Re: [api-dev] Writing a connection aware client without starting OOo in listening mode

2009-01-28 Thread Jason Cooper
On 1/28/09, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > On 01/27/09 18:46, Jason Cooper wrote: > >> Ok, so it seems that the only way to monitor the conneciton to OOo (re: >> add >> event listeners) is to go with the bridge/connection method. However, that >> brings me back to my original question about whether o

Re: [api-dev] Writing a connection aware client without starting OOo in listening mode

2009-01-28 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 01/27/09 18:46, Jason Cooper wrote: Ok, so it seems that the only way to monitor the conneciton to OOo (re: add event listeners) is to go with the bridge/connection method. However, that brings me back to my original question about whether or not I can use the bridge/connection method without

Re: [api-dev] Writing a connection aware client without starting OOo in listening mode

2009-01-27 Thread Steff Grund
Hello Jason, I didn't read through the whole thread carefully, so excuse when I am repeating something already said. You can use Bootstrap.bootstrap() to connect OpenOffice.org on the local machine, it will be started when it's not running. But the default connection here works only on the l

Re: [api-dev] Writing a connection aware client without starting OOo in listening mode

2009-01-27 Thread Jason Cooper
> > ah, ok now i understand but that is currently not possible. "simple > bootstrap" might be to simple here. But i agree that it would be a useful > feature ... > > Juergen Ok, so it seems that the only way to monitor the conneciton to OOo (re: add event listeners) is to go with the bridge/conne

Re: [api-dev] Writing a connection aware client without starting OOo in listening mode

2009-01-27 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Jason Cooper wrote: On 1/27/09, Juergen Schmidt wrote: Jason Cooper wrote: On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 4:34 AM, Juergen Schmidt wrote: Jason Cooper wrote: I'm writing a Java client that I would like to, among other things, be aware of OOo connection status. I've been reading through *3.3.1 UN

Re: [api-dev] Writing a connection aware client without starting OOo in listening mode

2009-01-27 Thread Jason Cooper
On 1/27/09, Juergen Schmidt wrote: > > Jason Cooper wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 4:34 AM, Juergen Schmidt > >wrote: >> >> Jason Cooper wrote: >>> >>> I'm writing a Java client that I would like to, among other things, be aware of OOo connection status. I've been reading through *3

Re: [api-dev] Writing a connection aware client without starting OOo in listening mode

2009-01-26 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Jason Cooper wrote: On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 4:34 AM, Juergen Schmidt wrote: Jason Cooper wrote: I'm writing a Java client that I would like to, among other things, be aware of OOo connection status. I've been reading through *3.3.1 UNO Interprocess Connections* in the Dev Guide and understand

Re: [api-dev] Writing a connection aware client without starting OOo in listening mode

2009-01-26 Thread Jason Cooper
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 4:34 AM, Juergen Schmidt wrote: > Jason Cooper wrote: > >> I'm writing a Java client that I would like to, among other things, be >> aware >> of OOo connection status. I've been reading through *3.3.1 UNO >> Interprocess >> Connections* in the Dev Guide and understand the >

Re: [api-dev] Writing a connection aware client without starting OOo in listening mode

2009-01-24 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Jason Cooper wrote: I'm writing a Java client that I would like to, among other things, be aware of OOo connection status. I've been reading through *3.3.1 UNO Interprocess Connections* in the Dev Guide and understand the ConnectionAwareClient.java example there. I'm wondering if I can somehow c