Re: Call for votes: Release 3.2.1

2012-07-18 Thread Alan M. Carroll
I think the best option is to move the burden to the backport proposer. While backports serve a critical function there's good reason to make it a bit of a challenge to keep them down to the ones that are really needed. Therefore we could make the proposer responsible for (1) detecting a +3

Re: Call for votes: Release 3.2.1

2012-07-18 Thread Leif Hedstrom
On 7/18/12 9:37 AM, Alan M. Carroll wrote: I think the best option is to move the burden to the backport proposer. While backports serve a critical function there's good reason to make it a bit of a challenge to keep them down to the ones that are really needed. Therefore we could make the

Re: Call for votes: Release 3.2.1

2012-07-17 Thread Igor Gali?
Just a reminder for myself: borrow subversion's automatic merge script. - Igor Galić iga...@apache.org wrote: Hey folks, I've added a bunch of bugs to backport for 3.2.1 http://s.apache.org/ts-3.2.1 I'd like to see some votes on this to cut and tag a release until Friday. Thanks

Re: Call for votes: Release 3.2.1

2012-07-17 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - Hey folks, I've added a bunch of bugs to backport for 3.2.1 http://s.apache.org/ts-3.2.1 I'd like to see some votes on this to cut and tag a release until Friday. Hey there, I did a first bunch of backports, the results of whic you can see here;