Adding those kinds of details was the reason we had the
ResponseStatus.attributes Map. I can really only speak for the java driver
as I only know that one really well (we might need other TinkerPop experts
to chime in for python, .net and c#). The java driver doesn't really
present ways to get
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16375083#comment-16375083
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1822:
---
Github user krlohnes commented on the issue:
Github user krlohnes commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/715
Last comment for tonight, it looks like that while loop works with
TinkerGraph and a simple query. I believe the more complex query I wrote for
the application I'm working on may have an issue.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16375049#comment-16375049
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1822:
---
Github user krlohnes commented on the issue:
Github user krlohnes commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/715
So it's not quite fixed. I changed the while loop to
```
int i = 0;
while (this.starts.hasNext()) {
if (i==0) {
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16374969#comment-16374969
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1822:
---
Github user krlohnes commented on the issue:
Hi All,
We are working on to expose metadata as part of gremlin to response to client.
The metadata is simply a property bag to provide special message/hints to the
client. But currently client libraries strip off everything and only return the
data to the client.
Specifically, We want to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16374878#comment-16374878
]
stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP-1900:
-
I'm aware of that test jar thingy - marko
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16374867#comment-16374867
]
David Pitera commented on TINKERPOP-1900:
-
>From a cursory glance it seems that the ones that
In my opinion, I don't think we need to go backward in time to improve old
docker images. We deploy the images when we tag a version for release and
it stays that way forever just like our other release artifacts. If you
want a better version of the docker image then upgrade your TinkerPop
version
> I guess he just said "new images for older versions"
> because these images do not exist yet. But once they're there, nobody
would
> ever update them again.
Actually, I understood Jean-Baptiste's original remark on that topic as
if he wanted to really deploy new images for older versions every
They would be static. We would checkout the release tag, build the image
and publish it. I guess he just said "new images for older versions"
because these images do not exist yet. But once they're there, nobody would
ever update them again.
Cheers,
Daniel
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 9:20 AM,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16374564#comment-16374564
]
Florian Hockmann commented on TINKERPOP-1897:
-
There's one other plugin we can use for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1726.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: stephen mallette
Fix Version/s: 3.3.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16374298#comment-16374298
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1726:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/800
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16374265#comment-16374265
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1872:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1872.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: stephen mallette
Fix Version/s: 3.3.2
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/793
---
stephen mallette created TINKERPOP-1902:
---
Summary: Remove URI class usage in java driver
Key: TINKERPOP-1902
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1902
Project: TinkerPop
Here are my slides from my presentation on Gremlin's Anatomy:
https://www.slideshare.net/StephenMallette/gremlins-anatomy-88713465
I plan to write up what was discussed there as part of TinkerPop
documentation at some point soon. I think there are ideas which can be
expanded upon and will be
Ok - i was just asking for clarity because this thread started as a
discussion on a "beta" release.
Our last release was in december, so I suppose it would be time to get
another one out. I do have a number of issues I'd like to complete for
these versions - can we tentatively say that we release
I'm referring to an official release of all artifacts for versions 3.2.8
and 3.3.2. The JavaScript GLV has been reviewed and merged, the test suite
is in good shape. This GLV has been in the pipeline for a long time now, I
think we should make the last effort for it to be generally available.
23 matches
Mail list logo
