Anyone wish to add anything? Is the project dead and attic
bound, or is it not?
On Apr 15, 2013, at 11:06 AM, Stefan Teleman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Just a quick Email... the list has been pretty quiet
>> lately and just pinging to see who's still watch
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Just a quick Email... the list has been pretty quiet
> lately and just pinging to see who's still watching
> and reading :)
This project is obviously dead. There is no active development being
done for C++2011, and no bug fixing for the exis
Still watching.
On 15 Apr 2013, at 4:36 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> If possible ;)
>
> On Apr 15, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>
>> On 04/15/2013 03:35 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Just a quick Email... the list has been pretty quiet
>>> lately and just pinging to see who's still watch
If possible ;)
On Apr 15, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 04/15/2013 03:35 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Just a quick Email... the list has been pretty quiet
>> lately and just pinging to see who's still watching
>> and reading :)
>>
>
> Should we all respond :)
>
> Cheers
> --
> ^TM
On 04/15/13 09:35, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Just a quick Email... the list has been pretty quiet
lately and just pinging to see who's still watching
and reading :)
Still here.
Pong
On 4/15/13 10:35 AM, "Jim Jagielski" wrote:
>Just a quick Email... the list has been pretty quiet
>lately and just pinging to see who's still watching
>and reading :)
On 04/15/2013 03:35 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Just a quick Email... the list has been pretty quiet
lately and just pinging to see who's still watching
and reading :)
Should we all respond :)
Cheers
--
^TM
Just a quick Email... the list has been pretty quiet
lately and just pinging to see who's still watching
and reading :)
Eric Lemings wrote:
[...]
...
Without the cast, the argument type passed to the internal ctor is
still `std::tuple<_TypesT...>' and, because of the template ctors,
the compiler would therefore bind to the templated copy ctor wisely
deeming this ctor a better "fit".
Would this be prevented by
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 9:16 AM
> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Tuple status
>
> Eric Lemings wrote:
> >
...
> >
> > I agree thoug
Eric Lemings wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 11:08 PM
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tuple status
Eric Lemings wrote:
I got this problem fixed with my latest change.
The tuple
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 11:08 PM
> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Tuple status
>
...
>
>c) in ctor initializer lists spanning multiple lines, pl
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 11:08 PM
> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Tuple status
>
...
>c) in ctor initializer lists spanning multiple lines, please
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Lemings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 10:45 AM
> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Tuple status
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 11:08 PM
> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Tuple status
>
> Eric Lemings wrote:
> >
> > I got this problem fixed wi
ginal Message-
From: Eric Lemings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 4:42 PM
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: RE: Tuple status
Committed.
Note, there is still a problem with using reference wrappers with
make_tuple() which I'm currently working on but I did
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 4:42 PM
> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Tuple status
>
>
> Committed.
>
> Note, there is still a problem with using reference wrappers with
> make_tuple() which I'm currently working on but I didn&#x
nt: Monday, June 30, 2008 10:46 AM
> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> Subject: Tuple status
>
>
> Just a brief status on tuple progress.
>
> I got the remaining portions of tuple (except the tie() function) work
> late Friday. I did a personal code review over the weeke
Just a brief status on tuple progress.
I got the remaining portions of tuple (except the tie() function) work
late Friday. I did a personal code review over the weekend and am
applying some cleanup and other finishing touches. Should be checking
in a lot of changes later today. So just a
Travis Vitek wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 3:31 PM
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: Re: status of with gcc
Travis Vitek wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
I'm getting compilation e
>-Original Message-
>From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
>Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 3:31 PM
>To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
>Subject: Re: status of with gcc
>
>Travis Vitek wrote:
>>
>>
>> Martin Sebor wrote:
Travis Vitek wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
I'm getting compilation errors with gcc 4.3. Is the implementation
supposed to be stable at this point with any compiler or are there
still some major issues?
I just did a sync of 4.3.x and a build with CXXFLAGS="-std=gnu++0x
-D_RWSTD_EXT_CXX_0X" and
Martin Sebor wrote:
>
>I'm getting compilation errors with gcc 4.3. Is the implementation
>supposed to be stable at this point with any compiler or are there
>still some major issues?
>
I just did a sync of 4.3.x and a build with CXXFLAGS="-std=gnu++0x
-D_RWSTD_EXT_CXX_0X" and didn't run into a
I'm getting compilation errors with gcc 4.3. Is the implementation
supposed to be stable at this point with any compiler or are there
still some major issues?
Thanks
Martin
I will be deferring all unresolved 4.2.1 issues scheduled until
4.2.2. Before I do, there are a few issues In Progress (and some
effectively in the same state even though they aren't marked as
such) that I'd appreciate if people assignees could resolve or
update (Stop Progress) as appropriate so I
25 matches
Mail list logo
