[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13193471#comment-13193471
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1366:
--
once the @Test annotation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13193558#comment-13193558
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1366:
--
i don't think we should commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benjamin Reed updated ZOOKEEPER-1355:
-
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Add zk.updateServerList(newServerList
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13193561#comment-13193561
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1355:
--
+1 i think this is ready
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13192863#comment-13192863
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1367:
--
so when you say that you only add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13189488#comment-13189488
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1366:
--
+1 nice patch. i vaguely remember
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13189491#comment-13189491
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-973:
-
+1 looks good
bind
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13189538#comment-13189538
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1366:
--
good catch zhihong! i wish hudson
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13189553#comment-13189553
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1355:
--
can you freshen the patch alex
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13184245#comment-13184245
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1355:
--
this looks really good! i have
we've done roadmaps in the past, and they don't seem to work out. in
the end it all really depends on the contributions that we get. making
releases feature based tends to encourage the just-in-time
implementation of the required features at the last minute, which
leads to a delayed and unstable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13178851#comment-13178851
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1177:
--
perhaps we should make
this is a good observation. one problem with this reasoning is that
the timeout should really be based on expected latencies which is
independent of the number of servers. one problem you may run into
with this logic is if you have a bunch of servers, like 9, your
timeouts may get too small and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179139#comment-13179139
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-575:
-
this looks good we should commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179151#comment-13179151
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-442:
-
daniel, i'm ready to look
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179156#comment-13179156
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1343:
--
+1 looks great. the tabs seem
+1 looks good.
thanx
ben
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Mahadev Konar maha...@hortonworks.com wrote:
+1 ran unit tests and some basic tests on the release.
thanks
mahadev
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
+1, lgtm. verified sig/xsum, rat, also ran
i agree. that is a bug. good catch fish! btw, we need to fix the tabs
in that function too!
ben
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Alex and I discussed it a bit offline and it seems to be bug for us. I have
created a jira (ZOOKEEPER-1343) and I'll try
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13175434#comment-13175434
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1343:
--
please also fix the tabs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13175497#comment-13175497
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1292:
--
+1 looks good
are all of these requests being issued from the same zookeeper handle?
ben
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The following originated from discussion on a feature in HBase which relies
on zookeeper for coordination.
A task is removed from the tasks map.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13173298#comment-13173298
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1334:
--
thanx for reporting this. what
On 19 Dec 2011, at 23:22, Benjamin Reed wrote:
we need a hedwig api and cli that allows you to get information such
as which hubs are up, which hubs own which topic (and perhaps change
the assignment), remove topics, remove subscriptions, etc.
ben
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Flavio
i've seen it before when the configuration files haven't been setup
properly. i would check the configuration. if the leader is still the
leader, it must have active followers connected to it, otherwise it
would give up leadership. i would use netstat to find out who they
are.
ben
On Tue, Dec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13173456#comment-13173456
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1333:
--
there are times that you don't
at 10:13 AM, Benjamin Reed br...@apache.org wrote:
i've seen it before when the configuration files haven't been setup
properly. i would check the configuration. if the leader is still the
leader, it must have active followers connected to it, otherwise it
would give up leadership. i would use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13173476#comment-13173476
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1333:
--
i looked more closely
there is a jira for an improvement that would add to the protocol
checks to make sure that the server configurations are compatible and
make sure that client configurations are compatible. i can't seem to
find them though...
ben
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Marshall McMullen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13173859#comment-13173859
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1333:
--
+1 this looks good. i can't think
i can answer the last question about sequence ids. the ids are
independent between regions. region A may publish a, b, c and region B
may publish x, y, z. region A's sequence may be (1,a), (2,b), (3,c),
(4, x), (5,y), (6,z). while region B's sequence may be (1,x), (2,a),
(3, b), (4,c), (5, y),
there are still remnants of hadoop urls
---
Key: ZOOKEEPER-1327
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1327
Project: ZooKeeper
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Benjamin Reed
+1 tests pass and everything looks good. i did notice one problem:
ZOOKEEPER-1327 there are still remnants of hadoop urls in some of our
files. that might explain why users keep finding the old wiki pages!
it's not a blocker, so i don't think it should hold up the release.
ben
On Mon, Dec 12,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13166609#comment-13166609
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1269:
--
+1 excellent work camille
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13164622#comment-13164622
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1292:
--
can you a comment to the LEThread
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13164624#comment-13164624
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1316:
--
+1 good catch and fix. i agreed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benjamin Reed updated ZOOKEEPER-1319:
-
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1319_trunk2.patch
this should fix everything. i'd like to add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13164996#comment-13164996
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1319:
--
never mind, i figured out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13164997#comment-13164997
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1319:
--
never mind, i figured out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-31?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benjamin Reed updated BOOKKEEPER-31:
Attachment: bookeper_wht.png
bookeper_blk.png
here are hi-res pngs one
be to go
incubator
first. At some point we would deprecate the existing ZK recipes
(ala
Curator had suitable replacements).
Patrick
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Benjamin Reed br...@apache.org
wrote:
while i agree with the sentiment of not fragmenting the zookeeper
community
recipes
and the recipes really do need separate release cycles. Independent
releases should be not much of an issue given how compatible ZK versions
tend to be.
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Benjamin Reed br...@apache.org wrote:
i also agreed that it would be great to build a community
+1 this looks great ivan! excellent work.
i do have one question for pat. in the binary tar files do we have to
put in something special for the licenses of the included binaries?
ben
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Ivan Kelly iv...@apache.org wrote:
This is the second candidate release for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13161098#comment-13161098
]
Benjamin Reed commented on BOOKKEEPER-131:
--
+1 looks good
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13161239#comment-13161239
]
Benjamin Reed commented on BOOKKEEPER-134:
--
+1
Delete
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13160642#comment-13160642
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1312:
--
why do you need multi op? you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13159575#comment-13159575
]
Benjamin Reed commented on BOOKKEEPER-127:
--
+1 looks good
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13159577#comment-13159577
]
Benjamin Reed commented on BOOKKEEPER-128:
--
+1
pom
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13159590#comment-13159590
]
Benjamin Reed commented on BOOKKEEPER-122:
--
it looks good
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13159617#comment-13159617
]
Benjamin Reed commented on BOOKKEEPER-111:
--
looks pretty good. there is a two
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13159634#comment-13159634
]
Benjamin Reed commented on BOOKKEEPER-111:
--
+1 looks good thanx ivan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-62?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13159805#comment-13159805
]
Benjamin Reed commented on BOOKKEEPER-62:
-
i don't think we want
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-31?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155462#comment-13155462
]
Benjamin Reed commented on BOOKKEEPER-31:
-
yes, george just gave this to me
+1 looks great. thanx for doing the release pat!
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.4. 22 JIRAs are
addressed in this release.
***
+1. looks good. one issue i found, which is i'm not sure if it is an
issue or not due to my ignorance of maven, is that i had to specify
the packaging when installing the jar file into my local repository:
mvn install:install-file
-Dfile=/tmp/zookeeper-3.4.0/dist-maven/zookeeper-3.4.0-test.jar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13143232#comment-13143232
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1264:
--
yeah, the observers (as far as my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13143233#comment-13143233
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1264:
--
henry could you check
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13143692#comment-13143692
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1282:
--
there is a test and a fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benjamin Reed updated ZOOKEEPER-1264:
-
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1264unittest.patch
i've created a unit test to reproduce
the tests aren't green dude! that is exactly what i proposed waiting for.
ben
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:57 AM, Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro wrote:
Martin Fowler wrote a comment yesterday on our recent discussion about
refactoring:
http://martinfowler.com/bliki/OpportunisticRefactoring.html
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13142182#comment-13142182
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1264:
--
just a quick update. i'm able
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benjamin Reed updated ZOOKEEPER-1264:
-
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1264unittest.patch
here is the unit test. doing a snapshot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benjamin Reed updated ZOOKEEPER-1264:
-
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1264.patch
i think i got it. camille can you try it with your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13142328#comment-13142328
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1264:
--
i agree, we should have the extra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13142638#comment-13142638
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1282:
--
i can easily put a test and fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benjamin Reed updated ZOOKEEPER-1264:
-
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1264.patch
this patch merges camille's test in as well
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141244#comment-13141244
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1264:
--
the reason we take a snapshot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141263#comment-13141263
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1264:
--
ah cool. ok i'll check it out now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141275#comment-13141275
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1264:
--
i applied your patch to trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141355#comment-13141355
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1264:
--
got it. i think i see how to make
i second the need for such a mocked ZooKeeper client! there are a
couple of failure cases to test in an application that uses ZooKeeper,
but we don't provide a good library to generate them.
ben
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
The testing pain that I
i know we have discussed this in the past, but we never really came to
a consensus or policy, so i'd like to reopen the discussion on cleanup
and subjective patches.
currently there are 7 jiras for cleanup issues, 6 of them marked as
major. the problem with cleanup or subjective patches is that
started in the
drafts
folder until I've calmed down again.
Benjamin Reed:
deprioritizing them doesn't help because the patches themselves bit
rot. shortly they will not apply and then they will be worthless. the
poor contributor would then be left with the task of maintaining
.
Benjamin Reed:
deprioritizing them doesn't help because the patches themselves bit
rot. shortly they will not apply and then they will be worthless. the
poor contributor would then be left with the task of maintaining a
patch that would never commit.
You should really give GIT a try. I've
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13139305#comment-13139305
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1269:
--
we convert multi to idempotent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-89?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13137211#comment-13137211
]
Benjamin Reed commented on BOOKKEEPER-89:
-
+1 yes, i think you are right ivan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-89?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13136010#comment-13136010
]
Benjamin Reed commented on BOOKKEEPER-89:
-
looks great. i like how you moved
to be
addressing. so, it's sucking up some valuable committer time.
having said that, if a committer does think it is a good idea and
wants to shepherd the patch, i certainly wouldn't stand in the way.
ben
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro wrote:
Benjamin Reed:
i
(and better because it
would provide completeness checking).
Ben, do you have something specific in mind here? Were you referring to the
boxing/unboxing cost? Or the clarity of the code in question? Or something
I didn't think of?
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Benjamin Reed br
i think you found the bug because you reviewed that code to convert to
enum. is there something inherit to using enums that helped? i don't
think it is wise to use enum when many (most perhaps) of the accesses
need to be integers.
ben
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13133147#comment-13133147
]
Benjamin Reed commented on BOOKKEEPER-88:
-
it's a sql error. i think the derby
i also agee. we should also call it a 4.0 release.
ben
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Ivan Kelly iv...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
I agree with Utkarsh. Initial release is as good of an excuse we'll ever have
for breaking stuff. The changes themselves shouldn't be too big though. Ill
have a go
derby doesn't like - in the topic names
---
Key: BOOKKEEPER-88
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-88
Project: Bookkeeper
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Benjamin Reed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benjamin Reed updated BOOKKEEPER-88:
Attachment: BOOKKEEPER-88.patch
derby doesn't like - in the topic names
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13129915#comment-13129915
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1231:
--
i don't think this is a good idea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-84?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13129856#comment-13129856
]
Benjamin Reed commented on BOOKKEEPER-84:
-
(i'll commit)
Add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-86?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13129882#comment-13129882
]
Benjamin Reed commented on BOOKKEEPER-86:
-
+1 looks good
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-39?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13123036#comment-13123036
]
Benjamin Reed commented on BOOKKEEPER-39:
-
great work sijie! i think it may
that's right tom. many of those interfaces were put in by design so
that later we can have other implementations, some of them were not
there originally. i agree thomas that it is a pain that you have to do
two clicks in eclipse to get to the actual implementation.
i believe the beans are used
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13112595#comment-13112595
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1199:
--
-1 i don't think this is a valid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13112605#comment-13112605
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1200:
--
+1 wow nice find thomas! what
i asked mahadev about committing to 3.4.0 and he said to just do
trunk. see 1191. there was only one patch. the patch for 1192 subsumed
1191.
ben
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
When committing a change be sure where you are committing it.
Mahadev
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benjamin Reed updated ZOOKEEPER-1191:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.4.0)
3.5.0
Synchronization issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benjamin Reed updated ZOOKEEPER-1192:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.4.0)
Leader.waitForEpochAck() checks waitingForNewEpoch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13112790#comment-13112790
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1201:
--
why is this classified
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13109887#comment-13109887
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1192:
--
+1 looks great alex. i think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13112149#comment-13112149
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1194:
--
can we break this out from 1192
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13112193#comment-13112193
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-1172:
--
this is great functionality
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benjamin Reed updated ZOOKEEPER-1192:
-
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1192.patch
the patch with the tabs and ^Ms fixed
we need to get our report to pat this weekend. what do you think about this?
BookKeeper status report for September 2011.
Bookkeeper is a distributed, reliable, and high performance logging
service. The project also includes Hedwig which is a highly scalable
Pub/Sub service built on top of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-67?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13104597#comment-13104597
]
Benjamin Reed commented on BOOKKEEPER-67:
-
on my linux machine i have
201 - 300 of 509 matches
Mail list logo
