On 09/29/2012 06:40 PM, Gavin Sharp wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Chris AtLee cat...@mozilla.com wrote:
http://people.mozilla.org/~catlee/highscores/highscores.html is a report of
where our time on Try is going.
I think we should have this data feed into a cronjob that emails the
On 27/11/12 22:35, Gregory Szorc wrote:
I feel the build system should be as fast as possible by default - no
user action necessary. If you find that -j == # cores isn't providing
the fastest builds possible, please present your data and we'll change
the default value.
I recently changed my
On 23/01/13 20:39, edgar.am...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
also, the the angularJS app is in my localhost port 81, the php file is in my
localhost, different port.
You are very likely being stopped by a cross-origin check. Try to run
both code within the same origin [1] and see if that works.
[1]
On 23/02/13 07:25, Jared Wein wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to let you all know about bug 842913, of which I just landed the
patch for on mozilla-inbound.
The goal of the bug is to make the process of working with the /browser and
/toolkit themes easier for new contributors. The previous names of
On 25/02/13 15:57, Benoit Girard wrote:
Hello dev.platform,
GTest has landed this weekend on mozilla-central[1]. It should now be
ready for developers to start writing test. It will appear on
tinderbox once it is build off '--enable-tests'. For more details see
the documentation:
On 26/04/13 11:17, Gregory Szorc wrote:
Anyway, I just wanted to see if others have thought about this. Do
others feel it is a concern? If so, can we formulate a plan to address
it? Who would own this?
As others, I believe that we should use IndexedDB for Gecko internal
storage. I opened a bug
On 26/04/13 20:42, bent wrote:
IndexedDB is our answer for this for JS... C++ folks are still pretty
much on their own!
Why? Wouldn't be the idea of such component to make sure it is usable
from C++?
--
Mounir
___
dev-platform mailing list
On 22/05/13 03:09, L. David Baron wrote:
On Friday 2013-02-08 14:37 -0800, L. David Baron wrote:
W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML Working Group.
For more details, see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Feb/0009.html
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/charter/2012/
On 21/06/13 21:45, Andrew Overholt wrote:
I'd appreciate your review feedback. Thanks.
Thank you for putting this together.
I am going to quote some parts of the document to give some context to
my comments.
Note that at this time, we are specifically focusing on new JS APIs
and not on
Hi Thomas,
MozICCManager is an API available only for built-in applications on
Firefox OS so it is fine to change it as much as you want.
--
Mounir
On 25/06/13 17:11, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi,
I intent to implement an extension to nsIDOMMozICCManager.
When unlocking a SIM card, there
On 25/06/13 17:28, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr wrote:
3. APIs solving use cases which no browser vendor shipping an engine
other Gecko is interested in at that time. In cases such as this,
Mozilla will solicit feedback from
On 26/06/13 18:13, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2013-06-26 12:17 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
On 26/06/13 11:48 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2013-06-26 11:21 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
On 24/06/13 05:52 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
There are two things that I think can use clarification. One is what
On 26/06/13 17:08, Andrew Overholt wrote:
On 25/06/13 12:15 PM, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
Also, I do not understand why we are excluding CSS, WebGL and WebRTC. We
should definitely not make this policy retro-apply so existing features
should not be affected but if someone wants to add a new CSS
On 11/07/13 16:43, Neil wrote:
Milan Sreckovic wrote:
That last thing was another item I found useful in the previous life.
When requesting a review from somebody, people could see this person
currently has X items in their review queue.
Even better would be if Bugzilla could compute
Hi dev-platform,
As of today, I intend to land patches to implement navigator.languages
and the languagechange event (on the Window object).
This feature will not live behind a flag given that it is not complex
nor controversial.
Bug : https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=889335
Spec:
Hi,
Note: this is not an Intent to Ship because it is a minor change but
given that it is still a content visible change, I want to make sure
dev-platform is aware of it.
I've landed a patch last week to update the vibration API implementation
to match the current specification. The changes make
Hi,
In Firefox 32, instead of returning yes or unspecified,
navigator.doNotTrack will start returning 1, 0 or unspecified,
making it closer to the specification in some aspects - returning 1
and 0 is what the specification requires, not yes. It will also fix
a nasty bug where asking to be tracked
On Sat, 6 Sep 2014, at 14:49, Martin Thomson wrote:
One idea that has been floated
(https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002676) is to restrict
persistent permissions to secure origins. The reasoning there being that
a persistent grant can be trivially intercepted if you work in the
On Tue, 9 Sep 2014, at 00:15, Lars Knudsen wrote:
looks good,
maybe adding to always take a holistic view on what you are doing and how
it will interact with other specs/standards used in the same apps (e.g.
considering DeviceOrientation and DeviceMotion before makeing
OrientationLock ;))
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, at 18:26, Ms2ger wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/2014 08:18 AM, Kershaw Chang wrote:
First of all, you neglected to explain the standardization situation
here. Is this feature being standardized? If not, why not? How do
other browser
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, at 02:49, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Yes!
Though as previously expressed, I don't think we should ship this until
it
supports sending Blobs.
What do other UAs implement?
-- Mounir
___
dev-platform mailing list
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, at 10:51, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:54 AM, Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr
wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, at 02:49, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Yes!
Though as previously expressed, I don't think we should ship this until
it
supports sending Blobs
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014, at 02:09, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Summary: document.origin returns the Unicode serialization of the
document's origin. The returned value does not depend on what
document.domain was set to.
Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=931884
Spec:
Note that Chrome 46 has a way to work around the white screen while a
page load using a new property in the Manifest. If a website added to
the homescreen on Chrome Android has a background_color information, it
will be used while the page loads. After Chrome gets the first paint
following a
FWIW, this is the usage of window.orientation in the wild recorded by
Chrome:
https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/285
However, Google's internal tools allow me to see the repartition between
platforms and this seen a lot by Chrome Android users.
Should we add this to
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015, at 02:02, zbranie...@mozilla.com wrote:
> On Friday, October 9, 2015 at 10:51:54 AM UTC-7, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
> > As far as speed feeling goes, they would win to show something as soon
> > as possible and handle any post-first paint loa
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, at 16:27, Vivien Nicolas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Mounir Lamouri <mou...@lamouri.fr> wrote:
>
> > Note that Chrome 46 has a way to work around the white screen while a
> > page load using a new property in the Manifest. If a website add
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015, at 07:57, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Birunthan Mohanathas
birunt...@mohanathas.com wrote:
Summary: The Permissions API allows a web application to be aware of
the status of a given permission, to know whether it is granted,
denied or if
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, at 03:50, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> On 2015-09-01 9:57 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> > But I agree that we should make it clear that we do not intend to
> > implement a request API.
>
> There is actually a valid use case for a request API. It has become
> clear that we need to
On Sat, 10 Dec 2016, at 17:58, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 12/5/16 3:20 AM, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
> > Correct. Intent to ship has been sent on blink-dev. Chrome Android
> > should follow.
>
> Do you have any idea what the timeframe is?
Unfortunately not. My best guestima
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016, at 04:00, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 12/11/16 8:47 AM, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Dec 2016, at 17:58, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> >> OK, but a website doing this won't work in Chrome Android. So what
> >> would websites actually do in practice
On Tue, 29 Nov 2016, at 15:17, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> > I understand the privacy concerns, but why can't these be handled similar
> > to the Geolocation API? Ask permission to use / user opts in.
>
> Because prompting users is generally an antipattern. If, as a user, you
> got a battery API
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016, at 15:09, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 12/2/16 6:11 AM, Shih-Chiang Chien wrote:
> > We implement 1-UA mode described in spec. Session resumption and many-to-1
> > session is not available in this mode.
> .
> > Google have release this API on both desktop and Android browser
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, at 18:22, Chris Pearce wrote:
> Hi Mounir,
>
> Replies inline below...
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 2:56 AM, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
>
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > Very excited to see Firefox going forward with autoplay blocking. A couple
&g
On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, at 15:35, Chris Pearce wrote:
> On Saturday, July 7, 2018 at 5:04:28 AM UTC+12, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, at 00:49, Chris Pearce wrote:
> > > On Friday, July 6, 2018 at 3:10:58 AM UTC+12, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
> > > > On We
On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, at 00:49, Chris Pearce wrote:
> On Friday, July 6, 2018 at 3:10:58 AM UTC+12, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, at 18:22, Chris Pearce wrote:
> > > Hi Mounir,
> > >
> > > Replies inline below...
> > >
> > >
Hi Chris,
Very excited to see Firefox going forward with autoplay blocking. A couple of
comments inline.
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018, at 19:38, Chris Pearce wrote:
> DETAILS:
>
> We intend to block autoplay of HTMLMediaElement in tabs which haven't
> had user interaction. Web authors should assume
37 matches
Mail list logo
