Minor issues with requiring Servlet 3:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54065
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Emond Papegaaij
emond.papega...@topicus.nl wrote:
I've started a vote some time
I've started a vote some time ago about this (somewhere in april), and it was
decided not to move to servlet 3 for wicket 6. Wicket itself does not (yet)
require it, and users are free to use a servlet 3 container. Even if some part
of wicket requires servlet 3, you can have that part depend on
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Emond Papegaaij
emond.papega...@topicus.nl wrote:
I've started a vote some time ago about this (somewhere in april), and it was
decided not to move to servlet 3 for wicket 6. Wicket itself does not (yet)
require it, and users are free to use a servlet 3
All,
As I was preparing to build a final, I noticed that we don't yet have
moved to servlet 3 in master. I thought that for the web socket stuff
we needed to at least move to 3.0. I do see a commit in the history
that adds servlet 3 done by Emond. I also see a commit reverting Jetty
from jetty 8
Hi,
Requiring Servlet 3.x as minimum version has never been in the scope
of Wicket 6. It is neither in the roadmap page nor there was any mail
discussion about this.
I think this is some confusion in/between you and Emond. He also
mentioned this few months ago in IRC.
I see no reason to require
http://s.apache.org/wicket-servlet3-discuss
It has been proposed a couple of times for the roadmap for 6. There is
no confusion between Emond and myself (at least for servlet 3, I won't
comment on any confusion on other topics :-)). We both think that
servlet 3 is out long enough and supported
If the code doesn't require it, why add it artificially?
Is there any planned feature that may potentially require it?
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
http://s.apache.org/wicket-servlet3-discuss
It has been proposed a couple of times for
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
http://s.apache.org/wicket-servlet3-discuss
I remember just the talk in IRC :-/
It has been proposed a couple of times for the roadmap for 6. There is
no confusion between Emond and myself (at least for
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
I still see no reason to require Servlet 3.0.
Wicket runs fine on servlet 3.0 containers and you can use some of the
features from 3.0, but I don't believe that you will add some code to
Wicket that will make big
