DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39221.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 12:57 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: configurable AJP Buffer Size
Henri Gomez wrote:
well client and server should be in phase about the buffer size and
the better way to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39221.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Just take a look at the AJP protocol documentation :
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/common/ajpv13a.html
Packets sent from the server to the container begin with 0x1234.
Packets sent from the container to the server begin with AB (that's
the ASCII code for A followed by the ASCII code
Henri Gomez wrote:
Just take a look at the AJP protocol documentation :
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/common/ajpv13a.html
Packets sent from the server to the container begin with 0x1234.
Packets sent from the container to the server begin with AB (that's
the ASCII code for A followed
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39221.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
2006/4/6, Jess Holle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Just take a look at the AJP protocol documentation :
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/common/ajpv13a.html
Packets sent from the server to the container begin with 0x1234.
Packets sent from the container to the server
Hello
If this is the wrong mailing list then I appoligise.
When compiling tomcat 5.5.16 on a solaris 10 (sparc) I get the following
error.
Can anyone please advice as to the problem so that I can continue?
I have simply downloaded the prerequirites into /usr share/jave and ran
ant in the tomcat
Henri Gomez wrote:
These proposals all look interesting. The problem is that there are
lots of proposals and this would seem to inevitably take quite some time
to stabilize all of this in mod_jk, mod_proxy_ajp, and Tomcat (native
and Java). I'd love to be proven wrong, though.
Not
Hi,
Start from a clean build setup: you have a servlet.jar file from
Servlet Spec v2.3 (or earlier) which doesn't have the Listener(s)
added in Servlet Spec v2.4. To build Tomcat, you don't need to (and
shouldn't) set a CLASSPATH environment variable or otherwise muck with
the classpaths setup by
KARNATI, SRINIVASA R [AG/1000] wrote:
Possible. But, I have no idea why connector should be constraining this.
???
It is obvious by your comment that you have no clue how AJP
protocol works, and why it has a fixed packet size in the spec.
Also take a look at what protocol and specification
Hello I am using servlet 2.4 and have made no change to CLASSPATH.
Below is the output from the command # ant output
Buildfile: build.xml
check.source:
get.source:
build:
proxyflags:
download:
setproxy:
testexist:
[echo] Testing for
Then I have no clue, it works just fine for me.
Yoav
On 4/6/06, Seed, Neville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello I am using servlet 2.4 and have made no change to CLASSPATH.
Below is the output from the command # ant output
Buildfile: build.xml
check.source:
get.source:
build:
Author: remm
Date: Thu Apr 6 07:09:45 2006
New Revision: 391990
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=391990view=rev
Log:
- Add common annotations interfaces.
- The latest docs seem to indicate that it's Declare*s*Roles.
Added:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/javax/annotation/
Hi,
This thread started (for whatever reason) on the private list as part of
an unrelated discussion. The point is to see what could be improved to
make Tomcat more suitable for shared hosting, which is a very nice goal,
but unfortunately with very serious issues.
I don't see many
Author: remm
Date: Thu Apr 6 07:13:54 2006
New Revision: 391991
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=391991view=rev
Log:
- Add support (note: not in NamingContextListener yet) for service-ref (after
all, there's support
for all other elements, so ...).
- Submitted by Fabien Carrion.
Added:
Author: remm
Date: Thu Apr 6 07:29:14 2006
New Revision: 391995
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=391995view=rev
Log:
- Add annotations JAR.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/build.xml
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/build.xml
URL:
Ideas? Yes, and it's very simple - use fork()!
Obviously this is not going to work on Windows, but for the case of Java
hosting, we largely don't care.
Let's put this in perspective. Quite a few hosting providors (mine
included) run PHP in CGI mode. Any less expensive solution is competitive.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37356.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 09:15:17AM -0700, Preston L. Bannister wrote:
You have to consider how (or if) to allow for long-running background
threads. Successive requests for the same user will not use the JVM
(whether this counts as an advantage or disadvantage is debatable). The JVM
isn't
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36204.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Well, that is one definition of real applications. There are other
definitions. :)
On 4/6/06, Tino Schwarze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 09:15:17AM -0700, Preston L. Bannister wrote:
You have to consider how (or if) to allow for long-running background
threads.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39226.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
isn't it easier to give each user a pre-configured lightweight but own tomcat?
leon
On 4/6/06, Preston L. Bannister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, that is one definition of real applications. There are other
definitions. :)
On 4/6/06, Tino Schwarze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu,
I have one suggestion regarding tomcat and security
manager, but I don´t know if it fits here. We have a
huge problem managing security configuration (i.e.
catalina.policy). We have a common base policy and an
entry for each virtual host. Sometimes clients put
unmanaged libraries that require
Define lightweight. :)
If we are talking about a small number of users, with high average
utilization, this might be a good solution. In fact this is similar in
resource usage to the virtual hosting (i.e. Xen) solutions.
For more typical usage, the number of users is large, and the average
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39231.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 4/6/06, Preston L. Bannister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Define lightweight. :)
only the basics you need for a webapp. no admin/manager, no
clustering, no gadgets.
To explain it:
Besides large portals with own server farms and millions of hits, I
often have small customers which get a dynamical
Author: remm
Date: Thu Apr 6 16:44:36 2006
New Revision: 392122
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=392122view=rev
Log:
- I don't know if this field is legitimate or not, but it's used by the rest of
the patch. I'll
check it.
Modified:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 4:45 PM
To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r392122 -
/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/javax/annotation/Resource.java
Author: remm
Date: Thu Apr 6 16:44:36 2006
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31426.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31426.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
2006/4/6, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jess Holle wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
We recently saw a customer run into this limitation in that all of their
headers, etc, would not fit in the first 8K.
Waiting for a new AJP version sounds like a non-starter. Can we just
have something
Write you own SecurityManager.
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/essential/system/writingSMgr.html
I have one suggestion regarding tomcat and security
manager, but I don´t know if it fits here. We have a
huge problem managing security configuration (i.e.
catalina.policy). We have a common
35 matches
Mail list logo
