Re: Issue Tracker not available

creating Toree jira and importing issues from Github > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11082 > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Chip Senkbeil < > chip.senkb...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > >

New Spark JIRA for needed SparkR changes

Just a heads up. I opened an issue against Spark about exposing some of the SparkR APIs. They are too restrictive on what the SparkR libraries allows (no custom Java methods) and the R backend is package protected. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13573 Our SparkR implementation is a

Re: Continuous Integration Tooling

button in github. > > (as the apache github is read only replicated from the apache git repo.) > > > > > On Jan 8, 2016, at 2:45 PM, Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > From there, I see there i

Re: Issue Tracker not available

Oh, I assumed you had all of the usernames for pmc members since they were supposed to email you their IDs, right? Would it make sense to list them here? Or for each of us to comment on the JIRA itself? I've been getting emails when others got their accounts set up and the only one I haven't seen

Re: Issue Tracker not available

My jira id is senkwich. Please add me (Chip Senkbeil) as well. On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:01 AM Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, January 19, 2016, Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Oh, I assumed you had all of the user

Re: Issue Tracker not available

> >>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Gino Bustelo <g...@bustelos.com> > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Seems like all 'closed' issues are now 'closed' Jira but are marked > > >>>> 'Unresolved' > > >>>>

Re: Publishing jar binaries to Maven Central

figure out if we can do everything through sbt. Seems like a lot of steps, though. On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:17 PM Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Currently, we

Re: April Update

Are you talking about the SF Data Science meetup where Asim Jalis gave a talk? http://www.meetup.com/SF-Data-Science/events/228958752/ On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:34 AM Gino Bustelo wrote: > @Corey What was the name of that event that was using Toree? > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at

Re: New Spark JIRA for needed SparkR changes

PM Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just a heads up. I opened an issue against Spark about exposing some of > the SparkR APIs. They are too restrictive on what the SparkR libraries > allows (no custom Java methods) and the R backend is package protected. > > http

Re: Contributing to Toree

To get involved with the project, all you need to do is pick up a JIRA. Here's the list of open JIRAs for 0.1.0: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-299?jql=project%20%3D%20TOREE%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.1.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC Here's

Re: Podling Report

Thanks :) On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 9:56 AM Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have uploaded the report to the wiki and signed off as a mentor, and will > take the blame if anyone complains about it :) > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Chip Senkbeil <ch

Re: Podling Report

Guess we missed this one since it was due yesterday. Considering they really didn't like when we edited after the deadline earlier, we should just be listed as missing the report. On Wed, Feb 1, 2017, 11:12 PM Marius van Niekerk wrote: > Pretty sure the following is

Podling Report

Looks like the report is due today. Marius, are you available to take care of it this month? I don't have time today.

Re: Calling a vote again?

Sorry, had a deadline at work today. I need to clear up a couple of things before I cut new artefacts for a vote. On Wed, Feb 1, 2017, 10:14 AM Marius van Niekerk wrote: > I think we've cleared out the required static jar pieces. Should we call a > vote again? > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC6

t; > > > Going to +1 this since I assisted with getting rid of some of the > bundled > > > pieces that were blocking for RC5. > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017, 12:14 Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > I'll go ahea

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC6

Voting is now closed. This vote has PASSED with 4 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. This vote will now go to the IPMC list for a second 72-hour minimum vote. Toree developers are encouraged to comment on the IPMC vote as well. +1: Chip Senkbeil Marius van Niekerk Gino Bustelo Corey Stubbs 0: -1:

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC6

Vote thread on the incubator @general channel can be found here: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ecb5e40078f01c488ada52e776d57cd80e130164c1e31d8ded564ba2@ On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:05 PM Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Voting is now closed. This vote has PASSED

Stale incubator vote thread

It's nearly been three days since the thread has been opened. I've seen other vote threads made after ours get some votes; so, I'm a little concerned that our thread has become a bit stale. Any mentor available to take a look at the thread and - if it looks good - provide a +1 to get the

Re: Toree for 1.6.x is broken

lnames, colnames<-, endsWith, intersect, rank, rbind, sample, > > startsWith, subset, summary, table, transform > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:03 AM Corey Stubbs <cas5...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I was able to run from the pip package just fine. > &g

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC6

the extra license info tacked onto the LICENSE file. I've also fixed the source release such that it is no longer dependent on being in a Git repository to be built nor does it require you to have sbt installed. On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:09 AM Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gmail.com>

Re: Toree for 1.6.x is broken

did wrong when backporting the spark > 2.0 R things > > On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 at 10:18 Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Turns out I needed to set my hostname on my machine to localhost. Doing > so > > fixed that error. > > > > As fo

Re: Interpreter outputs

I'll take a look at them soon and give you some feedback. Was preparing the next vote for the 0.1.0 release, which is why I've been a bit distracted. On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:05 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've been putting together a proof-of-concept

Re: Toree for 1.6.x is broken

By master, I mean the 0.1.x branch. Was trying to get the next vote started. On Wed, Feb 15, 2017, 4:44 PM Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just built master, got all of the artifacts ready, blah blah blah. Tested > by installing the artifact from > https://dist.a

Toree for 1.6.x is broken

Just built master, got all of the artifacts ready, blah blah blah. Tested by installing the artifact from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc5/toree-pip/ and now it's failing with not being able to bind to an ephemeral port for the sparkDriver. Can someone help me take

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC4

No votes as of yet and it closes later today. Should some of us comment on the thread to get activity again? On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:45 PM Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gmail.com> wrote: > The IPMC vote thread is here: > https://lists.apache.org

Re: Stale incubator vote thread

Thanks, appreciate it! On Wed, Mar 1, 2017, 6:41 AM Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > It's nearly been three days since the thread has been opened. I've seen > &

Discussion regarding our first release vote

Sure. On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 12:46 AM Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Can we move this discussion to public ? > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Was starting to read through this link: > h

Re: Share Object across interpreters

attr__', > '__sizeof__', '__str__', '__subclasshook__', '__weakref__', '_get_args', > 'command_header', 'container', 'converters', 'gateway_client', 'name', > 'pool', 'target_id’] > > > Any ideas? > > Thanks, > Ian > > > > > > > > On 11/2/16, 12:38 PM, &qu

Re: Share Object across interpreters

While it isn't supported (we don't test its use in this case), you can store objects in a shared hashmap under the kernel object that is made available in each interpreter. The map is exposed as `kernel.data`, but the way you access and store data is different per language. The signature of the

Re: Share Object across interpreters

Internal: 828716 > Office: (734) 623-8716 > Mobile: (313) 910-9272 > > > > > > > > > On 11/2/16, 11:39 AM, "Chip Senkbeil" <chip.senkb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >While it isn't supported (we don't test its use in this case), you can > >store ob

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

+1. - Manually installed using the pip package; verified that the install worked and the Scala option was available in the notebook. - Ran Scala code on the notebook. - Ran some simple parallelization, reduces, etc. using a local Spark cluster. - Verified that PySpark interpreter worked correctly

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC2

+1 On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:47 PM Marius van Niekerk < marius.v.niek...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 at 16:22 Gino Bustelo wrote: > > > Tagged as v0.1.0-rc2 and points to the commit. I was trying to avoid > overly > > tagging and reserving them for actual

Forbidden publishing to staging

Moved to dev. On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:23 PM Hitesh Shah <hit...@apache.org> wrote: > Lets move this conversation to dev@. > > thanks > -- Hitesh > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Both Gino and I h

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC4

The IPMC vote thread is here: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f891ecb9452b6b34b27e0f2879efb570e3768f8d09943a57bdd6e9d8@ On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:26 PM Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Voting is now closed. This vote has PASSED with 5 +1 votes and no 0 or -

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC4

Voting is now closed. This vote has PASSED with 5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. This vote will now go to the IPMC list for a second 72-hour vote. Toree developers are encouraged to comment on the IPMC vote as well. +1: Chip Senkbeil Luciano Resende Marius van Niekerk Gino Bustelo Corey Stubbs 0

[VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC4

Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache Toree version 0.1.0. Pay special attention to the LICENSE and NOTICE files since this is our first release. ## Information and Artifacts The tag to be voted on is v0.1.0-rc4 (1d526954ecaba1d5dc0f40ec555dd598b2b11df7),

Re: Where do the staging artifacts go?

ot; > > thanks > -- Hitesh > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I just published 0.1.0 artifacts to staging in preparation for an RC4 > vote. > > I cannot tell where they have gone to include a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC4

it a +1. On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 4:15 PM Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache > Toree version 0.1.0. Pay special attention to the LICENSE and NOTICE files > since this is our first release. >

Re: issue running toree kernel on mesos cluster

For some reason, I'm missing the first half of this thread. I only have Paco Nathan's email. I don't have one from Eszti and I don't see one in our mailing archive, either. Can someone repost his part? As for the runtime errors in Docker, we'd be happy to accept any and all contributions back

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

. Then the release needs to be approved > in > > general, check the archives there for an example of the vote thread, as > you > > need to add link to vote thread, cote result.... > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:03 PM Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gmail.com> > >

Where do the staging artifacts go?

I just published 0.1.0 artifacts to staging in preparation for an RC4 vote. I cannot tell where they have gone to include a link in the description. The root of the staging deployment is here: https://repository.apache.org/service/local/staging/deploy/maven2/org/apache/toree/ And I see

Should we start another release vote?

This is long overdue, but since the artifacts weren't in staging at the time of the vote for RC3, should we have another release vote?

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

> > wrote: > > > I would check with Gino if he is ok with somebody else continuing this, > but > > if you know he is way or something, then it should be ok for you to > > continue, > > > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gma

Re: Forbidden publishing to staging

) java.io.IOException: Access to URL https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/apache/toree/kernel/toree-sql-interpreter_2.10/0.1.0-incubating/toree-sql-interpreter_2.10-0.1.0-incubating-sources.jar was refused by the server: Forbidden On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 7:27 AM Chip Senkbeil

Re: Lazy consensus for 0.1.0 release?

ely from lack of votes. > > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:04 PM Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hitesh was our only other active mentor, and he seems to have > > disappeared. > > > Xin backed out because of too many

Re: Github Integration for Toree repositories

That's great news! Thanks for getting that set up! I'll take a look on Monday to see how ghee integration works. On Sat, Mar 18, 2017, 3:59 PM Luciano Resende wrote: > I have worked with infra team to enhance the issue workflow for Toree. We > now have enabled Github

Lazy consensus for 0.1.0 release?

Given that we have only 1 vote (+1) in three weeks, should I go ahead and publish the release? I know Luciano was asking about that on @general incubator. Just want to get confirmation from mentors before doing so.

Re: Lazy consensus for 0.1.0 release?

ing votes... I was mostly trying to provoque others to > review/vote. > > How about you send direct email to each mentor requesting their vote ? > > Also, it might be time to receuit more active mentors. > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:40 PM Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gma

Re: SQL interpreter

When refactoring our original interpreter codebase to support new languages such as Python and R, I wrote the broker service to abstract the process of communicating with another language's interpreter. When SQL was added, it was easier to add a stubbed-out broker service such that the interpreter

Re: Uploading PIP for 0.1.0 release

I've gotten mixed messages regarding where the pip artifacts should go. Originally, we were going to publish them on https://pypi.python.org/pypi (which we were previously doing for dev snapshots), but there has been some issues with hosting externally from Apache? Is that still the case? Can we

Re: Uploading PIP for 0.1.0 release

What is the exact name that you want for the release? Previously, we were using just "toree", but do you want "apache-toree" or "apache-toree-incubating"? On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:47 AM Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 201

Re: Best Practices for Creating and Merging PRs

We don't have access to the GitHub merge PR button, do we? That I'm aware of, Gino, Corey, and I have been manually merging fully-rebased PRs to keep a clean commit history. If the GitHub merge PR button was available, we could use the squash-and-rebase option, which provides a very clean way to

Re: Stale incubator vote thread

It's been over two weeks since the vote started. We only have Luciano's vote. Is there anything we can do at this point? On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 6:07 AM Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, appreciate it! > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017, 6:41 AM Luciano Resende <lu

Re: Uploading PIP for 0.1.0 release

and other stuff, right ? > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> It looks like all of our makefile work was updated awhile ago to use >> apache-toree. This must have been from an earlier conversation. I can >> upd

Re: Speeding up Toree Startup

At one point, we were going to make Toree highly pluggable using our then-new plugin framework. Things like an interpreter and a spark context would be initialized via plugins and anything needing them would be plugins dependent on those objects. The scala interpreter wasn't necessary for the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.2.0 RC3

I just ran through the usual basic stuff and it looked fine. +1 On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:03 AM Luciano Resende wrote: > Off course, my +1 > > Any others? > > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 6:30 PM, Luciano Resende > wrote: > > > Please vote to approve the

Re: Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating release status

, 2018 at 08:54 Chip Senkbeil > wrote: > >> Oh, I think I do have access to PyPi. Luciano, what email address do you >> want associated? Your gmail one? Your apache one? >> >> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:21 AM Ryan Blue >> wrote: >> >>> Great news!

Re: Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating release status

Who has ownership rights? Corey and Go no? I don't think I have them, but I'll check later today. On Mon, Aug 13, 2018, 11:23 PM Luciano Resende wrote: > The RC6 has been approved by the IPMC and I have started the process of > publishing the release which usually takes a day or so for

Re: Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating release status

Oh, I think I do have access to PyPi. Luciano, what email address do you want associated? Your gmail one? Your apache one? On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:21 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > Great news! Thank you for making this happen, Luciano. > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 3:29 AM Chip Senkbeil

Re: Removing Toree specific support for Python and R

They served as experiments in a time where the functionality may have been useful, but that time has long since passed. +1 On Tue, Sep 25, 2018, 9:19 PM Gino Bustelo wrote: > +1 > > Spark’s support to share temp tables across sessions voids any need for > this multi-Lang support. > > Gino B. >

Re: [jira] [Commented] (TOREE-421) KernelSecurityManager doesn't allow users to create their own thread groups

We only ever exposed the thread killing functionality through capturing the interrupt signal on the kernel process. This was to support the stop button in Jupyter notebooks. I can't remember if that code still exists as it was a bit flakey, relying on a Sun API to capture the signal and respond.

Re: [jira] [Commented] (TOREE-421) KernelSecurityManager doesn't allow users to create their own thread groups

This was an old implementation geared towards allowing us to manage all launched threads so we could interrupt/kill them on request. I'm not sure how useful this feature has been to folks, so my thought is that we either remove it entirely or make it a feature that can be enabled/disabled

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.4.0 RC1

+1, LGTM. Did we want to update the release notes with the changes? I was using https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/compare/v0.3.0-incubating...v0.4.0-incubating-rc1 to get a summary of what has changed since 0.3.0's release. On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 2:26 PM Luciano Resende wrote: > >

[jira] [Commented] (TOREE-314) External plugins using indirect traits not detected

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15300108#comment-15300108 ] Chip Senkbeil commented on TOREE-314: - Oh, forgot to close this one. It's already been fixed by https

[jira] [Commented] (TOREE-272) Jupyter Notebook works; Console is broken / hangs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15172323#comment-15172323 ] Chip Senkbeil commented on TOREE-272: - [~lbustelo], the issue is two fold: # The kernel does

[jira] [Comment Edited] (TOREE-272) Jupyter Notebook works; Console is broken / hangs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15172323#comment-15172323 ] Chip Senkbeil edited comment on TOREE-272 at 2/29/16 6:35 PM: -- [~lbustelo

[jira] [Updated] (TOREE-268) Plugin System

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chip Senkbeil updated TOREE-268: Affects Version/s: 0.1.0 > Plugin System > - > > Ke

[jira] [Resolved] (TOREE-169) support additional repositories in %AddDeps

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chip Senkbeil resolved TOREE-169. - Resolution: Fixed (was: Unresolved) Assignee: Chip Senkbeil > support additio

[jira] [Commented] (TOREE-38) Publish builds of SparkKernel

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-38?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15149430#comment-15149430 ] Chip Senkbeil commented on TOREE-38: Close it and make a new one. Title is wrong anyway, so enough

[jira] [Commented] (TOREE-246) IvyDependencyDownloader ignores repositoryUrl

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15143022#comment-15143022 ] Chip Senkbeil commented on TOREE-246: - We have a branch (PR https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree

[jira] [Commented] (TOREE-282) Remove `Created by` comments from source code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210648#comment-15210648 ] Chip Senkbeil commented on TOREE-282: - Makes sense. Those look like auto-generated comments. I know

[jira] [Commented] (TOREE-282) Remove `Created by` comments from source code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210676#comment-15210676 ] Chip Senkbeil commented on TOREE-282: - Even better! Thanks! > Remove `Created by` comments from sou

[jira] [Closed] (TOREE-222) Makefile should provide an install option

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chip Senkbeil closed TOREE-222. --- Assignee: Corey A Stubbs > Makefile should provide an install opt

[jira] [Resolved] (TOREE-270) Switch to Coursier for sbt dependency resolving/downloading

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chip Senkbeil resolved TOREE-270. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed using PR mentioned in description. > Switch to Coursier for

[jira] [Commented] (TOREE-274) Java support possible?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15175069#comment-15175069 ] Chip Senkbeil commented on TOREE-274: - Gave it a shot here: https://github.com/chipsenkbeil/incubator

[jira] [Resolved] (TOREE-309) pyspark_runner needs to be upgraded for Spark 1.5, 1.6

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chip Senkbeil resolved TOREE-309. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.1.0 Fixed by PR #31. > pyspark_runner ne

[jira] [Resolved] (TOREE-310) Allow override of python executable used for pyspark

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chip Senkbeil resolved TOREE-310. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.1.0 Fixed by PR #32. > Allow override of pyt

[jira] [Commented] (TOREE-311) commentation causes abiguos error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15278508#comment-15278508 ] Chip Senkbeil commented on TOREE-311: - Despite the error, is the variable you are declaring available

[jira] [Commented] (TOREE-272) Jupyter Notebook works; Console is broken / hangs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15248466#comment-15248466 ] Chip Senkbeil commented on TOREE-272: - See https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/pull/27 > Jupy

[jira] [Commented] (TOREE-374) Variables declared on the Notebook are not garbage collected

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15856197#comment-15856197 ] Chip Senkbeil commented on TOREE-374: - Here's what I used to do. It still works with our 0.1.x branch

[jira] [Commented] (TOREE-345) Spark 2.0.0 Fails when trying to use spark-avro

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15552803#comment-15552803 ] Chip Senkbeil commented on TOREE-345: - Yeah, that is what the Ivy files generated in the resource

[jira] [Resolved] (TOREE-341) Toree scala kernel doesn't handle exceptions correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chip Senkbeil resolved TOREE-341. - Resolution: Fixed > Toree scala kernel doesn't handle exceptions correc

[jira] [Closed] (TOREE-341) Toree scala kernel doesn't handle exceptions correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chip Senkbeil closed TOREE-341. --- > Toree scala kernel doesn't handle exceptions correc

[jira] [Commented] (TOREE-341) Toree scala kernel doesn't handle exceptions correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15526355#comment-15526355 ] Chip Senkbeil commented on TOREE-341: - Resolved by [~mariusvniekerk]. Can't seem to add him

[jira] [Closed] (TOREE-342) Switch tab completer to the default used for scala 2.11 console

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chip Senkbeil closed TOREE-342. --- > Switch tab completer to the default used for scala 2.11 cons

[jira] [Resolved] (TOREE-343) Added support for jupyter message `is_complete_request`

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chip Senkbeil resolved TOREE-343. - Resolution: Fixed > Added support for jupyter message `is_complete_requ

[jira] [Commented] (TOREE-343) Added support for jupyter message `is_complete_request`

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15526840#comment-15526840 ] Chip Senkbeil commented on TOREE-343: - Tackled by [~mariusvniekerk]. > Added support for jupy

[jira] [Commented] (TOREE-342) Switch tab completer to the default used for scala 2.11 console

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15526839#comment-15526839 ] Chip Senkbeil commented on TOREE-342: - Tackled by [~mariusvniekerk]. > Switch tab comple

[jira] [Commented] (TOREE-395) Provide a way to disable automatic printing of results in Toree Scala

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15936446#comment-15936446 ] Chip Senkbeil commented on TOREE-395: - I commented on the PR, but yeah I'm in favor of leaving

[jira] [Commented] (TOREE-396) SparkR interpeter does not connect to Spark 2.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15936457#comment-15936457 ] Chip Senkbeil commented on TOREE-396: - Thanks for pointing this out. Looks like the timeout