As an experiment, we declared the coding style of rr to be whatever
clang-format produces with rr's .clang-format file (which was tweaked to
resemble Mozilla style, including an 80-char line limit). Overall I've been
very happy with the results. Sometimes you get suboptimal linebreaking
decisions,
That reminds me: when I reformatted rr, I did manually change the code in a
few places (usually around #ifdefs) so that clang-format's line breaking
didn't go completely crazy.
Rob
--
oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Hubert Figuière h...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 16/06/15 05:13 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
Is there any reason not to support all the way back to the version of
GTK (3.4) on the test machines?
Between 3.10 and 3.14 there are bugs in the drag and drop code in Gtk3
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Xidorn Quan quanxunz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 3:15 AM, Markus Stange msta...@themasta.com
wrote:
Summary: The filter property on CanvasRenderingContext2D allows authors
to specify a filter that will get applied during canvas drawing. It
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
I think we're not quite there yet, but we're very close. There are two
things I want before we ship:
-- Get normative spec text up somewhere.
-- Get a signal from some other browser vendor that they're OK
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Xidorn Quan quanxunz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Ryan VanderMeulen
rvandermeu...@mozilla.com wrote:
SIGNIFICANT CHANGES
* Added support for MSVC2015 and dropped support for MSVC 2013, WinSDK
8.1, and MSVC Express Edition.
Does anyone know of a case where we had a regression that traded one
assertion for another? I don't.
Rob
--
oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo
osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Ryan VanderMeulen rya...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 6/9/2015 8:33 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
Does anyone know of a case where we had a regression that traded one
assertion for another? I don't.
How would we have found out? :)
Detecting the regression some
Usually I use NS_WARNING to mean something weird and unexpected is
happening, e.g. a bug in Web page code, but not necessarily a browser bug.
Sometimes I get useful hints from NS_WARNING spew leading up to a serious
failure, but for those usages could probably be switched to PR_LOG without
losing
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 5:21 AM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com
wrote:
And that is exactly the point I have been trying to make. The potential
for abuse definitely exists today, with Flash. And so far we have no
evidence that this is an issue in practice today. At the very least, by
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Gervase Markham g...@mozilla.org wrote:
On 03/05/15 03:39, Xidorn Quan wrote:
This has been happening in the Internet in China. I would suggest you use
360 Secure Browser, one of the major browsers in China. They completely
consider the experience of
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Leman Bennett (Omega X)
Redacted.For.Spam@request.contact wrote:
Inquiring minds would like to know.
At the moment, e10s tabs is still somewhat slower than non-e10s. Multiple
content processes would go a long way for more responsive navigation and
less
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 4:14 AM, bo...@mozilla.com wrote:
* member initializers
Should we have any rules around these, or should we use them
indiscriminately? I wonder particularly about initializers which are
complicated expressions.
Rob
--
oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Honza Bambas hbam...@mozilla.com wrote:
Just let you know about my intensive work on Backtrack or Caller Chain
which is about connecting Gecko Profiler and Task Tracer together to catch
all (instrumented) inter-object and inter-thread calls + IO blocking, lock
How is this related to PROFILER_LABELs, docshell ProfileTimelineMarkers,
and VisualEventTracer?
Rob
--
oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo
osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Andrew Halberstadt
ahalberst...@mozilla.com wrote:
But contributors aside, it could be de-motivating for employees too. If I
break inbound, I already feel really bad about it.. no need to rub it in my
face :). If there are employees who are blatantly abusing
The argument for suggestion #1 seems irrefutable.
Rob
--
oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo
osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo
owohooo
osoaoyoso otooo oao
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Gavin Sharp ga...@gavinsharp.com wrote:
We don't have telemetry yet. I've done some measurements and haven't
found
any cases where tab switching consistently takes longer in e10s. However,
it's certainly possible that it does on average. Either way, it's
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 8:00 AM, andreas@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure do what degree we can replicate on Windows what we do on FFOS to
launch content processes.
The Cygwin people have looked into fork() in Windows a bit. Some links:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
This is a quick read and an interesting analysis of how various sites fail
to achieve acceptable performance on mobile:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K-mKOqiUiSjgZTEscBLjtjd6E67oiK8H2ztOiq5tigk/pub
One
This is a quick read and an interesting analysis of how various sites fail
to achieve acceptable performance on mobile:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K-mKOqiUiSjgZTEscBLjtjd6E67oiK8H2ztOiq5tigk/pub
Rob
--
oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
owoiotoho oao
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Andreas Gal andreas@gmail.com wrote:
I guess we can add a command line option to our executable that calls the
function and prints the results and exits and then invoke ourselves to do
this in a new process and parse the output. What a silly bug.
Surely
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Bobby Holley bobbyhol...@gmail.com
wrote:
\o/
Can we switch from 4-space to 2-space indentation at some point too?
Together, those would remove the most glaring formatting differences. The
others (bracing single-line consequents, aNamingWarts, etc) might be
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Thinker K.F. Li thin...@codemud.net
wrote:
I was studying why maze solver from Microsoft is so slow with B2G and
Gecko, in last few days. If I am right, I found refresh driver always
invalidate whole region of display port, if there is, or visual overflow
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is this feature worth having a hacks blog post about? (hint: I think so!)
Yes!
Rob
--
oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro
Excellent!
Rob
--
oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo
osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo
owohooo
osoaoyoso otooo oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro,o
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Seth Fowler s...@mozilla.com wrote:
I guess (but don’t know for sure) that recording RR data for every test
that gets run might be too expensive.
It probably wouldn't be too expensive. The runtime overhead is low; the
main cost is trace storage, but we can
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Mason Chang mch...@mozilla.com wrote:
Yeah it is, but I don’t really want to do another PR run when lots of
people have already read about Silk on b2g. Feels spammy to me to do
another one just a month after the previous one, but that’s my 2 cents.
I see,
I've posted a followup of sorts to public-houdini:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-houdini/2015Mar/0020.html
There have been no replies, so I suspect I've said something terribly
incomprehensible and/or wrong :-).
Rob
--
oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Mike Taylor mi...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 3/1/15 17:58, smaug wrote:
Haven't changes from integer to doubles caused issues in some cases.
Boris might recall some examples.
IE just reverted from using doubles on MouseEvent for compat reasons:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Chris Peterson cpeter...@mozilla.com
wrote:
Gecko's offsetX/Y could return doubles, for compatibility with the spec,
that are always snapped to whole numbers, for compatibility with other
browsers.
Or Gecko could add random noise to the low bits of offsetX/Y
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Jeff Muizelaar jmuizel...@mozilla.com
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
Oh, another issue is that I've followed the spec and made offsetX/Y
doubles, whereas Blink is integers, which introduces a small
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
Summary: CSSOM Views specify offsetX/Y properties on MouseEvent. Other
browsers implement them. Many sites use it with a fallback for Firefox, but
I've found at least one site that doesn't have a fallback. It's
Summary: CSSOM Views specify offsetX/Y properties on MouseEvent. Other
browsers implement them. Many sites use it with a fallback for Firefox, but
I've found at least one site that doesn't have a fallback. It's trivial to
implement.
Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69787
Spec:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:50 PM, Christopher Lord cl...@mozilla.com
wrote:
I'd like to see #1 implemented first for two reasons; 1- I know this is
easy to do given our platform, and I expect the same for other browser
vendors, and 2- behaviour here is 100% predictable. There is nothing
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
Should UIWorkers have access to the full Worker API? It seems like
there's
no reason not to give them that.
There's two use-cases that I
Last week in Sydney I spent a lot of time talking to Chrome devs about
different approaches for 60fps effects in Web pages. There are three
different kinds of approaches being discussed (so far):
1) Apple's animation-timeline proposal, which lets CSS animations use
scroll position as an input
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, James Long longs...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally I think what we *really* need to be working on is making
all of the DOM APIs asynchronous. That's what Servo needs anyway.
That's a step in the right direction for #3, and we can see much more
we can
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Handyman david...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm working on bug 1075670 ([e10s] event.screenX and event.screenY is
wrong), which exposes a hole in the e10s architecture. Quickly, the issue
is that the dom behavior in an e10s content process redefines screen
coordinates
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Mike de Boer mdeb...@mozilla.com wrote:
2. Optionally bypass the browser compositor when a WebGL context is in
fullscreen mode. In this mode, WebGL draw calls would write to the OS back
buffer directly, increasing performance. Of course, this would never be
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Jet Villegas jville...@mozilla.com wrote:
The main downside I see is a potential Mozilla removes features used by
disabled people... PR fiasco. I think we can avoid that with a better
proposal that we do support.
Maybe Marco Zehe would be interested in
http://ifacethoughts.net/2007/07/21/pyro-desktop-inside-web/
--
oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo
osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo
owohooo
osoaoyoso otooo
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Seth Fowler s...@mozilla.com wrote:
Well, converting all existing code to use this convention overnight
definitely wouldn’t be worth it. And just adding this to the style guide
will give us very little benefit *right now*. But I think if we add this to
the
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Seth Fowler s...@mozilla.com wrote:
I’d like to change the coding style guide to let us make out-params more
obvious by using an ‘o’ prefix for their name instead of an ‘a’. For
example,
nsresult Modify(int aCount, size_t aSize, char* oResult);
This will
Tuesday 4pm in the Medford Room. This discussion will focus on painting:
how we go from a frame tree to a layer tree ready to be composited. I'll
talk about what we currently do, what Blink does, where Blink is going, and
where I think we should go. I've put my notes here so we can read, think
and
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Chris Peterson cpeter...@mozilla.com
wrote:
On 11/17/14 1:48 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
As for cat and mouse, I'd prefer putting our cat-and-mouse energies
into patching up https PKI instead of introducing a new cat-and-mouse
situation to pay attention to.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Which use-case do you need async for?
The Adjust the scroll position down by 10 pixels atomically with the
next reflow since I just added a 10 pixel element at the top of the
page use case could be supported using
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Note that I can't find *any* functions in the spec which are descried
as asynchronous.
I can only find things like, for example, element.scrollBy(), which is
defined in terms of reading scrollTop/scrollLeft, adding the
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Another use case that's not well supported by the current spec text is
smoothly scoll down by 50 pixels. The way you'd do that is to call
element.scrollBy({ top: 50, behavior: smooth }). However that
function call is
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
That said, it's scary that these APIs are described in terms of
synchronous operations on the scroll position. I.e. it seems to
pretend that off-main-thread scrolling doesn't exist and then hope
that implementations are
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
2) We could perhaps have some concept of taking a snapshot of the
current page or indicated fragment so we can analyze it
asynchronously. Then if a known-bad thing was found, such as a plugin,
native form control, or
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can we keep track of where the stream comes from, and make sure to taint
the images that can come out of them similar to the way that we taint cross
origin images by default to prevent them from being read back on the
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Jet Villegas j...@mozilla.com wrote:
Roc wrote up a proposal last year for a web-facing screen capture API:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/User:Roc/ScreenCaptureAPI
Even if not web-facing, we could use the implementation code to cover
chrome use cases like this
http://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.co.nz/2014/10/strengthening-2-step-verification-with.html
We should support this.
Rob
--
oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo
osouobojoeocoto otooo
Hurrah!
Rob
--
oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo
osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo
owohooo
osoaoyoso otooo oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro,o
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Nicholas Nethercote n.netherc...@gmail.com
wrote:
I was wondering what people think is the worst piece of code in the
entire Mozilla codebase. I'll leave the exact meanings of worst and
piece of code unspecified...
Probably not the worst, but always deserves
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch gijskruitbo...@gmail.com
wrote:
There are also interesting height computation issues that I'm pretty sure
HTML (flexbox) doesn't have, e.g. bug 451997. I'm not sure that's a
function of the box model, considering it's not an issue with flexbox...
It would be cool to use fast TLS via __declspec(thread) on Windows (and
__thread on gcc/clang). Due to WinXP bustage that only works for variables
in the .EXE or in DLLs statically linked by the .EXE, so not libxul, but in
our shipped Windows builds mozglue.dll is statically linked to firefox.exe
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 10:45 AM, David Major dma...@mozilla.com wrote:
in the .EXE or in DLLs statically linked by the .EXE, so not libxul, but
in
our shipped Windows builds mozglue.dll is statically linked to
firefox.exe
so we could put __declspec(thread) variables there.
What does
Will this be restricted to certified or privileged apps?
Rob
--
oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo
osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo
owohooo
osoaoyoso otooo
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Joshua Cranmer pidgeo...@gmail.com
wrote:
From another point of view: Mozilla, for over a decade, provided a
relatively featureful toolkit for building UIs known as XUL. If the
argument is that we should be using HTML instead of XUL, then wouldn't it
make
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Giuseppe Bilotta
giuseppe.bilo...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, sorry, I should have clarified that I meant the DPI for the
scaling. I can prepare a patch for this too. Should I submit it as a
second patch in addition to the first I submitted to the bugzilla, or
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Kan-Ru Chen (陳侃如) kc...@mozilla.com
wrote:
Link to standard:
Currently no formal standard. Ben Francis has created a draft which
largely resembles the current mozbrowser API. Google and Microsoft both
have their webview implementation similar to this
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Joshua Cranmer pidgeo...@gmail.com
wrote:
I nominally agree with this sentiment, but there are a few caveats:
1. nsITreeView and xul:tree exist and are usable in Mozilla code today.
No HTML-based alternative to these are so easily usable.
2. The main
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Giuseppe Bilotta
giuseppe.bilo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Nicolas Silva nical.si...@gmail.com
wrote:
In the mean time we should really detect hidpi screens and default to an
appropriate scale.
The current scale is a terrible
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Giuseppe Bilotta
giuseppe.bilo...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed. My patch only aims at providing a generic fallback. In
contexts where it is known how the desktop environment handles the DPI
settings, that convention should be followed. But in most cases, this
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:31 PM, giuseppe.bilo...@gmail.com wrote:
I recently got a HiDPI monitor (15 at 3200x1800, 234 dpi) and I noticed
that Firefox (32) doesn't automatically scale UI/content to take advantage
of the hidpi, with the result that stuff renders uncomfortably small by
Sounds reasonable.
Rob
--
oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo
osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo
owohooo
osoaoyoso otooo oao oboroootohoeoro oooro
Is the argument still valid that active attacks are detectable while
passive attacks are not, making the costs/risks to an active attacker
significantly higher?
Rob
--
oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fi wrote:
Does this have the same privacy protections as current gUM?
Yes. You can only use this on a stream you've already acquired (e.g. via
current gUM, but other APIs also produce streams). You can already shunt a
MediaStream
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fi wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fi
wrote:
Is current gUM restricted to authenticated origins
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
What's the use case here? Note that in order to build even a
half-decent camera app just for taking selfies you need some amount of
control over of focus. For more advanced camera apps you also want
control over backlight
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Ooh, that is great! Though surprisingly the API doesn't seem to have
any support for focus or flash control? Was that intentionally left
out?
I think it's just a case of not wanting the spec to get too far ahead of
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Looking at the API though, why is it based on Events rather than
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 5:59 AM, Jared Hirsch 6...@mozilla.com wrote:
FWIW, Safari on iOS doesn't allow autoplay or preload, and also only
initiates play/load on a user-triggered event (so, pages can't use JS to
fake a click).
The reason given in the docs[1] is that users might be charged
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Yonggang Luo luoyongg...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, I means a backgound-image: URL(transparent.png)
Will this image take effect
It should do, but transparent window backgrounds are not very well tested.
Rob
--
oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Yonggang Luo luoyongg...@gmail.com
wrote:
在 2014年8月17日星期日UTC+8下午2时44分34秒，Yonggang Luo写道：
I am trying to calling the JS API comes from C++,
and need to transform the nsRect, so how to do the transformation.
I found it's x/60, y/60,
don't know where does
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 4:35 AM, Aryeh Gregor a...@aryeh.name wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 6:46 PM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
In these cases we document that it's likely safe for callers to do
this by having those getters return raw pointers. Getters that
require
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Jeff Walden jwalden+...@mit.edu wrote:
One last note. UniquePtr is patterned on std::unique_ptr, the C++11
standard version of this idiom. The current mozilla::Scoped class is
another recent attempt to address largely the same needs. The older
nsAutoPtr and
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Jason Orendorff jorendo...@mozilla.com
wrote:
An alternative involves letting you modify JS code just before it's
compiled (source-to-source transformation). This is more general (you could
modify the instrumented code arbitrarily, and react synchronously as it
See the thread in www-svg starting here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2014Jun/0063.html
For the reasons mentioned in that thread, I'm against adding SVG elements
like iframe that duplicate existing HTML elements, and I'm not the only
one.
Instead I think we should focus on
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Jonathan Kew j...@mozilla.com wrote:
If I'm reading bug 948856 correctly, the difference may have been somewhat
less (150ms? comment 17) when the font was inlined in the CSS using a data
URI, rather than loaded from a separate file
If we can't afford that,
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
A long time ago we talked about just writing a very low-level USB API,
then enabling signed snippets of javascript to create page-exposed
APIs on top of that. This way we wouldn't have to go through the long
and expensive
Looks good.
A classic problem we have had is with boolean parameters, which are hard to
read at call sites. We currently solve that by turning them into enum or
flag parameters, but named parameters would be a lighter-weight
alternative. However, it would be great to be able to ensure at the
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Leman Bennett (Omega X)
Redacted.For.Spam@request.contact wrote:
Is that really necessary? It seems superfluous.
It's necessary in that there's no other way to use this hardware from a Web
app.
The only question is whether it's high-enough priority to work
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Kip Gilbert kgilb...@mozilla.com wrote:
While beginning implementation I noticed that there is smooth
scrolling functionality already implemented within
ScrollFrameHelper::AsyncScroll, using simple splines via
nsSMILKeySpline. This smooth scrolling behavior
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Gijs Kruitbosch gijskruitbo...@gmail.com
wrote:
No, I think that in 99.99% of cases, I don't care about the type, and
therefore I would normally use is() and not care that it's using non-strict
equality. I think the case where there is (a) a possibility that I
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
There are 2 things that I have questions about:
1. isIdentity()
We settled that this should mean that the matrix was never changed to a non
identity state.
This means that the following code:
var m = new DOMMatrix();
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
:) would be short enough I guess. But doesn’t sound serious enough.
translateSelf?
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.rt sS?o Whhei
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
:) would be short enough I guess. But doesn’t sound serious enough.
translateSelf?
Or translateThis of course.
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
What about
DOMMatrix(1,0,0,1,0,0) or
DOMMatrix(1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1)
Do we check the values and determine if the matrix is identity or not? If
we do, then authors could write
So IIUC this means that script can't call any methods on these interfaces,
so the only remaining users could be binary extension components and those
within libxul itself. So if we're willing to ignore the former, and
eliminate the latter, then we can remove these interfaces entirely? Or do
we
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Benoit Jacob jacob.benoi...@gmail.com
wrote:
This list misses some of the points that I care more about:
- Should DOMMatrix really try to be both 3D projective transformations
and 2D affine transformations or should that be split into separate classes?
I
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Benoit Jacob jacob.benoi...@gmail.com
wrote:
This list misses some of the points that I care more about:
- Should DOMMatrix really try to be both 3D projective transformations
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
isIdentity() indeed suffers from rounding errors but since it's useful, I'm
hesitant to remove it.
In our rendering libraries at Adobe, we check if a matrix is *almost*
identity. Maybe we can do the same here?
One option
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 4:24 AM, Martin Thomson m...@mozilla.com wrote:
it conveys that this is a 2d matrix and that you can ignore the 3d
components.
Maybe you misunderstood what I was implying. You are describing an
intended application of the matrix to 2d or 3d graphics. The problem is
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
Android and B2G got fixed to use #pragma GCC visibility. So, we can go
ahead and remove all NS_HIDDEN-related code now.
This also means that when modifying Android and B2G-specific code that
uses symbols imported
Off the top of my head, the places in Gecko I know of that use isIdentity
or is2D fall into two categories:
1) math performance optimizations
2) (is2D only) we're going to take an implementation approach that only
works for 2D affine transforms, and either a) there is no support for 3D
perspective
I'm all for it! :-)
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.rt sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t uTph eann
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Kearwood Gilbert
kearwood.gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
My greatest concern is that as platform conventions change, this behavior
could (or should) be updated to match. Web developers that depend on
particular acceleration / deceleration curves or time to
101 - 200 of 389 matches
Mail list logo
