interesting ..
Suddenly java gets passed by reference instead of value?
things like: (sounds dark magic to me ;) )
@Serializer
public pattern Range(int lo, int hi) {
lo = this.lo;
hi = this.hi;
}
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 at 12:47, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> Current
Ehh serialisation is done in read and writeobject methods, all the stuff
should be created there (readObject)
The entry array is not meant to be serialized by itself.
At first sight it seem to be correct, the sizes are serialized and then an
int + object pair is done. And the read creates the
at 11:47 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com
wrote:
Why not just go to the latest 1.9.x?
I thought that was .10 but without all the removed api?
1.9 has removed the api.
Martijn
On 3 Jul 2013 11:13, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com
wrote:
While I typically agree
those files are needed, at least to get a consistent formatting behavior
across all developers.
I would say just commit those files. Thats the whole point of the .settings
dir in eclipse.. (else don't specify anything at the project level)
On 14 January 2013 13:27, Emond Papegaaij
I am interested in your article..
How else to really do it then cherry picking.. but I guess h that also
depends where you do you're good first?
I always start at their lowest version I want to fix it and forward port
it, almost never do back ports
Op 10 sep. 2012 19:33 schreef Carl-Eric Menzel
+1
On 29 August 2012 15:41, Carl-Eric Menzel cmen...@wicketbuch.de wrote:
It's time to mop up the last remaining changes in 1.4.x so we can
finally close that branch and concentrate on 1.5 and 6.0.
Please check the following source release and then vote:
- branch build/wicket-1.4.21
-
While my hatred for Maven runs deep, I have yet to find a solution
that works better or is more appealing.
Martijn
really?? runs deep? for martijn? i just can't believe that!
Explain to me then what Wicket it self really needs from the new API?
So what are we going to change?
On Apr 13, 2012 2:32 PM, Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@topicus.nl
wrote:
Hi all,
It was already mentioned by Martijn some time ago as a suggestion for the
roadmap for Wicket 6, but it was
i think it would be fine to have something like this, and enabled by default
but only to have an option to turn it off
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 22:30, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
-1 on adding it if its not enabled by default. its a trivial class
thats only about 40-50 lines of
fine by me, i am not sure why it does that, it seems to me that the script
that tests if the server is up and running is to aggressive or something.
Maybe point wicketstuff.org to wicket-library.com?
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:51, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.comwrote:
All,
We
+1
On Mar 23, 2012 1:34 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
This vote is to release wicket 6.0.0-beta1.
This is the first release of 6.x branch and its purpose is to get more
feedback from
the community. There are no more planned changes in the API but if you
find something
that
+1
On Mar 7, 2012 5:47 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
This vote is to release wicket 1.4.20
Branch
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/?p=wicket.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/build/wicket-1.4.20
Artifacts
http://people.apache.org/~ivaynberg/wicket-1.4.20/dist/
Stick for now to Java 6
or does somebody really has good reason (api or feature that he wants to
use) to go to Java 7?
I think java 7 almost brought nothing, the all postponed the nice stuff to
Java 8 (which is postponed to next year i believe)
i do think that the eol of java 6 is quite fast, i
they
see they are inside another form...
-igor
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com
wrote:
here:
http://wicket.apache.org/apidocs/1.5/org/apache/wicket/extensions/ajax/markup/html/modal/ModalWindow.html
we say
If you want to use form in modal
not find any other form because
the modal dialog form is just in javascript/html, its not a wicket
component..
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 20:22, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote:
yes i just read that in a jira issue :)
but in my example it doesn't ...
will check it
On Thu, Feb 16
the modal's content
-igor
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com
wrote:
ok for a form inside a modal dialog
you need to override:
/**
* @see org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form#isRootForm()
*/
@Override
public
a modal window..
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 20:58, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
thats why the javadoc says to put the modal window component inside a
wicket form...
-igor
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com
wrote:
but the modal dialog iself
on this afaik.
-igor
So I guess they haven't finished yet!
Bertrand
On 10/02/2012 9:34 AM, Johan Compagner wrote:
Hi,
What broke now that we are over to git is the nice link between jira
issues and the source code
so this tab:
https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse
guess they haven't finished yet!
Bertrand
On 10/02/2012 9:34 AM, Johan Compagner wrote:
Hi,
What broke now that we are over to git is the nice link between
jira
issues and the source code
so this tab:
https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/WICKET-1654?page
to make sure the string is present i
suppose. i am not sure if infra would like that or not...
-igor
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com
wrote:
can we somehow force that? Just like we did with svn that has that build
in
case:xxx support (in the commit dialog
or use the let statement.. but support in all browsers could be a bit
tricky ;)
shouild be javascript 1.7 (thats FF 2.0 from 2006) but i don't think its in
EcmaScript yet (looks like EcmaScript 6 gets it) and most other browsers
follow that and do currently Edition 5.x or something
On Thu, Feb
then it is something to tune in WebSphere. If it
works then there is something in Wicket.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com
wrote:
Websphere,
i am currently testing our product in a war deployment with the latest
wicket 1.4 code
But i am still bumping against
Websphere,
i am currently testing our product in a war deployment with the latest
wicket 1.4 code
But i am still bumping against this with Websphere 8.0.2
was it really fixed? Do i need a setting somehow?
It is really weird for example
if this is the url
workspaces directly.
Personally, I use this last approach, but that's mainly because I do not
yet
feel comfortable enough to play with git internals :)
Emond
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 16:25:32 Johan Compagner wrote:
Currently i just have 3 workspaces for wicket (1.4,1,5 and trunk/master
what is the best way to set that ? or turn that off?
i tried this
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1510798/trying-to-fix-line-endings-with-git-filter-branch-but-having-no-luck/1511273#1511273
but still many many outgoing changes.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 14:09, Emond Papegaaij
if this is done using 'git checkout .' or 'git
reset
--hard HEAD' after changing autocrlf. Cloning again also fixes it :)
Emond
On Friday 06 January 2012 14:26:38 Johan Compagner wrote:
what is the best way to set that ? or turn that off?
i tried this
http://stackoverflow.com/questions
/master repo.
then everything is merged and i have in my 1.6/trunk repo all the changes
over the 3 branches and i push that to the remove wicket at onces
johan
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 14:28, Renaud Bruyeron bruye...@fullsix.com wrote:
2012/1/4 Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com:
What
.
I too am new to git so I'd like to know if there are disadvantages to the
second approach.
Bertrand
On 06/01/2012 9:11 AM, Johan Compagner wrote:
Ok, its getting clearer and clearer,
The thing is what i want is that i can make make a change for 1.4, 1.5 and
master/trunk
And do
my commit
got to wicket 6:
git fetch wicket-1.5 (fetches the commit i just did on wicket-1.5)
git cherry-pick wicket-1.5/wicket-1.5.x
Emond
On Friday 06 January 2012 15:55:15 Johan Compagner wrote:
the thing is i like the first approach if that one works,
why? Because then i am forced
i have a friend of mine that is also a long time eclipse users and he has
now a few months a job where they have to use Intellij
his qoute from a few days (after using it now for quite a while) ago: btw,
intellij sucksnah, eclipse is way ahead
so i guess thats a matter of taste..
The
Currently i just have 3 workspaces for wicket (1.4,1,5 and trunk/master)
But git works with a/one working directory...
thats always one of those..
So is the only solution to have the remote git repo dumped three times on
my disk?
I don't find that very logical..
And no i don't want to
harder and way more steps (at least
it looks that way to me now) then what i would do with svn.. (using the
merge client shipped with subclipse)
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 16:40, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 16:25:32 Johan Compagner wrote:
Currently i just have 3 workspaces for wicket (1.4,1,5 and trunk/master)
But git works with a/one working directory...
thats always one of those..
So is the only solution to have the remote git repo dumped three times on
my disk
Start coding! :-)
On Dec 30, 2011 4:26 PM, Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@topicus.nl
wrote:
Thank you all for the confidence you have in my work! I'm really proud to
be a
member of the Wicket team and am looking forward to get some real work
done.
I've already pushed some patches for a few
hmm i use EGit but some how i always get not authorized if i try to push
something
I am quite sure the username/password is correct, but will recheck it, i
use this url:
https://jcompag...@git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket.git
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 19:26, Jeremy Thomerson
fine by me
i do monitor it now and then, problem if it doesn't run is mostly some
full disk problem that i then clean up
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 06:08, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:53 PM, Michael O'Cleirigh
michael.ocleir...@rivulet.ca wrote:
+1 code wise it runs fine for us. (was already on a snapshot with the
latest stuff)
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 18:10, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
This vote is to release wicket 1.4.19
Branch
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.19
Artifacts
For us personally i don't care, 1 could be done, we are not on 1.5
yet and if we do the package rename is easy to fix.
But i agree with the rest that this is to big to do in such a late
stage, and maybe also after that stage.
Because for osgi the simppe fix is to make one big jar right? Thats
why is that suddenly disabled i ask my self, that always did work..
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 09:18, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
1.4-SNAPSHOT is still there but I cannot make Tomcat see it.
How can I configure Tomcat to list the contents of a folder in
webapps/maven if maven/
enabled dir listing
http://www.wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 09:21, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote:
why is that suddenly disabled i ask my self, that always did work..
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 09:18, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
1.4
For Wicket 1.6 we can move to JDK6 but this will be discussed later.
Usage of JDK7 for frameworks is not very close.
this is an understatement :)
wicket and java 7... my guess? more then 4 years...
But who knows if Oracle speeds it up (they say Java 8 next year..)
also the upgrades are a
the nice thing is that the diamond notation for generics is working
out of the box when you can target 1.7 your self in your app.
Thats can be quite a bit lot less typing of characters in wicket apps.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 14:57, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
I'm saying only that
+1 release
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:10, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
On behalf of Igor Vaynberg:
This vote is to release wicket 1.4.17. This is a bugfix release on the
1.4.x (stable) branch.
Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.17/
Artifacts:
Expected behavior:
- request1: starts processing, locks pagemap
- request2: comes in: tries to acquire lock
- request2: waits for max N seconds (N being a small number, 1 or 2
seconds) - request2: sets kill switch for request1
- request1: first time in wicket managed code: throws
+1
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 05:33, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
This vote is to release wicket 1.4.16. This is a bugfix release on the
1.4.x (stable) branch.
Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.16/
Artifacts:
why not just introduce that interface and the impl in component?
So why also alter abstract behavior? Because that would mean that
suddenly almost all the behaviors that are used are suddenly also
IComponentConfigurationBehavior
And 99.9% of them don't do anything.
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 04:17,
fine by me
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:58, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
It appears that we can reduce the amount of spam JIRA sends to our
commits list by telling it not to send notifications when the fix-in
version is modified. I'd like that feature to be enabled...
+1
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 20:55, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 to make it consistent, dont care which way its spelled.
-igor
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners...@gmail.com wrote:
what shall we do with
This commits breaks all header contributions when the
ajaxrequesttarget has more then 1 component that it must render and
the component after the first one also wants to render something in
the head..
i committed a fix:
commit -m fix form previous commit: 1031432...
ok this test was then correct that it failed..
Ajax does have to push it to the client because it doesnt know if it
is there yet or not
that you only know because of the id script id=xxx that can be set i
believe then at the client side it is checked if that id is there
already
For example if
a 1.4.15?
Regards,
Ernesto
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com
wrote:
that really sounds ...
+1
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 03:22, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
the ibehavior interface has become somewhat cluttered and a lot of
methods in it can have a nice default implementation that works for
99% of the usecases. there is no longer a point to having it as an
interface.
...@gmail.com wrote:
i added boolean canCallListenerInterface(Component component) to ibehavior
-igor
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com
wrote:
which method name?
I currently only have a tagging interface that tags this behavior...
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010
, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote:
yes that i did see in 1.5
but in 1.4 i guess the only thing we can do is just introduce that
IIgnoreDisabledComponentBehavior interface (that doesnt have any
method)
(or something the same with a different name, any recomendations?)
johan
On Wed
();
}
It would solve the problem at the ticket. IMO the proposed interface is
prolix because the behavior enabled/disabled state is enough information to
decide to silent return or not an ajax call to it.
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.comwrote:
yes that i did
of the mixin matters much because 1.5 is out
soonish. IListenerInterfaceTarget { canCallListenerInterface()} is not
so bad.
-igor
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote:
yes that i did see in 1.5
but in 1.4 i guess the only thing we can do is just introduce
hi,
i suddenly bump big time into this issue that is fixed.
( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3098 )
I get that disabled behaviors can't be used to do respond, because
that behavior shouldnt be rendered in the first place.
But the fix also goes one step deeper... It also blocks if
();
+ }
+ return;
+ }
+
+
// Invoke the interface method
behaviorListener.onRequest();
}
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 09:42, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
i suddenly bump big time
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.comwrote:
i am currently using this patch for our wicket code so that we can move
on..
First check is that if it is an ajax request for that behavior then
just throw an abort exception..
Dont just return null because
should be ok now.
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:30, Sebastian nospam...@gmx.net wrote:
hi,
can someone please free some diskspace on the wicketstuff hudson server
please.
I receive Error deploying artifact: Error creating temporary file for
deployment: No space left on device when trying to
this is known issue from day 1 :)
it is a test that fails 2 times a year.. dont think anybody bothers about it :)
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 14:02, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
Locally org.apache.wicket.util.time.TimeOfDayTest.test() fails today due to
Daylight Time Savings
+1
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 05:45, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
This vote is to release wicket 1.4.12. This release fixes a critical
problem with 1.4.11 namely WICKET-3040.
Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.12/
Artifacts:
+1 release
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 05:12, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
This vote is to release wicket 1.4.11
Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.11/
Artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~ivaynberg/wicket-1.4.11/dist
Maven repo:
when do you test this?
((WebRequestCycle)RequestCycle.get()).getWebRequest().getHttpServletRequest().getMethod(),
and why do you care if it is a get or post?
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 22:15, ganesh.k...@gmail.com
ganesh.k...@gmail.com wrote:
TITLE New Document /TITLE
META NAME=Generator
cleaned it
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 03:04, Michael O'Cleirigh
michael.ocleir...@rivulet.ca wrote:
Hello,
Hudson on wicketstuff.org is failing to build anything because of a lack of
temporary space. I created a job to run nightly and attempt to clean up
some space. Normally I have seen the
i see that teamcity is gone now, and we use hudson, but that doesnt
build wicket-examples
So the easy copy file that i have doesnt work anymore..
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 15:09, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I would like to ask wicketstuff.org maintainers to update the
at the moment 1.5.0_13-p7 does run there.
And i dont know how to update that under freebsd.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 14:53, Michael O'Cleirigh
michael.ocleir...@rivulet.ca wrote:
Hello,
With the version of java 5 currently installed on wicketstuff.org hudson
gives build errors with one of the
i think i can get _16 on it if i get it right.. But not sure if that
would fix your compile problem
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 15:55, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote:
at the moment 1.5.0_13-p7 does run there.
And i dont know how to update that under freebsd.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010
, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.comwrote:
i see that teamcity is gone now, and we use hudson, but that doesnt
build wicket-examples
So the easy copy file that i have doesnt work anymore..
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 15:09, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
I would like
thats something else but i also fixed that one quickly
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 16:57, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
Is this related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2977 or this
is something different ?
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:23 PM, jcompag...@apache.org
rename http://wicketstuff.org/wicket/ to
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket15/ http://wicketstuff.org/wicket/ ?
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.comwrote:
ok if that is stable then thats fine
i updated the copywicket14.sh file:
wget -Owicket14.war
'
http
done, trunk - wicket
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 17:14, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote:
there is no such file with the extention .warplease ;)
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 17:12, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
And the same for
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Apache
i think this change was triggered by the commit for:
WICKET-1124: enhancement of nested form handling
its like that in the patch we got, i guess the patch is just applied this way.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:38, Florian Wunderlich fwunderl...@factor3.de wrote:
It can be assumed that an
a very old java 5 version??
Java version: 1.5.0_06
thats old..
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 18:56, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
I still don't understand why only Igor had these problems.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com
wrote:
+1
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 20:23, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
This vote is to release wicket 1.4.10
Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.10/
Artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~ivaynberg/wicket-1.4.10/dist
Maven repo:
in.
Pushing them to only 1.5 ensures we get enough folks trying 1.5 though
:)
Martijn
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com
wrote:
we (servoy) dont care much about those changes, they can be left in
(we dont use it and they also dont give us a problem
we (servoy) dont care much about those changes, they can be left in
(we dont use it and they also dont give us a problem (after my fix ;)
)
the only problem is by the way onInitialize and onConfigure()
Because initialize and also doInitialize() are package scope so they
are not a problem as far
wrote:
Hi Johan, actually it is 2 overridable protected methods that can execute an
rule already implemented by some custom component.
I attached an test to via Jira site showing the possible problem.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2960
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 5:38 AM, Johan
invalidate the test. But the described problem remains. I
attached in the Jira another test case, in another package...
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.comwrote:
yes if you use the package org.apache.wicket!!!
But that is something i definitely dont see as a problem
Why do we want already tomcat 7, which is still in a first? beta?
Why not the latest stable 6? Is it really faster and better?
(I havent really looked into 7 yet will do asap)
- Original message -
OK seems to be a tomcat 7 incompatibility of hudson...
Martijn
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010
hudson is just a war right?
so that can be dumped by anybody of the wicket devs to onto the tomcat
webapp dir.
What more does hudson need?
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:14, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
My little bird told me that no build server is part of the new deal
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
Security needs to be enabled and other stuff. Deploying as a war does
have some drawbacks: restarting using the UI won't work,
installing/updating plugins/new versions of hudson is enabled by
default.
Martijn
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Johan Compagner
/HUDSON/Installing+Hudson#InstallingHudson-Unix%2FLinuxInstallation
You *can* just do:
java -jar hudson.war
and it'll run. That's just a quick way to get it up and running to
play around with it.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote:
how do you deploy
+1 revert it, i dont see a big pro in having it anyway
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 09:22, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.comwrote:
As you may have noticed over the past couple of days (ha), there has been
quite a bit of discussion over what seemed at the time like a very trivial
change
+1
(i dont care about the InheritableThreadLocal, if there are really problems
with it we could back it out in the next release)
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 09:35, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.comwrote:
This vote is to release wicket 1.4.9
Branch:
which leaks?
give use a real wicket example where it leaks, which isnt the thread itself
thats the leak.
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:49, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
adrian...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20/05/2010 19:14, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
But it also don't break anything with the ITL, and it
i still dont see your solution about the wicket thread class.
What should that one do??? give an example.
The best solution is to use a threadpool like a described above.
And yes that InheritableThreadLocal isnt needed then.
But using
final Application app = Application.get()
// start thread
Exactly...
the InheritableThreadLocal is never a problem, its the thread itself not
what it possess
in the other thread this example is given:
final Application application = Application.get();
new Thread(new Runnable()
{
run() {application.xxx}
}).start();
if that thread doesnt die on a
- Original message -
On 19/05/2010 13:06, Alex Objelean wrote:
This currently make web-classloader leaks. If you start using
InheritableThreadLocal's with arbitrary objects, you're going to make
even more leaks.
Also note, there is something not good here. AFAIK, Wicket sets the
If you where using threads in your application
Then i would do it this way:
Your WebApplication class has a method:
getExecutor() that returns a ThreadPoolExecutor
That threadpoolexecutor (that you extend) overrides 2 methods
protected void beforeExecute(Thread t, Runnable r) { }
that sets the
I checked today 2 little things in that i would like to have in the next
build
one of this is a small regression from: WICKET-1825
The other is a small fix for the patch that i did yesterday for modal
window.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 19:12, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
this vote
problem is that we need to roll those var logs better.
With those latest maven fixes for this unique version number problems did
fix most of the hd problems
only var is now an issue because of those logs that are just appending and
appending.
that will not solve even if we just host the examples
i cleaned out /var
will talk to seb to just kill those stupid mod_jk logs and httpd-access
i just deleted some log files and now on 22% is used...
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 16:45, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.comwrote:
The volume says it's out of diskspace. The following usages are
no integration needed?
How do you compare (with the repository version or another version, branch)?
how do you check what is all incoming? (synchronize with working sets)
History view: getting a revision, comparing 2 revisions, getting the
contents?
Annotations?
I use above points daily. I cant
How is the latest eclipse plugin support?
But why not just use then svn-git 'bridge' that git has build in?
- Original message -
What's the latest on Git migration? If not for Wicket proper, for
Wicket-Stuff?
Windows support as come a long way...
Whoohooo
finally i get rid of all the spam messages!
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:40, Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com wrote:
All tests in Wicket Trunk pass (except that one ignored, whatever that is).
Kudos to Igor!
-Matej
+1
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 01:13, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
this vote is to release wicket 1.4.7
this maintenance release brings over 30 bug fixes and improvements.
branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.7/
artifacts:
if a user refreshes the browser or does some other action (go first to
another form in another page and back again)
then we still can render the latest user output just fine the next time
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 21:42, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote:
IMO the form processing can be:
+1
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 08:42, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
this vote is to release wicket 1.4.6
this maintenance release brings over 40 bug fixes and improvements.
branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.6/
artifacts:
that would be weird.
if wicket 1.3 to wicket 1.4 would be just a .1 increase because of java 4 to
5
but because of java 6 we suddenly have to call it wicket 2.0?
purely looking at the java version used wicket 1.3 to 1.4 is a way bigger
leap then wicket 1.4 to 1.5
(looking at the changes wicket
1 - 100 of 417 matches
Mail list logo
