There are nightly builds here:
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/nightly/struts-faces/
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 4:35 PM
Subject: struts-faces binary?
> Hi,
> Debated about wheth
Martin Cooper recently applied a patch which hopefully would have sorted out
the Struts gump failure. However it still failed again after he made that
commit and I'm wondering whether gump is pointing to the new SVN repository
that we moved to. From the looks of the "jakarta-struts.xml" file it isn
My 2 cents
* Release plans are a good idea IMO and I'd prefer them being a *must*
rather than *may* - since it takes a while to get a release out, its a good
way of communicating where its at.
* I think test builds such as 1.2.5 should be on the aquiring page,
hopefully that will encourage a
Now that 1.2.5 has been built and uploaded, can we now move Struts
dependancy on to BeanUtils 1.7.0 and remove the dependancy on Commons
Collections?
If the answer is yes and there are no objections to doing this, then looks
to me like the following needs doing:
1) Update the dependancies listed
Currently we have a 1.2.5 build that has no details of whats changed in the
documentation thats included with it. The problem with the way release
notes currently work is that the release-notes.xml contains the current
release - but since a new build (like 1.2.5) is created before its voted on
whe
Message -
> From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 10:42 AM
> Subject: Re: Release/Version Notes
>
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:34:03 +0100, Niall
This raises another question. Do we want the release notes to be "all the
changes since the last GA quality release" or "the changes in this version"?
I'd prefer "all the changes since the last GA quality release" as I think
thats what users really want to know. If a build doesn't make GA release
I'm +1 for 1.5 as well, but from memory I believe there were people who
didn't want to be that bleeding edge.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: Struts
I'm all for taking JSF faces strongly into account, but the proposal seems
to be *JSF only* for the view tier - to the exclusion of all others. Since I
haven't tried out JSF yet and therefore don't know enough about it that
makes me uneasy.
Seems to me at this point that its early days to commit t
I take your points but I probably didn't express this very well - I was
thinking more that in the same way that jsp is a standard java technolody
and has its supporters/detractors - the same will probably be true of JSF.
The jsp detractors don't like the jsp orientation even when Struts isn't
actua
uts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 7:21 PM
Subject: Re: Struts Shale
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
> >I'm all for taking JSF faces strongly into account, but the proposal
seems
> >to be *JSF only* for the view tier - to the exclusi
Open Source Evangelist
> EdgeTech, Inc.
> 678.910.8017
> AIM: jmitchtx
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 10:
xml
> files as well? That's what my nightly build executes.
>
> Craig
>
>
> On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 05:20:11 +0100, Niall Pemberton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Craig,
> >
> > I've updated the docs, can you change the
You just need to update your build to use BeanUtils 1.7.0 (and also upgrade
Digester to version 1.6) - it now includes the collections FastHashMap class
in the BeanUtils jar. All you should need to do is either drop the 1.7.0
version of BeanUtils jar into the appropriate place on your machine or
ch
>
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 3:17 AM
Subject: Re: Broken Build?
> Great - working again - thanks Niall. :-)
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> S
I've updated the Ant build to remove Commons Collections.
To use the new build you need to:
* get the latest Ant build files from SVN (i.e. build.xml, build-tests.xml
and build-webapp.xml)
* Upgrade to version 1.7.0 of Commons BeanUtils
* Upgrade to version 1.6 of Commons Digester
To upgrade t
I've added a new page, but someone with with more SVN knowledge thean me
might want to correct/update it.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 7:19 PM
Subject: [Apache Struts Wiki] New: StrutsMaintenanceSvn
Date
Thanks Joe, good info - I've found the config file where I can set these
auto-props in TortoiseSVN
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Germuska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Apache Struts Wiki
Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Apache Struts Wiki] New: StrutsMaintenanceSvn
> AFAIK, you shouldn't have to do the first two things for each file.
> Those should just happen by default.
>
> --
> Martin C
Joe,
Thanks for the comments, I've removed that question from the wiki - I guess
its no big deal to leave whats been set already as the default, then if
theres ever a need to use them in the future, then the properties wouldn't
need changing.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Germus
Url validation is part of Commons Validator rather than Struts so it might
be more appropriate to raise it there.
Also, this is subject to an outstanding bug:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30686
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "David Bowers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
If there has been no negative feedback on Commons Validator 1.1.4 by Monday
(2004-11-22) I was planning to call for a Vote to release it as "GA" quality
then.
I don't think we should vote on 1.2.5 since 1.2.6 is coming soon.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Germuska" <[EMAIL PROTEC
The issue is that Validator was missed out when message bundles was
implemented in Struts - I'd prefer we wait for Validator 1.1.4 and fix
#18169 and #21760 and that hole will then be plugged in the 1.2.x series.
If we were carrying on in the 1.2.x series, then releasing 1.2.6 and leaving
them ti
*Munging* the path was in the original version of BeanValidatorForm - so
whats changed?
If you don't want *munging* then just override the getValidationKey() method
and implement tyour own un-munged behaviour.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Danny Mui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts
I've put forward a proposal to Commons Validator to add a facility to render
the dynamic javascript for form validation. If considered a good idea, and
Struts wanted to use it then most of the code in the JavascriptValidatorTag
would disappear. IMO it has significant improvements over the current S
Have you got the latest build-webapp.xml?
Craig commented out the tiles-documentation build to stop this failing
(Revision 56019)
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 2:54
Vic,
Are you thinking this would this be a good idea to manage the "Struts API
Bean" thats being talked about?
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.struts.devel/23601
... or did you have other ideas where it could be put to work?
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Germuska"
Wouldn't it be better to get rid of this in 1.3 with the move to Chain?
Doesn't everything get thrown up in the air and re-defined at that point
including Action's being deprecated in favour of objects that just implement
the Command interface?
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Co
uess for people
in larger teams (mines a team of one :-) it would probably sell itself as a
development feature alone.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Vic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 8:48 PM
Subject: Re: Object configu
---
From: "Joe Germuska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Struts Developers
List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: ActionForm.validateForm(...) to replace
ActionForm.validate(...)
ndicator ...
>
> Eddie
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 8:12 PM
> Subject: Re: ActionForm.validateForm(...) to replace
The page Martin pointed out says it needs a vote. The ByeLaws page says this
about voting...
* Decision Making
All Volunteers are encouraged to participate in decisions, but the decision
itself is made by the Project Management Committee. The Project is a
"Minimum Threshod Meritocracy".
* Voting
+1 beta
For me, I would also like to see Bug #18169 & Bug #21760 fixed -
resource/bundle attributes for Commons Validator are broken - requires
moving Struts to depend on Validator 1.1.4
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[
I buy into what Ted said on legality/reality. The reality is that if
anyone -1's anything then they have to justify why, whether they're a PMC
member or not - if someone puts forward good reasons for a -1 then they're
not going to be ignored. On the other side of the coin the more people that
+1 a
+1 to 4.1.x, 5.0.x, 5.5.x.
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2004 7:04 AM
Subject: Tomcat versions and Struts
> For recent builds of Struts, we have "officially" tested against Tomcat
> 4.1.x and 5.0.x. Os
+1
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2004 6:12 AM
Subject: Minimum Ant version for building Struts
> Currently, we say that Ant 1.5.4 is required for building Struts. I'd like
> to bump that to 1.6.2 as a m
Does anyone object to me moving Strut's dependency on to the recently
released Version 1.1.4 of Commons Validator?
Its a very minor maintenance release of Validator, but will allow the issues
with Validator and different resource bundles to be resolved. Details of
changes in 1.1.4 are here:
http:
you planning to do this for the 1.2 branch as well as
trunk?
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 23:15:21 -, Niall Pemberton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does anyone object to me moving Strut's dependency on to the recently
> > released V
If a user requires a "request" scoped behaviour then wouldn't it be better
if this was implemened in a Command rather than Utils? In my mind Utils
should be more of a Global thing thats overriden rarely. I think one of the
problems with current Struts is that sometimes too much has been put into
ut
As Craig pointed out its not our decision to appoint the Struts PMC Chair -
however I'm proposing we put one name forward as our nomination for this
post to the ASF Board.
So far Don Brown and Martin Cooper have been mentioned as replacements for
Craig in this role. Both IMO would make excellent C
Sorry wrong list
- Original Message -
From: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 12:23 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Nomination for Struts PMC Chair
> As Craig pointed out its not our decision to
This is the wrong list for this type of question - please post user
questions to the Struts User List.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Nils Liebelt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 2:18 PM
Subject: Form in the wrong scope
> Hi everybody,
>
> For some reason s
Browsing the Subversion repository seem to have been unavailable for a long
time now (weeks I think) - does anyone know whats happening with this?
Trying to view http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/struts/ results in the
following error
"The Apache Software Foundation ViewCVS Subversion interface i
Seems like its back now.
Niall
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This commit seems to have gone missing - I don't see it in the new "taglib"
sub-project. I'm guessing this happened when Don extracted the taglibs out
of core and into their own sub-project? All I can see from the commit
message when taglibs were moved on 30/12/2004 is the following...
struts/tag
r123447
> What do you mean? The files are there, did we lose the history or
> properties or something?
>
> --
> James Mitchell
> Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
> EdgeTech, Inc.
> 678.910.8017
> AIM: jmitchtx
>
> - Original Message -
> From:
The ActionMapping will be "frozen" and trying to set the input will throw an
exception. You could get round this by overriding the processMapping()
method and returning a "clone" of the ActionMapping.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 02,
BeanUtils.cloneBean() would work but it probably won't copy the
ExceptionConfigs / ForwardConfigs associated with the ActionMapping as there
aren't appropriately named getters/setters - but you could use
BeanUtils.cloneBean() to copy the other and then retrieve the
ExceptionConfigs / ForwardConfigs
Thanks for putting the effort into a solution for this Hubert, it will be a
good addition to Struts. I have a couple of comments
I'm wondering whether as well as what you suggest we should also inherit the
actual FormBeanConfig as well? This would make it far more complex to
implement because
I agree with you in general that the multipart functionality should be
re-factored so that it could be more easily overriden. IMO though one of the
issues is that the key multipart processing is in the RequestUtils's
populate() method and as thats a "static" utils method its not possible to
overrid
g
the request wrapped until the multipart processing starts.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 2:00 AM
Subject: Re: multipart requests -- suggesting things be retho
AFAIK there were two issues with multipart request handling that needed
Servlet 2.3 to resolve:
1) Forwarding a "wrapped" Request
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17583
2) Un-implemented Servlet 2.3 methods
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28983
I think we agre
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 4:25 AM
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 04:15:17 -0000, Niall Pemberton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > AFAIK there were two issues with multipart request handl
CTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 5:43 AM
>
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 02:16:14 -, Niall Pemberton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually I just realized, if the Multipart stuff was all done in its own
> > Command, the point in the process it gets executed
OK I think I have the answer to the confusion, see inline...
- Original Message -
From: "Dakota Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 8:38 AM
> Thanks, Niall,
>
> I don't know how to approach this without some danger of raising some
> ill feeling, but I just don't th
Yes, I agree it serves no purpose until that point.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Dakota Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 9:43 AM
> Hi, Niall,
>
> I see! I do think that it is a bad idea to have the
> MultipartRequestWrapper available to the framework pri
Yes I agree. For me I was just looking at it from the point of view "can we
make the existing implementation more flexible, whilst retaining
compatibility", but I look forward to seeing Martin's new work when its
ready.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Dakota Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
T
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 5:22 AM
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 04:51:27 -0000, Niall Pemberton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "
Apologies for being late to this debate. I've had half an eye on recent
discussions, but not much time to contribute. My preference would be to
liberate the core of Struts from ActionForm and Action whilst still
providing backwardly compatible Command implementations.
To support an Action the only
Please ask this type of question on the User list.
Thanks
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Murugasen Kalimuthu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 2:41 PM
> Hi,
>
> Anybody help me the following error is comming while using validator.
>
> type Exception report
>
Having the wrapper extend the HttpServletRequestWrapper (introduced in
Servlet 2.3) resolves this - just need to remove the "dummy" methods.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Craig McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 4:11 AM
Subject:
- Original Message -
From: "Frank W. Zammetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 1:52 AM
> I was one of the proponents of POJOs as Actions a week or so ago, but
> upon further reflection I have to ask the question... what does this
> really get anyone? I'm not really s
- Original Message -
From: "Dakota Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 4:22 AM
> The idea, I thought, was to use the Commands to supplant the
> RequestProcessor with a composable request processor. Some of the
> present suggestions are so radical as to provide some
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 4:48 AM
> I'm not sure I see the reasoning / benefit of POJOs as Actions. The
> implication is that some method that wasn't designed to be invoked as
> a command / action can do something usefu
I've looked at 1.3 and the Chain stuff, but not actually tried it out.
However the original RequestProcessor is still there and presumably still
works. The default RequestProcessor is now the chain
ComposableRequestProcessor, so to use the original one would have to be
configured. No one (to my kn
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> My feeling is that POJO Actions might encourage people to couch their
> business logic as POJO actions :)
>
> It's unlikely that such a class could be a true POJO. It would have to
> be bound to Struts in some way. Otherwise, the Action would not
> produce a
Sorry frank I had only half an eye on that thread when it was happening.
Wasn't the comments you got back that it was targeted at Struts 1.2 rather
than the current 1.3 development version. I didn't think it was criticised
for flexibilty, just that any solution to this kind of issue needs to be 1.3
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Germuska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 3:58 PM
> At 3:41 PM +0000 3/16/05, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >OK, "POJO Actions" is a bad example.
>
> perhaps, but I think having that in the subject
I haven't looked at your actual implementation, but my gut feel is that we
need to be careful about adding new elements to the struts-config.xml - the
simpler the better IMO. Maybe there are alternative mechanisms that achieve
the same goal. Martin suggested ChainAction in that thread (for Struts
1
- Original Message -
From: "Frank W. Zammetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 5:32 PM
> But if there are others that still want or need to use 1.2, and there are
> some that are willing to tackle some of that work, wouldn't there be
> support for that (keeping compati
- Original Message -
From: "Frank W. Zammetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 9:14 PM
> It seems like there is a bit of denial going on here... I view 1.3 as not
> a minor upgrade but a major one because a significant amount of code has
> changed.
There is a load
I tried the latest maven build-all from SVN, but although it seemed to
complete OK, the taglibs jar didn't get created - is it supposed to work at
the moment or is it "in progress"?
Also I get some InvocationTargetExceptions, although this doesn't seem to
stop it running
ASTIdentifier : java.
James,
Thanks for the response, and appreciate the work you're doing on the maven
build. Unfortunately I'm a maven novice, so I'm struggling to know what its
doing.
I believe I found the cause of the InvocationTargetExceptions - in the
build/project.xml the "url", "siteDirectory" and "distributio
I resolved this - I needed to download the Maven Cactus Plugin
http://jakarta.apache.org/cactus/integration/maven/installing.html
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 2:35 AM
> I tried the latest maven
Bob,
It works fine for me when I run "$maven build-all" following what James
outlined here...
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg07192.html
I changed both ELJavascriptValidatorTag and JavascriptValidatorTag
yesteday - but it looks like when you build EL its not picking up the l
I just committed a change to project.xml in the taglibs project and because
of line endings, it looks like the whole file was modified :-(
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40struts.apache.org/msg07984.html
Looks like alot of the newer files added since the SVN conversion have not
had their SVN pro
I just tried to load a new version of a web site page, but I'm unsure what
the procedure is now. I loaded a new version of the volunteers.html page to
people.apache.org:/www/struts.apache.org
but none of the changes are showing up. Is this the right place and I just
need to be patient until the s
Thanks Don, I'll sit on my thumbs :-)
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Don Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 11:30 PM
Subject: Re: Updating Struts Web site
> Have patience. There is a cron job running every few hours that will
>
That would be great thanks.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 4:24 PM
Subject: 1.2.x nightlies?
> WRT: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21760
>
> Do you want me to add a 1.2.x nightly build?
>
> Instead o
Thanks for doing this. One issue with the 1.2.x nightly binary distribution
is that it doesn't include the el taglib, which we've distributed in the
"contrib" folder with the 1.2.x versions.
AFAIK the only thing preventing someone from using the current "trunk" el
version with Struts 1.2.x is that
- Original Message -
From: "James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 1:03 PM
> That's cool. No worries (see above). El will be part of the nightlies
> tonight. Thanks for pointing this out.
Excellent, thanks again :-)
> > The only other thing I noticed was th
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 4:05 AM
> Anyway, that was just a suggestion. It would really be better to hear
> from people who are interested in doing translations on how they would
> prefer to track changes.
Maybe pingin
It was done in validator about a year ago - but just hasn't been released
yet.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27870
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Riyaz Mansoor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 11:04 AM
Subject: Re:
- Original Message -
From: "Riyaz Mansoor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 12:07 PM
> > It was done in validator about a year ago - but just hasn't been
released
> > yet.
>
> hi. u mean that no final release has been made after the patch was
> submitted?
Yes
> is th
- Original Message -
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 3:30 PM
> Is it hard to get new code into the Struts project? Yes, it is. But
> peole do it. Craig did it. Don did it. I'm hoping Niall will do it
> soon with LazyDynaBeans, and that Hubert will do
- Original Message -
From: "Dakota Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: RFC: Struts HTML Ajax-Aware Tags
> We should develop
> numbers for certain responses to avoid having to have threads devolve
> to them.
>
> Answer 1 = "If there is an itch, I
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Germuska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 8:54 PM
> This page http://www.quirksmode.org/index.html?/dom/error.html
> demonstrates a more graceful way of alerting users to errors in their
> form than an "alert" window. (In case you don't
- Original Message -
From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 2:08 AM
>
> --- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Joe Germuska" <[EMAIL
TECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 11:28 AM
On 4/12/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its "in-progress" - except I haven't given it any time so far this year
:-(.
> I am planning to re-visit it, as it has stuff I want to implement.
Is the WIP anything
Can you ask this type of question on the user list please.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Liu, Benson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 9:44 PM
Subject: Struts Validator Illegal Argument Exception - Digester problem?
Hi,
I'm working on a Struts/Tiles web app
Jack
I find your continuous sarcasm, insults and generally rude manner in your
posts to these lists unacceptable. I would appreciate it if you could please
stop posting all this type of rubbish and stick to the purpose of these
lists. Thank You.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Dakota
I'm having problems with the maven build - it now needs the "findbugs"
plugin, which it can't find.
The "download links" on the following page are broken...
http://maven-plugins.sourceforge.net/maven-findbugs-plugin/index.html
Anyone know where I can get the find bugs plugin for maven?
Niall
Thanks James. I just added a Wiki page for maven with the "limited"
knowledge I have - maybe you could take a look at it.
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsMaintenanceMaven
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 7:47 PM
> I
Isn't it the case that anyone can checkout using the https address - I
believe its only when you try to committ it asks who you are.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 8:41 PM
> Might want to add a note that unless they ha
No problem. I was hoping it would be a seed for a James Mitchel "brain dump"
:-)
- Original Message -
From: "James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 8:42 PM
> By the way. Thanks for doing this!!
---
Sounds good to me.
I've realized the wiki is incorrect - since if you don't specify a
"chainConfig" parameter then it uses the default one shipped. Maybe we can
make it all automatic if no chainConfig is specified. - if theres a tiles
chain config present (i.e. they ship the tiles jar) then use th
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Germuska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 8:20 PM
> Two independent things: first, the bigger one: I'm not that excited
> about the current bootstrapping mechanism for the chain. It doesn't
> play well with the possibility that you don
I remember the discussion about the JDK version for Struts 1.3 - but I can't
remember if an actual decision was made. Have we decided on JDK 1.4 as a
minimum for Struts 1.3?
Niall
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Actually that was discussed...
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg02909.html
The thing was we took a decision on the Servlet Spec but the JDK aspect was
just discussed.
- Original Message -
From: "Pilgrim, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:10
I'm against changing it in this way. Currently all three flavours of
DispatchAction require the parameter to be configured in the
struts-config.xml in order for them to be able to determine which method to
call. Without the parameter none of them can determine the method - thats a
different scenari
1 - 100 of 554 matches
Mail list logo
