Support for mochitest-chrome on mobile is sorely needed in devtools. It
would increase our test coverage there by at least an order of magnitude.
Panos
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Bobby Holley bobbyhol...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't comment on the importance of the a-team's other
On 06/17/2014 09:18 PM, James Burke wrote:
On 6/17/14, 10:08 AM, Vivien Nicolas wrote:
That's true. Actually there are many other hacks that depends on the
fact that application are certified. So even if I would like to have
more apps as privileged apps just for the principle, it's not that
On Jun 18, 2014, at 2:03 AM, Vivien Nicolas vnico...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 06/17/2014 09:18 PM, James Burke wrote:
On 6/17/14, 10:08 AM, Vivien Nicolas wrote:
That's true. Actually there are many other hacks that depends on the fact
that application are certified. So even if I would like
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 5:09 AM, James Burke jbu...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 6/16/14, 12:34 PM, Jet Villegas wrote:
I also propose that we make any required code changes in v2.0 so that
non-certified apps can't get unrestricted use of the font. All the options
proposed (#2,3, or 4,) have
Very cool.
One quick question - is this covered in the proposal?
class Base {
virtual int f( int ba, char bb );
};
class Derived {
virtual int f( int da, char db ); // is this allowed and does it count like
a base class function override?
};
Derived d;
Base* b = d;
// What is the
One quick question - is this covered in the proposal?
class Base {
virtual int f( int ba, char bb );
};
class Derived {
virtual int f( int da, char db ); // is this allowed and does it count
like a base class function override?
};
Derived d;
Base* b = d;
// What is the
Benjamin Smedberg schrieb:
The known-large crashes will have a signature of OOM | Large |
C++Signature. The engineering action for these crashes should
typically be to make the call site use a fallible allocator instead of
an infallible allocator. Crashkill will track and file the most common
On 6/18/14 8:25 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Another thing that will likely force us to use certified apps for now
is Web Components. We are only enabling those for certified apps for
now since we want to have freedom to make changes to the spec and the
implementation without worrying about breaking
Could you give some examples of what tests we could run on mobile in chrome?
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
On 2014-06-17 11:01 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
[bcc dev-tree-management]
In the continuing effort to make our testsuites more reliable, bug
995417 has landed on inbound. This bug enforces the long-standing
policy of no external network connections in the testsuite with code:
external network
With the 31 train going to beta last week, Firefox telemetry is now
enabled by default for new and existing beta users for Firefox desktop
and Firefox for Android. Existing users will see the data-choices prompt
again.
The beta population in particular is much more representative of our
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 6:59 PM, James Burke jbu...@mozilla.com wrote:
So, I think we just need to set the expectation for at least another year
or two, that the gaia set of apps will not be able to be privileged,
because we need them as early beta testers for features and capabilities we
are
On 6/18/14 12:20 PM, Ben Francis wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 6:59 PM, James Burke jbu...@mozilla.com
mailto:jbu...@mozilla.com wrote:
So, I think we just need to set the expectation for at least
another year or two, that the gaia set of apps will not be able to
be privileged,
On 2014-06-18, 2:30 PM, Milan Sreckovic wrote:
Works for me.
For the function override in the first place though, the names of the
parameters are ignored, right?
Yes. Basically, I think we should not make the names of the arguments
part of the function's type, which would imply that the
On 6/17/14 4:32 PM, Jonathan Griffin wrote:
Many of those tests don't apply to Android or B2G, and for those that
theoretically do, many of them won't work because they rely on XUL
files which aren't supported in B2G, and may not be in Android (not
sure on that point).
I'm told Android uses
This *unofficial* export should have every branch/tag labeled (in a very
verbose/per-branch fashion to avoid the issues aki mentions) and be
compatible with gecko-dev: https://github.com/Nephyrin/mozilla-git
On 06/16/2014 08:30 PM, Aki Sasaki wrote:
We cannot sync all the tags.
Here's why.
Hi,
MFBT is in the process of being converted to standard Mozilla style.
(See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1014377 and
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1026319.)
As a result, please write any new modules in standard Mozilla style.
There's one wrinkle: existing
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:20 AM, Ben Francis bfran...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 6:59 PM, James Burke jbu...@mozilla.com wrote:
So, I think we just need to set the expectation for at least another year
or two, that the gaia set of apps will not be able to be privileged,
18 matches
Mail list logo
