Re: TomEE Jakarta project - have we reach the limit?

Agreed ... 1.7.x - EOL 7.0.x and 7.1.x - mostly similar so if we maintain one, we should maintain the other. But I agree that 1 actively developed version (TomEE master/TomEE 9.x) and 1 maintained version (TomEE 8.x) is good. That'd be my choice. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitte

Re: TomEE Jakarta project - have we reach the limit?

-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 7:56 AM David Jencks wrote: > Maybe even “Our second release _confirmed_…”… > > David Jencks > > > On Oct 4, 2021, at 12:33 PM, David Blevins > wrote: > > > >>

JAXRS TCK Standalone

ompliant on this one and then release TomEE again so we have a JDK 17 compatible binary. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: JDK 17 - TomEE TCK

I'll dump the information into a specific email thread -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 8:59 AM Zowalla, Richard < richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > No problem. If I can help somehow, let me know :)

Re: JDK 17 - TomEE TCK

Yes, I'd like the JAX RS issues to be fixed, because it's a provider ordering or discovery issue on the client side. It's taking a bit of time, I'm sorry -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 11:38

Re: TomEE Jakarta project - have we reach the limit?

move master to a TomEE maintenance branch and switch master to jakarta, we can do the relocation in the source itself. Of course the downside is maintenance cost as we'll have to backport to TomEE branch with the packages always conflicting. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismon

Re: TomEE Jakarta project - have we reach the limit?

ag EE9 on the > road to EE10 but never maintain or release it. > That's another option yes. > > Also not sure about the exact timeline, when we should start to migrate. > > > > > > Am Fr., 1. Okt. 2021 um 13:25 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro < > jlmonte.

TomEE Jakarta project - have we reach the limit?

e the cost of maintaining both TomEE 8 and TomEE source tree. But looks like to do that we end up by duplicating pretty much the entire TomEE tree but the examples. Is it worth it? Should we move master to Jakarta and leave a maintenance branch for TomEE 8? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitte

EE 9 TCK challenges for EE 8?

Hi all, We opened some challenges for EE 9 for JPA as an example. Most of them got accepted so tests are excluded in EE 9. In EE 8, we run them because they are not excluded but they are failing. Should we exclude them even though the challenges haven't been opened against EE 8? -- Jean-

TCK Sigtests

Hi, Probably more for David, but writing openly so more car learn like me lol I tried to run the sigests for EE8 and EE9 but I don't seem to be very successful. Do you have pointers to help? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

JDK 17 - TomEE TCK

.work/tomee/project?id=8 For TomEE 9 and EE 9, the build just started Results will be available here https://tck.work/tomee/project?id=17189 -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: TomEE & Java 17

Hi all, Good progress thanks to some fixes Jon applied. https://tck.work/tomee/project?id=8 Similar results with JDK 8 / 11 and 17. I need to compare the failures, but most likely same results. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, Sep

Re: TomEE & Java 17

work on the proxy issue and a couple of other minor issues but it gives a status of the situation. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:11 PM Zowalla, Richard < richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > Correction:

JSONB/JSONP TCK failures

Hi, I reverted Johnzon update because it seems that 1.2.11 and onward introduced a regression. I'll checkout with Johnzon community but I wanted to see how it looks with 1.2.10 -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: TomEE KEYS update

Unless I'm mistaken I got 8.0.8 signing based on new apache guidelines. Sha512 is now recommended or required can't recall. So not surprised tomcat is doing the same Le jeu. 16 sept. 2021 à 20:54, Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) < jenki...@nationwide.com> a écrit : > David, > > From an earlier email: > >

TomEE KEYS update

Hi all, Rod reported that we are missing some keys for signature checking of the binaries. David, yours isn't the correct one. So maybe you rotated the key to a new one. Can you guys make sure your key is there and up to date? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache TomEE 8.0.8

lt; > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de>: > > > Can confirm. It is available via the mirrors. > > DL page now contains the links to 8.0.8 > > > > Thanks to all :) > > > > Am Montag, dem 13.09.2021 um 10:14 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro: > > >

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache TomEE 8.0.8

Should be available soon. Just pushed -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 8:51 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > I'll move the dist today. > Did it on Friday but forgot the SVN CI .

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache TomEE 8.0.8

> > Am Sonntag, dem 12.09.2021 um 23:19 +0200 schrieb Thomas Andraschko: > > Hi, > > > > is the release already done? > > the download page still shows 8.0.6 > > > > Am Do., 9. Sept. 2021 um 11:29 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro < > > jlmonte...@tomit

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache TomEE 8.0.8

Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 3:49 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote: > Hi All, > > This is a first attempt at a vote for a release of Apache TomEE 8.0.8. > > Maven Repo: > https://repository.apache.o

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 8.0.8

surprised. Maybe a dependency issue because I got them 100% passing for EE9 with Jonhzon. JSF, JAXRS, we probably need to have a look if we can fix them. Servlet, and WebSockets are probably setup issues or Tomcat gaps that got fixed in Tomcat 10.x -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismon

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 8.0.8

+1 (binding) -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 5:31 PM Alex The Rocker wrote: > Alright so my vote is [+1] non-binding for TomEE 8.0.8 based on my > tests (I doubt the fix for activemq exception can be in time for &

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 8.0.8

Java 16 runtime > > > * My own test of a JAX-RS end point fails with attached exception stack > > > > > > Tested class is AboutService.java (attached too) > > > Test class which fails is AboutServiceTest (attached too) > > > > > > Wi

[VOTE] Apache TomEE 8.0.8

he.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2967[TOMEE-2967] > Translate to Spanish: examples/xa-datasource > - link:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2964[TOMEE-2964] > Translate to Portuguese: examples/serverless-tomee-webprofile (modifié) > (Developers - please review and adjust your tickets if necessary!) Please VOTE: [+1] Yes, release it [+0] Not fussed [-1] Don't release, there's a showstopper (please specify what the showstopper is) Vote will be open for 72 hours. Thanks -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: TomEE build work to make it stable

Thanks. I'll put up a vote then -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 11:18 AM Thomas Andraschko < andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > My colleague tested our applications, so +1 from our Side > > Big th

Re: TomEE build work to make it stable

Awesome. Thanks for the feedback Richard and thanks for the huge help in putting back the build to stable. Let's wait till Thomas gets a chance to give it a try. If we don't hear back, then I'll put the vote up before end of the week -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlou

Re: TomEE build work to make it stable

Ok looks like I got to stage a TomEE 8.0.8 @Thomas Andraschko If you want to give it a try before I put a vote up, that'd be awesome. https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1186 JLouis -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro

Re: TomEE build work to make it stable

Yes I tried an `mvn clean package -DskipTests` and it worked well. So maybe a different set of profiles, yes. I'll need to look at that so we can do a release. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 12:53 PM Zowalla, Ri

Re: TomEE build work to make it stable

symbol: class WebAppBuilder > [INFO] location: class org.apache.tomee.myfaces.TomEEAnnotationProvider > [INFO] [ERROR] > /Users/jlmonteiro/devs/jeanouii/apache/tomee/tomee/tomee-myfaces/src/main/java/org/apache/tomee/myfaces/TomEEAnnotationProvider.java:[41,39] > cannot find symbol > -- Jean-Louis Mont

Re: TomEE build work to make it stable

Yeah, I can try to do it. I'll trigger a TCK meanwhile so we know where we are at -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 10:42 AM Zowalla, Richard < richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > Afaik, I have no righ

Re: TomEE build work to make it stable

Awesome. Let's see if I can remember how to release this thing unless you want to give it a try Richard? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 9:33 AM Zowalla, Richard < richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: >

Re: TomEE build work to make it stable

Hey Thomas, Richard and all, Sorry, been on holiday as well. I'm sure we can ignore them and create 2 tickets to make sure we fix them. Then I can try to do the release or if someone wants to go we can for sure -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitrib

Re: TomEE build work to make it stable

PR looks good. Thanks Thomas. I'll see if I can do a release tomorrow. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 3:12 PM Thomas Andraschko < andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Richard, > > could you p

Re: Problems with master branch in Windows 10

Oh yeah, you are correct Richard, It might be related to issues with paths under windows. If you have a windows machine and you can have a look, that'd be fantastic. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 9:34 AM Zowalla, Ri

Re: TomEE build work to make it stable

Hi all, Thanks Richard for the recap. I just push a small change and revert of JAX Application provider scanning to see if that is better. I'll monitor the CI and see how it looks from the MP TCK point of view. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitrib

Re: Problems with master branch in Windows 10

Hi all, Just checked the CI and it looks ok https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tomee/ Are you up to date with git? What command are you using? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 8:24 PM Luis Ventocilla wrote: > Hi everyb

Re: MicroProfile TCK failures - status

a JAX-RS runtime to automatically > discover provider classes via mechanisms such as class scanning. A > JAX-RS implementation that supports automatic discovery of classes MUST > process only those classes that are annotated with @Provider. > This part is also clear. All annotated pro

MicroProfile TCK failures - status

oints such as /openapi aren't deployed anymore. I reverted all the shaded and patching thingy and used regular CXF jars after rebuilding everything and it fails as well. I'm going to do a git bysec, rebuild and try to see if I can determine what's going on. -- Jean-Louis Mo

Re: TomEE build work to make it stable

if we want to also get TomEE a EE8 compatible implementation as we have done for TomEE 9 -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 12:48 PM Zowalla, Richard < richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > I pushed a workaround,

Re: TomEE 8.0.7 withdraw

Thanks David. Didn't pay attention Le jeu. 10 juin 2021 à 22:31, David Blevins a écrit : > Gentle reminder to avoid cross-posting. > > > -David > > On Jun 9, 2021, at 10:13 AM, COURTAULT Francois < > francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > So I think we have 2 possibilities: >

Re: TomEE build work to make it stable

nd it. org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.rs.DisableTomEEJohnzonTest.client org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.rs.AppPropertiesPropagationTest.checkStarIsNotAnIssue We should get back into a green build again. And therefore ready for a release soon. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro

Re: TomEE 8.0.7 withdraw

ppy to do my best to help you. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 9:48 AM COURTAULT Francois < francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> wrote: > Hello Jean-Louis, > > Thanks for your reply. > What about my q

Re: TomEE 8.0.7 withdraw

add the others - we need to somehow find a way to release all the other jars, so we can use EJBContainer, ApplicationComposer, Arquillian with EE 9 and jakarta namespace -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 7:13 P

Re: TomEE build work to make it stable

We are 2 failures away from green now. One of them is a system property to disable Johnzon on the client side which is not supported anymore. The other one, I need to look at it I'm trying to get some TCK results -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro

Re: TomEE build work to make it stable

nd created a shaded version. Did a bit of cleanup in dependencies. Fixed WebSocket issues. We might still have some issues pending but I'd like to see the TCK results at this point. Any issue? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Fri, Jun 4,

Re: TomEE build work to make it stable

as the test passes locally. > > Gruss > Richard > > > [1] > > https://github.com/apache/tomee/commit/8dd89daec484a84b2dd8e0f97a29f87a4d4fd3a4 > [2] https://github.com/jeanouii/tomee/pull/4 > > Am Mittwoch, den 02.06.2021, 15:58 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro: > > >

Re: TomEE build work to make it stable

[image: image.png] The 2 first and the last one. Trying to understand the async-servlet related issues. For the 2 last cxf-rs, I'd need David's input -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 9:56 AM Zowall

TomEE build work to make it stable

help from David who worked quite heavily on CXF so I don't have to pay that same cost. https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tomee/job/pull-request/lastBuild/testReport/ I'm trying to address the websocket failures but any help is welcome as usual -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com

Re: TOMEE-3740 - The CompBean - What is it?

ly -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 9:55 AM Zowalla, Richard < richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > Hi all, > > I took a quick look at our failing openejb-core tests. Most of them > seem to fail due to th

Re: Updated Contributors list

Well done guys -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 11:36 PM Cesar Hernandez wrote: > Nice work David and Richard! > As of today, the page shows 100+ contributors :) > > > El vie, 21 may 2021 a las 22:22

Re: Potential new home page

I think it has to do with "minimal and iterate slowly". Also like the new design. Quite refreshing and on time with the compatible part we just accomplished. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 10:01 AM Zowall

Re: Converting "release-tools" from svn to git

Thanks David - looks like good timing for upcoming 8.0.x maintenance -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 7:17 PM David Blevins wrote: > > On May 10, 2021, at 3:50 PM, David Blevins > wrote: > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

Great work David. That's definitely good for visibility. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 1:12 AM David Blevins wrote: > > On May 18, 2021, at 10:31 AM, David Blevins > wrote: > > > > - Draft

Re: Build process: tag names

1. 2. org.apache.maven.plugins 3. maven-release-plugin 4. 3.0.0-M4 5. 6. tomee-@{project.version} 7. 8. This should do the trick -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 5:36 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro

Re: Build process: tag names

I think this is by default the artifact id or the parent project. But it's something we can change in the release plugin. https://maven.apache.org/maven-release/maven-release-plugin/examples/prepare-release.html *"Overriding the default tag name format"* -- Jean-Louis Monteiro htt

Re: The wrong way to close PRs

All fixed now! We can get back to fixing the master after TCK work -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 7:49 PM Zowalla, Richard < richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > We re-created some (newer) PRs, which were

Re: The wrong way to close PRs

If people used a branch, you can re-create the PR like this [image: image.png] Click on the branch link. Then create the pull request. I'll do this one as an example. https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/791 What other PR do you have to restore? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitte

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

Got some time to give it a try. No other comment. +1 -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:14 PM Mark Struberg wrote: > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 03.05.2021 um 17:01 schrieb David Ble

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

Thanks for the feedback though and for the time spent on testing. It's definitely useful feedback for next release -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 9:06 PM Alex The Rocker wrote: > Okay I understand that 8.0.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

agreed! -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 7:56 PM Cesar Hernandez wrote: > +1 (binding) > We can add a Note in the download section for TomEE 8.0.7 and in parallel > working on the fixes to then release 8.0.8. We

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

time, work and energy the community spent to implement missing pieces, and pass the TCK. Here is my +1. Thanks everyone for the work, tests, moral support. Thanks David for the hours and fights you put on this release. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitrib

Re: [jira] [Commented] (TOMEE-3725) Returns invalid principal - Java EE Security - Inject javax.security.enterprise.SecurityContext

-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 10:58 AM Pramod (Jira) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=173

Re: tomee-security update

Done. I'll monitor the publish and fire a new TCK -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:25 PM David Blevins wrote: > I say merge it and let's see what the TCK says. > > > -- > David Blevins >

tomee-security update

eed to circle back, write down a lot of tests and rework some parts. Still feedback is welcome. That should bring us to one single failure com.sun.ts.tests.securityapi.idstore.idstorepermission.Client In essence this is a policy configuration in catalina.properties. -- Jean-Louis Mo

Re: [DISCUSS] Retiring the "tomee" webapps from TomEE 8

Agreed with all Le dim. 18 avr. 2021 à 21:37, Mark Struberg a écrit : > yup, the webapp was always kind of a a half baked solution imo. > When you just need CDI, then one can use OWB natively in the app on an > unmodified Tomcat. > If one needs the fully blown EE features, then TomEE is a perfec

TCK status

ee if I can finish the Security implementation over the next few days. We have a feature gap in there but the wiring in TomEE is probably more tricky than other things. Very happy with the progress made. We can do it. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

TCK - yet another milestone passed

still welcome. If you feel you want to be part of the fun Let us know we can help you get started. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: Rework TomEE 9 to use Tomcat 10 and build webapps & tar.gz

Might be an outdated snapshot because I don't seem to reproduce locally and I'm up to date -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 8:43 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > Ok looks

Re: Rework TomEE 9 to use Tomcat 10 and build webapps & tar.gz

Ok looks like we are back to normal. Everything is working so far. Bad news is that I have no idea what really fixed the problem. But we are having a lot of NoSuchMethodError with OpenWebBeans -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Mar 29, 2021

Re: Rework TomEE 9 to use Tomcat 10 and build webapps & tar.gz

me-9.0.0-M7-SNAPSHOT/lib/tomee-webservices-8.0.7-20210327.040612-103.jar > If someone can look at it, or I'll have a look today -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 5:05 AM David Blevins wrote: > Hi All, > > So

Re: Rework TomEE 9 to use Tomcat 10 and build webapps & tar.gz

a TCK build. I'm overall fine with the approach. Sounds like a good compromise to avoid big maintenance costs without blocking us too much on the Jakarta EE 9 and forward. We'll see over time if we can improve, but it looks like a good starting point. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro htt

Re: JUnit5 Jupiter support with Arquillian

Hi Bruno, I think Richard worked on it. Not sure about the status, but as far as I can recall, he created a ticket (TomEE-2966: JUnit5 OpenEJB Extension Module) and a PR for it. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 8:11 PM

Re: Why the indivial components didn't get certified yet?

Hi Thiago, I had that in my todo list but did not get a chance to start filling the CSR for individual tools like Johnzon for JSONP and JSONB, etc Haven't got any time yet. But you are correct, we could do individually and at the end for TomEE -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitte

Re: TomEE 9 with Jakarta EE 9

If we don't want to maintain both quite yet, we need to still improve what we have. Back to you email because I see some common ideas and possible options. See bellow ... -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 2:05 AM David Blev

Re: TomEE-2966: JUnit5 OpenEJB Extension Module - Any thoughts?

I agree. Would be awesome to have something more stable. It's better than it was. But still some work to do. Le ven. 5 févr. 2021 à 19:55, Zowalla, Richard < richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> a écrit : > Hi Cesar, > > would be very much appreciated, I guess. > > I noticed, that the PR jenkins job

[TCK] EJB 30 Interceptor test in embedded mode

maybe. - - com.sun.ts.tests.ejb30.lite.packaging.war.datasource.singleton.Client - Same as previous After that, we should also be 100% compliant. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

TomEE 9 with Jakarta EE 9

to TomEE 9.x so we have minimal changes between the 2 and we don't spread our effort on multiple source trees. What do you think? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [TCK] Status and plans

don't duplicate the effort. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 4:35 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > https://tck.work/tomee/build?id=1608726402626 > > Boom, JSTL 1 failure a

Re: [ANN] Apache TomEE 8.0.6

Thanks Jon. Good job. I realized TomEE Master is still 8.0.6-SNAPSHOT https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/pom.xml Maybe push did not happen after release prepare/perform? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 7:58 PM

Re: [TCK] EJB 3.2 timers

https://tck.work/tomee/build?id=1610964398253 100% green on EJB32 !!! -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 4:18 PM Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Fantastic - thank you! > > On Fri,

Re: [TCK] EJB 3.2 timers

Went ahead and merged this PR and marked the jira as being resolved. I'm waiting for the build to finish and I'll fire a new TCK run over the weekend maybe so we can validate if it fixed or not the issue. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.co

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.6

That's awesome to see so many people and users giving feedback and voting. This is critical for the project and good overall. Thanks Jon, here is my +1. Tested on many TCK tests RAT checked License and notice checked -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro

Re: Releases?

Do you know if it's fixed by the current master? Just want to make sure it's fixed lol -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:58 PM exabrial12 wrote: > We've been have some applications in prod OOME. I t

Re: [TCK] Building the TCK?

Now that TCKs are public (Welcome Jakarta), this repo turned public and we should attach it to TomEE group in my opinion. Meanwhile, I'll merge it for you. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:01 AM Zowall

Re: [TCK] Building the TCK?

Good updates I approved it but did not merge. Can you go ahead and see if you can merge? You should now be able to click the merge button, even on this repo. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:24 AM Zowalla, Richard

Re: [TCK] EJB 3.2 timers

Here is the PR https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/749 I'm building locally and I'll run the EJB32 related tests locally first -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:45 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@

Re: [TCK] EJB 3.2 timers

n order to set a valid end date to restart a server. In that case, we are expecting the server to successfully start, but the timer to never trigger. I'll create a PR so you can double check before I merge it. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

[ANN] Welcome new Apache TomEE Committer Richard Zowalla

r enables assistance with the management and to guide the direction of the project. Please join me and send him a warm welcome and thank you. [1] http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/It-takes-a-village-Jean-Louis-td988516.html#a988522 -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: Master build on CI

Hi Cesar, Thanks for the heads up and the details. It looks good. I have reviewed the 2 PRs and approved them. Feel free to merge. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 5:23 AM Cesar Hernandez wrote: > Hi Jean-Louis >

Re: Releases?

Go for it -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 2:15 PM Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Any objections if I kick off a 8.0.6 release? I think there are some > dependen

Re: [TCK] Servlet status

e you and help. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 11:33 PM Thiago Henrique Hupner wrote: > Hi all! > > So, I couldn't take a look at the TomEE for a while. > From what I recall I couldn't get any fur

Re: [TCK] Servlet status

Hey Thiago, Happy new year. Wanted to check if you got any change to move something forward, or if you need something from us? Thanks -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 6:51 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.

Re: [TCK] Status and plans

https://tck.work/tomee/build?id=1608726402626 Boom, JSTL 1 failure and JSONP 0 failure. We are down to 209 failures -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 10:34 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: &g

Re: [TCK] Status and plans

the Quartz upgrade, I'll see if I can address the EJB32 issue with the endDate prior to startDate (see related thread). I'll fire up a new build when I have figured out the JSTL issue so we also have a JSONP green bar ;-) -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www

Re: [TCK] Servlet status

j, dh ...). it gives the ports you can connect to. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 6:04 PM Thiago Henrique Hupner wrote: > Well, the AnnotationDeployer does in fact run on servlet classes, however > it doesn't proc

Re: [TCK] Servlet status

too many things A solution would be to fork it in TomEE TCK and clean it up so we can support all deployment descriptors for EAR, WAR packagings. We would use the TCK specific version to deploy and configure (finer). What do you think? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro

Re: [TCK] Servlet status

here https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/jee/oejb3/RoleMapping.java Small trick to solve, for glassfish the mapping is done from servlet name to principal. For OpenEJB/TomEE the mapping is done from role to principal Hope it helps -- Jean-Loui

[TCK] Servlet status

nder discussion If someone wants to take the RunAs, it's an easy one to do. I can provide some guidance. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [TCK] Status and plans

dback, but I don't want to mess with the results artificially. Have a good weekend and thanks Great community effort. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 3:12 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote:

Re: Java 11, Corba Dependencies & Questions related to the build itself

On the TCK thing, I just sent a status, hopefully it helps. For the mailing lists. I'll gather that for you and let you know -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 2:23 PM Zowalla, Richard < richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.d

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >