project. Dig through Pull Requests and
> discussions
> > to figure out who is familiar with which components.
> >
> > (I can help a cbit with my background - I have worked on the DML grammar
> and
> > ANTLR parser layer previously and am working on the GPU backend now. I
> also
> > ran the perf tests and am somewhat familiar with the work needed to
> > automate it.)
> >
> > Welcome!
> >
> > -Nakul
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
ng both
> should use spaces though.
>
> Finally, I would recommend to also include common inconsistency such as
> exception handling (catch all vs redundant error messages),
> hashcode/equals, unnecessary branches, etc.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
>
> On 5/2/2017 7:15 PM, Dero
t; because being PPMC is by default as committer too, and change from PMC to
> PPMC since we are still podling.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Deron Eriksson
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Henry! Note that the original podling report template did not
>
3) as an improvement from
our existing 1). We could also have alternate options such as spaces for
DML and tabs for Java.
Thoughts?
Deron
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
> > > I would like to welcome Felix Schueler as a new
> > > Committer and PPMC member of Apache SystemML.
> > >
> > > Thanks for all your work, and welcome !!!
> > >
> > > Arvind Surve | Spark Technology Center | http://www.spark.tc/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
following:
svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk incubator
cd incubator
// modify content/podlings.xml
svn status
svn diff
svn commit -m "This is my update to podlings.xml..."
For reference, please see: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html
Deron
--
Dero
Mon, May 1, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Henry Saputra
wrote:
> Thanks, Deron for taking stab at it
>
> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Deron Eriksson
> wrote:
>
> > I volunteer to create the SystemML podling report for May.
> >
> > Deron
> >
> >
> >
ages because they distract from the actual
> > discussions. I already had to change my notification settings
> > accordingly - essentially I'm not watching SystemML's PR activity any
> > more.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > On 4/28/2017 10:
I volunteer to create the SystemML podling report for May.
Deron
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Deron Eriksson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would anyone else care to volunteer to create the SystemML podling report?
> If there are no volunteers, I will volunteer, but since SystemML is a
ning off reports shows that you are
> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
> for the Incubator PMC.
>
> Incubator PMC
>
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
one
(such as "Build successful" and "Refer to this link...").
(3) get rid of the automated messages
I like (2). Any other opinions or options?
Thoughts?
Deron
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
her.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Deron Eriksson ---04/24/2017 01:28:58
> PM---Hi, I see after a recent commit that the main jar file now]Deron
> Eriksson ---04/24/2017 01:28:58 PM---Hi, I see after a
tself covered by the above license."
So could someone tell me if caffe and tensorflow licenses now need to be
added to the project?
Even if they are not required, some confusion during artifact validation
can occur since the project looks like it contains caffe and tensorflow
classes.
Deron
BTW, that is assuming our algorithms have been converted to functions.
Deron
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Deron Eriksson
wrote:
> Thank you Matthias. I highly agree with your idea about having a default
> specification similar to R WRT the function signatures for default values.
&g
; to a subset of parameters.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Deron Eriksson
> wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to set default parameter values using DML? I believe both
> R
> > and Python offer this capability.
> >
> > The only solut
(double b) return (double a) {
c = ''+b;
if (c == 'NaN') {
b = 2.0
}
a = b + 1;
}
z=0.0/0.0;
x = addone(z);
print(x);
y = addone(4.0);
print(y);
Is there a cleaner way to accomplish this, or is DML lacking this R feature?
Deron
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Te
ml/0.12.0-
> incubating/systemml-0.12.0-incubating.zip
>
> The 0.13.0 version download link from the main page (
> https://systemml.apache.org/) works fine.
>
> Ethan
>
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
rial to help
> podlings incorporate incubator branding into their logos.
>
> Please review the Press Kit for Podlings page at
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/press-kit.html . If you have any
> questions, please follow up on general AT incubator or press AT apache.
>
> John
>
ward unless there is immediate need for a branch, branch based
> on
> > Release Candidate (RC) won't be created until RC build gets approved.
> > -Arvind Arvind Surve | Spark Technology Center | http://www.spark.tc/
>
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http
and I are the
only SystemML committers on the ASF SystemML channel, so it would be nice
to get more committers to sign up so we can utilize this great resource for
open communication.
Deron
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
re has been some discussion on removing Java 7 as well because it
> reached end of life in April 2015. Moving to Java 8 would allow us to
> modernize the code base going forward and the 1.0 release would be the
> perfect time for this change.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
>
>
>
>
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
e.org
> > Sent: Saturday, January 7, 2017 1:35 AM
> > Subject: Re: Release cadence
> >
> > I think that a 2 month cycle would be a good compromise for major/minor
> > releases. Fixpack release could be at a 1 month cycle.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
>
or.apache.org/guides/graduation.html
> [3] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/systemml.html
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
e website source code?
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I can not find the information about the source code location for the
> SystemML website.
>
> I believe it is in SVN or is it using Git repo?
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Henry
>
>
>
>
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
OT
> >systemml
> >jar
> >SystemML
> > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
> >scm:git:git@github
> > .com:apache/incubator-systemml
> >scm:git:h
> > ttps://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-systemml > eveloperConnection>
> >https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > systemml.git
> > - v0.13.0-incubating-rc1
> > + HEAD
> >
> >
> >JIRA
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
sing header files, etc). Minor bugs
> or regressions should not block this release.
> -Arvind Arvind Surve | Spark Technology Center | http://www.spark.tc/
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
and move it to a central place like SparkExecutionContext to ensure
> consistency across all APIs and deployments.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Deron Eriksson ---02/20/2017 02:14:00
> PM---Hi Felix, I agree that the 2.1 hard requirement i
se have a hard requirement in MLContext
> for Spark 2.1. Is this really necessary or could we set it to >= 2.0? Only
> supporting the latest Spark release seems a little restrictive to me.
>
>
> -Felix
>
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
This implies we run both the performance as well as accuracy
> > > test suite before our release. Alternative is to replace simplified
> > > algorithms with our released algorithms.
> > >
> > > Advantages of accuracy test suite approach:
> > > 1. No increase the running time of integration tests on Jenkins.
> > > 2. Accuracy test suite could use much larger datasets.
> > > 3. Accuracy test suite could include algorithms that take longer to
> > > converge (for example: Deep Learning algorithms).
> > >
> > > Advantage of replacing simplified algorithms:
> > > 1. No commit breaks any of the existing algorithms.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Niketan Pansare
> > > IBM Almaden Research Center
> > > E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
> > > http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 115.25
>> sec - in org.apache.sysml.test.integration.applications.dml.GNMFDMLTest
>> Running org.apache.sysml.test.integration.applications.dml.WelchTDMLTest
>> Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 13.286
>> sec - in org.apache.sysml.test.integration.applications.dml.WelchTDMLTest
>> Running org.apache.sysml.test.integration.applications.dml.ApplyTran
>> sformDMLTest
>> Tests run: 14, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 25.878
>> sec - in org.apache.sysml.test.integration.applications.dml.ApplyTran
>> sformDMLTest
>> Running org.apache.sysml.test.integration.applications.pydml.ID3PyDMLTest
>> Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 331.351
>> sec - in org.apache.sysml.test.integration.applications.pydml.
>> ID3PyDMLTest
>> Running org.apache.sysml.test.integration.applications.pydml.
>> GNMFPyDMLTest
>> Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 57.087
>> sec - in org.apache.sysml.test.integration.applications.pydml.
>> GNMFPyDMLTest
>>
>> Results :
>>
>> Tests in error:
>>
>> TransformCSVFrameEncodeReadTest.testFrameParReadMetaHybridCSV:79->runTransformTest:122
>> Runtime
>>
>> TransformCSVFrameEncodeReadTest.testFrameParReadMetaSparkCSV:74->runTransformTest:122
>> Runtime
>>
>> TransformCSVFrameEncodeReadTest.testFrameParReadMetaSingleNodeCSV:69->runTransformTest:122
>> Runtime
>>
>> Tests run: 6676, Failures: 0, Errors: 3, Skipped: 0
>>
>> [INFO]
>> [INFO] --- maven-failsafe-plugin:2.17:verify (default) @ systemml ---
>> [INFO] Failsafe report directory: <https://sparktc.ibmcloud.com/
>> jenkins/job/SystemML-DailyTest/ws/target/failsafe-reports>
>> [INFO]
>>
>> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>> [INFO]
>>
>> [INFO] Total time: 02:54 h
>> [INFO] Finished at: 2017-02-11T17:30:34-06:00
>> [INFO] Final Memory: 62M/2071M
>> [INFO]
>>
>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-failsafe-plugin:2.17:verify
>> (default) on project systemml: There are test failures.
>> [ERROR]
>> [ERROR] Please refer to <https://sparktc.ibmcloud.com/
>> jenkins/job/SystemML-DailyTest/ws/target/failsafe-reports> for the
>> individual test results.
>> [ERROR] -> [Help 1]
>> [ERROR]
>> [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the
>> -e switch.
>> [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
>> [ERROR]
>> [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
>> please read the following articles:
>> [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/conflu
>> ence/display/MAVEN/MojoFailureException
>> Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
>> Run condition [Always] enabling perform for step [[]]
>>
>>
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
it in 1.0).
> >
> > Currently the section about the old API is placed in between up-to-date
> documentation and makes it pretty confusing to see what is old and what is
> new.
> >
> > Any objections? Alternatively we could put it all the way to the end or
> in a separate document.
> >
> > -Felix
>
>
>
>
>
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
w the 0.12.0 release?
Thanks!
Deron
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
1
hsaputra 1
FelixNeutatz 1
nishi-t 0
sandeep-n 0
romeokienzler 0
tgamal 0
taasawat 0
sourav-mazumder 0
kevin-bates 0
kakal 0
GrapeBaBa 0
objectadjective 0
nmanchev 0
jodersky 0
jdyer1 0
gmlewis 0
aloknsingh 0
akunft 0
ahmaurya 0
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
load the appropriate Spark version on
> Jenkins (or on any dev machine which runs the integration tests) and set
> SPARK_HOME environment variable.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Niketan Pansare
> IBM Almaden Research Center
> E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
> http://researcher.watson.i
inwald, Prithviraj Sen: SPOOF: Sum-Product
> Optimization and Operator Fusion for Large-Scale Machine Learning, CIDR
> 2017.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> >> On 2/1/2017 7:30 AM, Deron Eriksson wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I
write access or ask Mike, Luciano, or me to
make any additions or modifications.
Thanks,
Deron
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
o that they contain the
expected root folder and so they do not need to be manually renamed.
Deron
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
values in B-R: 3
> > ! B-DML<->B-R # stored values in B-DML: 3
> > ! B-DML<->B-R identical values(z=0): 0
> > ! B-DML<->B-R wrong values(z=1.0E-10): 3
> > ! B-DML<->B-R min error: 38.93887198928196
> > ! B-DML<->B-R max error: 95.5452
th a DML program, can I view (a) the DML program
> > parsed
> >into HOPs; (b) what rules fire and where in the plan, as well as the
> > plan
> >after each rule fires; and (c) the lowering and fusing of operators to
> > LOPs?
> >
> >I know this is a lot to ask for; I'm curious how far SystemML has gone
> >in this direction.
> >
> >3. Is there any relationship between the SystemML optimizer and Apache
> >Calcite <https://calcite.apache.org/>? If not, I'd love to
> understand
> >
> >the design decisions that differentiate the two.
> >
> > Thanks, Dylan Hutchison
> >
> >
>
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
t;>>
> > >>>> I'd like to welcome Nakul Jindal as a new Committer and PPMC member
> for
> > >>>> the Apache SystemML project!
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks for all of the hard work so far, Nakul, and welcome!
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The Apache SystemML PPMC Members
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Mike Dusenberry
> > >>>>
> > >>>> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > >>>>
> > >>>> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Sent from my iPhone.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
nch my_local_branch
> >
> > For creating dev branches for 1.6, first go to you local 1.6 branch and
> > continue with your regular steps such as git branch -b JIRA-222
> >
> > And good luck !!!
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
ded only for use by the
> >>> individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this
> >>> message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> >>> any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or
> >>> other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this
> >>> information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> >>> communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the
> >>> material from your computer.
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or
> proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used
> solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The information
> transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or entity
> to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission,
> dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any
> action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and
> delete the material from your computer.
>
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
may only be used
>> solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The
>> information transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the
>> individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this
>> message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
>> any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or
>> other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this
>> information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
>> communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the
>> material from your computer.
>>
>
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
is time to merge the above PR into the master branch of the
> > project in order to move SystemML onto Spark 2.x.
> >
> > Thoughts? If no objections, I'd like to merge next week.
> >
> >
> > Cheers!
> >
> > - Mike
> >
> > --
> >
> > Michael W. Dusenberry
> > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
and Scala.
>
> My Webpage
> kkalyan.in
>
> My Spark Pull Requests
> https://github.com/apache/spark/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr%20author%
> 3Akrishnakalyan3%20
>
> Thank you so much,
> Krishna
>
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
> release process because, as I mentioned before, the release early,
> release
> > often mantra is good to increase community interest, generate more
> traffic
> > to the list as developers discuss the roadmap and release blockers, and
> > also enable users to provide feedback sooner on the areas we are
> developing.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
--
Deron Eriksson
Spark Technology Center
http://www.spark.tc/
queue. If that is not
> common, we can wait.
> -Arvind From: Deron Eriksson
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, December 9, 2016 7:34 AM
> Subject: Re: test suite running slowly after disable cache/sparse commit?
>
> Hi Fred,
>
> The last two da
even
> be reviewing most PRs until after they have passed the automated tests.
>
> Deron, are you seeing a backlog of not-yet-started builds queueing up on
> the PR build server? If the queue is getting long, we can add additional
> machines to the Jenkins cluster.
>
> Fred
>
Hi,
I just submitted a few pull requests to do some minor refactoring to remove
some unused code.
Please let me know if you believe any of this code is not actually dead
code and should be kept, or if it should be kept with comments (such as
'TODO: operation needs to be implemented', etc).
[SYST
6]jenkins---11/18/2016
> 03:12:48 PM---See <https://sparktc.ibmcloud.com/jenkins/job/SystemML-
> DailyTest/635/changes> Changes:
>
> From: jenk...@spark.tc
> To: Michael W Dusenberry/San Francisco/IBM@IBMUS, lrese...@apache.org,
> dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org, Deron Eriksson/Sa
Hi Arvind,
Thank you for bringing this up. Just wanted to let you know we have
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-848 to address this. I would
be happy to work with Luciano in the creation of such documentation. Since
Luciano has had to do all of our release deployments by himself, I w
Hi,
I have enabled javadoc doclint checking. Previously the default Java 8
doclint checking was turned off by a profile because of javadoc errors in
the project. Since these errors have been fixed, we can now turn on the
default Java 8 doclint behavior. Javadoc errors will cause the build to
fail,
Hi Luciano,
Here is my understanding of the release artifacts at a very high level.
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> This has been causing confusion with IPMC, and I want to document my
> understanding of the release artifacts:
>
> Source Distribution
> systemml-0.11.0-i
+1
Successfully cloned the tagged version and packaged using a clean maven
repo.
Test suite passed on OS X. Ran in 2 hours 27 minutes using 1.7.0_80-b15.
Downloaded all rc5 artifacts and verified that 'hello world' DML works for
each.
Verified that project can be built using src release.
Single no
Thank you for reviewing, Luciano.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> +1, Reviewed on the wiki as a mentor
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Deron Eriksson
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you for the feedback Mike. I added the VLDB paper award.
> >
>
Hi,
In case it's useful for anyone else writing a future podling report, here
are a few things that can be done to generate stats:
1) # emails
Go to http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-systemml-dev/ and
add up the 3 previous months (200 + 103 + 72).
2) # new contributors
See who h
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Nov 1, 2016, at 4:43 PM, Deron Eriksson
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Here is a draft of the November monthly
Hello,
Here is a draft of the November monthly report due tomorrow that Felix and
I put together. Feedback is welcome.
Deron
SystemML
SystemML provides declarative large-scale machine learning (ML) that aims at
flexible specification of ML algorithms and automatic generati
t reduce this confusion by dropping our
number of released artifacts, as addressed by
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926.
Deron
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Deron Eriksson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I mentioned here that the "source-release.zip" is not something
Thank you Felix! I really appreciate it!
Deron
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 1:01 PM, wrote:
> I will help you, Deron!
>
> Felix
>
>
> Am 31.10.2016 20:26 schrieb Deron Eriksson:
>
>> If there are no other volunteers to help with the report, I will help. If
>> any
Hi Jeremy,
I think moving forward with visualization and design is a great idea,
especially since I feel there is currently momentum after the great design
refactoring of the project website. Mike and Jeremy, please let me know if
there's any way in which I can help.
Deron
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016
If there are no other volunteers to help with the report, I will help. If
anyone else is interested in writing the monthly report, I would also be
very happy to provide any assistance and guidance. Contributing to the
project monthly report is a great way to become familiar with ASF
procedures and
2016, at 10:55 PM, Glenn Weidner
> wrote:
> > >
> > > In my opinion it can be removed.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Glenn
> > >
> > > Deron Eriksson ---10/20/2016 01:36:04 PM---The 0.11.0 rc3 artifacts are
> > located at: https://di
Hi,
I mentioned here that the "source-release.zip" is not something I
recognize:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg00960.html
Is this mystery artifact created by the script to deploy release candidates?
It should definitely be removed in my opinion.
Deron
On S
Hi Luciano,
Since the current website updates are major improvements, I have gone ahead
and published the new updates. I think we can now start publishing more
frequently since important parts of the codebase have stabilized.
Deron
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Deron Eriksson
wrote:
>
Hi Luciano,
Several updates to the website were merged today. I think we're at the
point where we can publish the new website updates. Do you agree?
Deron
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Jason Azares
wrote:
> Hi Luciano,
>
> Initial page:
> > - What's the intention of the section just abov
+1. Great idea!
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Renee Mascarinas
wrote:
> +1 This is a great idea! It would be nice to invite the community to write
> about their experiences with SystemML as well. Maybe we can start with
> Medium and in the future, do a youtube vlog :]
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 20
+1 sounds great to me too.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:44 PM, wrote:
> +1 that sounds great to me.
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Oct 25, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Madison Myers
> wrote:
> >
>
Would it be acceptable for a user to receive a log warning if the user uses
an operation that is currently only implemented for single node? My concern
is that there is an expectation for operations to be distributed with
SystemML, and if an operation is not currently distributed, the user needs
to
Hi James,
Thank you for the great questions! I think some of the issues that you are
experiencing are usage issues from a failure on our part to convey this
information clearly. The good news is that a tremendous amount of effort
and focus is currently being directed towards fixing our website and
x27;t expecting
> > this at all. Somehow my eyes always ignored this.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> >
> > On 10/21/2016 9:22 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote:
> >
> >> I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the features of
>
Hi Nakul,
+1
I think having some clear characteristic to distinguish operations that
only operate locally is a great idea. Otherwise, how would a user know that
these operations are only local and not distributed? Adding this naming
convention for local operations sounds reasonable to me so that w
I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the features of 3
and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements of others here since I have
no training in design and the multitude of considerations involved such as
scalability.
I believe the logo trademark is an official requirement of th
The 0.11.0 rc3 artifacts are located at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.11.0-incubating-rc3/
I see the following artifact:
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-source-release.zip
I do not recognize this artifact. Can anyone tell me what this artifact is?
Can it be removed?
Der
be ok, but it's a community decision.
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Deron Eriksson
> wrote:
>
> > I believe that for an Apache release, our test suite is supposed to pass
> > (although I'm pretty sure random test fails can be ignored).
> >
&
I believe that for an Apache release, our test suite is supposed to pass
(although I'm pretty sure random test fails can be ignored).
See 2.1 of Release Check List here:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
"2.1 Build is successful including automated tests.
The ex
uld prefer to leave the empty (automatically generated)
> javadoc comments - at least in eclipse, this provides a better overview of
> parameters and exceptions.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Deron Eriksson ---09/30/2016 12:35:30
> PM---Hi Lucian
Hi Luciano,
I am definitely in favor of fixing these javadocs. I created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-842 two months ago to
address this issue.
However, there are so many problems with the javadocs that I think
addressing this should probably be broken down into separate java pa
The SYSTEMML-963 and SYSTEMML-967/-971 issues have been resolved and are no
longer blocking the release.
Deron
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Deron Eriksson
wrote:
> -1, SYSTEMML-963 and SYSTEMML-967 are potential needed license fixes.
> Glenn and I should have these issues addres
s been tagged as v0.1.
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Deron Eriksson
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Luciano,
> >
> > I would prefer doing fixes on master for the website. However, I do not
> > feel strongly about this issue.
> >
> > Anyone else any thought
-1, SYSTEMML-963 and SYSTEMML-967 are potential needed license fixes. Glenn
and I should have these issues addressed by tomorrow.
Deron
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Matthias Boehm wrote:
>
> > -1, unfortunately, SYSTEMML-964 and SY
Hello Luciano,
I would prefer doing fixes on master for the website. However, I do not
feel strongly about this issue.
Anyone else any thoughts?
Deron
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> I have created a PR [1] porting the Jekyll based website to use the new
> design co
+1
Great idea, Berthold. Adding a roadmap to the project will be a very
welcome addition to the project, both for users and developers.
Deron
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Berthold Reinwald
wrote:
> In the spirit of other Apache projects, we should publish a Roadmap page.
> The page shoul
+1
Deron
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Niketan Pansare wrote:
> +1 for 0.11 release
>
> Thanks
>
> Niketan
>
> > On Sep 19, 2016, at 10:39 PM, Acs S wrote:
> >
> > I would agree to most of the part except that there would be need to
> have SystemML support on Spark 2.0 for "Spark As A Serv
ixObject/FrameObject and
> other internal structures from API level, remove the
> BinaryBlockMatrix/BinaryBlockFrame
> types, and try to consolidate the various Matrix/Frame objects as well as
> replicated compilation chains.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> [image: Inactive hid
Feel free to not expose MatrixObject and FrameObject. I am fine with that.
The only reason MatrixObject and FrameObject are exposed is that I felt if
the new MLContext API did not expose them, there would be complaints from
existing committers that these objects were not available. I can't see
anyo
ception. I've made a change and I'll run the test suite and verify the
tests work and then commit a hotfix if that fixes it.
Deron
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:01 PM, wrote:
> See <https://sparktc.ibmcloud.com/jenkins/job/SystemML-
> DailyTest/495/changes>
>
> Chan
eremy. The website looks awesome !!
>
> Deron/Luciano: Do you think we should change the 'Get Started' link to
> point to one of the beginner's guide rather than point to the Download
> page ? Alternatively we can add a link in Download page instructing what
> the u
Wow, these updates really look incredible! Thank you Jeremy Anderson for
this amazing contribution!
Deron
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> Jeremy Anderson has been so kind to spend few days on a new design for the
> Apache SystemML website, and this is now attached to
+1
Deron
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Deron Eriksson
> wrote:
>
> > Luciano,
> >
> > Yes, I like the idea of the next release being SystemML 1.0. Given the
> > significance of the version, it wou
Luciano,
Yes, I like the idea of the next release being SystemML 1.0. Given the
significance of the version, it would be a good idea to not rush the
release so that we can make this a truly great release.
Deron
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at
sounds like a good plan to allow us to continue supporting the Spark
> 1.x line in the short term, with a plan for moving to Spark 2.x support
> soon.
>
> -Mike
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberr
+1
Continuing to support Spark 1.4/1.6 for now while setting a cutover date
for 2.0 sounds like a great idea. This allows for the creation of a really
solid release for 1.x, which greatly benefits SystemML users using Spark
1.x. It also gives these users a general date that they can use to plan
mig
Hi Sourav,
Great question. Work is currently being performed by Alok Singh (see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-860) regarding this topic.
Deron
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Sourav Mazumder <
sourav.mazumde...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any work going on to call Sy
etailed code comments and suggestions to try out can be made in the
> branch commit instead of this mail thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Glenn
>
> Deron Eriksson ---08/05/2016 02:02:10 PM---I am open to the idea of
> supporting Spark 2 and Spark<2 concurrently if someone shows th
l features since 0.10 (specifically frames, the prototype
> Python
> > DSL, and the new MLContext) and it would be good to have a Spark 1.6
> branch
> > of our version tree where we can backport the debugged versions of these
> > features if needed.
> >
> > I would reco
t;
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Deron Eriksson ---08/02/2016 05:39:53
> PM---Here is a draft I created for the August monthly report. F]Deron
> Eriksson ---08/02/2016 05:39:53 PM---Here is a draft I created for the
> August monthly report. Feedback we
Here is a draft I created for the August monthly report. Feedback welcome.
Deron
-
SystemML
SystemML provides declarative large-scale machine learning (ML) that aims at
flexible specification of ML algorithms and automatic generation of hybrid
runtime plans ranging from single node, in-memor
I would definitely be in favor of moving to Spark 2.0 as early as possible.
This will allow SystemML to be current with cutting edge Spark. It would be
nice to focus our efforts on the latest Spark.
Deron
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 12:05 PM, wrote:
> I'm in favor of moving to Spark 2.0 now, meanin
3/changes>
>
> Changes:
>
> [Deron Eriksson] [SYSTEMML-832] Upgrade Scala version and prune
> dependencies
>
> --
> Started by timer
> [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
> [EnvInject] - Preparing an environment for
1 - 100 of 256 matches
Mail list logo
