Re: Rethinking the crash experience

into Firefox: Oh, by the way, I recovered. Cheers, David -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https

Capturing the JS stack in case of crash

, and to attach the output to the Crash Reporter if available. Cheers, David -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https

Re: Rethinking the crash experience

On 08/07/14 16:25, Tobias Besemer wrote: Am Samstag, 5. Juli 2014 14:21:47 UTC+2 schrieb David Rajchenbach-Teller: [...] 3. Crash report is stored to disk, without any dialog; 4. If the crash happened during Firefox shutdown, do nothing, otherwise restart Firefox to its previous state

Re: Unimplement: @-moz-document regexp support?

On Monday 2014-07-07 15:18 -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: That seems pretty bad. I think we should at least stop supporting it for Web content. David, what do you think? I'm ok with restricting it to UA and user style sheets, although if we're going to do that because of security risks I'd like

Improving Session Restore Experience (was Re: Reordering opened windows)

it visible, restore its contents; 5. Asynchronously, once that window is restored and the second window has been opened, make it visible and restore its contents; 6. etc. A bit more complicated, but it should provide almost the same result. Cheers, David On 06/07/14 11:08, Neil wrote: David

Re: Rethinking the crash experience

to keep the behavior as a fallback, in case of startup or near-startup crash. Cheers, David -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform

Rethinking the crash experience

-on encountered a problem [a few seconds ago / on July 4rd, 2014] and recovered. If you wish, Firefox can report it automatically so that we can fix the bug report/not this time/always report/never report. My apologies if this is part of the ongoing CrashManager work. Cheers, David -- David Rajchenbach-Teller

Reordering opened windows

. Cheers, David -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Depending on libnotify

for the kind of applications we have in mind, so that's ok for me. Thanks, David On 02/07/14 18:45, Gregory Szorc wrote: I've written a cross-platform file watching API for Windows/OS X/Linux before. It's no fun. -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla signature.asc

Depending on libnotify

? Thanks, David -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Depending on libnotify

, David On 02/07/14 13:19, Mike Hommey wrote: libnotify != libinotify. You're talking about the former, but you're thinking about the latter. Note that inotify is not really well suited for some kinds of directory monitoring (so, depends what you really need), and is phased out in favor

Re: Depending on libnotify

incantations needed to use glib? Thanks, David [1] https://mail.gnome.org/archives/dashboard-hackers/2004-October/msg00022.html On 02/07/14 15:07, Mike Hommey wrote: I don't know what the windows and osx file monitoring APIs offer. If they have the same kind of drawbacks as inotify for recursive

Re: Intent to implement and ship: Improved ruby parsing in HTML with new tag omission rules

and therefore requiring separate code). See the 7-digit dependencies of https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=256274maxdepth=1hide_resolved=0 -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂

Tree Closure Stats - June 2014

to previous months please see http://futurama.theautomatedtester.co.uk/ David ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Session Restore (sessionstore)

differential updates will remove any influence they may still have at runtime. Consequently, I suggest we concentrate on other parts of Session Restore. Next benchmarks planned: history and forms. Cheers, David On 28/06/14 13:27, Tobias Besemer wrote: I often restart FF because of memory use bloat

Re: Session Restore (sessionstore)

See bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=956713 for details on the proposed Journaled Storage mechanism. This should bring down the number of writes by an order of magnitude. Cheers, David On 28/06/14 14:32, Tobias Besemer wrote: Am Samstag, 28. Juni 2014 14:25:35 UTC+2 schrieb Tim

Re: Session Restore (sessionstore)

, in which case our efforts on Session Restore would have little to no impact on the life-time of your device or on the battery usage. Tobas, if you have an opportunity to perform a comparison, this would be an interesting piece of data. Cheers, David On 28/06/14 14:32, Tobias Besemer wrote

Re: Session Restore (sessionstore)

, David On 28/06/14 18:18, Tobias Besemer wrote: OK, I made a short test with: sqlite3.exe places.sqlite .dump places.dump It creates in my case a file with ~9.5MB. But it is really fast !!! :D Also it is much better readable with an editor then JSON and can be used in any other program

Re: Are you interested in doing dynamic analysis of JS code?

it would look like. There are several possibilities. We need to know how to prioritize this work. We need to know what kind of API we should build. So we're looking for early adopters. If that's you, please speak up and tell us how you'd like to instrument JS code. -- David Rajchenbach-Teller

Intent to unimplement: proprietary window.crypto functions/properties

[dev.platform cc'd for visibility - please follow-up to dev.tech.crypto] Summary: We intend to remove the proprietary window.crypto functions and properties. See https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript_crypto for what will be affected by this change. Our reasoning is as follows: These

Re: Identifiable TBPL Try push tab titles

Thanks for that change. It's really helpful for my day-to-day use of TBPL. Cheers, David signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev

BzAPI Compatibility API has been rolled out to production BMO

Until recently, Bugzilla supported only older Web technologies, namely XMLRPC and JSONRPC. The BMO team created a new REST API in the summer of 2013 to provide a modern Web interface to Bugzilla. Prior to the native REST API[1], a separate proxy service called BzAPI[2] was created that

Proposed W3C Charter: XML Processing Model Working Group

through June 19. Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should say. I intend to explicitly abstain from the charter review unless somebody gives a good reason to do otherwise. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla

Re: Standardized assertion methods

(or maybe a scarier sounding name, like deprecated_relaxed_is) might help in fixing the 99% case so that we don't add more problems on top of our existing ones, though. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https

Re: Overriding the CSP for privileged protocols

the addon. Having a more distinct mechanism for this might avoid these CSP issues. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I

Re: Intent to implement: DOMMatrix

it easy for authors to care about performance. And I'm worried that a flag-based isIdentity will not be useful for optimization because it won't hit many of the cases that authors care about, e.g., translating and un-translating, or scaling and un-scaling. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron

Re: Standardized assertion methods

the actual test assertions. (I believe I didn't want to move the whole test, because, if my memory is correct (I'm writing this offline), we run mochitest-chrome on fewer platforms than mochitest-plain.) -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla

Proposed W3C Charter: Social Web Working Group

it, so I intend to support it unless I hear a good reason to do otherwise. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I

Re: bugzilla can now show bugs that have been updated since you last visited them

That sounds quite useful. Thanks, David On 04/06/14 08:34, Byron Jones wrote: thanks to dylan's work on bug 489028, bugzilla now tracks when you view a bug, allowing you to search for bugs which have been updated since you last visited them. see my blog post for more details: http://wp.me

Re: Standardized assertion methods

seeing the complete set of failures is often a much better hint as to the cause of the failures than just seeing the first one. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built

Tree Closure Stats - May 2014

://futurama.theautomatedtester.co.uk/ David ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Uncaught rejections in xpcshell will now cause orange

, this heuristic hasn't caused any false positive. We intend to progressively extend this policy to: - mochitests (bug 1016387); - addon-sdk tests (bug 998277); - DOM Promise (bug 989960). Cheers, David -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla signature.asc Description

Re: B2G, email, and SSL/TLS certificate exceptions for invalid certificates

fingerprint. If it matches the certificate the server provided, then the exception can safely be added. The user will have to obtain that fingerprint out-of-band over a hopefully secure channel. I would be wary of implementing a more involved scheme that involves remote services. Cheers, David On 05/28

Re: B2G, email, and SSL/TLS certificate exceptions for invalid certificates

On 05/28/2014 06:01 PM, Karl Dubost wrote: Andrew, Le 29 mai 2014 à 09:50, Andrew Sutherland asutherl...@asutherland.org a écrit : Trusting you as a human doesn't translate into protecting the users of your server from man-in-the-middle attacks. How do you translate the human trust into

Re: Style guide clarity on C++-isms

WidthCoordDependsOnContainer(mMinWidth); } bool MaxWidthDependsOnContainer() const { return WidthCoordDependsOnContainer(mMaxWidth); } from http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/9506880e4879/layout/style/nsStyleStruct.h#l1321 but I think that variant may be less widely used. -David

Re: Intent to implement: CSSOM-View scroll-behavior property

week and sent: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0255.html -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I

Re: Do we still need Trace Malloc?

on the abovementioned wiki page. I think it works in tandem with Trace Malloc, and may be a candidate for removal as well. I don't think leaky is in the tree anymore. (It was once in tools/leaky/.) -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla

Re: Do we still need Trace Malloc?

On Monday 2014-05-19 20:09 -0700, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 5:32 PM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote: Another is being able to find the root strongly connected components of the memory graph, which is useful for finding leaks in other systems (e.g., leaks

Re: Intent to ship: Hyperlink Auditing (a ping)

when sites can do that sort of tracking in many other ways that aren't controlled by the preference. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know

Re: Intent to ship: Hyperlink Auditing (a ping)

the redirect only if the cookie is set.) -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out

Re: Intent to ship: Hyperlink Auditing (a ping)

and understandable things. -David [1] Speaking of DNT -- if it's all just the honor system for honoring this preference anyway -- why shouldn't it just be based on the DNT header anyway? We send the DNT header in the network request for the ping, right? -- 턞 L. David Baron

Re: Argument validation as a JSM?

I remember opening a bug for this ~2.5 years ago. The answer was that most of these assertions are so trivial to write that putting them in a module would actually make reading the code harder than simpler. I don't think the situation has changed since then. Cheers, David On 15/05/14 08:04

Proposed W3C Charter: CSS Working Group

a chance to incorporate those comments (which it probably wouldn't if no AC representative mentioned them). -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know

Proposal to revise W3C Process

(and thus not go another 9 years without a revision to the process), although I concede I haven't talked to others about that idea. If there are things you think Mozilla should raise in its comments, please bring them up in this thread. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http

Re: Intent to implement: WebGL 2.0

for other platforms (and with those other platforms practices and conventions in mind) or primarily for authors building things on the Web platform (and accustomed to its conventions)? -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla

Re: OS.File design issue from bug 961080 (making downloads respect umask)

as a prefix than posix, to match the rest of the API. Unless somebody disagrees, all that's left is nitpicking and we can finish that discussion on the bug. Cheers, David -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Who is the moderator/owner of this group?

happens in mailman. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like

Re: People building and debugging Firefox on Windows wanted

build, -Z7: build 16:59, objdir 4.43GB I used the opt Z7 build for a bug investigation and, at least at first glance, I didn't notice any problems with the debugging information. David - Original Message - From: Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org To: Neil n...@parkwaycc.co.uk Cc: dev

Re: Can we remove NS_HIDDEN, NS_HIDDEN_(...)?

a difference on Mac). (That patch was later conditioned on configure tests in bugs 293438 and 307168 to work around compiler bugs; this is the configure test you're observing.) -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https

Re: ASSERTION: bad size recorded: 'aInstanceSize == 0 || entry-GetClassSize() == aInstanceSize

that use the NS_IMPL_ISUPPORTSn or NS_IMPL_ADDREF + NS_IMPL_RELEASE macros should use the fully qualified class name and not depend on being inside namespace declarations. In this case, I think the problem is mozilla::dom::MessagePort and mozilla::dom::workers::MessagePort. -David -- 턞 L. David

Re: Is XPath still a thing?

is still a going concern from where I stand. Web Testing people, who use Selenium WebDriver, use XPath extensively since they struggle to get to have testable documents. Having decent documentation for them would be awesome :) David P.S. Having a native implementation of XPath makes Selenium

Re: Is XPath still a thing?

Not from my side! David On 14/04/2014 22:41, Eric Shepherd wrote: On 2014-04-14 21:38:24 +, David Burns said: XPath is still a going concern from where I stand. Web Testing people, who use Selenium WebDriver, use XPath extensively since they struggle to get to have testable documents

Re: Policy for disabling tests which run on TBPL

. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense

Re: Policy for disabling tests which run on TBPL

to auto-retry failing tests and report them as passing if they intermittently pass; that's the bit I'm not comfortable with. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall

Re: Policy for disabling tests which run on TBPL

, actually enabling all the tests that are passing reliably, rather than stopping after enabling the passing tests in only some directories). -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂

Re: Policy for disabling tests which run on TBPL

a reasonably good job at this lately, although rates of progress have varied. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling

Re: mozilla::Atomic considered harmful

thread safe. You might claim that the increased chance of being caught is small, but claiming it's zero is laughable. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall

Re: Promise.jsm and the predefined Promise object

with bz a long time ago, but it might have been someone else. Numbers would be interesting, though. Paolo, do you have plans to perform benchmarking? Cheers, David -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla ___ dev-platform mailing

Re: Firebug in embedded XULRunner.

on top of Phantom (Webkit) or SlimerJS (Gecko)). I have no idea as to the Java embedding story for this though. David ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Promise.jsm and the predefined Promise object

the bigger footgun. Also, keeping the necessity to import Promise.jsm will make it easier to eventually migrate from Promise.jsm to [a superset of] DOM Promise once we consider that everything is ready for that migration. Cheers, David -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla

Re: Warning about mutating the [[Prototype]] of an object ?

with a recommended solution that won't bog down performance. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla

Re: MOZ_ASSUME_UNREACHABLE is being misused

., the compiler can produce undefined behavior). MOZ_DANGEROUSLY_ASSUME_UNREACHABLE is one idea I've thought of for that, though it's a bit of a mouthful. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂

Re: Spring cleaning: Reducing Number Footprint of HG Repos

there is a massive one it will take down their site for hours impacting engineering productivity again since people can't pull or push. I couldn't find similar reports on bitbucket but it can happen to any third party we may use. David [1] https://github.com/blog/1796-denial-of-service-attacks On 26/03

Re: Spring cleaning: Reducing Number Footprint of HG Repos

it makes sense if individual developers are going to end up spending more time/resources working around the fact that we don't do it than it would take to continue doing it. I don't have data one way or another, but I think it's a real possibility. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron

Re: Spring cleaning: Reducing Number Footprint of HG Repos

/Creating_Mercurial_User_Repositories#Editing_your_personal_repository -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling

talk on XPCOM and String APIs

others might be interested, it's at: https://air.mozilla.org/xpcom-and-internal-strings-in-gecko/ -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Timed Text Working Group (WebVTT and TTML)

as two subgroups than Teleconferences: Weekly for TTML, and as needed for WebVTT. -David On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote: On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:56 AM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote: The W3C is proposing a revised charter

Re: Should nsIPrefBranch.set*Pref return NS_ERROR_UNEXPECTED on type mismatch?

be ignored; if it were in a set*Pref call, it would throw an exception. Whether this is worth the work or the (probably not huge, but also nonzero) compatibility risk is another question. [ Written on an airplane; sorry if I missed responses in the last 11 hours. ] -David -- 턞 L. David Baron

Re: Memory management in features implemented in JS

, I could rework it in something a bit faster/more robust. Cheers, David On 3/20/14 1:25 AM, smaug wrote: And we could add a flag to WrappedJS so that it would call some callback when it is about to go away. That would let cleanup of WeakPromise happen asap. Basically keep a hashtable

Re: Memory management in features implemented in JS

. On 3/20/14 12:39 AM, Kyle Huey wrote: Followup to dev-platform please. -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Intent to ship: @counter-style rule

(nsIDOMCSSRule) as well. Do you mind doing this before landing this code please? I don't think we should do this before landing; I'd rather convert all CSS rules at once in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=851892 -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org

Re: Using preferences off the main thread now asserts

of curiosity, what's the benefit of this? Is it just a correctness issue? The bug didn't have much detail. It's an issue of not crashing when trying to manipulate the same hashtable from two different threads at the same time without any sort of locking. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron

Re: W3C Proposed Recommendations: WAI-ARIA (accessibility)

On Tuesday 2014-02-25 09:43 -0500, david bolter wrote: I support this W3C Recommendation. Yep. While I wasn't entirely happy with some of the history that led to the current state, I agree we should support it. (In particular, in the early days of ARIA I was told, in private conversations

Re: Blink removing the concept of user styles?

by removing the concept of user styles. https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?revision=234007view=revision Conceptually, not at all. It would be one fewer item in an array. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https

Re: We live in a memory-constrained world

. -David [1] Shouldn't be an issue with Nuwa-cloned processes on B2G, though. -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling

Re: Consensus sought - when to reset try repository?

, but only the older ones. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I

Re: Consensus sought - when to reset try repository?

could even add a keep me for N days parameter to try syntax for pushes that we'd like to stick around. I'm not sure how well hg strip would interact with a repository that people are pushing to at the same time, though. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org

Re: Fixing build warnings [was: Re: Always brace your ifs]

if we added initializations to squelch all those warnings. I'm not at all concerned about performance impact. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Geolocation Working Group

On Monday 2014-02-24 23:57 -0800, L. David Baron wrote: The W3C is proposing a revised charter for: Geolocation Working Group http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2014Feb/0002.html http://www.w3.org/2014/02/geo-charter.html deadline for comments: March 15 I don't

Proposed W3C Charter: Timed Text Working Group (WebVTT and TTML)

comments or objections through March 20. Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should say. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 signature.asc Description: Digital

Proposed W3C Charter: Geolocation Working Group

the opportunity to send comments or objections through March 15. Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should say. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 signature.asc Description

Re: Always brace your ifs

a lot of code. I'm worried we're moving to a model where tests need to have active defenders to keep them running (even though that isn't how features on the Web platform work), because we blame the old test rather than the new regression. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron

Re: Announcing AsyncShutdown

Indeed, AsyncShutdown should help you in the normal scenario, i.e. if Firefox is quit normally. It won't help you if the process crashes, is killed by the task manager, or the computer goes to sleep. Cheers, David On 2/18/14 6:35 PM, Noitidart wrote: Much thanks David. Im working on an addon

Re: Announcing AsyncShutdown

No, this module is not designed to transact events, just to ensure that we do not proceed with shutdown before the appropriate time. What is your application need exactly? Cheers, David On 2/18/14 11:13 AM, noitid...@gmail.com wrote: what if someone were to ctrl+alt+delete the process. would

Announcing AsyncShutdown

in touch (bug 918317). Asynchronously yours, David -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

ISomething, nsISomething or mozISomething?

Do we have naming conventions for new xpcom interfaces? I believe that I have seen all three forms on the tree. I need to pick one for my new bug. Which one should I pick? Cheers, David (Cross-posting to ask.mozilla.org) -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla

Re: Possible to make all (CSS) transitions 0/1ms to speed up FxOS Gaia tests?

advance, and (2) it affects all presentations that happen to share the same refresh driver, which is something that might change over time. It might work here -- but it's a sharp tool, so be careful with it. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla

W3C Proposed Recommendations: WAI-ARIA (accessibility)

say so in this thread. (I'd note, however, that there have been many previous opportunities to make comments, so it's somewhat bad form to bring up fundamental issues for the first time at this stage.) -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla

W3C Proposed Recommendations: MathML 3.0 and XML Entity Definitions for Characters

for the first time at this stage.) -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML5 Chinese Interest Group

On Wednesday 2014-02-12 11:16 +0800, Kan-Ru Chen (陳侃如) wrote: Kyle Huey m...@kylehuey.com writes: On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 3:27 AM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote: W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML5 Chinese Interest Group. For more details, see: http://www.w3.org

Re: Tagging legitimate main thread I/O

On 2/10/14 2:43 PM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: On 2/7/2014 10:31 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote: Since main thread I/O keeps being added to the tree, for good or bad reasons, I believe that we should adopt a convention of tagging legitimate main thread I/O. When you say tagging do you mean

Tagging legitimate main thread I/O

, David -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Tagging legitimate main thread I/O

On 02/07/14 10:31, ISHIKAWA, Chiaki wrote: Message: [10549] WARNING: Security network blocking I/O on Main Thread: file /REF-COMM-CENTRAL/comm-central/mozilla/security/manager/ssl/src/nsNSSCallbacks.cpp, line 422 This generally happens when javascript calls a function on an nsIX509Cert that

Re: Intent to ship background-blend-mode

. OK with me, then. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I

Re: Intent to ship background-blend-mode

, and, as a result, harm other things (for example, by making things that should be content be background images instead, and hurting accessibility). Otherwise I think this is reasonable, though. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla

Re: Parallel sandboxed iframes

Hi, So far, nobody said that the idea was either stupid or impossible/impractical, so I went ahead and filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=961689 David ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https

Parallel sandboxed iframes

parent. I believe parallel sandboxed iframes would be a good thing also because it would encourage web developers to use them also for their security characteristics. It would also save the work of creating new WebWorker-specific APIs. Thoughts? David [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi

Re: Terminating xulrunner?

Having proper support for multi-profile is great, by opposition to the current hidden on the command line support, but I believe that this discussion deserves its own thread (and its own bug). Cheers, David On 1/16/14 4:13 PM, WaltS wrote: User thoughts. You can close this bug as WONTFIX

Re: Parallel sandboxed iframes

-isolated (since a sandboxed iframe is in its own site). I believe this lowers the chance of Blink adopting the WebWorker-specific APIs to draw on canvas/WebGL contexts that Mozilla is working on. David [1] https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msg/blink-dev/Z5OzwYh3Wfk/IWooaY5FZowJ [2] http

Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: Progress Events

On Wednesday 2013-12-18 12:50 +, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Kyle Huey m...@kylehuey.com wrote: Should we be explicitly voting in favor of this one too? I suppose. We implement it :-) OK, I've done so (without further comments). -David -- 턞 L. David

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >