Ping,
This issue (and mailinglist thread) is now more than two months old. The latest
patch adds a testcase showing the issue in the APR testsuite. (There is also an
XFail test in the subversion testsuite for this issue)
The patch was written on the 1.4.x branch but I svn switch'ed it
Hi All
Mike has suggestion at [1] to make use 'DAV:apply-to-version' to avoid
the problematic PROPFIND altogether.
This suggestion works very well.
It is just the ra_neon fix i.e no mod_dav_svn fix
Attached patch implements this fix.
All tests pass with this test(except the known mergeinfo
On 01/18/2010 11:47 PM, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
whether it addresses any of the points Mike raised and in what ways,
that sort of thing.
Hey forgot to answer this bit. Mike was suggesting to make use of
'DAV:apply-to-version' in CHECKOUT rather than the problematic PROPFIND. I did
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Kamesh Jayachandran kam...@collab.net wrote:
Mike has suggestion at [1] to make use 'DAV:apply-to-version' to avoid the
problematic PROPFIND altogether.
This suggestion works very well.
It is just the ra_neon fix i.e no mod_dav_svn fix
How does this work
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Edmund edm...@belfordhk.com wrote:
Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
Hi there,
after converting the list to .apache.org it seemed to me that my account
for moderating the dev-list is lost ?
Can i be dev-list moderator as before or not ?
I don't think there is
On 01/19/2010 06:55 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Kamesh Jayachandrankam...@collab.net wrote:
Mike has suggestion at [1] to make use 'DAV:apply-to-version' to avoid the
problematic PROPFIND altogether.
This suggestion works very well.
It is just the ra_neon
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 2:10 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net wrote:
We still have in our tree (currently at
trunk/www/license-for-python-bindings.html, but likely to be moved
elsewhere) a special license for the Subversion Python bindings. The
document claims that the copyright for
On 01/19/2010 07:23 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:49 AM, C. Michael Pilatocmpil...@collab.net wrote:
Mark Phippard wrote:
Any idea how it works? CHECKOUT is serviced by the proxy server
right? I would think it would lead to the same problem? Maybe the
code
On 19 Jan 2010, at 12:17 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I'd like to roll 1.4.2 ASAP, all that we are waiting for is to roll
back
this breakage. Volunteers?
Graham, you committed r817810, any thoughts on other changes
required, besides
simply reverting the single commit?
I think
[[[
Minor fixes in the French translation:
* réçent - récent
* the proper French translation for consistent is usually cohérent
* consiste seulement en des espaces - est constitué seulement d'espaces
]]]
--
Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
Sometimes a setback can be the greatest form of progress.
David James wrote:
2010/1/18 Роман Донченко dxdra...@yandex.ru:
Also note that I want to eventually remove the trac directory and integrate
non-duplicate tests from there into the main testsuite - albeit I'm not
sure if I'm allowed to do that. Maybe we can persuade Edgewall to formally
Ping!
This patch hasn't been reviewed.
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 07:44:49PM +0100, Daniel Näslund wrote:
Hi!
[[[
Fix issue #3483 - extend svn_client_upgrade() to include externals. I've
done the externals upgrading after wc upgrade is finished. In that way
no errors in the externals will
C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net писал в своём письме Tue, 19 Jan
2010 17:57:17 +0300:
David James wrote:
2010/1/18 Роман Донченко dxdra...@yandex.ru:
Also note that I want to eventually remove the trac directory and
integrate
non-duplicate tests from there into the main testsuite -
Done. Would be ideal to get one more moderator for d...@subversion...
- Original Message
From: Lorenz loren...@yahoo.com
To: dev@subversion.apache.org
Sent: Tue, January 19, 2010 10:18:59 AM
Subject: Re: Moderator of the DEV-List
Mark Phippard wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at
Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu wrote on 01/12/2010
04:52:33 PM:
After pulling 1.6.7 due to a segfault regression, we've rerolled the
branch as Subversion 1.6.8. The magic revision is r898464, and you
can find the tarballs here:
http://orac.ece.utexas.edu/pub/svn/1.6.8/
Роман Донченко wrote:
C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net писал в своём письме Tue, 19 Jan
2010 17:57:17 +0300:
I'd be lying if I said I cared a lick about the licensing of our Python
bindings *tests*. But unless I'm mistaken, there's no reason for the
bindings themselves to carry
2010/1/19 C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net:
Роман Донченко wrote:
C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net писал в своём письме Tue, 19 Jan
2010 17:57:17 +0300:
I'd be lying if I said I cared a lick about the licensing of our Python
bindings *tests*. But unless I'm mistaken, there's no
On 1/7/2010 9:12 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
Looking at apr's 1.3.x branch:
In r817810 a change to the hash table implementation was introduced,
which moves the data of a hash table from the main pool to a subpool (as
seen from the pool passed to apr_hash_make). This makes the contents of
the
Hi TC fans,
I've been digging into diff again, aiming at that missing tree-conflict
detection: 'Incoming delete of a folder will also delete a folder that
locally differs from what was originally deleted.'
I'm facing this question;
Obviously we want to enforce this rule:
1. An incoming delete
2010/1/19 Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de:
I guess you ran into http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2873
Yes, I guess so. Thanks for the link. Do you think it gets resolved
any time soon?
Andrey Paramonov
On Jan 19, 2010, at 9:26 AM, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote:
Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu wrote on 01/12/2010 04:52:33
PM:
After pulling 1.6.7 due to a segfault regression, we've rerolled the
branch as Subversion 1.6.8. The magic revision is r898464, and you
can
1.6.8 is a dud, and will never see the light of day. Thankfully, we found the
problems with ra_serf and the deps during the testing, and appropriate fixes
have been nominated.
My plan is to reroll 1.6.9, but holding the roll until r900797 (a high-impact
bug fix), and the
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 07:59:42PM +0300, Андрей Парамонов wrote:
2010/1/19 Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de:
I guess you ran into
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2873
Yes, I guess so. Thanks for the link. Do you think it gets resolved
any time soon?
I don't know. It
2010/1/19 Андрей Парамонов cmr.p...@gmail.com:
2010/1/19 Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de:
I guess you ran into http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2873
Yes, I guess so. Thanks for the link. Do you think it gets resolved
any time soon?
Looking at the lack of activity, I wouldn't
Hi!
This is not a finished patch.
I've added mark and seek handlers to svn_subst_stream_translated().
Those two handlers are just wrappers that calls the underlying
streams handlers. Now that works in my test but what happens if we set a
mark in front of what we've read so far from the file? We
Minor fixes in the French translation:
* réçent - récent
* the proper French translation for consistent is usually cohérent
* consiste seulement en des espaces - est constitué seulement d'espaces
Done in trunk r900912.
--
Fabien.
Once the plan for the new subversion.apache.org web site settles out,
what's the plan for the old subversion.tigris.org? Did the community
want to keep maintaining it? Would it be helpful for CollabNet to take
it over (or would it be evil)?
I'd say something like we could save the
On Jan 15, 2010, at 4:13 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 14:54, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
...
+++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/workqueue.c Fri Jan 15 19:54:47
2010
...
@@ -1217,12 +1217,13 @@
is_file = (kind == svn_wc__db_kind_file ||
Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
Users can post without being subscribed. Those are the messages that
are moderated. I do not know how you configure the moderators. I
think we need Greg Stein to add more people. Perhaps a ticket with
ASF infrastructure would also do it, but I suspect it would need to
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Stas Cherkassky scher...@gmail.com wrote:
Michael,
I think you are right - Subversion just wasn't designed for this
methodology.
But I can't believe SVN users don't have the same problem. I wonder how they
solve it ...
We have the same problem, but our
On 1/19/2010 5:19 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
The patch was written on the 1.4.x branch but I svn switch'ed it to trunk for
easy application.
I would suggest one bit of alternate code that is a bit more condensed, any
concern?;
+static int same_drive(const char *path1, const char *path2)
+{
+
31 matches
Mail list logo
