Was there a discussion on the mailing list about this?
On May 4, 2012 8:50 AM, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com
wrote:
It looks like we are not going to use the gradle build files. Does
anyone object to removing them?
Martijn
The fact that they are not going to be used anymore.
On May 7, 2012 7:36 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 2:34 PM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
Was there a discussion on the mailing list about this?
About what
.
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 2:40 PM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
The fact that they are not going to be used anymore.
On May 7, 2012 7:36 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 2:34 PM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote
, May 7, 2012 at 3:19 PM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
OK. I'm not against it. It's just the first I've heard of it. It would
seem like an important discussion to have though, changing the build
process.
On May 7, 2012 7:42 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote
Welcome, Carl-Eric!
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
Carl-Eric Menzel has been invited to join the Wicket team. Please
welcome Carl-Eric!
Martijn Dashorst
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
? extends String looks strange too
Yes, especially since String is final. Curiouser and curiouser. :)
as is...
-igor
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:02 PM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
Perhaps have wicket piece itself together using cdi! This might help it
be
more pluggable. It is much better these days but some things could be
easier.
On Apr 16, 2012 5:21 PM, Martijn
I'm -0 to going to servlet 3.0. I think it's a bad idea, but I'm not
currently using Wicket at my day job, so I wouldn't want to stand in
the way of progress. I like the idea of having an optional module
that depends on 3.0, though, with the core being 2.5-compatible.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at
of them wont
even know that its possible to do this.
-igor
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Sven Meiers...@meiers.net wrote:
The listener won't be set in IFrameworkSettings by default, right?
IMHO it's better located in extensions then.
Sven
On 04/07/2012 01:37 AM, James Carman wrote
Oh, sorry I didn't understand what you meant. Yeah that is a nasty
scenario. I would much rather implement this as an aspect if it were me.
Wicket should have a library of useful aspects like this.
Sent from tablet device. Please excuse typos and brevity.
On Apr 8, 2012 10:03 AM, James Carman
Add the listener to core and if folks want to use it they can. You could
have a component instantiation listener add the detach listener to the
components. Another option would be an aspect.
On Apr 6, 2012 12:43 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
i wrote a IDetachListener that
Wicketeers,
I was wanting to do some comparing between trunk and what's in the
latest release tag (trying to backport something out of trunk). I
went looking for the tag for the 1.5.4 release. I looked here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/releases/
I can see 1.5.3, but there's no tag
OMG! I can't get it through my thick skull that you guys are on GIT
now! DUH! Sorry for the traffic.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 4:26 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
Wicketeers,
I was wanting to do some comparing between trunk and what's in the
latest release tag (trying
and new classes.
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:19 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
JIRA created and patch attached:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4264
I ended up actually not using ObjectOutput. I created a new interface
called ObjectWriter which only contains
While doing a bit of debugging today, I noticed that I didn't see that
nice serialization issue message that tells me which field is the
problem. So, I started looking into it (with some direction from
martin-g on IRC):
The Problem
In the new JavaSerializer class, it has a CheckerOutputStream
are
internals of JavaSerializer, imo.
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:24 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
While doing a bit of debugging today, I noticed that I didn't see that
nice serialization issue message that tells me which field is the
problem. So, I started looking
All,
I have moved the active development of Wicketopia back to GitHub. You
can now find it at:
https://github.com/jwcarman/Wicketopia
Some recent developments:
1. CDI Integration (including Weld adapter)
2. Rudimentary support for entity relationships (drop down chooser).
Coming soon:
1.
I'm having a bit of trouble with my CDI library's example. I'm not
sure if I'm attempting to do something that I shouldn't expect to work
or if my library isn't working correctly. I've got a couple of links
on my page:
add(new Link(convBegin)
{
@Override
Perhaps we should re-write it using wicket-velocity! ;)
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
his test is hand-tailored to fail any true component oriented
framework. 5000 items per page? really? show me a single website that
does that. even facebook
I like the idea of the builder pattern much better. DSLs rock!
Sent from tablet device. Please excuse typos and brevity.
On Jun 8, 2011 6:35 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
or builder pattern:
AttributeModifier.attr(name).model(someModel).create().append()
On Wed, Jun 8,
I'm -1 to gradle. We don't all use it. It's not like we're a groovy-based
framework.
On May 1, 2011 12:07 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
i guess the question then is, do we switch to gradle for 1.5? can you
check in the gradle build file so we can all take a look?
-igor
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Attila Király kiralyattila...@gmail.com wrote:
We can add the eclipse prefs to git so it gets configured automatically. Do
not know how to do it for other IDE-s.
If we add this I do not think that we should reformat all projects at once.
Only to do it when we
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:47 AM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Attila Király kiralyattila...@gmail.com
wrote:
We can add the eclipse prefs to git so it gets configured automatically. Do
not know how to do it for other IDE-s.
If we add this I
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Attila Király kiralyattila...@gmail.com wrote:
(Also an answer to Hans Lesmeister)
Afaik there is no checkstyle plugin that can do the same as eclipse
formatter + save actions: format and clean up code upon save. Checkstyle
will only test that the rules are met
Thanks for taking point on this wicketstuff/github/maven report stuff,
Michael. Your work is much appreciated!
On Mar 22, 2011 8:56 PM, Michael Oapos;Cleirigh
michael.ocleir...@rivulet.ca wrote:
Hi,
I've added you to the committers team in github.com
Let me know when your module is in and
What about AJAX requests coming from multiple places for the same session?
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if this is still happening in 1.5, but could it be
possible to nix the pagemap lock (or severely shorten it to 1-2
I don't think he was saying it was incorrect. He was saying that he's
okay with the added inconvenience if it makes everything work
correctly.
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:51 PM, tetsuo ronald.tet...@gmail.com wrote:
Why would it (Igor's proposal) be not correct?
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 2:28
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:56 AM, tetsuo ronald.tet...@gmail.com wrote:
Since Spring 3.0, scoped proxies are Serializable. So, it's perfectly
possible to use @Configurable, @Autowired, and lots of AspectJ magic,
for Pages and Components, instead of wicket-spring/@SpringBean.
Provided, of
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:46 PM, tetsuo ronald.tet...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, it is. Just use @SpringBean.
Agreed! :)
The problem with that is that it doesn't address the situation where
the reference is passed elsewhere (like to a DataProvider). With the
proxy-based approach (which wicket-spring does now), it does.
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Bruno Borges bruno.bor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
A
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Maarten Bosteels
mbosteels@gmail.com wrote:
-1 for updating to spring 3 (especially when wicket-spring doesn't need
features not available in 2.5.6)
How about version[2.5.6,)/version ?
It clearly indicates that 2.5.6 is the minimum required version for
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
with the new split we have introduced iprovider interface which
decouples the mess. a good example is that if now some part of request
processing needs a configurable option it gets it via iprovider which
in turn
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
The separate modules is a good way to enforce the separation. If you have
other ideas for enforcing them, I'd be happy to hear them.
It doesn't really enforce anything. Folks can still put classes in
the
Sure blame us commons people :)
On Jan 25, 2011 12:21 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
that code was taking out of apache commons upload afair.
-igor
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:16 AM, richard emberson
richard.ember...@gmail.com wrote:
While going through RC1 wicket-util I
So, what does this have to do with Lucene?
2011/1/24 César Couto cesar...@dcc.ufmg.br:
Dear developers,
I am a PhD student at UFMG, Brazil and as part of my research I am
making a study about the relevance of the warnings reported by the
FindBugs bug finding tool.
Since I am planning to
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://wickettraining.com
*Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:38 AM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.comwrote:
So, what does this have to do with Lucene?
2011/1/24 César Couto cesar...@dcc.ufmg.br:
Dear developers,
I
I have also questioned the usefulness of this new approach, compared
to all of the hoops you have to go through to get it to work? What
are we saving here? Are wicket-request and wicket-util really
intended to be used outside of Wicket? I really don't see the
benefit, at least when you consider
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
I, too, like the idea. Couldn't it be simpler? Couldn't he:
Yes, it could be simpler. It could be easier to add a listener to the
ART in-general. :)
,
}
...
;)
**
Martin
2011/1/19 James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com:
I believe this conversation has gone enough off-course that it no
longer belongs on this mailing list. We're not discussing anything
related to Wicket anymore.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:57 AM, richard emberson
ApplicationLifecycleListener?
On Jan 18, 2011 8:14 AM, Major Péter majorpe...@sch.bme.hu wrote:
Hi,
since IInitializer now also works as an IDestroyer, wouldn't be
ApplicationContextListener a better name for it? (based on
ServletContextListener)
Regards,
Peter
Releases can't be vetoed but it is good to see a binding -1 vote. Just call
the vote cancelled because there was a problem identified
On Jan 13, 2011 9:26 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
here is a binding -1 to close this officially.
-igor
2011/1/13 Major Péter
It's like crossing the streams on Ghostbusters. Just don't do it. :)
On Jan 13, 2011 9:27 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
if you put two of them on a page do you get an infinite loop? :)
-igor
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com
Since scala is statically-typed, the ide can (and does) give you contextual
help very easily
On Jan 8, 2011 2:21 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com
wrote:
But it will do the right thing about 90% of the time. you'll
subconsciously
work around 4 or 5% of the rest that doesn't
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
What I hate about java is its one-dimensionality... ehh.. say you have:
object man
object man carrying bag
bag carrying pencil case.
This isn't a Java problem. This is a design problem.
How would you
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
It should be possible to say that man will proxy by default all get
methods of his belongings, It should be possible to say that bag
will proxy by default all get methods of his belongings. Same with
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Either way, you have to put logic somewhere that tries to figure out
what the heck you want to borrow and then figure out where the heck to
get it.
If it is done at compile time you don't need messaging
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Gustavo Hexsel ghex...@gmail.com wrote:
One of the cool things about scala is that you could have a model concept
without a model class. You just need to receive 2 functions, a setter and a
getter (or just a setter for read-only models). So for instance a
Is this in IntelliJ IDEA?
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Gerolf Seitz gerolf.se...@gmail.com wrote:
It's cmd+shift+G (OSX) and it works quite well ;)
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Justin Lee evancho...@gmail.com wrote:
You can paste a java class into a .scala file and it'll autoconvert.
I've got to try it!
On Jan 5, 2011 6:10 PM, Gerolf Seitz gerolf.se...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this in IntelliJ IDEA?
yes
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Gerolf Seitz gerolf.se...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's cmd+shift+G (OSX) and it works quite well ;)
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Justin
I haven't had time to read all of this (hard to get through it all on
my phone), but I don't think that mere port of Wicket to Scala is
what is needed. I'd rather see a project built for Scala from the
ground up based on some of the concepts from Wicket. Wicket wasn't
designed with a functional
Please add me too. My username is jwcarman. Thanks.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Sebastian nospam...@gmx.net wrote:
Please add me too.
username: sebthom
Added
Thanks!
Seb
On 01.01.2011 15:47, Michael
+1
On Dec 29, 2010 12:49 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
i think core and sandbox are probably better names and more clearly
communicate the intent.
-igor
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently our wicketstuff repo at
-1, sounds very confusing to me. I was just looking for something
last night in the source. It was something that I assumed would be in
the core of the framework, but I had to look in wicket-util for it.
I don't like that. If it's required to run Wicket, then it should be
part of the core.
On
, formatting, or
compiler errors
On Dec 22, 2010 7:34 AM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
-1, sounds very confusing to me. I was just looking for something
last night in the source. It was something that I assumed would be in
the core of the framework, but I had to look in wicket
+1 for Apache Extras.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
Things change and while we had a nice stay at sf.net, I think it is
time to move on with Wicket Stuff to newer ground. We have had this
discussion before and the discussion stalled mostly
What do you do with docModel in that constructor?
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Don donle...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I would suspect that having a class like below I wouldnt really need to use a
LoadableDetachableModel model because I dont store it in some field of the
class (or any of the
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Clint Checketts checke...@gmail.com wrote:
While I appreciate having onConfigure as an option it seems like overriding
isVisible is still the cleaner and clearer way. Folks just need to follow
the rule that expensive calls should be contained in an LDM.
The
, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Eelco Hillenius
eelco.hillen...@gmail.com wrote:
Niether is evil. It has potential pitfalls, which you should just be
aware of. We use such overrides all over the place and never have
problems with them either
No, it's not necessary, but it makes it a heck of a lot easier. If
you really don't want to use Maven in the long run, it might help you
get started and figure out which jars you absolutely need on your
classpath. Start a maven-based project and once you get stuff
working, you can do mvn
Congratulations, Pedro!
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
I'd just like to pass this on to everyone on the list. Pedro Santos
has been added as a committer and PMC member for Apache Wicket. Pedro
has been increasingly active in the Wicket
Yeah that's not gonna work with the way people typically use wicket
On Nov 19, 2010 9:02 AM, ekabanov jevg...@zeroturnaround.com wrote:
We are looking into solving this for anon classes in the next version. Our
typical suggestion for workaround is to use named method classes, like this:
//
I've used jrebel pretty successfully with wicket. There are a lot more
compatible changes you can make than non-compatible ones.
On Nov 18, 2010 7:53 AM, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've been trying out jrebel and wicket a couple of times, and I
thought it didn't work. It
Email them. They have a wicket plugin and they're very responsive
On Nov 18, 2010 7:53 AM, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've been trying out jrebel and wicket a couple of times, and I
thought it didn't work. It does, but the way Wicket development works
is undoing most of
Has anyone looked at how Tapestry solved this problem? I know they
did some work to make sure reloading happened in a smart way.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
invoking a constructor on a constructed class can lead to a lot more
weirder state
+1 to the maven plugin. And, yes IDEA does it too.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:04 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.comwrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote
Where are you that DST changed last night? Ours (EDT timezone)
doesn't change until next Sunday at 2:00 AM. At least that's what the
time settings dialog in Windows 7 says.
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
Locally
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
Where are you that DST changed last night? Ours (EDT timezone)
doesn't change until next Sunday at 2:00 AM. At least that's what the
time settings dialog in Windows 7 says.
Europe.
Figures. I don't know why
This is a user question. Please send your question to the user list.
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:52 AM, elesi jsar...@gmail.com wrote:
could anyone explain how wicket searches the context path for resources?
i mean is it different from the local drive path that i use for non-web
applications?
This isn't a Wicket question.
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:54 AM, elesi jsar...@gmail.com wrote:
drobson drob...@... writes:
The files are being stored on the server but i've found a way of doing what I
need and it seems pretty nice. By creating a new xml file, named audio.xml,
in the tomcat
Why not ask this question on the user list? That's where you're
supposed to ask this type of question.
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:58 AM, elesi jsar...@gmail.com wrote:
im sorry for that, but let me ask if there's another way of getting the mp3
resource...
besides creating an xml file like
Jira supports tags right?
On Sep 20, 2010 8:55 AM, Clint Checketts checke...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure I could take whichever approach the core team prefers. A bonus of
having a master issue is once it gets resolved that the release notes will
specifically mark that it is compatible with GAE.
On
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:32 PM, norm.pence norm.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been working with Wicket for only a few days so please bare with me.
First of all, this is a user question, it should be sent to the user
list, not the developer list.
This is a test to see if we can still post to the dev mailing list via
nabble. Did this get through?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Test-tp2538143p2538143.html
Sent from the Wicket Dev (Old) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:14 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
This is a test to see if we can still post to the dev mailing list via
nabble. Did this get through?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Test-tp2538143p2538143.html
Sent from
, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
i was hoping you were doing this just to mess with martijn...
-igor
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:25 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
Heh! Yeah, I got it on my machine, too. Martijn thought he had this
turned off. I wanted to see
Why the snapshots?
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:52 AM, chitrabhanu.das
chitrabhanu@gmail.com wrote:
thanks for your prompt reply now i have removed 1.3 versions and have set
the following jars in classpath:
wicket-ioc-1.4-SNAPSHOT.jar
wicket-spring-1.4-SNAPSHOT.jar
A better question is why are you so averse to a service layer in between?
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:09 AM, chitrabhanu.das
chitrabhanu@gmail.com wrote:
How do we integrate Wicket and Hibernate without any service layer in
between Is it even possible??? I have tried to but in vein
The test case compares the output to a static file on disk that was
generated in a non-de environment. I would imagine that's why it's
failing. ClientSideImageMap is a new class, so it's not changing existing
functionality. It merely attaches itself to an existing Image component
(via an
I'd say at least move it to wicketstuff, so that if there's some other
person out there with the will and means to take the project on, they
can do so.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I just created a ticket
This will give you a rough idea of what you need for Hudson. It does
need some disk space:
http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Administering+Hudson
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
Security needs to be enabled and other stuff. Deploying
Here are the instructions for setting it up on linux/unix:
http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Installing+Hudson#InstallingHudson-Unix%2FLinuxInstallation
You *can* just do:
java -jar hudson.war
and it'll run. That's just a quick way to get it up and running to
play around with it.
On
The DefaultDataTable has a navigation component at the top that allows
you to go to a page. You could borrow from that (or use
DefaultDataTable).
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Alis ajcalve...@yahoo.es wrote:
Hello! I doing a DataTable, and i need implement in .java go to a page.
Try going to http://mywebserverurl/mycontext/wicket
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:16 PM, ujtordai ujtordaikov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'm new in Wicket. I use NetBeans 6.9 and Glassfish.
I made a simple J2EE project.
The project deployed successfully.
My project is a skeleton of
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
But how does your user select the row? Clicking a checkbox or what? Do
you need an ajax event for each?
The user has to underline the row with a marker to select it.
But, if they scroll, won't the marker just
.. It's just that
Artifactory was WICKET powered :)
2010/6/24 James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com
And, a LOT of the maven-based projects are going that route. Nexus
even makes it easier to do releases The Apache Way.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer
How do you click vs. select?
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Alis ajcalve...@yahoo.es wrote:
Hello! How are you?
I´m implement a DataTable, and the rows is link, i need make click the row
and implement a process and when select row do other process. Help me,
please and very thank.
--
So, whatever happened with this issue? I'm just curious.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Boneless1213 boneless1...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried replying using email and it didn't seem to work, hope this doesn't
double post, sorry if it does.
I'm not near my app right now, but I do recall that
What do you mean by rebuilds? Wicket is designed so that links
(non-bookmarkable ones at least) will always point back at the page
from whence they came, so that their state remains consistent. So, if
you mean that the link seems to be dealing with the same page instance
that it came from, then
And, a LOT of the maven-based projects are going that route. Nexus
even makes it easier to do releases The Apache Way.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
Because Nexus is hosted and supported by Apache.
Jeremy Thomerson
-- sent from my
Do you see any error messages in your console. Perhaps Wicket can't
serialize your page(s)?
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Boneless1213 boneless1...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is what I mean by rebuilds.
For this instance I have a browse page and a viewDetails page, you click
links on the
Just send an email to dev-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Heather Trumbower
htrumbo...@navigenics.com wrote:
Please remove me from dev@wicket.apache.org.
Thank you.
Heather Trumbower
htrumbo...@navigenics.com
I believe that repository is for software published by the ASF, but I
could be wrong.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Michael O'Cleirigh
michael.ocleir...@rivulet.ca wrote:
Hello,
The wicketstuff.org site seems to have gone down over the weekend.
The main item for me is that the maven
Sorry, I saw the wicketstuff in the original email. Long day, man.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:58 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.comwrote:
I believe that repository is for software published by the ASF
Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
The newest tomcat has improved permgen cleanup which they backported
from tomcat 7 iiuc.
Martijn
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:10 AM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I've done some playing with Tomcat undeploy and it does appear that
the ITL
It has been shown many times why this change was a bad idea.
Nevermind the theoretical nature of the initial objections, which have
also been shown to be true concerns (see
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6489540). It has
been shown that this change doesn't really solve
You don't create the thread yourself. Java does!
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Alex Objelean alex.objel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Adriano again!
I know you have no time for creating the quickstart. That is why I am trying
to reproduce it. I want to make a quickstart to prove if the problem
Just try using something like JFreeChart
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Alex Objelean alex.objel...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, then just give me whatever code you use which causes the memory leak...
--
View this message in context:
Or draw something yourself if you want to skip the dependency
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:38 AM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
Just try using something like JFreeChart
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Alex Objelean alex.objel...@gmail.com
wrote:
OK, then just give me
Here's an example page that you can plug into a quickstart to show the bug:
public class HomePage extends WebPage
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
static
{
System.out.println(I'm being initialized within the context
of thread +
inheritableThreadLocals and look in its table
field. In there, you'll find a reference to the WicketApplication
object. There's your leak! The Java2D Disposer thread runs for the
duration of the VM and won't let go of that sucker.
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:15 AM, James Carman
ja
1 - 100 of 257 matches
Mail list logo
