Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?

[saurabh mimani]

It will be great if we can also release *1.2*.x along with this.



Best Regards

Saurabh Kumar Mimani




On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 9:01 PM Alexandre Vermeerbergen <
avermeerber...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> Le sam. 5 janv. 2019 à 14:12, Kishorkumar Patil
>  a écrit :
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 5:04 AM Stig Rohde Døssing <
> stigdoess...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Den lør. 5. jan. 2019 kl. 07.42 skrev Govind Menon <
> > > govindappume...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Jan 4, 2019 23:46, "Roshan Naik" 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Friday, January 4, 2019, 9:02 PM, Ethan Li <
> ethanopensou...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 on this
> > > >
> > > > Ethan Li
> > > >
> > > > > On Jan 4, 2019, at 20:19, P. Taylor Goetz 
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Taylor
> > > > >
> > > > >> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani <
> mimani.saur...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no
> blockers?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Best Regards
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Saurabh Kumar Mimani
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing <
> > > > stigdoess...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
> > > > >>>
> > > >  Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans <
> > > bo...@apache.org
> > > > >:
> > > > 
> > > >  I think all of the blockers are in now.  Please take a look and
> > > > >>> hopefully,
> > > >  we can get a release out soon.
> > > > 
> > > >  Thanks,
> > > > 
> > > >  Bobby
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have
> been
> > > > heads
> > > >  down
> > > > > on a different project for a while before that.  I'll respond
> to
> > > the
> > > >  JIRA.
> > > > > I am happy to let it go in.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Bobby
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
> > > >  stigdoess...@gmail.com
> > > > >>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
> > > > >>
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
> > > > > regarding
> > > > >> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was
> going
> > > > with
> > > >  it,
> > > > >> so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's
> > > > >>> waiting
> > > > > for
> > > > >> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same
> > > code.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
> > > > >> :
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Sounds like -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> > > >  (STORM-3290)
> > > > >> is
> > > > >>> merged -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
> (STORM-3276)
> > > > >>> is
> > > > >>> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
> > > > >>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907  (STORM-2990,
> > > > >>> STORM-3279)
> > > > >>> appears ready to be committed ?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911   -
> (STORM-2720)
> > > > > seems a
> > > > >>> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> -roshan
> > > > >>>  On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde
> > > > >>> Døssing
> > > >  <
> > > > >>> stigdoess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I would like to get at least
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> > > > >>> (breaking changes) and
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
> > > > >>> (regression) in.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I think it would be nice to also get
> > > > >>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
> > > > >>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're
> in a
> > > >  hurry
> > > > >> they
> > > > >>> could go in the next release.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
> > > > >>> lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com>:
> > > > >>>
> > > >  Hi devs,
> > > > 
> > > >  Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any
> idea of
> > > >  when
> > > > >> it
> > > >  could happen?
> > > > 
> > > >  Thanks
> > > > 
> > > >  Julien
> > > > 
> > > >  --
> > > > 

Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?

[Alexandre Vermeerbergen]

+1

Le sam. 5 janv. 2019 à 14:12, Kishorkumar Patil
 a écrit :
>
> +1
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 5:04 AM Stig Rohde Døssing 
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Den lør. 5. jan. 2019 kl. 07.42 skrev Govind Menon <
> > govindappume...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Jan 4, 2019 23:46, "Roshan Naik" 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Friday, January 4, 2019, 9:02 PM, Ethan Li  > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 on this
> > >
> > > Ethan Li
> > >
> > > > On Jan 4, 2019, at 20:19, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate.
> > > >
> > > > -Taylor
> > > >
> > > >> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani 
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Best Regards
> > > >>
> > > >> Saurabh Kumar Mimani
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing <
> > > stigdoess...@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
> > > >>>
> > >  Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans <
> > bo...@apache.org
> > > >:
> > > 
> > >  I think all of the blockers are in now.  Please take a look and
> > > >>> hopefully,
> > >  we can get a release out soon.
> > > 
> > >  Thanks,
> > > 
> > >  Bobby
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been
> > > heads
> > >  down
> > > > on a different project for a while before that.  I'll respond to
> > the
> > >  JIRA.
> > > > I am happy to let it go in.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Bobby
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
> > >  stigdoess...@gmail.com
> > > >>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
> > > >> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
> > > > regarding
> > > >> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going
> > > with
> > >  it,
> > > >> so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
> > > >>
> > > >> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's
> > > >>> waiting
> > > > for
> > > >> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same
> > code.
> > > >>
> > > >> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
> > > >> :
> > > >>
> > > >>> Sounds like -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> > >  (STORM-3290)
> > > >> is
> > > >>> merged -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276)
> > > >>> is
> > > >>> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907  (STORM-2990,
> > > >>> STORM-3279)
> > > >>> appears ready to be committed ?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911   - (STORM-2720)
> > > > seems a
> > > >>> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> -roshan
> > > >>>  On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde
> > > >>> Døssing
> > >  <
> > > >>> stigdoess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I would like to get at least
> > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> > > >>> (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
> > > >>> (regression) in.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I think it would be nice to also get
> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a
> > >  hurry
> > > >> they
> > > >>> could go in the next release.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
> > > >>> lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com>:
> > > >>>
> > >  Hi devs,
> > > 
> > >  Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of
> > >  when
> > > >> it
> > >  could happen?
> > > 
> > >  Thanks
> > > 
> > >  Julien
> > > 
> > >  --
> > > 
> > >  *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
> > > 
> > >  http://www.digitalpebble.com
> > >  http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> > >  #digitalpebble 
> > > 
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > 
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
> --
> -Kishor

Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?

[Kishorkumar Patil]

+1


On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 5:04 AM Stig Rohde Døssing 
wrote:

> +1
>
> Den lør. 5. jan. 2019 kl. 07.42 skrev Govind Menon <
> govindappume...@gmail.com>:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Jan 4, 2019 23:46, "Roshan Naik" 
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> >
> >
> >
> > On Friday, January 4, 2019, 9:02 PM, Ethan Li  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > +1 on this
> >
> > Ethan Li
> >
> > > On Jan 4, 2019, at 20:19, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:
> > >
> > > If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate.
> > >
> > > -Taylor
> > >
> > >> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani 
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Best Regards
> > >>
> > >> Saurabh Kumar Mimani
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing <
> > stigdoess...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
> > >>>
> >  Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans <
> bo...@apache.org
> > >:
> > 
> >  I think all of the blockers are in now.  Please take a look and
> > >>> hopefully,
> >  we can get a release out soon.
> > 
> >  Thanks,
> > 
> >  Bobby
> > 
> > 
> > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been
> > heads
> >  down
> > > on a different project for a while before that.  I'll respond to
> the
> >  JIRA.
> > > I am happy to let it go in.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Bobby
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
> >  stigdoess...@gmail.com
> > >>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
> > >> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
> > > regarding
> > >> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going
> > with
> >  it,
> > >> so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
> > >>
> > >> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's
> > >>> waiting
> > > for
> > >> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same
> code.
> > >>
> > >> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
> > >> :
> > >>
> > >>> Sounds like -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> >  (STORM-3290)
> > >> is
> > >>> merged -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276)
> > >>> is
> > >>> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
> > >>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907  (STORM-2990,
> > >>> STORM-3279)
> > >>> appears ready to be committed ?
> > >>>
> > >>> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911   - (STORM-2720)
> > > seems a
> > >>> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
> > >>>
> > >>> -roshan
> > >>>  On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde
> > >>> Døssing
> >  <
> > >>> stigdoess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> I would like to get at least
> > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> > >>> (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
> > >>> (regression) in.
> > >>>
> > >>> I think it would be nice to also get
> > >>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
> > >>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a
> >  hurry
> > >> they
> > >>> could go in the next release.
> > >>>
> > >>> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
> > >>> lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com>:
> > >>>
> >  Hi devs,
> > 
> >  Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of
> >  when
> > >> it
> >  could happen?
> > 
> >  Thanks
> > 
> >  Julien
> > 
> >  --
> > 
> >  *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
> > 
> >  http://www.digitalpebble.com
> >  http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> >  #digitalpebble 
> > 
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > 
> > >>>
> >
>
-- 
-Kishor

Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?

[Stig Rohde Døssing]

+1

Den lør. 5. jan. 2019 kl. 07.42 skrev Govind Menon <
govindappume...@gmail.com>:

> +1
>
> On Jan 4, 2019 23:46, "Roshan Naik"  wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
>
>
> On Friday, January 4, 2019, 9:02 PM, Ethan Li 
> wrote:
>
> +1 on this
>
> Ethan Li
>
> > On Jan 4, 2019, at 20:19, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:
> >
> > If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate.
> >
> > -Taylor
> >
> >> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Best Regards
> >>
> >> Saurabh Kumar Mimani
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing <
> stigdoess...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
> >>>
>  Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans  >:
> 
>  I think all of the blockers are in now.  Please take a look and
> >>> hopefully,
>  we can get a release out soon.
> 
>  Thanks,
> 
>  Bobby
> 
> 
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans 
> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been
> heads
>  down
> > on a different project for a while before that.  I'll respond to the
>  JIRA.
> > I am happy to let it go in.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bobby
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
>  stigdoess...@gmail.com
> >>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
> >> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
> > regarding
> >> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going
> with
>  it,
> >> so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
> >>
> >> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's
> >>> waiting
> > for
> >> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.
> >>
> >> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
> >> :
> >>
> >>> Sounds like -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
>  (STORM-3290)
> >> is
> >>> merged -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276)
> >>> is
> >>> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
> >>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907  (STORM-2990,
> >>> STORM-3279)
> >>> appears ready to be committed ?
> >>>
> >>> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911   - (STORM-2720)
> > seems a
> >>> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
> >>>
> >>> -roshan
> >>>  On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde
> >>> Døssing
>  <
> >>> stigdoess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I would like to get at least
> > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> >>> (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
> >>> (regression) in.
> >>>
> >>> I think it would be nice to also get
> >>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
> >>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a
>  hurry
> >> they
> >>> could go in the next release.
> >>>
> >>> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
> >>> lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com>:
> >>>
>  Hi devs,
> 
>  Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of
>  when
> >> it
>  could happen?
> 
>  Thanks
> 
>  Julien
> 
>  --
> 
>  *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
> 
>  http://www.digitalpebble.com
>  http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
>  #digitalpebble 
> 
> >>>
> >>
> >
> 
> >>>
>

Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?

[Govind Menon]

+1

On Jan 4, 2019 23:46, "Roshan Naik"  wrote:

+1


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone



On Friday, January 4, 2019, 9:02 PM, Ethan Li 
wrote:

+1 on this

Ethan Li

> On Jan 4, 2019, at 20:19, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:
>
> If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate.
>
> -Taylor
>
>> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani 
wrote:
>>
>> Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers?
>>
>>
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Saurabh Kumar Mimani
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing <
stigdoess...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
>>>
 Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans :

 I think all of the blockers are in now.  Please take a look and
>>> hopefully,
 we can get a release out soon.

 Thanks,

 Bobby


> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans  wrote:
>
> Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads
 down
> on a different project for a while before that.  I'll respond to the
 JIRA.
> I am happy to let it go in.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bobby
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
 stigdoess...@gmail.com
>>
> wrote:
>
>> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
> regarding
>> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with
 it,
>> so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
>>
>> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's
>>> waiting
> for
>> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.
>>
>> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
>> :
>>
>>> Sounds like -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
 (STORM-3290)
>> is
>>> merged -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276)
>>> is
>>> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907  (STORM-2990,
>>> STORM-3279)
>>> appears ready to be committed ?
>>>
>>> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911   - (STORM-2720)
> seems a
>>> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
>>>
>>> -roshan
>>>  On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde
>>> Døssing
 <
>>> stigdoess...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I would like to get at least
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
>>> (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
>>> (regression) in.
>>>
>>> I think it would be nice to also get
>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a
 hurry
>> they
>>> could go in the next release.
>>>
>>> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
>>> lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com>:
>>>
 Hi devs,

 Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of
 when
>> it
 could happen?

 Thanks

 Julien

 --

 *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*

 http://www.digitalpebble.com
 http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
 #digitalpebble 

>>>
>>
>

>>>

Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?

[Roshan Naik]

+1


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Friday, January 4, 2019, 9:02 PM, Ethan Li  wrote:

+1 on this 

Ethan Li

> On Jan 4, 2019, at 20:19, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:
> 
> If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate.
> 
> -Taylor
> 
>> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani  wrote:
>> 
>> Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Best Regards
>> 
>> Saurabh Kumar Mimani
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
>>> 
 Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans :
 
 I think all of the blockers are in now.  Please take a look and
>>> hopefully,
 we can get a release out soon.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Bobby
 
 
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans  wrote:
> 
> Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads
 down
> on a different project for a while before that.  I'll respond to the
 JIRA.
> I am happy to let it go in.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bobby
> 
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
 stigdoess...@gmail.com
>> 
> wrote:
> 
>> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
> regarding
>> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with
 it,
>> so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
>> 
>> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's
>>> waiting
> for
>> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.
>> 
>> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
>> :
>> 
>>> Sounds like -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
 (STORM-3290)
>> is
>>> merged -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276)
>>> is
>>> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907  (STORM-2990,
>>> STORM-3279)
>>> appears ready to be committed ?
>>> 
>>> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911   - (STORM-2720)
> seems a
>>> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
>>> 
>>> -roshan
>>>  On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde
>>> Døssing
 <
>>> stigdoess...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I would like to get at least
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
>>> (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
>>> (regression) in.
>>> 
>>> I think it would be nice to also get
>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a
 hurry
>> they
>>> could go in the next release.
>>> 
>>> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
>>> lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com>:
>>> 
 Hi devs,
 
 Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of
 when
>> it
 could happen?
 
 Thanks
 
 Julien
 
 --
 
 *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
 
 http://www.digitalpebble.com
 http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
 #digitalpebble 
 
>>> 
>> 
> 
 
>>> 

Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?

[Ethan Li]

+1 on this 

Ethan Li

> On Jan 4, 2019, at 20:19, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:
> 
> If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate.
> 
> -Taylor
> 
>> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani  wrote:
>> 
>> Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Best Regards
>> 
>> Saurabh Kumar Mimani
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
>>> 
 Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans :
 
 I think all of the blockers are in now.  Please take a look and
>>> hopefully,
 we can get a release out soon.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Bobby
 
 
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans  wrote:
> 
> Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads
 down
> on a different project for a while before that.  I'll respond to the
 JIRA.
> I am happy to let it go in.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bobby
> 
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
 stigdoess...@gmail.com
>> 
> wrote:
> 
>> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
> regarding
>> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with
 it,
>> so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
>> 
>> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's
>>> waiting
> for
>> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.
>> 
>> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
>> :
>> 
>>> Sounds like -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
 (STORM-3290)
>> is
>>> merged -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276)
>>> is
>>> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907  (STORM-2990,
>>> STORM-3279)
>>> appears ready to be committed ?
>>> 
>>> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911   - (STORM-2720)
> seems a
>>> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
>>> 
>>> -roshan
>>>   On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde
>>> Døssing
 <
>>> stigdoess...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I would like to get at least
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
>>> (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
>>> (regression) in.
>>> 
>>> I think it would be nice to also get
>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a
 hurry
>> they
>>> could go in the next release.
>>> 
>>> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
>>> lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com>:
>>> 
 Hi devs,
 
 Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of
 when
>> it
 could happen?
 
 Thanks
 
 Julien
 
 --
 
 *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
 
 http://www.digitalpebble.com
 http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
 #digitalpebble 
 
>>> 
>> 
> 
 
>>> 

Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?

[P. Taylor Goetz]

If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate.

-Taylor

> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani  wrote:
> 
> Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers?
> 
> 
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> Saurabh Kumar Mimani
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing 
> wrote:
> 
>> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
>> 
>>> Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans :
>>> 
>>> I think all of the blockers are in now.  Please take a look and
>> hopefully,
>>> we can get a release out soon.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Bobby
>>> 
>>> 
 On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans  wrote:
 
 Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads
>>> down
 on a different project for a while before that.  I'll respond to the
>>> JIRA.
 I am happy to let it go in.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Bobby
 
 On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
>>> stigdoess...@gmail.com
> 
 wrote:
 
> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
 regarding
> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with
>>> it,
> so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
> 
> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's
>> waiting
 for
> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.
> 
> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
> :
> 
>> Sounds like -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
>>> (STORM-3290)
> is
>> merged -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276)
>> is
>> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907  (STORM-2990,
>> STORM-3279)
>> appears ready to be committed ?
>> 
>> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911   - (STORM-2720)
 seems a
>> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
>> 
>> -roshan
>>On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde
>> Døssing
>>> <
>> stigdoess...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I would like to get at least
 https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
>> (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
>> (regression) in.
>> 
>> I think it would be nice to also get
>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a
>>> hurry
> they
>> could go in the next release.
>> 
>> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
>> lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com>:
>> 
>>> Hi devs,
>>> 
>>> Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of
>>> when
> it
>>> could happen?
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> Julien
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
>>> 
>>> http://www.digitalpebble.com
>>> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
>>> #digitalpebble 
>>> 
>> 
> 
 
>>> 
>> 

Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?

[saurabh mimani]

Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers?



Best Regards

Saurabh Kumar Mimani




On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing 
wrote:

> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
>
> Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans :
>
> > I think all of the blockers are in now.  Please take a look and
> hopefully,
> > we can get a release out soon.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bobby
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans  wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads
> > down
> > > on a different project for a while before that.  I'll respond to the
> > JIRA.
> > > I am happy to let it go in.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Bobby
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
> > stigdoess...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
> > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
> > > regarding
> > > > whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with
> > it,
> > > > so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
> > > >
> > > > I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's
> waiting
> > > for
> > > > STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.
> > > >
> > > > Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
> > > > :
> > > >
> > > > >  Sounds like -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> > (STORM-3290)
> > > > is
> > > > > merged -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276)
> is
> > > > > nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907  (STORM-2990,
> STORM-3279)
> > > > > appears ready to be committed ?
> > > > >
> > > > > and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911   - (STORM-2720)
> > > seems a
> > > > > bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
> > > > >
> > > > > -roshan
> > > > > On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde
> Døssing
> > <
> > > > > stigdoess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >  I would like to get at least
> > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> > > > > (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
> > > > > (regression) in.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it would be nice to also get
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a
> > hurry
> > > > they
> > > > > could go in the next release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
> > > > > lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com>:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi devs,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of
> > when
> > > > it
> > > > > > could happen?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Julien
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.digitalpebble.com
> > > > > > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> > > > > > #digitalpebble 
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?

[Stig Rohde Døssing]

Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.

Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans :

> I think all of the blockers are in now.  Please take a look and hopefully,
> we can get a release out soon.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bobby
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans  wrote:
>
> > Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads
> down
> > on a different project for a while before that.  I'll respond to the
> JIRA.
> > I am happy to let it go in.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bobby
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
> stigdoess...@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
> > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
> > regarding
> > > whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with
> it,
> > > so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
> > >
> > > I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's waiting
> > for
> > > STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.
> > >
> > > Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
> > > :
> > >
> > > >  Sounds like -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> (STORM-3290)
> > > is
> > > > merged -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276) is
> > > > nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
> > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907  (STORM-2990, STORM-3279)
> > > > appears ready to be committed ?
> > > >
> > > > and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911   - (STORM-2720)
> > seems a
> > > > bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
> > > >
> > > > -roshan
> > > > On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde Døssing
> <
> > > > stigdoess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >  I would like to get at least
> > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> > > > (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
> > > > (regression) in.
> > > >
> > > > I think it would be nice to also get
> > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
> > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a
> hurry
> > > they
> > > > could go in the next release.
> > > >
> > > > Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
> > > > lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi devs,
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of
> when
> > > it
> > > > > could happen?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > Julien
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.digitalpebble.com
> > > > > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> > > > > #digitalpebble 
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?

[Bobby Evans]

I think all of the blockers are in now.  Please take a look and hopefully,
we can get a release out soon.

Thanks,

Bobby


On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans  wrote:

> Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads down
> on a different project for a while before that.  I'll respond to the JIRA.
> I am happy to let it go in.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bobby
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing  >
> wrote:
>
> > I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
> > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
> regarding
> > whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with it,
> > so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
> >
> > I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's waiting
> for
> > STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.
> >
> > Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
> > :
> >
> > >  Sounds like -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913 (STORM-3290)
> > is
> > > merged -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276) is
> > > nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
> > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907  (STORM-2990, STORM-3279)
> > > appears ready to be committed ?
> > >
> > > and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911   - (STORM-2720)
> seems a
> > > bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
> > >
> > > -roshan
> > > On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde Døssing <
> > > stigdoess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >  I would like to get at least
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> > > (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
> > > (regression) in.
> > >
> > > I think it would be nice to also get
> > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
> > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a hurry
> > they
> > > could go in the next release.
> > >
> > > Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
> > > lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > Hi devs,
> > > >
> > > > Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of when
> > it
> > > > could happen?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > Julien
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
> > > >
> > > > http://www.digitalpebble.com
> > > > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> > > > #digitalpebble 
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?

[Bobby Evans]

Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads down
on a different project for a while before that.  I'll respond to the JIRA.
I am happy to let it go in.

Thanks,

Bobby

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing 
wrote:

> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136) regarding
> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with it,
> so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
>
> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's waiting for
> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.
>
> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
> :
>
> >  Sounds like -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913 (STORM-3290)
> is
> > merged -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276) is
> > nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
> > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907  (STORM-2990, STORM-3279)
> > appears ready to be committed ?
> >
> > and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911   - (STORM-2720)  seems a
> > bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
> >
> > -roshan
> > On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde Døssing <
> > stigdoess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >  I would like to get at least https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> > (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
> > (regression) in.
> >
> > I think it would be nice to also get
> > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
> > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a hurry
> they
> > could go in the next release.
> >
> > Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
> > lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Hi devs,
> > >
> > > Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of when
> it
> > > could happen?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Julien
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
> > >
> > > http://www.digitalpebble.com
> > > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> > > #digitalpebble 
> > >
> >
>

Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?

[Stig Rohde Døssing]

I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136) regarding
whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with it,
so I didn't want to merge prematurely.

I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's waiting for
STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.

Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
:

>  Sounds like -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913 (STORM-3290) is
> merged -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276) is
> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907  (STORM-2990, STORM-3279)
> appears ready to be committed ?
>
> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911   - (STORM-2720)  seems a
> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
>
> -roshan
> On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde Døssing <
> stigdoess...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  I would like to get at least https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
> (regression) in.
>
> I think it would be nice to also get
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a hurry they
> could go in the next release.
>
> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
> lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi devs,
> >
> > Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of when it
> > could happen?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Julien
> >
> > --
> >
> > *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
> >
> > http://www.digitalpebble.com
> > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> > #digitalpebble 
> >
>

Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?

[Roshan Naik]

 Sounds like -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913 (STORM-3290) is 
merged -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276) is nearly 
complete and may need some small tweaks. - 
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907  (STORM-2990, STORM-3279) appears 
ready to be committed ?

and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911   - (STORM-2720)  seems a bit 
inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.

-roshan
On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde Døssing 
 wrote:  
 
 I would like to get at least https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
(breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
(regression) in.

I think it would be nice to also get
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a hurry they
could go in the next release.

Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com>:

> Hi devs,
>
> Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of when it
> could happen?
>
> Thanks
>
> Julien
>
> --
>
> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
>
> http://www.digitalpebble.com
> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> #digitalpebble 
>
  

Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?

[Stig Rohde Døssing]

I would like to get at least https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
(breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
(regression) in.

I think it would be nice to also get
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a hurry they
could go in the next release.

Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com>:

> Hi devs,
>
> Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of when it
> could happen?
>
> Thanks
>
> Julien
>
> --
>
> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
>
> http://www.digitalpebble.com
> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> #digitalpebble 
>

Storm 2.0.0 release?

[Julien Nioche]

Hi devs,

Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of when it
could happen?

Thanks

Julien

-- 

*Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*

http://www.digitalpebble.com
http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
#digitalpebble