Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-19 Thread kmradke
Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu wrote on 01/12/2010 04:52:33 PM: After pulling 1.6.7 due to a segfault regression, we've rerolled the branch as Subversion 1.6.8. The magic revision is r898464, and you can find the tarballs here: http://orac.ece.utexas.edu/pub/svn/1.6.8/

Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-19 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Jan 19, 2010, at 9:26 AM, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote: Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu wrote on 01/12/2010 04:52:33 PM: After pulling 1.6.7 due to a segfault regression, we've rerolled the branch as Subversion 1.6.8. The magic revision is r898464, and you can

Re: [NEW TARBALLS] Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-15 Thread Philip Martin
Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com writes: The check is inside an assert(), so it only aborts in maintainer/DEBUG mode.        Bert Doh, Thanks Bert. I wasn't paying close enough attention. Indeed it does assert with a debug build:

Re: [NEW TARBALLS] Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-15 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 09:49:44AM +, Philip Martin wrote: So serf works out of the box only for a Windows release build; it fails for a Windows debug build, a Linux build or an OSX build (assuming OSX is like Linux). These other builds need to do something like 'configure

Re: [NEW TARBALLS] Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-15 Thread Senthil Kumaran S
Mark Phippard wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote: Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com writes: TESTED: --- [ fsfs | bdb ] x [ file | svn | http (neon) | http (serf) ] You're the second person to show the serf tests passing on Windows. Are

Re: [NEW TARBALLS] Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-15 Thread Senthil Kumaran S
Philip Martin wrote: Building -DNDEBUG makes the tests pass on Linux. Yes I confirm this. When I configure with 'CFLAGS=-DNDEBUG' option, there is no failures, here are the dependencies, APR 1.3.9 APR-UTIL 1.3.9 Apache httpd 2.2.14 Neon 0.29.3 Serf 0.3.0 BDB 4.7.25 OpenSSL 0.9.8g

RE: [NEW TARBALLS] Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-15 Thread Bert Huijben
-Original Message- From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com] Sent: vrijdag 15 januari 2010 10:50 To: Paul Burba Cc: Bert Huijben; Mark Phippard; Hyrum K. Wright; Joe Swatosh; Subversion Dev Subject: Re: [NEW TARBALLS] Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing Paul Burba

Re: [NEW TARBALLS] Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-15 Thread Philip Martin
Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl writes: I just performed a $ svn diff -x -p ^/subversion/tags/1.6.6 ^/subversion/tags/1.6.8 1.6.6-1.6.8.patch And I see no changes in serf at all. You've made a mistake somehow: r889935 | hwright | 2009-12-12 14:38:38 + (Sat, 12 Dec 2009) | 15 lines

RE: [NEW TARBALLS] Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-14 Thread Bert Huijben
+1 for release. Tested [fsfs | bdb] x [ local | svn | serf | neon ] Windows 7 X64 Visual Studio 2008 SP1 (Compiling everything as X86 application) APR 1.3.8 APR-Util 1.3.9 BDB 4.4.20 Serf 0.3.0 Cyrus Sasl 2.1.23 SqLite 3.6.22 Neon 0.29.3 Apache httpd 2.2.9 (With IPv6 enabled in APR and

Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-14 Thread Philip Martin
Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com writes: I can reproduce as follows: $ rm -rf repo $ svnadmin create repo $ svn mkdir -mm http://localhost/repo/A $ svn copy -mm http://localhost/repo/A http://localhost/repo/B lt-svn: ../src-1.6/subversion/libsvn_subr/path.c:955:

Re: [NEW TARBALLS] Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-14 Thread Paul Burba
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote: Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com writes: TESTED: --- [ fsfs | bdb ] x [ file | svn | http (neon) | http (serf) ] You're the second person to show the serf tests passing on Windows. Are you testing against the

Re: [NEW TARBALLS] Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-14 Thread Philip Martin
Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote: Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com writes: TESTED: --- [ fsfs | bdb ] x [ file | svn | http (neon) | http (serf) ] You're the second person to show the serf tests

Re: [NEW TARBALLS] Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-14 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote: Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com writes: TESTED: --- [ fsfs | bdb ] x [ file | svn | http (neon) | http (serf) ] You're the second

Re: [NEW TARBALLS] Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-14 Thread Paul Burba
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote: Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com writes: TESTED: --- [ fsfs |

Re: [NEW TARBALLS] Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-14 Thread Lieven Govaerts
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote: I don't understand. it.  The server generates baseline collection URLs with a trailing slash (a DeltaV requirement?) in dav_svn__build_uri:    case DAV_SVN__BUILD_URI_BC:      return apr_psprintf(pool,

Re: [NEW TARBALLS] Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-14 Thread Paul Burba
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote: Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com writes: Not to sound like I am testifying before Congress...but I don't recall that.  More importantly, as Mark mentioned, Senthil successfully ran the serf tests on Debian. Could

RE: [NEW TARBALLS] Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-14 Thread Bert Huijben
-Original Message- From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com] Sent: donderdag 14 januari 2010 20:29 To: Mark Phippard Cc: Paul Burba; Hyrum K. Wright; Bert Huijben; Joe Swatosh; Subversion Dev Subject: Re: [NEW TARBALLS] Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing I don't

Re: [NEW TARBALLS] Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-14 Thread Paul Burba
: Re: [NEW TARBALLS] Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing I don't understand. it.  The server generates baseline collection URLs with a trailing slash (a DeltaV requirement?) in dav_svn__build_uri:     case DAV_SVN__BUILD_URI_BC:       return apr_psprintf(pool, %s%s/%s/bc/%ld/%s

Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-13 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
Joe, Would it be possible for you to describe the differences between the versions in the two deps tarballs? I think part of the problem was that when I lost my box a few weeks ago, I also lost the magic combination of deps versions, so just used the most recent versions from the rolling

Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-13 Thread Mark Phippard
I think the problem is with Neon. We get this error: Linking... Creating library ..\..\..\Release\subversion\libsvn_ra\libsvn_ra-1.lib and object ..\..\..\Release\subversion\libsvn_ra\libsvn_ra-1.exp libneon.lib(ne_socket.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _inet_aton referenced

Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-13 Thread Philip Martin
Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu writes: After pulling 1.6.7 due to a segfault regression, we've rerolled the branch as Subversion 1.6.8. The magic revision is r898464, and you can find the tarballs here: What's the status of serf? I'm seeing lots of failures (46 so far and it

Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-13 Thread Mark Phippard
SUMMARY: +1 to release NOTE: I tested with the original 1.6.8 zip but signed and verified the current one. PLATFORM: Windows Vista SP2 VS 2008 SP1 Java 1.6 COMPONENTS: Apache2.2.11 APR 1.3.5 APR-UTIL1.3.7 OpenSSL 0.9.8k Neon 0.28.3 Serf

Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-13 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Jan 13, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Philip Martin wrote: Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu writes: After pulling 1.6.7 due to a segfault regression, we've rerolled the branch as Subversion 1.6.8. The magic revision is r898464, and you can find the tarballs here: What's the status

Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-13 Thread Philip Martin
Lieven Govaerts svn...@mobsol.be writes: You mean ra_serf, not serf. I've triggered a build on the Mac buildbot with ra_serf to see if it has the same problem, cause it's the first time I see these errors. On what platform are you building? 64-bit Linux (Debian/Lenny). I can reproduce as

Re: [NEW TARBALLS] Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-13 Thread Joe Swatosh
; Subversion Dev Subject: Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing I think the problem is with Neon.  We get this error: Linking...   Creating library ..\..\..\Release\subversion\libsvn_ra\libsvn_ra-1.lib and object ..\..\..\Release\subversion\libsvn_ra\libsvn_ra-1.exp libneon.lib(ne_socket.obj

1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-12 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
After pulling 1.6.7 due to a segfault regression, we've rerolled the branch as Subversion 1.6.8. The magic revision is r898464, and you can find the tarballs here: http://orac.ece.utexas.edu/pub/svn/1.6.8/ Please be sure to test the bindings. You know the drill: signatures from full

Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-12 Thread Joe Swatosh
Hi On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu wrote: After pulling 1.6.7 due to a segfault regression, we've rerolled the branch as Subversion 1.6.8.  The magic revision is r898464, and you can find the tarballs here: