websocket heartbeat

Is there an example of writing a heartbeat (ping pong) for @ServerEndpoint? https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6455#section-5.5.2

openjpa sequence generator

could someone point me to the source code where openjpa generates id numbers using @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)? i would like to understand better how it works

Re: singleton with autocloseable

closed before it goes out of scope. In theory, it should close the connection for you and clean up, so it sounds like something isn't happening there. I might need to circle back with some questions on how to specifically reproduce the issue. Jon On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 10:59 AM Matthew Broadhead

Re: singleton with autocloseable

: org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.ManagedConnectionInfo@248c479f. mc: org.apache.tomee.chatterbox.nats.adapter.out.NATSManagedConnection@328626fa] from pool org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.SinglePoolConnectionInterceptor@71031d13 On 02/08/2021 14:55, Matthew Broadhead wrote: Hi Jon,  Thanks!  I might have updated the test a few times while

Re: jwt loginmodule

/tree/master/examples/mp-rest-jwt-public-key - the ability to validate access via a JWT was introduced in MicroProfile fairly early on. Jon On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 8:29 AM Matthew Broadhead wrote: Is there a JWT loginmodule? Would be nice to have an extended SQLLoginModule that used Bearer

jwt loginmodule

Is there a JWT loginmodule? Would be nice to have an extended SQLLoginModule that used Bearer instead of Basic Auth

Re: singleton with autocloseable

at 8:35 PM Matthew Broadhead wrote: Is it possible to mock an RA during testing with ApplicationComposer? it isn't possible to run any tests without errors once it is used in the program as far as i can see On 07/07/2021 08:56, Matthew Broadhead wrote: Romain has pointer me to this file which

Re: singleton with autocloseable

Is it possible to mock an RA during testing with ApplicationComposer?  it isn't possible to run any tests without errors once it is used in the program as far as i can see On 07/07/2021 08:56, Matthew Broadhead wrote: Romain has pointer me to this file which seems to do what I want but I

Re: broadcast to all sessions through websocket

after investigation it seems that proxying the websocket through httpd is timing out the connection.  as it is not happening on my local machine On 17/07/2021 12:59, Matthew Broadhead wrote: Trying to broadcast to all sessions on a WebSocket but it is a bit hit and miss.  the WebSocket is got

broadcast to all sessions through websocket

Trying to broadcast to all sessions on a WebSocket but it is a bit hit and miss.  the WebSocket is got by DefaultServerEndpointConfigurator dsec = new DefaultServerEndpointConfigurator(); NewsWebSocket nws = dsec.getEndpointInstance(NewsWebSocket.class); nws.broadcast(myString); and in the

Re: singleton with autocloseable

, congratulations :) Jon On Mon, 28 Jun 2021, 22:04 Matthew Broadhead, wrote: Hi Jon, Have you got any tips for mocking the NATSConnectionFactory? I am trying to start doing some tests with SingleApplicationComposerRunner and I get org.apache.openejb.OpenEJBException: Can't find resource for class

Re: singleton with autocloseable

, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: Do you have a test you can post? Off the top of my head, I'm not sure, but I imagine we can figure something out. P.S. thanks for the PR - I merged it in. Is that your first TomEE commit? If so, congratulations :) Jon On Mon, 28 Jun 2021, 22:04 Matthew Broadhead, wrote

Re: singleton with autocloseable

something out. P.S. thanks for the PR - I merged it in. Is that your first TomEE commit? If so, congratulations :) Jon On Mon, 28 Jun 2021, 22:04 Matthew Broadhead, wrote: Hi Jon, Have you got any tips for mocking the NATSConnectionFactory? I am trying to start doing some tests

Re: singleton with autocloseable

, I'm not sure, but I imagine we can figure something out. P.S. thanks for the PR - I merged it in. Is that your first TomEE commit? If so, congratulations :) Jon On Mon, 28 Jun 2021, 22:04 Matthew Broadhead, wrote: Hi Jon, Have you got any tips for mocking the NATSConnectionFactory? I am

Re: singleton with autocloseable

://github.com/apache/tomee-chatterbox? Looking into embedding the rar into the webapp, but as it stands right at the moment, I'm either doing something wrong, or hitting an unusual bug with the resource creation. I'm debugging through it. Jon On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 7:39 AM Matthew Broadhead wrote

Re: singleton with autocloseable

apache/tomee-chatterbox? Looking into embedding the rar into the webapp, but as it stands right at the moment, I'm either doing something wrong, or hitting an unusual bug with the resource creation. I'm debugging through it. Jon On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 7:39 AM Matthew Broadhead wrote: I have p

Re: singleton with autocloseable

complete but it allows me to set ackWait and durableName On 17/06/2021 15:37, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 1:48 PM Matthew Broadhead wrote: i added ackWait and durableName as Strings in NATSActivationSpec so it is working for me ok. Very nice! Can you send a PR

Re: singleton with autocloseable

the process using the launch configuration? On 17/06/2021 11:52, Matthew Broadhead wrote: maybe it is possible to put the Subscription option in the NATSActivationSpec On 17/06/2021 09:43, Matthew Broadhead wrote: Hi Jon, I was wondering how to set the SubscriptionOptions.  If you look

Re: singleton with autocloseable

maybe it is possible to put the Subscription option in the NATSActivationSpec On 17/06/2021 09:43, Matthew Broadhead wrote: Hi Jon, I was wondering how to set the SubscriptionOptions.  If you look at the example below they are the third argument to the subscribe function after

Re: singleton with autocloseable

erally just opened the IDE to finish this off. :) Jon On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 9:46 AM Matthew Broadhead wrote: hi Jon, Is there anything else you need from my end? It feels like it is nearly finished. Could it pass the parameters in a similar way to how it is done in the chatterbox-i

Re: singleton with autocloseable

ah ok i have found the readme at https://github.com/apache/tomee-chatterbox/blob/master/chatterbox-nats/README.adoc On 16/06/2021 20:00, Matthew Broadhead wrote: Hi Jon, Thanks for all the effort you have put in.  Looking at the latest commit I can't see any change to the readme file or any

Re: singleton with autocloseable

lim...@gmail.com> wrote: Sorry, tied up with a couple of things here. Literally just opened the IDE to finish this off. :) Jon On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 9:46 AM Matthew Broadhead wrote: hi Jon, Is there anything else you need from my end? It feels like it is nearly finished. Could it pass the para

Re: singleton with autocloseable

still feels very hard to get into - I wonder if there is anything we can propose in that regard to try and make creating simple connectors a bit easier. Jon On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:31 PM Matthew Broadhead wrote: hi, it was my fault putting a confusing value in the docker compose file

Re: singleton with autocloseable

into - I wonder if there is anything we can propose in that regard to try and make creating simple connectors a bit easier. Jon On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:31 PM Matthew Broadhead wrote: hi, it was my fault putting a confusing value in the docker compose file. it should work like

Re: singleton with autocloseable

yourclientid").build()); On 09/06/2021 17:15, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: Thanks. If I can get that test going, I can probably get the rest working. I suspect there are some other bugs in there. Jon On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:04 PM Matthew Broadhead wrote: Thanks I will have a look now On 09/0

Re: singleton with autocloseable

ss) .clusterId("cluster-id").clientId("client-id").build()); connection = cf.createConnection(); connection is null. Any pointers? Jon On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 8:16 AM Matthew Broadhead wrote: i have never used a JCA adapter before. is it loaded in using the tom

Re: singleton with autocloseable

up an example for you. Jon On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 9:02 AM Matthew Broadhead wrote: Hi Jon, NATS is basically a message queue, like ActiveMQ I suppose. I included the adapter into the project using maven io.nats java-nats-streaming 2.2.3 i started up a nats server using

Re: singleton with autocloseable

. Conversely, JCA even gives you a work manager to potentially handle that stuff. If you can give me some pointers to running a NATS server, I'd be happy to help with a sample adapter and application. Jon On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 11:49 AM Matthew Broadhead wrote: I am trying to subscribe to a NATS

singleton with autocloseable

I am trying to subscribe to a NATS streaming server with https://github.com/nats-io/stan.java which is java.lang.Autocloseable. At first it wasn't closing properly as seen in my original gist: https://gist.github.com/chongma/2a3ab451f2aeabc98340a9b897394cfe This was solved with this

Re: New Votes

+1 non binding On 16/01/2020 15:39, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: Folks These votes have been up for 9 days. We still need one more binding +1. Could I encourage those on the PMC to take a look? Thanks Jon On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 4:11 PM Richard Monson-Haefel wrote: Thanks, Jon!! On Tue, Jan

Re: Fwd: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenJPA-3.1.0

+1 loads of progress!  i don't think i am subscribed to openjpa dev, only users. On 06/04/2019 15:05, Mark Struberg wrote: FYI. OpenJPA-3.1.0 vote is otw. LieGrue, strub Anfang der weitergeleiteten Nachricht: Von: Mark Struberg Betreff: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenJPA-3.1.0 Datum: 6. April

Re: Performance issue with JMS on Tomee 7.0.5

hich isn't mine) - yes, that does work. I've even managed to look at heap dumps with that which have been corrupted or otherwise unreadable by other tools. If you're interested in what goes in a heap dump, the source code is worth a look. Jon On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 8:31 AM Matthew Broadh

Re: Performance issue with JMS on Tomee 7.0.5

that is a good idea.  then i can submit more dumps.  does it work? On 08/01/2019 17:27, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: One of the things on my todo list is to try and strip sensitive information out of heap dumps using this library: https://github.com/eaftan/hprof-parser. I'll have to try and get

Re: Microprofile release train

should we be on geronimo list?  i would like to monitor the process On 26/12/2018 12:08, Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote: Hi, In case you missed it, MicroProfile implementations are under vote on the geronimo side of things. I'll proceed with the RESULT emails and with the process. Is there any

Re: Move to Gitbox?

+1 good idea On 11/12/2018 12:44, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: Hi Folks It appears that the git-wip service is going to be retired, and the repositories are going to be migrated over to Gitbox - https://gitbox.apache.org/. We can voluntarily move to GitBox anytime between now and January 9th

Re: Documentation Contribution Opportunities

source file? Cheers Bruno Baptista https://twitter.com/brunobat_ On 03/12/18 11:25, Matthew Broadhead wrote: Should the licence be stored centrally and appended to the top (or bottom) of each page? On 03/12/2018 04:21, David Blevins wrote: Hello hopeful contributors! As of this weekend we

Re: Documentation Contribution Opportunities

Should the licence be stored centrally and appended to the top (or bottom) of each page? On 03/12/2018 04:21, David Blevins wrote: Hello hopeful contributors! As of this weekend we have two new index pages for our documentation on the website: - http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-8.0/docs/ -

Re: Documentation Contribution Opportunities

Hi David, I would be happy to do this task.  But how to avoid conflicting PRs? Matthew On 03/12/2018 04:21, David Blevins wrote: Hello hopeful contributors! As of this weekend we have two new index pages for our documentation on the website: - http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-8.0/docs/ -

Re: TomEE 8 Release Preview

i thought microprofile would be in plus On 02/11/2018 12:15, Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote: I'm ok with it let's see if this does not break anything. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:47 AM Roberto Cortez wrote: I think

Re: Finish the bval setup

i  installed JavaFX on OpenJDK as I use it on another project.  but is he saying to use a flag to include it in TomEE?? On 31/10/2018 14:25, Matthew Broadhead wrote: does that mean pull the branch including the PR and compile? On 31/10/2018 12:09, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hi guys, Wonder

Re: Finish the bval setup

does that mean pull the branch including the PR and compile? On 31/10/2018 12:09, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hi guys, Wonder if somebody wants to review https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/180 for merge From my point of view it looks good and would enable us (bval+tomee) to appear on bean

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.0 MILESTONE 1

why is Romain being removed as a PMC member? On 19/10/2018 19:43, Mark Struberg wrote: Btw Romain is technically still PMC member as the board didn't yet ack his removal. So we even have 5 binding +1 :D LieGrue, strub Am 19.10.2018 um 17:19 schrieb Roberto Cortez : Hi, Yeah. Sorry, I was

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.0 MILESTONE 1

will it remain as M1 or does it go to 8.0.0? On 19/10/2018 17:19, Roberto Cortez wrote: Hi, Yeah. Sorry, I was travelling. Here are the votes: + 1 Binding: David, Jean Louis, Mark and Jon. +1 Non Binding: Romain, César, Richard, Matthew, Roberto And the vote PASSES! :) Thank you everyone

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.0 MILESTONE 1

+1 i installed apache-tomee-8.0.0-M1-plus.tar.gz on my development machine Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS and everything seemed to be working well On 15/10/18 02:13, Roberto Cortez wrote: Hi everyone, I’ve tried to push all the required stuff to have a Milestone version release of TomEE 8. Please,

Re: TomEE 8 Release Preview

ubuntu-jvm8 <https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8> Please, if you have the chance try it out. We hope to come up with the final binaries and the vote real soon. Cheers, Roberto On 10 Oct 2018, at 14:32, Matthew Broadhead wrote: great! thanks On 10/10/18 13:52, Roberto

Re: TomEE 8 Release Preview

great! thanks On 10/10/18 13:52, Roberto Cortez wrote: Yes, already merged it. On 10 Oct 2018, at 07:59, Matthew Broadhead wrote: is MyFaces update making it into the release? On 09/10/18 22:04, Roberto Cortez wrote: Excellent! I can prepare a RC2-SNAPSHOT for quick testing while we

Re: TomEE 8 Release Preview

pening with the RC1? El mar., 2 oct. 2018 a las 14:04, Roberto Cortez () escribió: Hi Matthew, Feel free to try it. Yes, no planned changes, unless something required fixing. Cheers, Roberto On 2 Oct 2018, at 16:37, Matthew Broadhead < matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk.INVALID> wrote: sh

Re: TomEE8 / Upgrade MyFaces

+1 On 09/10/18 13:11, Mark Struberg wrote: +1 LieGrue, strub Am 09.10.2018 um 09:42 schrieb Thomas Andraschko : Hi, i read on the BVal mailing list, that you would like to release TomEE8 soon. Could someone update MyFaces to the latest release? (

Re: TomEE 8 Release Preview

should i try out the RC1 or wait for release candidate?  i guess they will be the same unless something needs upgrading? On 02/10/18 12:18, Roberto Cortez wrote: I guess it would be ASAP :) So if anyone wants to have anything in, now its the time. Speak now or forever hold your peace :)

Re: TomEE 8 Release Notes Preview

requirement, but lots of people keep asking me for it. Given the timescale, I'd be inclined to start a release with Java 8 support asap. Jon On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, 09:52 Matthew Broadhead, wrote: i thought TomEE 8 was going to target Java 8 first? a yum search on my CentOS server shows isn't even

Re: TomEE 8 Release Notes Preview

i thought TomEE 8 was going to target Java 8 first?  a yum search on my CentOS server shows isn't even offering Java 11 yet.  is TomEE 8 supposed to support 11 based on some specifications? although i suppose it would be eye catching to demo Java 11 support at a conference... On 25/09/18

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 7.1.0 (take 2)

+1 working well on my development machine.  thanks Jon On 04/09/18 17:51, Matthew Broadhead wrote: i see that it is targetting  OpenJPA 2.4.3 and MyFaces 2.2.12 from https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=blob;f=pom.xml;h=3709474f265c65f038b77a01a093587cc2fd3bac;hb

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 7.1.0 (take 2)

is there a list somewhere of the packages included in TomEE 7.1.0? i am looking forward to trying MyFaces 2.3 and OpenJPA 3.0.0 On 03/09/18 23:22, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: Hi Everyone, Here is the first roll of TomEE 7.1.0. Please can you take a look and vote? Everyone, committer or not, is

Re: deploying a TomEE snapshot right now.

thanks for the link.  so it looks like i can grab the latest binary at https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/tomee/apache-tomee/8.0.0-SNAPSHOT/ On 25/08/18 16:18, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/ Le sam. 25 août 2018 15:55, Matthew

Re: deploying a TomEE snapshot right now.

where do the snapshots end up? On 24/08/18 22:49, Roberto Cortez wrote: Thank you! On 24 Aug 2018, at 19:42, Mark Struberg wrote: Sure, just started it. Should be avail in 15 minutes. LieGrue, strub Am 24.08.2018 um 19:54 schrieb Roberto Cortez : Hi Mark, Can you please deploy an

Re: deploying a TomEE snapshot right now.

thanks Mark.  i take it they will be available from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1118/  shortly? On 24/08/18 13:44, Mark Struberg wrote: hi folks! I'm right now deploying a TomEE snapshot with the versions which will most probably make it into the next release. Means

Re: [1/3] tomee git commit: jdk 11 compatibility

is it not connecting to the archiva maven repo to upload the new snapshots? On 20/08/18 18:14, Matthew Broadhead wrote: meant to paste this [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin:2.8.2:deploy (default-deploy) on project tomee-project: Failed to retrieve

Re: [1/3] tomee git commit: jdk 11 compatibility

meant to paste this [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin:2.8.2:deploy (default-deploy) on project tomee-project: Failed to retrieve remote metadata org.apache.tomee:tomee-project:7.0.6-SNAPSHOT/maven-metadata.xml: Could not transfer metadata

Re: [1/3] tomee git commit: jdk 11 compatibility

it says build successful but if i scroll to the bottom of the stdio there are errors.  is that normal? On 20/08/18 15:41, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: Snapshot (openejb-core) should be available when this build finishes: https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-7.0.x-deploy/builds/4 Jon On Mon, Aug

Re: Release on Monday

previously Mark did a snapshot binary of TomEE 8 so we could download and test with our projects.  are we releasing directly or will we get a chance to try the snapshot first?  are there nightly builds somewhere? On 15/08/18 00:13, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: We discussed in the the thread

Re: MP Summary in TomEE

i watched this video earlier today https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9uZndZc47E and now i feel like i actually understand the parts of MP like Config, JWT, Health etc so your post is making sense to me.  us slow ones will catch up eventually! On 13/08/18 18:19, Roberto Cortez wrote: An update

Fwd: [UPDATE][SECURITY] CVE-2018-8037 Apache Tomcat - Information Disclosure

the below seems important.  also shouldn't the tomee dev list be copied on there security update emails? Forwarded Message Subject: [UPDATE][SECURITY] CVE-2018-8037 Apache Tomcat - Information Disclosure Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 21:00:30 +0100 From: Mark Thomas To:

Re: [VOTE] Allow an MicroProfile-focused TomEE 7.1 release

+0 if TomEE 8 is available then i will use that, and probably never install 7.1.x.  they both target java 8 anyway so it won't help if you are stuck on a lower version? On 09/08/18 08:08, David Blevins wrote: For a few months we've discussed doing and not doing a TomEE 7 flavored release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 7.0.5 (round 2)

+1 [VOTE] i did have a problem with xalan and  java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMManagerDefault cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager but using fop 2.3 and excluding the jars seems to be working On 19/07/18 13:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: Here's my +1. Jon

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 7.0.5 (round 2)

when might they release 8.5.33? On 11/07/18 02:17, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: Hi Jon Thanks for initiating this. I opened a bug in Tomcat regarding java:/ namespace and it will be corrected in 8.5.33 and upper versions. If we distribute the TomEE with 8.5.32, it will be a problem for users who uses

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

n: 3926, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 2 What is your build environment? Did you run all the tests succesfully? On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Matthew Broadhead < matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk.invalid> wrote: i have downloaded tomee-plus-7.0.5 and have it running on my development machi

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

i have downloaded tomee-plus-7.0.5 and have it running on my development machine.  everything seems fine so far.  i will let you know if there are any problems On 04/07/18 10:33, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: Hi Everyone, Here is the initial roll of TomEE 7.0.5. Please can you take a look and

Re: TomEE-7.0.5 work

i am replying to an issue you had a while ago...i was going to say that i am using ubuntu 18.04 but i could easily install windows 7 on virtualbox.  i may be able to get access to a windows 10 box as well if you want me to run the tests On 19/06/18 07:55, Mark Struberg wrote: Yes, could

Re: completely weird unit test failure

ocalhost].StandardContext[/SubjectServiceTomEETest] org.apache.openejb.config.ValidationFailedException: Module failed validation. AppModule(name=SubjectServiceTomEETest)     at org.apache.openejb.config.ReportValidationResults.deploy(ReportValidationResults.java:88) [INFO] OpenEJB :: Examples :: Polling :: Web .. FAILURE [ 

Re: completely weird unit test failure

sorry. my bad 17-May-2018 14:57:38.259 SEVERE [main] sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke StandardServer.await: create[localhost:8005]:  java.net.BindException: Address already in use (Bind failed) i already had TomEE running elsewhere On 17/05/18 15:05, Matthew Broadhead wrote: ok

Re: completely weird unit test failure

lt;https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le jeu. 17 mai 2018 à 14:08, Matthew Broadhead < matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> a écrit : i cloned and installed. but then i thought maybe i should switch t

Re: completely weird unit test failure

Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le jeu. 17 mai 2018 à 12:12, Matthew Broadhead < matthew.broadh

Re: completely weird unit test failure

oh yes sorry.  that won't be pushed to maven central.  is it only available from svn repo https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bval/trunk/ or is it mirrored on git? On 17/05/18 07:23, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Did you rebuild bval 2 too? Le jeu. 17 mai 2018 00:39, Matthew Broadhead

Re: completely weird unit test failure

au> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le mer. 16 mai 2018 à 20:07, Matthew Broadhead < matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> a écrit : [INFO] OpenEJB :: Server

Re: completely weird unit test failure

schrieb Matthew Broadhead <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk>: if i try to compile fb_tomee8 i get WARNING - Interceptor for {http://rs.cxf.server.openejb.apache.org/}En has thrown exception, unwinding now java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.rs.JSonStreamingOutputT

Re: completely weird unit test failure

if i try to compile fb_tomee8 i get WARNING - Interceptor for {http://rs.cxf.server.openejb.apache.org/}En has thrown exception, unwinding now java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.rs.JSonStreamingOutputTest$En$1@69762669 is not an instance of class

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Johnzon-1.0.1

+1 On 05/05/18 12:04, Mark Struberg wrote: Hi folks! This is a VOTE thread for the long awaited Johnzon-1.0.1 maintenance release. The staging repo is https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1027/ The source zip is available under

Re: Status of TomEE 8

i saw MyFaces 2.3.1 was released.  will that get update in 8.0? On 05/05/18 14:18, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: We didnt upgrade the api yet and still uses validation 1.1 Le 5 mai 2018 13:03, "cocorossello" a écrit : Hi, I just noticed that

Re: [RESULTS] Merge Pull Request 123 - MicroProfile JWT support

This one needed some good discussion and a bit of extra time. +1s Andy Gumbrecht Bruno Baptista David Blevins Gurkan Erdogdu Ivan Junckes Filho Jean-Louis Monteiro Jonathan Gallimore Otávio Gonçalves de Santana Richard Monson-Haefel Rudy De Busscher Thiago Veronezi 0s Matthew Broadhead -1s Romain

Re: [VOTE] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

aren't there apache projects already dealing with public key formats?  cxf must have done a lot of work on that?  would this just be a wrapper to existing libs? On 02/05/18 10:03, Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote: PCS8 "standard" or not is probably the one to no miss -- Jean-Louis Monteiro

Re: Releasing OWB-1.7.5?

i am using 7.0.x in development so not sure i can help with testign.  not really sure why we need to backport?  can some people not upgrade? On 27/04/18 11:53, Mark Struberg wrote: Hi folks! How does OWB-1.7.5-SNAPSHOT look like in TomEE-1.7.5-snap? If no problems did pop up then I'd love

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.5

it [+0] meh, don't care [-1] stop there is a ${showstopper} The VOTE is open for 72h. txs and LieGrue, strub -- Matthew Broadhead NBM Solicitors See the latest jobs available at NBM @www.nbmlaw.co.uk/recruitment.htm 32 Rainsford Road Chelmsford Essex CM1 2QG Tel: 01245 269909 Fax: 01245 261932

Re: Status of TomEE 8

and attempt to present it disconnected from your preference (i.e. use different emails). We should probably discuss for a while, capture some options we like, then loop in users and try to get as much feedback as possible. Maybe a google poll. -- David Blevins http://twitter.com/dblevins htt

Re: [RESULT] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

already proved being a failure promise multiple times so it is more a management reason than a technical one since the spec is pretty trivial. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book 2018-04-11 14:54 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.

Re: [RESULT] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

Hi David, Thanks for the invitation to vote.  I don't want to vote because I am not sure I have enough knowledge to be able to do so. My gut feeling would probably be to side with Mark and Romain as they have been very supportive with my queries about TomEE and they have shown  deep

Re: [VOTE] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

alve"/> i just wondered if it was similar.  are there any docs? On 29/03/2018 04:00, David Blevins wrote: On Mar 28, 2018, at 1:22 AM, Matthew Broadhead <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote: would it allow configuration of an oauth endpoint in TomEE and then defining security-constraint

Re: [VOTE] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

d Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> 2018-03-28 10:10 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <matthew.

Re: [VOTE] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

e is that we could make the TomEE codebase a bit lighter. What do you guys think? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Matthew Broadhead < matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote: does this mean a reusable JW

Re: Propose a Logo for TomEE

-size_Multi-color.png?dl=0 On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:57 AM, Matthew Broadhead < matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote: i can't see the attachment On 25/03/2018 17:22, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: 2018-03-25 17:16 GMT+02:00 Ivan Junckes Filho <ivanjunc...@gmail.com>: Hey guys,

Re: Propose a Logo for TomEE

i can't see the attachment On 25/03/2018 17:22, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: 2018-03-25 17:16 GMT+02:00 Ivan Junckes Filho : Hey guys, even though the old contest is dead. I would love if TomEE had a cool logo, we probably should reopen the discussion as Richard is willing

Re: What is this project?

yes very interesting.  i didn't realise there was so much history behind it.  i came from tomcat so never knew about geronimo.  i heard the name all over the place of course On 22/03/2018 03:04, David Blevins wrote: On Mar 19, 2018, at 2:45 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

does this mean a reusable JWT library external to TomEE, or within the TomEE project? i have to agree with previous statements i read that TomEE is a bundle of libraries and not really the place to locate reusable pluggable projects.  it is more like the place where you might plug a project in

Re: [VOTE] Merge Pull Request 123 - MicroProfile JWT support

0 - i don't really know enough about it On 19/03/2018 01:02, David Blevins wrote: Jean-Louis has put a PR up for discussion for JWT Support in TomEE. - https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/123 There are 35 commits spanning 27 days of work. It's been reviewed by Andy and Rudy. One a

CMS diff: Mailing Lists

Clone URL (Committers only): https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://tomee.apache.org/mailing-lists.mdtext Matthew Broadhead Index: trunk/content/mailing-lists.mdtext === --- trunk/content/mailing

Re: TomEE-8.0.0-SNAPSHOT green and deployed

as TomEE 8? On 19/02/2018 12:07, Matthew Broadhead wrote: i have tried apache-tomee-plus-8.0.0-SNAPSHOT with a small project and everything seems to be working fine on my local machine. next i will try it on a development server with many webapps running and report back On 19/02/2018 11:54

Re: TomEE-8.0.0-SNAPSHOT green and deployed

i have tried apache-tomee-plus-8.0.0-SNAPSHOT with a small project and everything seems to be working fine on my local machine. next i will try it on a development server with many webapps running and report back On 19/02/2018 11:54, Matthew Broadhead wrote: Thanks Mark, good job!  I will try

Re: TomEE-8.0.0-SNAPSHOT green and deployed

Thanks Mark, good job!  I will try it out and let you know On 18/02/2018 23:29, Mark Struberg wrote: hi folks! The TomEE8 branch is now green and I've deployed a snapshot version to repository.apache.org. If you want to try those out then you can download them from

Re: Let's do better

i don't even know what argument this discussion relates to but my 2 cents are that email and text are a terrible medium for long term communication and people should regularly have face to face discussions on hangouts or similar.   it is easy to read between the lines of text communications

Re: TomEE8 TCK status

exciting.  when it passes all the tests will there be a beta release ? On 01/02/2018 14:37, Mark Struberg wrote: With a bit help from Romains we are now down to 10 failing tests: ERROR] Failures: [ERROR]   EnterpriseDefaultBeanDiscoveryModeTest>Arquillian.arquillianBeforeClass:109 »

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

or deactivating the auto registration but none of these solutions are really stable and reliable on the long term. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-26 13:28 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk>: sorry i meant javax.xml.* On

  1   2   >