Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/842
I don't think it's wrong to mark something as "deprecated" in preparation
for a future non-usage that may or may not happen. I think the point is to
establish the intent to users that we no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16488060#comment-16488060
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1945:
---
Github user danielcweber commented on the
Github user danielcweber commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/842
>remove all deserializers again for which no serializer exists and vice
versa
Why would we do that? If we can construct (i.e. deserialize) e.g. a
DateTime of whatever a server gives
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16487927#comment-16487927
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1945:
---
Github user FlorianHockmann commented on the
Github user FlorianHockmann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/842
After thinking a bit more about this, my conclusion was that deprecating
those types doesn't really make sense unless we plan on GraphSON 4.0 as we
couldn't remove the types before that.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16487893#comment-16487893
]
Florian Hockmann commented on TINKERPOP-1942:
-
I like the idea of using a binary
Github user FlorianHockmann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/868
@ashwini-ms did you see my comment regarding whether `IGremlinClient`
should return a `ResultSet` now instead of an `IReadOnlyCollection`? It's now a
bit hidden as GitHub collapsed it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16487796#comment-16487796
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1897:
---
Github user FlorianHockmann commented on the
Github user FlorianHockmann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/802
No, you're right. That is something that is very unlikely to occur and I
can't think of other (more likely) reasons where the build of the docker images
could fail as they really only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16487659#comment-16487659
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1897:
---
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/802
> detect when changes break the Docker images, e.g., when the naming of the
zip archives or their location changes
That's fair, though that specific example seems really unlikely to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16487649#comment-16487649
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1897:
---
Github user FlorianHockmann commented on the
Github user FlorianHockmann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/802
> what is the advantage to building these images if a .docker file is
present?
A reason to keep this option is that it makes it easier to detect when
changes break the Docker
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16487613#comment-16487613
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1897:
---
Github user FlorianHockmann commented on a diff
Github user FlorianHockmann commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/802#discussion_r190320705
--- Diff: docs/src/reference/gremlin-applications.asciidoc ---
@@ -353,6 +353,38 @@ variable initialization code into the console.
Like,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16487608#comment-16487608
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1897:
---
Github user spmallette commented on a diff in
Github user spmallette commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/802#discussion_r190319710
--- Diff:
gremlin-driver/src/test/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/driver/ResultQueueTest.java
---
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ public void
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16487604#comment-16487604
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1897:
---
Github user FlorianHockmann commented on a diff
Github user FlorianHockmann commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/802#discussion_r190319039
--- Diff:
gremlin-driver/src/test/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/driver/ResultQueueTest.java
---
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ public void
stephen mallette created TINKERPOP-1975:
---
Summary: Introduce with() step modulator
Key: TINKERPOP-1975
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1975
Project: TinkerPop
20 matches
Mail list logo
