse-UI in servicecomb(named servicecomb-UI may be), this??s the unified console of sc,cc and monitoring. So we just need to cost a little of time to fix bugs of SC-UI. The sericecomb-UI will be more valuable in the future iPhone --

?????? [DISCUSS] about integration test

Agree! 1. Just like willem.jiang said, we can push multiple SC versions to docker hub 2. Chassis integration test can run with different SC version in every time -- -- ??: "willem.jiang"; : 2018??7??10??(??) 5:16 ??: "dev";

Re: [DISCUSSION] How to migrate configurations from cse toservicecomb prefix

-1 I think just change cse to servicecomb. It would not have much work to change one word in micro service project -- Original -- From: Zen Lin Date: Thu,Jun 14,2018 9:27 AM To: dev Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] How to migrate configurations from cse toservicecomb

??????[VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating) version 1.0.0-m2

+1 1?? Commit id match. 2?? Checksum is correct. 3?? Release name is correct. 4?? DISCLAIMER/LICENSE/NOTICE file exist. 5?? README is correct.6?? Integration tests passed. -- -- ??: "Mohammad Asif Siddiqui"; : 2018??6??8??(??) 6:59

?????? [Discuss] Should we clean up vendor/github.com/go-ecosystem for ServiceCenter

we do not change the code in go-ecosystem package and we can remove these files from project Just make sure the same version of this package compiled with etcd components when make the release. -- -- ??: "willem.jiang"; :

ok

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1 - Fourth Attempt

+1 -- Original -- From: Mohammad Asif Siddiqui Date: Mon,Mar 19,2018 0:16 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1 - Fourth Attempt +1 Binding

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Saga (incubating) version 0.1.0 - Second Attempt

+1 LGTM -- Original -- From: Mohammad Asif Siddiqui Date: Mon,Mar 19,2018 0:25 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Saga (incubating) version 0.1.0 - Second Attempt +1 Binding I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1 - Second Attempt

+1 LGTM -- Original -- From: Mohammad Asif Siddiqui Date: Sat,Mar 17,2018 2:52 AM To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1 - Second Attempt Hi All,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1 - Third Attempt

+1 All testings are pass! -- Original -- From: Mohammad Asif Siddiqui Date: Thu,Mar 8,2018 8:02 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1 - Third

?????? [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating)version 1.0.0-m1

Suggestion: merge these configures in SC app.conf, and move the frontend readme into main readme. -- -- ??: "Yang Bo"; : 2018??3??8??(??) 3:36 ??: "dev"; : Re: [VOTE] Release

Re: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating)version 1.0.0-m1

+1 -- Original -- From: Sukesh A C Date: Mon,Feb 26,2018 1:46 PM To: Mohammad Asif Siddiqui , dev@servicecomb.apache.org Cc: Vinay Murudi , Krishna M Kumar

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating)version 1.0.0-m1

+1 All tests are passed -- Original -- From: preethi Date: Tue,Feb 20,2018 2:14 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating)version 1.0.0-m1 +1 Verified build

?????? [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating)version 1.0.0-m1

ISSUE link: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCB-343 -- -- ??: "Sure"<sure_0...@qq.com>; : 2018??2??12??(??) 5:27 ??: "dev@servicecomb.apache.org"<dev@servicecomb.apache.org>; : ?? [

?????? [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating)version 1.0.0-m1

-1 there is a major bug in this version, i have raise an ISSUE here. and i will fix it as soon as possible. -- -- ??: "Mahesh Raju Somalaraju"; : 2018??2??12??(??) 2:42 ??:

??????[VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating)version 1.0.0-m1

+1 Tested build from source on linux/windows machine and tested user case to be OK -- -- ??: "Mohammad Asif Siddiqui"; : 2018??2??9??(??) 11:26 ??: