Looks like there are some test failures with them.
I swear that one passed for me, but it may have been before the merge that I
tested it.
-David
> On May 27, 2019, at 11:28 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro
> wrote:
>
> I fixed it already never mind.
>
> Le lun. 27 mai 2019 à 20
> On May 27, 2019, at 11:40 AM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> Looks like there are some test failures with them.
>
> I swear that one passed for me, but it may have been before the merge that I
> tested it.
Fixed.
Next issue looks like we have intermittent failures in the
> On May 27, 2019, at 2:03 PM, Jonathan Gallimore
> wrote:
>
> I think this is looking great, and a big thank you for the changes. I have
> one question, and I apologize for not picking this up last time around -
> we're now picking up the Eclipse Implementation of JAXB -
> https://projects.ecli
Ok, official +1 from me!
Summarizing the vote shortly :)
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On May 23, 2019, at 1:43 AM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> Ok, the extra libraries have been removed and new M3 build created. Vote
> will be open for 72
Alright folks, THANK YOU everyone for the votes!
The 8.0.0-M3 vote is officially passes with 9 +1s (5 binding):
- César Hernández Mendoza
- David Blevins
- James Meen
- Jean-Louis Monteiro
- Jonathan Gallimore
- Marco Ferreira
- Mark Struberg
- Martin Wiesner
- Thiago Veronezi
Implied
Thank you for the heads up -- I'm going to quickly see if I can backport the
Bean Validation + JWT feature.
If I do I will do my best to keep an eye on the build so it's green when you
are ready to go.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> O
I gave this a shot and it would be a big backport. I don't think it'd be wise
to shove it in the day before a release.
I do think we should do it, however. Really just a matter of how. I'll start
a thread.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.
the sorting, we could probably use classname to determine order. The trick
would be the thread-safety. We would need to rethink how we do that. Sorting
the list while another thread might be modifying it would just lead to an
unstable sort. Maybe an AtomicReference or something. Dunno.
Anyway, huge email. Sorry for the book :) Love to hear your thoughts!
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
+1 from me. Thank you, Jonathan!
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Jun 6, 2019, at 4:08 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
> wrote:
>
> Maven Repo:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1138/
>
> Binar
+1 from me. Thank you, Jonathan!
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Jun 6, 2019, at 4:08 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
> wrote:
>
> Maven Repo:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1139/
>
> Binar
> On Jun 26, 2019, at 11:56 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Just a quick note to let you know that I have backported the working
> microprofile examples to the 7.1.x branch. This includes config and fault
> tolerance. Stuff that specifically doesn't work are the healthcheck,
> metr
> On Jul 23, 2019, at 5:46 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
> wrote:
>
> I did a build on master and on the branch. The "plus" artifact for the
> branch has the following library diffs compared with master:
Thanks!
> +jacorb-3.9
> +jacorb-omgapi-3.9
> +jboss-rmi-api_1.0_spec-1.0.6.Final
These should be
> On Jul 23, 2019, at 6:03 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro
> wrote:
>
> Hi all, with Java 11, we have to provide additional jars.
>
> JAXB API and JAXB IMPL are 2 of them.
On this one, we actually had this issue in TomEE 1.x as the version of JAXB was
not what we needed. We were forced to overwrite
> On Jul 24, 2019, at 3:11 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
> wrote:
>
> I did a little simplification of this code so it simply uses a resource
> finder from XBean, and uses the appModule's classloader.
> https://github.com/apache/tomee/commit/76463ffb883ef7648b5efab8d28ff42cee03f00b.
> If you see or run
> On Jul 24, 2019, at 5:50 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In this PR, looks like we changed our code to use BasicURLClassPath.
> https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/176
>
> But while running under Java 11, I just realized, it produces exceptions
>
>> java.lang.IllegalAccessExce
> On Jul 26, 2019, at 6:09 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro
> wrote:
>
> Yeah, first build green also on buildbot. Let's merge this one and continue
> the work.
> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-java11-take2-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/0
+1 to merge from me.
If it's a step forward or sideways and no step
ng
up the show.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Aug 2, 2019, at 4:15 PM, Thomas Andraschko
> wrote:
>
> I would really like to use the official bval but there is no feedback on my
> mail
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau schrieb am Fr., 2. Au
> On Aug 2, 2019, at 4:19 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> We can delete/disable the feature as well. I don't want to be the guy
> holding up the show.
Dug in to take this route as it's all around simpler. It looks, however, the
build has been failing since the 12th and
Go ahead and drop it. Thank you!
Good catch.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Aug 4, 2019, at 11:15 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
> Good morning!
>
> While releasing Johnzon-1.1.13 I stumbled across a TomEE staging repo f
+1
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Jun 18, 2014, at 9:33 AM, Andy Gumbrecht wrote:
> Hi TomEE developers,
>
> This mail is going out to both d...@openejb.apache.org and
> dev@tomee.apache.org.
>
> If you are still using d...@
+1
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Jun 18, 2014, at 2:10 PM, Andy Gumbrecht wrote:
> Hi TomEE developers,
>
> This mail is going out to both d...@openejb.apache.org and
> dev@tomee.apache.org.
>
> If you are still using d...@
+1
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Jun 18, 2014, at 2:21 PM, Andy Gumbrecht wrote:
> Hi TomEE developers,
>
> This mail is going out to both d...@openejb.apache.org and
> dev@tomee.apache.org.
>
> If you are still using d...@
ns is just a bear. Let's make sure we do that
one before we put up another vote as voting drastically decreases each time we
reroll.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
Looks like the legal report needs to be fixed -- attack of ASL header :)
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Jul 26, 2014, at 8:22 AM, Andy Gumbrecht wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Anyone with some spare time is welcome to try out these preview
On Jul 17, 2014, at 8:18 AM, David Blevins wrote:
> On the legal side, we still need:
>
> - Library diff
> - Review/adjust LICENSE and NOTICE files
We still need a report of the changed libraries from this release to the
previous. I guarantee there will be adjustments that wil
On Jul 27, 2014, at 12:31 AM, agumbre...@tomitribe.com wrote:
> The LIBRARY file in the repo contains the report.
Took a couple pokes in preview 1034, didn't see it so just generated a new one.
Also added a little chunk for Plume. Since we don't have a previous release of
that, I diffed it a
Also looks as though we need to remove Gson from the NOTICE files as we no
longer ship it.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Aug 3, 2014, at 10:06 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> rmannibucau@asus:~/.m2/repository/org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/1.
Getting a deadlock on AsynchronousInheritanceAnnotationFinder when the
interface a class implements is not in the jar being scanned.
"main" #1 prio=5 os_prio=31 tid=0x7f98ba812000 nid=0x1903 waiting on
condition [0x00010862c000]
java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
at sun
014-08-07 20:52 GMT+02:00 David Blevins :
>> Getting a deadlock on AsynchronousInheritanceAnnotationFinder when the
>> interface a class implements is not in the jar being scanned.
>>
>> "main" #1 prio=5 os_prio=31 tid=0x7f98ba812000 nid=0x1903 waiting on
>&
On Aug 7, 2014, at 10:16 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>> Specifically, what JAX-RS functionality would we lose not using
>> findImplementations? Last performance measurements I did, it doubled our
>> scan time and wasn't required to pass the TCK.
>>
>>
>
> Sorry was Servlet (too late answe
make it easier to contribute.
Seems working the same way someone who doesn't have commit would work is one
way to do that. I haven't tried it yet, though.
So I say go for it. Let us know what is hard and we'll try and make it better
so it's easier for other to c
That's a great attitude. I think it helps to have a trail-blazing mindset when
looking to be involved with any open source project.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Aug 12, 2014, at 6:46 PM, helio frota <00h...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 from me.
Thank you, Andy, for the patience and endurance :)
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Aug 10, 2014, at 1:24 PM, Andy Gumbrecht wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> What's changed:
>
> Using Apache Tomcat 7.0.55 - TCK and Buil
404 http://www.motorlogy.com/apache/tomee/tomee-1.7.0
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
cript (just whipped it up):
- https://gist.github.com/75f41aa5b6fd91a0605e
Looks like we're near 50%
> Also my fault that some of the site links were not correct - All done now.
I still do that. Good to see it's not just me. :)
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
We'll want to be careful about "trunk shifting" users. If a user reports a
problem on 1.7.x we need to fix it on 1.7x and ask them to verify it on
1.7x. (or 1.8.x). Anything we can guarantee will be shipped as final
within 3~ months.
This will be our first time chasing a new spec version since
We were on the fence last time we talked git, but I wonder with all the merging
we'll need to do between 1.7 and 2.0, this might be the right time to switch to
git.
Pull requests from Github would get a lot easier as well.
Thoughts?
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
On Aug 28, 2014, at 4:35 AM, Andy Gumbrecht wrote:
> After a chat with David it was agreed that we can go for such a release from
> trunk when:
>
> 1. The buildbot performs a repeatable green build.
> 2. That green build passes the old (EE6) TCK.
s/agreed/suggested/ :)
Thanks for bringing thi
+1
Thanks again, Andy!
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Sep 12, 2014, at 3:01 PM, Andy Gumbrecht wrote:
> SVN Tag:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.7.1/
>
> Maven Repo:
>
> https://reposito
typically operated that all votes count equally and any -1 is cause for
pause and we will try to resolve if we can.
In fact I'd probably go further and say in a truly healthy community, the user
votes count the most.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
Passing the release baton around is definitely a good thing. 1) learn to do
releases 2) contribute something to the automation of releases 3) pass the
baton to someone else.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
Been a good 20+ days. All feedback positive or neutral. I'll poke Infra and
get the show started!
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Aug 27, 2014, at 8:58 AM, David Blevins wrote:
> We were on the fence last time we talked git, but I wonder
On Sep 20, 2014, at 11:02 AM, David Blevins wrote:
> Been a good 20+ days. All feedback positive or neutral. I'll poke Infra and
> get the show started!
JIRA filed asking for next steps:
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8374
>
> On Aug 27, 2014, at 8:58
On Sep 22, 2014, at 11:53 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> started to hack around tomee embedded and added in TOMEE-1355 the
> ability to run the classpath as a flat webapp (test
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/trunk/tomee/tomee-embedded/src/test/java/org/apache/tomee/e
:)
Meanwhile, it was already there!!!
-David
> Le 23 sept. 2014 23:00, "David Blevins" a écrit :
>
>> On Sep 22, 2014, at 11:53 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> started to hack around tomee embedded a
Seems the majority of checks were commented out in this commit:
-
https://github.com/apache/tomee/commit/6bbf5ce32d5a408bde13eefe393c6b1f3381a48d#diff-f6aa0817f9f5b87a8bae7a33578bc10f
Any particular reason?
The idea of those checks is to enforce constraints such as the singleton
container sho
Awesome. Let's backport that for safe measure.
Thanks again for the ASM5 upgrade work. That's always so painful.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Feb 1, 2015, at 2:57 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> no real reason - guess it was f
`tomee.autoconfig` to `false`
in `conf/system.properties` or as a plain -D jvm system property.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Jan 28, 2015, at 5:44 AM, Massimiliano Maggiari
wrote:
> Hi guys, is there a way to mimic JBoss modules in Tommy?
>
On Apr 7, 2015, at 8:30 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>> Any committers willing to release, can do it, and I'm more than convince
>> that current PMCs would be more than happy to help.
>>
>
> :) check apache release rules. This is wrong even if anyone can start it
> only pmc can actually ma
According to our Google Analytics exactly 0.09% of our traffic saw the SNAPSHOT
page in the last 12 months.
This seems reasonable and within the spirit of the rule. I'll include this in
our next board report and get input.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
d add.
Before volunteering, however, please read:
- http://tomee.apache.org/management-and-voting.html
We've gone years with little to no traffic on the private@ list. If we
suddenly turned into a closed community, it'd be a sad thing.
-David
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:29 AM, David
On Apr 24, 2015, at 12:24 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> I apreciate your attempt to openness but I fear it doesn’t work that way.
I wouldn't call 8 years of voting in the open an "attempt" :)
The board is aware of how we operate. As long as projects stick to the
"constitution", they are free to
Was writing up my vote, summary already hit. Note we have to count the the +0s
in the summary.
Here would be my votes:
+1 for v2
+0 for OpenEJB version.
I have some specific thoughts now the troubles with alignment that I'll post in
another thread. It's a "been there and done that" thing fo
I see the +1s for version alignment and get the draw. Seems everyone has tried
it at least once -- the appeal is obvious.
There will be some challenges.
SLOW VERSIONS
OpenEJB attempt to align versions: We've had this exact vote before to keep
OpenEJB aligned with the EJB version. In fact I w
+1
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
On May 18, 2015, at 8:14 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have re-rolled the latest 1.7.2 binaries, hopefully all is well.
>
> GIT Tag:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=to
major issues nearly resolved, I ask you not to
disrupt the delicate process of closing a legal contract.
You are, however, welcome to share the information as you see fit.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
What do people think about dropping the drop-in-war feature in .next?
It has had two use cases:
- allow users to use their own tomcat version and just add TomEE
- allow users to use "TomEE" in situations where they don't have access to
modify the server (cloud)
It seems we can do the first ca
Thoughts?
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
+1 on getting it out as-is.
IMHO, the community would enjoy seeing more release activity rather than
less. One now and one later with the improvements. It's been more than a
year of "real soon" already.
I think we just need to get started.
-David
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Jonathan Gall
The trick is we need to rely on shutdown() being called when the bean is
undeployed to ensure the application can successfully terminate and not
leak timers.
Sharing a ScheduledExecutorService per application is the best we could do
in that regard. The shutdown logic would still become a bit diff
Side note to readers: best use @Singleton with @Lock(READ) for stateless
applications unless there is some specific need to keep a finite pool of
instances and lock threads till an instance becomes available.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:46 AM, David Blevins
wrote:
> The trick is we need to r
Yep. We picked Mx as that's what Eclipse was doing in their milestones.
So 7.0.0-M1 or something like that would be great.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Le 15 juin 2015 10:34, "agumbrecht" a écrit :
> >
> > +1 Mark, but not for this roll.
> >
> > Just started
On Jun 15, 2015, at 7:26 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>>
>>> The trick is we need to rely on shutdown() being called when the bean is
>>> undeployed to ensure the application can successfully terminate and not
>>> leak timers.
>>>
>>
>
> we can use ScheduledTask#cancel then
>
> will cha
On Jun 16, 2015, at 4:41 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Le 16 juin 2015 02:04, "David Blevins" a écrit :
>>
>> On Jun 15, 2015, at 7:26 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> The trick is we need to rely
+1
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Jun 16, 2015, at 7:10 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I’d like to call a VOTE on Apache OpenWebBeans-1.6.1.
>
> The staging repository is here
> https://repository.apache.org/co
u> | Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>
> 2015-06-17 1:34 GMT+02:00 David Blevins :
>
>> On Jun 16, 2015, at 4:41 AM
For source zip, tomee-project is good.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Jun 17, 2015, at 1:38 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hi
>
> root pom is openejb,this creates openejb.zip as source distrib.
>
> this doesnt look right bu
hear of someone using the pooling
aspect consciously and effectively!
-David
> 2015-06-15 10:48 GMT+02:00 David Blevins :
>
>> Side note to readers: best use @Singleton with @Lock(READ) for stateless
>> applications unless there is some specific need to keep a finite po
setup to use case-insensitive
object attributes.
If we were to add a setProperties method, we'd have to in some way ensure it
has the same feature or pull all the properties out and move them in.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Jun 17, 2015, at 10:
Hi Violeta,
Sounds good to me as well. Not entirely sure what the actions are. How do we
get started?
What has to happen on this side of the fence?
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Aug 12, 2015, at 5:48 AM, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
>
on:
- What motivated the change?
- How do we rework that code?
Ideally, we’d restore the ability to sequentially boot embedded containers,
passing in properties and not have the actual properties used reflect some
aggregate of all the containers that came before.
--
David Blevins
http:/
not do it if a user was
> relying on it in a test suite - wouldnt happen in prod I think).
>
>
> Romain
>
> 2015-11-11 14:59 GMT-08:00 David Blevins :
>
>> Looks like we made as part of a routine Tomcat upgrade to change
>> SystemInstance so that it modi
Late, by my +1 :)
> On Dec 7, 2015, at 1:59 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Andy Gumbrecht
> wrote:
>
>> This is the re-roll that resolves the commons-collections critical issue
>> described here:
>> For more information please read:
>> https://bl
Also late, but again +1 from me :)
Didn’t want to miss the honor of voting on our first 7x release :)
-David
> On Dec 6, 2015, at 9:57 AM, Andy Gumbrecht wrote:
>
> Several significant license & notice files have been updated. Thank you
> everyone for your time in again reviewing these new bi
you’re not subscribed to the list you probably missed it.
Happy new year!
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Jan 4, 2016, at 4:36 AM, Nilesh Chauhan wrote:
>
> Any inputs from tomee dev team for example requested in email chain below.
>
>
you’re not subscribed to the list you probably missed it.
Happy new year!
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins <http://twitter.com/dblevins>
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Jan 4, 2016, at 4:36 AM, Nilesh Chauhan <mailto:nileshbchau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Any in
o consider. It is
however a huge pain — as you note.
-David
>> On Jan 5, 2016, at 3:50 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>
>> Hi Nilesh!
>>
>> CORBA is not supported in the current TomEE distributions, however remote
>> EJBs definitely are. We support a custom E
Thanks for the feedback, Nilesh.
On your CORBA usage, do you need either of?
- Distributed transactions
- Distributed security
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Jan 5, 2016, at 9:43 PM, Nilesh Chauhan wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
&g
Good thread.
Recap of my understanding: we release 7.0 as-is and move forward to 7.1 based
on Tomcat 8.5?
I’d be +1 for that plan.
-David
> On Apr 23, 2016, at 2:17 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
> Hi guys
>
> Having tomcat 8.5 now I d like to move tomee to 7.1 to show coming release
> i
have to redo
the guts, that’d be TomEE 3.0.
-David
> On Apr 24, 2016, at 2:03 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> Good thread.
>
> Recap of my understanding: we release 7.0 as-is and move forward to 7.1
> based on Tomcat 8.5?
>
> I’d be +1 for that plan.
>
>
> -
7.1 - not only for the palimdrom beauty ;)?
>
> (Please dont hijack this thread commenting on these coming ones, just tried
> to give a bit more visibility on the overall goal and why I asked about 7.x
> versioning now)
> Le 24 avr. 2016 23:04, "David Blevins" a écrit :
>
&
some feedback.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Apr 24, 2016, at 2:29 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
> We can do a 7.0 based on M3 and 7.1 (8.0 if you prefer) in the same vote.
>
> Basically I want master released whatever TCK status
ely with Tomcat 8.5.
We could have that out there while we prepare for a GA. GA is less technical
and more about communication. We haven’t started the communication efforts.
We could let users try out Tomcat 8.5 in that time.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
h
“meh, you didn’t keep
up with me, ok out the door with 7.0 and no documentation.”
I don’t think we could survive a miscommunication on this sensitive topic and
would want to see it as top priority ahead of any 7.0 GA release.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
the vote please do or your opinion will not be part of the
> result.
>
> Side note: if 7.0.0 is ok I'll try to gather what we need in a quick thread
> before starting vote process.
> Le 26 avr. 2016 23:31, "David Blevins" a écrit :
>
>> My vote would b
In terms of statements of compliance, which of these Java EE 7 samples will
currently run successfully?
- https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples
<https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples>
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
>
No worries on the many posts. Thank you for the Java EE 7 samples checkup :)
It appears we fail 35% of the JAX-RS 2.0 tests. Do we know what is preventing
us from passing those tests?
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On May 1, 2016, at 6:42 PM, Joh
Ideally we’d pass the Java EE 7 Samples tests for the parts we claim to
implement.
We seem to fail even basic things like the JAX-RS 2.0 client test. Do we know
why that is?
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Apr 29, 2016, at 10:24 AM, Romain Ma
> On May 2, 2016, at 5:05 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
> Fully agree that's why it has been stated tomee 7 != javaee 7.
My memory of that vote was we intentionally aligned the TomEE version number
specifically to align to the Java EE version number and further that it would
not be changed
> On May 5, 2016, at 7:26 AM, ross.cohen wrote:
>>
>> Examples are not spec compliant too or abuse of vendor behavior. Also a
>> serious amount of users just need what is in tomee now. I tend to prefer
>> to
>> move forward with active people than waiting passive ones move - we lost 2
>> years w
Where is the documentation page again?
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On May 18, 2016, at 12:39 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> As mentionned and after the vote about the version here is the 7.0.0 vote.
>
> He
Also the download page would need to be updated. It currently says “Java EE 6
compliant” and we would need to remove that and replace it with “NOT Java EE 7
compliant”. That text should be a link to an explanation of why and an
explanation of the version number.
--
David Blevins
http
Can you put up a proposed page for the download and I can give feedback on how
it should be updated. Let’s start another thread.
I’m obviously very time constrained, but happy to give you time and work openly
on it.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
>
Can we consider this a preview release and execute the diffs, rat reports and
ensure our LICENSE and NOTICE files are up to date? Or at the very least pause
this vote till that stuff is done.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On May 19, 2016, at 12:45
> On May 19, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> 2016-05-20 1:23 GMT+02:00 David Blevins :
>
>> Also, we’ve historically done a preview run in advance of an official vote
>> for major releases:
>>
>> [PREVIEW] OpenEJB 4.
That’s so amazing you took the big step to say hello! Big applause :)
Any particular kinds of things that you like to do or things you want to learn
more about?
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Jun 28, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Diego Urenia wr
Looking great!
I’d definitely be “pro” grouping.
Note on the Wall of fame, I think it’d be great to list everyone. Maybe two
sections “Most Recent” and “All time”.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Sep 2, 2016, at 10:18 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wr
or deprecate.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Dec 5, 2016, at 4:21 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
> Concretely the proposal can be:
>
> p.setProperty(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY, RemoteInitialContextFactory.
> class.getName());
> p.setProperty(Context.PROVIDER_URL, ejbUrl + "?authype=basic");
> p.setProperty(Context.PRINCIPAL, "t
Is there a way to get the commit back?
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Dec 5, 2016, at 5:13 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
> +1
>
> note that if you have the history you can still get back the commits from
> their hash (but f
201 - 300 of 977 matches
Mail list logo
