On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Johann Nallathamby wrote:
> IMO Help link are good for a public facing application. E.g. API Store,
> Google Apps, etc. I don't think for a administrator application help link
> is necessary. Administrator applications are generally accompanied
Hi Samuel,
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Samuel Gnaniah wrote:
>
>> If the user needs to refer to the documentation to fill a form in the UI,
>> that means the UI is not intuitive enough for the user. Better UX is a
>> better and more sustainable solution, even if it
IMO Help link are good for a public facing application. E.g. API Store,
Google Apps, etc. I don't think for a administrator application help link
is necessary. Administrator applications are generally accompanied with a
manual.
Just my opinion.
Regards,
Johann.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:43 PM,
Hi Samuel,
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Samuel Gnaniah wrote:
> If the user needs to refer to the documentation to fill a form in the UI,
> that means the UI is not intuitive enough for the user. Better UX is a
> better and more sustainable solution, even if it means a
If the user needs to refer to the documentation to fill a form in the UI,
that means the UI is not intuitive enough for the user. Better UX is a
better and more sustainable solution, even if it means a wider set of
changes in the short term.
--
*Samuel Gnaniah*
Lead Technical Writer
WSO2
IMO we should link the specific documentation pages related to the page
topics without completely removing help link, then if the user needs help
s/he need not search for the related content. Even though It is not
accessible without internet for most of the cases it will be helpful.
Thanks,
+1 to remove this.
This is something comes from kernel right? So this is something has to
agree with all products.
Are we ok to remove this in a kernel patch release?
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Shiraz Azad wrote:
> Agree with Thilina. At the same time, we should make
Hi all,
For the 5.4.0 we have to go with the assumption that the current
Implementation of the UI, self-explain enough.
With that assumption, we can go ahead and can remove the help links. WDYT?
Making UI self-explain better can be achieved in the 5.5.0 release since
there is a plan to re-write
+1 to remove the links as Johann has suggested.
Regards,
Thilina.
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Johann Nallathamby
wrote:
> +1 to remove these links. I think better UX is the solution than asking
> users to read more docs.
>
> Regards,
> Johann.
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at
+1 to remove these links. I think better UX is the solution than asking
users to read more docs.
Regards,
Johann.
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Samuel Gnaniah wrote:
> Our strategy here is to remove these help links and walk through the UI
> with the dev team to make the
Our strategy here is to remove these help links and walk through the UI
with the dev team to make the UIs and forms easier to configure without
requiring additional documentation. This is the stragety we are following
for all products.
Thanks,
--
*Samuel Gnaniah*
Lead Technical Writer
WSO2
+documentation, +shiraz, +samuel
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Sherene Mahanama wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> We can use [1] as the base URL as it will always point to the latest docs
> of IS. If we export an html page though, when we update the doc page with
> improvements the
Hi Team,
We can use [1] as the base URL as it will always point to the latest docs
of IS. If we export an html page though, when we update the doc page with
improvements the changes won't get reflected in the help page right unless
we export again every time we make a change?
[1]
One other option would be to export an html from the doc page and include
it in the product.
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Johann Nallathamby
wrote:
> Only problem I see is if Internet access is not available from the
> client's machine which can access the carbon console,
Only problem I see is if Internet access is not available from the client's
machine which can access the carbon console, which could be the case
sometimes.
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Thilina Madumal
wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> Currently, in IS Management Console, the
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Thilina Madumal
wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> Currently, in IS Management Console, the context sensitive help pages are
> outdated. See [1].
> Even though the content is up to date, the content is not informative
> enough IMO.
>
> If we are to
Hi Devs,
Currently, in IS Management Console, the context sensitive help pages are
outdated. See [1].
Even though the content is up to date, the content is not informative
enough IMO.
If we are to update the help-pages, we need to make them up to date and
informative enough.
The concern is if we
17 matches
Mail list logo