LoggingResearch closed pull request #3553: Handle InterruptedException in
Supervisor close() method.
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3553
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
LoggingResearch opened a new pull request, #3553:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3553
## What is the purpose of the change
This PR addresses the handling of InterruptedException in the close() method
of the Supervisor class. The changes include:
1. Adding a separate
Hi everyone, I can confirm that voting has begun. In terms of timeline,
the vote must stay open for one week and then this is a minimum waiting
period of a few days after we forward results to the board to have new PMC
members added. So please expect another update toward the last week of
July.
Great for jdk11/jdk17 !
Attached the mvn clean install's GZIP logs which I forgot to attach in
previous post, in case that's of any help as a feedback on RC1
Le sam. 8 juil. 2023 à 18:54, Bipin Prasad
a écrit :
>
> About jdk11,jdk17 this is coming shortly. Because of some downstream
>
About jdk11,jdk17 this is coming shortly. Because of some downstream
dependencies, there were some issues with tests. After this release, we need to
add jdk11 and 17 to GitHub actions (and then at some point drop jdk8).
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Saturday, July 8, 2023, 11:44 AM,
More tests on Storm 2.5.0-RC1:
* Using the binary distribution, I upgrade my Storm cluster with 6
workers/supervisor dedicated machines (without changing the big JARs
which are still compiled with Storm 2.4.0 dependencies)
=> everything work fine so far
* I tried to compile from sources on a
I am working on release candidate 2, but will also look at this issue this
weekend and get back to you.Thanks for checking.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Saturday, July 8, 2023, 1:15 AM, Alexandre Vermeerbergen
wrote:
Hello,
I tried to check apache-storm-2.5.0.tar.gz.sha512(from
Hello,
I tried to check apache-storm-2.5.0.tar.gz.sha512(from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.5.0-rc1/),
but I get this error:
$ /usr/bin/sha512sum -c apache-storm-2.5.0.tar.gz.sha512
/usr/bin/sha512sum: apache-storm-2.5.0.tar.gz.sha512: no properly
formatted SHA512
bipinprasad merged PR #3552:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3552
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
bipinprasad opened a new pull request, #3552:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3552
…d update the uri from gitbox to github
## What is the purpose of the change
*While doing "mvm perform", the checkout times out at the end when using the
https connection. Also the url
bipinprasad merged PR #3549:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3549
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
bipinprasad commented on PR #3547:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3547#issuecomment-1614815685
Triggered workflow.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
bipinprasad merged PR #3550:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3550
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
bipinprasad merged PR #3551:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3551
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
bipinprasad merged PR #3548:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3548
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
bipinprasad opened a new pull request, #3551:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3551
## What is the purpose of the change
*Python2 has been deprecated and removed Storm 2.5.0. Update documentation
to reflect this change.*
## How was the change tested
*Render
bipinprasad opened a new pull request, #3550:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3550
## What is the purpose of the change
*Python2 has been deprecated. However many systems still activate python2
when only using python. Change it to python3 to ensure Python version 3 is
bipinprasad opened a new pull request, #3549:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3549
## What is the purpose of the change
*Python2 has been deprecated. However many systems still activate python2
when only using python. Change it to python3 to ensure Python version 3 is
I found some issues with python vs python3 with the release candidate that
Bipin is addressing.
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 6:15 PM Bipin Prasad wrote:
> Storm Release candidate version 2.5.0 rc1 is here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.5.0-rc1
> Please vote on this
rzo1 commented on code in PR #3546:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3546#discussion_r1246591112
##
docs/flux.md:
##
@@ -765,6 +770,16 @@ The `override` property controls how includes affect the
values defined in the c
**N.B.:** Includes are not yet recursive.
[Note: You're receiving this email because you are subscribed to one or
more project dev@ mailing lists at the Apache Software Foundation.]
This is your final reminder that the Call for Presentations for
Community Over Code (formerly known as ApacheCon) is closing soon - on
Thursday, 13 July 2023
Stephen, That will be great. Hope you get this message since the return
email has INVALID at the end.
Thanks—Bipin
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Tuesday, June 27, 2023, 8:21 AM, Stephen Powis
wrote:
I'm happy to take up the redis spout. I think I have an outstanding PR
(might be 3
I'm happy to take up the redis spout. I think I have an outstanding PR
(might be 3 or 4 years old at this point tho...) to improve the existing
one, and also have this implementation I'd be willing to give to the
project after bringing it up to date:
Great news!
I will start testing this Storm 2.5.0 RC later this week, as i do not have
access to my machines before.
Thanks!
Alex
Le mar. 27 juin 2023, 01:15, Bipin Prasad a écrit :
> Storm Release candidate version 2.5.0 rc1 is here:
>
Storm Release candidate version 2.5.0 rc1 is here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.5.0-rc1
Please vote on this release.
1. How to vote is described here:
https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/RELEASING.md#how-to-vote-on-a-release-candidate
2. Release
Hey,
I have been accumulating a list of popular/trending db for which storm
connectors are still missing and preparing a case for getting them
prioritized and added to the repo based on user interest.
For now, we have the below list of potential candidates (based solely on my
own experience in
Hey,
I happened to come across the board meeting notes for this month (21st June
2023) which states that: "A report was expected, but not received"
(ref: https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Storm.html)
Humble request from PMC chair if we can get some traction here.
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023
rzo1 commented on PR #3547:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3547#issuecomment-1605965102
@6harat i am no committer on Storm, so nö karma to do so ;-)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
6harat commented on PR #3547:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3547#issuecomment-1605948131
@bipinprasad @rzo1 could you please help trigger the workflow
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
Hi,
The dev changes related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3925
are now completed and tested locally.
Associated PR: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3547
Requesting the existing committers/PMC members with relevant permissions to:
1. trigger the github workflow for the above
6harat commented on PR #3546:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3546#issuecomment-1605932509
> I was going through other parts of the code and found this TODO. Seems
like it was intended to be connected to WorkerHooks when those were first
introduced.
>
> ```
>
Hey,
Bumping up this thread as I am still awaiting review comments on the
aforementioned PR: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3546
Let me know if anything else is required from my end.
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 9:14 PM 6harat
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Just an update on the Apache JIRA account. I
bipinprasad merged PR #3540:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3540
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Agree with Bipin Prasad, since it seems that we're close to a Storm
2.5.0 candidate release...
Le mar. 20 juin 2023 à 17:38, Bipin Prasad
a écrit :
>
> I would urge PMC Chair to give us some guidance on this.
>
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 8:32 AM, 6harat
Hey,
Just an update on the Apache JIRA account. I was able to get the access
with help from us...@infra.apache.org. Requesting existing maintainers to
please add me to the relevant user group for being able to get the JIRA
assigned to myself going forward. (I have create ticket and comment
I would urge PMC Chair to give us some guidance on this.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 8:32 AM, 6harat
wrote:
Hey,
Just wanted to follow-up on the thread initiated by Richard, if there were
any updates from the PMC circle that can be shared with the wider
Hey,
Just wanted to follow-up on the thread initiated by Richard, if there were
any updates from the PMC circle that can be shared with the wider audience.
Also, curious about if we have any previous roadmap available for the
further evolution of the project. (I checked on JIRA but wasn't able to
6harat commented on PR #3547:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3547#issuecomment-1599002790
Pending tasks:
1. Add feature tests
2. Update documentation / comments
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
bipinprasad commented on PR #3546:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3546#issuecomment-1597358946
Activated the checks. There may be some PMD exceptions - that can be checked
locally as "mvn pmd:check"
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
bipinprasad merged PR #3545:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3545
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
The PR by Bipin seems to fix it? ;)
Am Freitag, dem 16.06.2023 um 20:19 +0200 schrieb Richard Zowalla:
> Ok from looking into gitact-script.sh, it looks like we are skipping
> storm-cassandra, storm-hive, storm-hdfs, storm-hbase, storm-sql,
> storm-
> hdfs-blobstore if we are building with Java
Don't want to come across as an annoying user, but have we made any
progress in this area yet? Everyone who has expressed interest
(usually) doesn't have read access to private@, so no one knows what
the current status is regarding the continuation of the project by
expanding the committer / pmc
6harat commented on PR #3546:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3546#issuecomment-1596224842
I was going through other parts of the code and found this TODO. Seems like
it was intended to be connected to WorkerHooks when those were first introduced.
```
private Map
Hey,
I submitted a PR for review yesterday and am looking for some help from
existing contributors regarding the below:
1. new JIRA ticket for the feature (and if someone can also approve my JIRA
account creation request if they are one of the approvers)
2. trigger the github workflow:
6harat commented on PR #3546:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3546#issuecomment-1595677853
Please note the following observations / callouts:
1. have not added workerHoosk to executioncontext. AFAIS constructed spouts
and bolts are being stored here so as to allow creation
6harat opened a new pull request, #3546:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3546
## What is the purpose of the change
A while back the support for declaring WorkerHook in TopologyBuilder was
added. Related JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-126. This
change
Ok from looking into gitact-script.sh, it looks like we are skipping
storm-cassandra, storm-hive, storm-hdfs, storm-hbase, storm-sql, storm-
hdfs-blobstore if we are building with Java 11 and run them with Java
8. That explains why Java 11 runs do not fail ;-)
Nevertheless, we have runs, which
bipinprasad opened a new pull request, #3545:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3545
## What is the purpose of the change
*Storm Cassandra (external/storm-cassandra) test fail because OOM*
## How was the code tested
*Git Actions build and test run as part of this
Created Jira [STORM-3923] Cassandra module fails tests probably OOM - ASF JIRA
. I think mvn test is using 3gb (inherited from main pom.xml), but will add
directly in its pom under Cassandra. Also MAVEN_OPTS in git actions is set to
1.5gb. I wonder if that is limiting the memory.
|
|
| |
Hi,
looks like it only falls occasionally in Java 8 with an OOM issue / JVM crash.
Might be possible to just increase the JVM memory for that module.
I remember from the Travis migration, that we had some heap adjustments in the
scripts. Wdyt?
Gruß
Richard
Am 16. Juni 2023 17:57:21 MESZ
+1 to exclude Storm Cassandra
(my 2 cents)
Thanks,
Alex
Le ven. 16 juin 2023 à 17:58, Bipin Prasad a écrit :
>
> All,
>I am working on creating a new release for Storm 2.5.0. Unfortunately,
> storm-cassandra has been failing tests since we moved to Git Actions. Can
> someone take a look at
All,
I am working on creating a new release for Storm 2.5.0. Unfortunately,
storm-cassandra has been failing tests since we moved to Git Actions. Can
someone take a look at it and possibly get it to work - with a newer
version of Cassandra if possible and/or upgraded tests?
If no one is
Hi All,
(This email goes out to all our user and dev project mailing lists, so you
may receive this
email more than once.)
The Travel Assistance Committee has opened up applications to help get
people to the following events:
*Community Over Code Asia 2023 - *
*August 18th to August 20th in
bipinprasad merged PR #3544:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3544
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
bipinprasad opened a new pull request, #3544:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3544
## What is the purpose of the change
*Acker executors are sorted in a specific order that backtracking needs to
account for.*
## How was the change tested
*This code has been
+1
Le lun. 12 juin 2023 à 11:57, Richard Zowalla a écrit :
>
> Some weeks passed, any updates?
>
> Gruß
> Richard
>
> Am Donnerstag, dem 11.05.2023 um 19:16 -0400 schrieb P. Taylor Goetz:
> > Thanks for the reminder Richard,
> >
> > In response, I’ve bumped the PMC-private discussion around
Some weeks passed, any updates?
Gruß
Richard
Am Donnerstag, dem 11.05.2023 um 19:16 -0400 schrieb P. Taylor Goetz:
> Thanks for the reminder Richard,
>
> In response, I’ve bumped the PMC-private discussion around adding new
> members interested in contributing.
>
> - Taylor
>
> > On May 11,
agresch commented on code in PR #3540:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3540#discussion_r1221809229
##
storm-server/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/scheduler/resource/strategies/scheduling/BaseResourceAwareStrategy.java:
##
@@ -527,13 +538,13 @@ protected
bipinprasad commented on code in PR #3540:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3540#discussion_r1220355853
##
storm-server/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/scheduler/resource/strategies/scheduling/BaseResourceAwareStrategy.java:
##
@@ -527,13 +538,13 @@ protected
bipinprasad commented on code in PR #3540:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3540#discussion_r1220322597
##
storm-client/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/Config.java:
##
@@ -859,9 +859,11 @@ public class Config extends HashMap {
@IsString
public static final String
bipinprasad commented on code in PR #3540:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3540#discussion_r1220291317
##
storm-server/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/scheduler/resource/strategies/scheduling/BaseResourceAwareStrategy.java:
##
@@ -164,6 +168,7 @@ public
bipinprasad commented on code in PR #3540:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3540#discussion_r1220277226
##
storm-server/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/scheduler/resource/strategies/scheduling/BaseResourceAwareStrategy.java:
##
@@ -123,6 +123,10 @@ public
bipinprasad commented on code in PR #3540:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3540#discussion_r1219931053
##
storm-client/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/Config.java:
##
@@ -859,9 +859,11 @@ public class Config extends HashMap {
@IsString
public static final String
bipinprasad commented on code in PR #3540:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3540#discussion_r1219927539
##
storm-client/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/Config.java:
##
@@ -859,9 +859,11 @@ public class Config extends HashMap {
@IsString
public static final String
agresch commented on code in PR #3540:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3540#discussion_r1218307249
##
storm-client/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/Config.java:
##
@@ -859,9 +859,11 @@ public class Config extends HashMap {
@IsString
public static final String
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to one more
more developer mailing lists at the Apache Software Foundation.
The call for presentations is now open at
"https://apachecon.com/acasia2023/cfp.html;, and will be closed by
Sunday, Jun 18th, 2023 11:59 PM GMT.
The event will
bipinprasad merged PR #3538:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3538
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
bipinprasad commented on code in PR #3536:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3536#discussion_r1213687480
##
storm-core/pom.xml:
##
@@ -137,6 +137,7 @@
org.mockito
mockito-core
+${mockito.version}
Review Comment:
agresch commented on code in PR #3536:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3536#discussion_r1213655650
##
storm-core/pom.xml:
##
@@ -137,6 +137,7 @@
org.mockito
mockito-core
+${mockito.version}
Review Comment:
why was
Hello Aishwarya, Are you using a helm chart for this deploy and/or k8s
deployment/service files that you can share? I don't believe Storm has been
extensively tested in IPv6.
Thanks--Bipin
On Thursday, June 1, 2023 at 12:20:45 PM PDT, Aishwarya Soni
wrote:
Hi,
I have a storm 2.4.0
Hi,
I have a storm 2.4.0 cluster with all the storm components such as Nimbus,
UI, supervisors, and drpc. Recently we moved to a new GCP Kubernetes
cluster where both traffic was coming from both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.
Previously, we were on a hashicorp nomad cluster where only IPv4 was
Hi,
I have a storm 2.4.0 cluster with all the storm components such as Nimbus,
UI, supervisors, and drpc. Recently we moved to a new GCP Kubernetes
cluster where both traffic was coming from both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.
Previously, we were on a hashicorp nomad cluster where only IPv4 was
bipinprasad merged PR #3535:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3535
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
ScottBrenner commented on PR #35:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm-site/pull/35#issuecomment-1565183279
@bipinprasad please review
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
vesense commented on PR #3543:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3543#issuecomment-1557058816
Thanks @snikhil5 Merged into master.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
vesense merged PR #3543:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3543
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
snikhil5 opened a new pull request, #3543:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3543
## What is the purpose of the change
Update the document for setting up secure cluster
## How was the change tested
Tested on a secure cluster
--
This is an automated message from
Hi,
https://github.com/apache/storm/commit/4fb1feb9466ec84ec7d2b9ac00c10e1bc9d60333
Should be already fixed but awaits a release.
Gruß
Richard
Am 12. Mai 2023 14:57:23 MESZ schrieb Alexandre Vermeerbergen
:
>Hello,
>
>I just created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3918
>Any
Hello,
I just created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3918
Any objection for this dependency update ?
I guess I can take care of this - I just need a reminder about how to
properly create a git branch to deliver an update to .pom and make
this branch linked to the JIRA
Thanks,
Alex
vesense commented on PR #3542:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3542#issuecomment-1545705349
Thanks @jmartell7 Merged into master.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
vesense merged PR #3542:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3542
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Thanks, Taylor!
Am Donnerstag, dem 11.05.2023 um 19:16 -0400 schrieb P. Taylor Goetz:
> Thanks for the reminder Richard,
>
> In response, I’ve bumped the PMC-private discussion around adding new
> members interested in contributing.
>
> - Taylor
>
> > On May 11, 2023, at 8:39 AM, Richard
Thanks for the reminder Richard,
In response, I’ve bumped the PMC-private discussion around adding new members
interested in contributing.
- Taylor
> On May 11, 2023, at 8:39 AM, Richard Zowalla wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I know we are all busy with our day jobs, but is there any news?
>
> We
Hello,
I know we are all busy with our day jobs, but is there any news?
We had some activity after a move to the attic was proposed. In the process, a
few people volunteered to help with the project.
A few weeks later, IMHO we are back to where we were before the proposal. Mails
are going
(Note: You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the dev@
list for one or more Apache Software Foundation projects.)
The Call for Presentations (CFP) for Community Over Code (formerly
Apachecon) 2023 is open at
https://communityovercode.org/call-for-presentations/, and will close
Thu,
jmartell7 opened a new pull request, #3542:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3542
Allow users to change worker heap size in ThroughputVsLatency example topo.
## What is the purpose of the change
ThroughputVsLatency adds an explicit 2GB worker heapsize overriding the
agresch merged PR #3541:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3541
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
jmartell7 opened a new pull request, #3541:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3541
## What is the purpose of the change
An infinite loop can occur when the worker directory takes too much space,
but no files are found to remove.
## How was the change tested
I have not
bipinprasad opened a new pull request, #3540:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3540
…mit.
## What is the purpose of the change
*Round Robin strategy will distribute components evenly across nodes.
Default behavior will be to spread across all nodes. But can be limited
Any updates? :-)
Think Storm would benefit from a new release soon...
Am Mittwoch, dem 22.02.2023 um 18:02 -0500 schrieb P. Taylor Goetz:
> Quick update:
>
> The ASF Board voted to accept both our report and the resolution to
> change PMC Chair. Board feedback on our report was positive.
>
>
bipinprasad merged PR #3539:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3539
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
bipinprasad commented on PR #3539:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3539#issuecomment-1529862186
storm-cassandra test failure will be fixed in a separate Jira
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3915
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
bipinprasad commented on code in PR #3539:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3539#discussion_r1180617441
##
storm-server/pom.xml:
##
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
org.rocksdb
rocksdbjni
+${rocksdb-version}
Review Comment:
I missed
bipinprasad commented on code in PR #3539:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3539#discussion_r1180600883
##
storm-server/pom.xml:
##
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
org.rocksdb
rocksdbjni
+${rocksdb-version}
Review Comment:
The
agresch commented on code in PR #3539:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3539#discussion_r1180543200
##
storm-server/pom.xml:
##
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
org.rocksdb
rocksdbjni
+${rocksdb-version}
Review Comment:
even though
bipinprasad commented on code in PR #3539:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3539#discussion_r1180506358
##
storm-server/pom.xml:
##
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
org.rocksdb
rocksdbjni
+${rocksdb-version}
Review Comment:
Not
agresch commented on code in PR #3539:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3539#discussion_r1180464412
##
storm-server/pom.xml:
##
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
org.rocksdb
rocksdbjni
+${rocksdb-version}
Review Comment:
just curious
bipinprasad opened a new pull request, #3539:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3539
## What is the purpose of the change
*Version 6.27.3 does not have Mac OSX JNI Library. Some tests fail to load
because of this missing dependency on Mac.*
## How was the change tested
vesense merged PR #3537:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3537
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
bipinprasad commented on code in PR #3537:
URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3537#discussion_r1169127101
##
DEPENDENCY-LICENSES:
##
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ List of third-party dependencies grouped by their license
type.
Apache License
+* carbonite
701 - 800 of 53364 matches
Mail list logo
