Hi,
Recently in my company we moved from TeamCity to Hudson for two major
reasons:
- Hudson can start several runners (i.e. build several projects at once)
while TC agent can build at most one project at a time
- Hudson knows Maven, i.e. after building project X it builds all projects
that depend
There are some developments unfolding in the near future that might
help out on the future of our wicketstuff server and/or its
infrastructure. I don't have the full details to those plans yet, and
don't know if they entail a build server of some sorts.
I'm perfectly happy with switching to
Hi,
If anyone is looking for a Wicket contract position in Edinburgh please
get in contact.
Best regards,
Steven
Steven Tierney
Bright Purple Resourcing Ltd
Senior Consultant
The Eagle Building, 19 Rose Street, Edinburgh, EH2 2PR
Office: +44 131 473 7045 (Direct Line)
+44 131
My little bird told me that no build server is part of the new deal
which is slated to be announced mid-august, so IMO we should not delay
the migration off of teamcity and setup hudson. I'll contact the
sysadmin for the box to see if I can grant direct access, or that only
trusted folks are
- Hudson can start several runners (i.e. build several projects at once)
while TC agent can build at most one project at a time
Just to keep the facts straight: at my company we have several TC agents
on one machine. Works without problems.
Regards,
Erik.
Op 21-07-10 09:31, Martin
Hi,
Few feedbacks:
* two link on the page is 404-ing:
http://wicket.apache.org/contribute/writing-documentation.html and
http://wicket.apache.org/contribute/building-from-svn.html
* also for some reason I couldn't find the page about mailing lists and
archives (they were under the big Community
hudson is just a war right?
so that can be dumped by anybody of the wicket devs to onto the tomcat
webapp dir.
What more does hudson need?
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:14, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
My little bird told me that no build server is part of the new deal
Security needs to be enabled and other stuff. Deploying as a war does
have some drawbacks: restarting using the UI won't work,
installing/updating plugins/new versions of hudson is enabled by
default.
Martijn
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote:
hudson is
This will give you a rough idea of what you need for Hudson. It does
need some disk space:
http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Administering+Hudson
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
Security needs to be enabled and other stuff. Deploying
how do you deploy then?
has hudson its container (tomcat)??
Then we also need another port. And have all kind of apache config to
support things like:
wicketstuff.org/hudson
hmm that i dont like. It should just run on the tomcat instance we have.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 14:51, Martijn Dashorst
Here are the instructions for setting it up on linux/unix:
http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Installing+Hudson#InstallingHudson-Unix%2FLinuxInstallation
You *can* just do:
java -jar hudson.war
and it'll run. That's just a quick way to get it up and running to
play around with it.
On
its a FreeBSD server, so dont know if that is all the same that a linux one.
But still everywhere i see java -jar hudson.war or hudson start
That means that hudson has its own web container right? Where does
that run on? which port?
Then again also changes to apache must be done to map
which is possible, but we should ensure that pranksters won't be
shutting down our server...
Martijn
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote:
its a FreeBSD server, so dont know if that is all the same that a linux one.
But still everywhere i see java -jar
In linux I've been using the screen command like this:
screen java -jar hudson.war --httpPort=9090
Then detaching and letting it run. Running it like this is useful if
auto update doesn't work and a manual restart is required.
Google seems to show that the 'screen' command also exists for
As you might have noticed, I've done a bit of preparing for our
migration to hudson...
Tomcat - 7.0
Java - 1.6 (otherwise tomcat doesn't run)
I had to tweak the tomcat configuration to ensure that confluence
would start up: added the missing drivers from the previous tomcat
installation's lib
Thank Michael.
Does this work with other jquery integrations? What I mean is, will there
be any conflicts?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Adding-the-flot-project-tp1909066p2297694.html
Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
installing hudson 1.367 doesn't seem to work properly. I get 404
errors on the homepage, users page and other pages.
Asking around on #hudson on irc hasn't yielded a response...
Martijn
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
As you might have
2010/7/21 jdonners...@apache.org
Author: jdonnerstag
Date: Wed Jul 21 20:43:25 2010
New Revision: 966409
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=966409view=rev
Log:
fixed WICKET-2946 Exceptions raised in overridden sessionDestroyed() event
(of WebApplication class) are completely swallowed
OK seems to be a tomcat 7 incompatibility of hudson...
Martijn
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
installing hudson 1.367 doesn't seem to work properly. I get 404
errors on the homepage, users page and other pages.
Asking around on #hudson on
I forgot about this ...
Actually this
is org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebApplication.unmount(String) from
Wicket 1.4.
Don't know why this method is renamed ...
Do we still need it ?
2010/7/19 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
you can by subclassing it...
-igor
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010
Someone mentioned in users@ about a problem with relative paths in TC7 too.
Maybe the examples wont work too.
2010/7/21 Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com
OK seems to be a tomcat 7 incompatibility of hudson...
Martijn
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Martijn Dashorst
i dont see why
-igor
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
I forgot about this ...
Actually this
is org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebApplication.unmount(String) from
Wicket 1.4.
Don't know why this method is renamed ...
Do we still need it ?
22 matches
Mail list logo
