>
> Please don't forget that there is people out there using Syncope core
> *without* (or not exclusively via) the admin console.
> Currently, they only needs the syncope-client dependency (+Spring if they
> want to rely upon RestTemplate) in their java apps.
>
> Moreover, some client classes (th
On 18/01/2013 09:43, Jan Bernhardt wrote:
Hi Francesco,
-Original Message-
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org]
Sent: Donnerstag, 17. Januar 2013 17:47
To: dev@syncope.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discussion] CXF migration (branches)
On 17/01/2013 10:54, Jan Bernhardt
Hi Francesco,
> -Original Message-
> From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 17. Januar 2013 17:47
> To: dev@syncope.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Discussion] CXF migration (branches)
>
> On 17/01/2013 10:54, Jan Bernhardt wr
On 17/01/2013 12:55, Andrei Shakirin wrote:
Hi Francesco,
Sorry Jan, I don't think this fact is inline with community-driven development.
This community discussed and established a roadmap with some releases
[2]: this roadmap can be reviewed over time, of course, but it remains the
driver for t
lf
Of Christian Schneider
Sent: Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2013 18:48
To: dev@syncope.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discussion] CXF migration (branches)
Jan contacted me that the E-Mail Server in the Bonn office is
currently down so he can not reply himself at the moment.
So I am replying what he wrote me via Skyp
.@apache.org]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 17. Januar 2013 10:05
> To: dev@syncope.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Discussion] CXF migration (branches)
>
> On 17/01/2013 09:13, Jan Bernhardt wrote:
> > Hi syncoper,
> >
> > Our mail system is working again :)
>
> Nice: next
Hi Francesco,
> -Original Message-
> From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 17. Januar 2013 10:05
> To: dev@syncope.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Discussion] CXF migration (branches)
>
> On 17/01/2013 09:13, Jan Bernhardt w
On 17.01.2013 10:05, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> On 17/01/2013 09:13, Jan Bernhardt wrote:
>
>> As Christian already stated, we have 4 developers currently with time
>> & budged to get the CXF migration done. We cannot delay this task
>> without massive re-planning time constrains...
>
> Sorr
der [mailto:cschneider...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Christian Schneider
Sent: Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2013 18:48
To: dev@syncope.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discussion] CXF migration (branches)
Jan contacted me that the E-Mail Server in the Bonn office is currently down
so he can not reply himself at the moment
lient.validation --> org.apache.syncope.validation
WDYT?
Best regards.
Jan
> -Original Message-
> From: Christian Schneider [mailto:cschneider...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Christian Schneider
> Sent: Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2013 18:48
> To: dev@syncope.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Discussion] CXF mi
It sounds good.
On my side, I gonna move forward around the OSGi support.
Thanks for the update.
Regards
JB
On 01/16/2013 06:47 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
Jan contacted me that the E-Mail Server in the Bonn office is currently
down so he can not reply himself at the moment.
So I am reply
Jan contacted me that the E-Mail Server in the Bonn office is currently
down so he can not reply himself at the moment.
So I am replying what he wrote me via Skype:
We currently have the plan to finish the CXF migration during the next
1.5 weeks with 4 developers. The issue is a little urgent as f
On Jan 16, 2013, at 4:29 PM, Fabio Martelli wrote:
>
> Il giorno 16/gen/2013, alle ore 16.08, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:
>
>> On 16/01/2013 15:50, Jan Bernhardt wrote:
>>> Hi Syncopers,
>>>
>>> all preparation tasks are more or less done for CXF migration, so next we
>>> would like to
Il giorno 16/gen/2013, alle ore 16.08, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:
> On 16/01/2013 15:50, Jan Bernhardt wrote:
>> Hi Syncopers,
>>
>> all preparation tasks are more or less done for CXF migration, so next we
>> would like to start with actual CXF migration.
>>
>> Since we are planning t
On 16/01/2013 15:50, Jan Bernhardt wrote:
Hi Syncopers,
all preparation tasks are more or less done for CXF migration, so next we would
like to start with actual CXF migration.
Since we are planning to release Syncope 1.1.0 soon I can see two reasonable
solutions to continue.
1. Creat
Hi Syncopers,
all preparation tasks are more or less done for CXF migration, so next we would
like to start with actual CXF migration.
Since we are planning to release Syncope 1.1.0 soon I can see two reasonable
solutions to continue.
1. Creating a release branch for 1.1.0 and making su
16 matches
Mail list logo
