[Bug 6847] sorbs reject dns queries from dul ip listed ips, even from ripe net seperate static ips

2012-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6847 Darxus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 6847] sorbs reject dns queries from dul ip listed ips, even from ripe net seperate static ips

2012-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6847 Benny Pedersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|IN

[Bug 6847] sorbs reject dns queries from dul ip listed ips, even from ripe net seperate static ips

2012-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6847 --- Comment #4 from Darxus --- (In reply to comment #2) > 1: sorbs ignore that my isp put me in ripe.net in a dynamic pool, but still > list me as static self ranged in ripe.net (80.162.68.52/30 and > 2.104.223.8/30) is seperated listed,

[Bug 6847] sorbs reject dns queries from dul ip listed ips, even from ripe net seperate static ips

2012-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6847 AXB changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 6848] HTML URI spoofing detection

2012-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6848 --- Comment #4 from John Hardin --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Who wants to add these to their sandbox? > > How about a dedicated file in the "emailed" sandbox? Good idea! -- You are receiving this mail b

[Bug 6847] sorbs reject dns queries from dul ip listed ips, even from ripe net seperate static ips

2012-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6847 Benny Pedersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug 6848] HTML URI spoofing detection

2012-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6848 --- Comment #3 from AXB --- Alex, Pls include rules in a file named 20_bug_6848_ajb.cf and attached to this bug. For safety, enclose rules in: ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDetail # put rules here endif -- You are receivin

[Bug 6847] sorbs reject dns queries from dul ip listed ips, even from ripe net seperate static ips

2012-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6847 Darxus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug 6848] HTML URI spoofing detection

2012-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6848 --- Comment #2 from AXB --- (In reply to comment #1) > Who wants to add these to their sandbox? How about a dedicated file in the "emailed" sandbox? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 6848] HTML URI spoofing detection

2012-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6848 John Hardin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jhar...@impsec.org --- Comment #1

[Bug 6848] New: HTML URI spoofing detection

2012-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6848 Priority: P2 Bug ID: 6848 Assignee: dev@spamassassin.apache.org Summary: HTML URI spoofing detection Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux

[Bug 6847] New: sorbs reject dns queries from dul ip listed ips, even from ripe net seperate static ips

2012-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6847 Priority: P2 Bug ID: 6847 Assignee: dev@spamassassin.apache.org Summary: sorbs reject dns queries from dul ip listed ips, even from ripe net seperate static ips Seve

Re: make test fails trying to compile spamc

2012-10-02 Thread Mark Martinec
> On 10/2/2012 12:36 PM, Axb wrote: > > Yep - heaven knows why it worked till today and all of a sudden... > > Mark made some changes recently. It's possible zlib wasn't require > previously, possibly? Some changes indeed [Bug 6842], although I don't think I touched anything regarding zlib. Ma

[Bug 6845] Message parsing incorrectly detects MIME headers in message body

2012-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6845 --- Comment #8 from Kevin A. McGrail --- I would say any test to start with is good. we can build on it from there. But I'm always afraid of these tiny core changes rippling things badly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You a

Re: make test fails trying to compile spamc

2012-10-02 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 10/2/2012 12:36 PM, Axb wrote: Yep - heaven knows why it worked till today and all of a sudden... Mark made some changes recently. It's possible zlib wasn't require previously, possibly? Regards, KAM

Re: make test fails trying to compile spamc

2012-10-02 Thread Axb
On 10/02/2012 06:34 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: On 10/02, Axb wrote: On 10/02/2012 02:11 PM, Axb wrote: On 10/02/2012 01:51 PM, Henrik Krohns wrote: On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:38:40PM +0200, Axb wrote: totally new to me... gcc -g -O2 spamc/spamc.c spamc/getopt.c spamc/libs

Re: make test fails trying to compile spamc

2012-10-02 Thread darxus
On 10/02, Axb wrote: > On 10/02/2012 02:11 PM, Axb wrote: > >On 10/02/2012 01:51 PM, Henrik Krohns wrote: > >>On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:38:40PM +0200, Axb wrote: > >>>totally new to me... > >>> > >>>gcc -g -O2 spamc/spamc.c spamc/getopt.c spamc/libspamc.c > >>>spamc/utils.c \ > >>>

Jenkins build is back to stable : SpamAssassin-trunk #8062

2012-10-02 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See

[Bug 6845] Message parsing incorrectly detects MIME headers in message body

2012-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6845 --- Comment #7 from John Hardin --- (In reply to comment #6) > The patch seems straightforward but can you think of any way to add t/ tests > to check this code to make sure it doesn't have a larger impact than > intended? I'm not exper

Re: make test fails trying to compile spamc

2012-10-02 Thread Axb
On 10/02/2012 02:11 PM, Axb wrote: On 10/02/2012 01:51 PM, Henrik Krohns wrote: On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:38:40PM +0200, Axb wrote: totally new to me... gcc -g -O2 spamc/spamc.c spamc/getopt.c spamc/libspamc.c spamc/utils.c \ -o spamc/spamc -ldl -lz spamc/libsp

Re: make test fails trying to compile spamc

2012-10-02 Thread Axb
On 10/02/2012 01:51 PM, Henrik Krohns wrote: On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:38:40PM +0200, Axb wrote: totally new to me... gcc -g -O2 spamc/spamc.c spamc/getopt.c spamc/libspamc.c spamc/utils.c \ -o spamc/spamc -ldl -lz spamc/libspamc.c:68:18: fatal error: zlib.h: No

Re: make test fails trying to compile spamc

2012-10-02 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 10/2/2012 7:38 AM, Axb wrote: totally new to me... gcc -g -O2 spamc/spamc.c spamc/getopt.c spamc/libspamc.c spamc/utils.c \ -o spamc/spamc -ldl -lz spamc/libspamc.c:68:18: fatal error: zlib.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. make[1]: *** [spamc

Re: make test fails trying to compile spamc

2012-10-02 Thread Henrik Krohns
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:38:40PM +0200, Axb wrote: > totally new to me... > > gcc -g -O2 spamc/spamc.c spamc/getopt.c spamc/libspamc.c spamc/utils.c \ > -o spamc/spamc -ldl -lz > spamc/libspamc.c:68:18: fatal error: zlib.h: No such file or directory > compilation t

make test fails trying to compile spamc

2012-10-02 Thread Axb
totally new to me... gcc -g -O2 spamc/spamc.c spamc/getopt.c spamc/libspamc.c spamc/utils.c \ -o spamc/spamc -ldl -lz spamc/libspamc.c:68:18: fatal error: zlib.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. make[1]: *** [spamc/spamc] Error 1 axb@

Jenkins build became unstable: SpamAssassin-trunk #8061

2012-10-02 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See

[Bug 6846] FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO FSL_FREEMAIL_1 FSL_FREEMAIL_2 False positives

2012-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6846 AXB changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 6846] FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO FSL_FREEMAIL_1 FSL_FREEMAIL_2 False positives

2012-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6846 --- Comment #1 from AXB --- Imo it's very unwise to HARD reject with a score of 6 Is Infra doing regular sa-updates ? score FSL_FREEMAIL_10.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 score FSL_FREEMAIL_22.796

[Bug 6846] New: FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO FSL_FREEMAIL_1 FSL_FREEMAIL_2 False positives

2012-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6846 Priority: P2 Bug ID: 6846 Assignee: dev@spamassassin.apache.org Summary: FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO FSL_FREEMAIL_1 FSL_FREEMAIL_2 False positives Severity: normal C

[Bug 6838] 404 error from sa-update since 19/09/2012

2012-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6838 Larsen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||larsen...@web.de --- Comment #22 from