Re: [Bug 62644] Apache httpd hangs after a few days on Solaris i386

2018-08-24 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Tuesday, August 21, 2018, Eric Covener wrote: > Looks like we need a 1.6 release to pickup this pollset hang issue on > Solaris. +1

1.6 release?

2018-08-24 Thread Eric Covener
Starting a new thread as potential RM's may be filtering bugzilla emails. There are a lot of reports of PR62644 from solaris users of httpd, can anyone RM? -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com

Re: 1.6 release?

2018-08-24 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 08/24/2018 09:16 AM, Eric Covener wrote: Starting a new thread as potential RM's may be filtering bugzilla emails. There are a lot of reports of PR62644 from solaris users of httpd, can anyone RM? I am running a few versions of httpd on solaris and have not seen any issues. Is there a bu

Re: 1.6 release?

2018-08-24 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 12:37 PM Dennis Clarke wrote: > > On 08/24/2018 09:16 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > > Starting a new thread as potential RM's may be filtering bugzilla emails. > > > > There are a lot of reports of PR62644 from solaris users of httpd, can > > anyone RM? > > > > I am running a f

Re: 1.6 release?

2018-08-24 Thread Jim Jagielski
If no one volunteers, I will. > On Aug 24, 2018, at 9:16 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > > Starting a new thread as potential RM's may be filtering bugzilla emails. > > There are a lot of reports of PR62644 from solaris users of httpd, can > anyone RM? > > -- > Eric Covener > cove...@gmail.com

Re: 1.6 release?

2018-08-24 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 08/24/2018 12:48 PM, Eric Covener wrote: On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 12:37 PM Dennis Clarke wrote: On 08/24/2018 09:16 AM, Eric Covener wrote: Starting a new thread as potential RM's may be filtering bugzilla emails. There are a lot of reports of PR62644 from solaris users of httpd, can anyon

Re: 1.6 release?

2018-08-24 Thread Nick Kew
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:16:54 -0400 Eric Covener wrote: > Starting a new thread as potential RM's may be filtering bugzilla > emails. > > There are a lot of reports of PR62644 from solaris users of httpd, can > anyone RM? You've spurred me into reviewing changes in svn since last release. There

Re: svn commit: r1838963 - /apr/apr/branches/1.6.x/poll/unix/port.c

2018-08-24 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:13 PM wrote: > > -if ((*num = j)) { /* any event besides wakeup pipe? */ > +if (nres > 0) { /* any event besides wakeup pipe? */ > +*num = nres; > rv = APR_SUCCESS; Shouldn't we set *num = 0 still? Btw, this commit probably needs to go to trunk

Re: svn commit: r1838963 - /apr/apr/branches/1.6.x/poll/unix/port.c

2018-08-24 Thread Nick Kew
> On 25 Aug 2018, at 00:39, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:13 PM wrote: >> >> -if ((*num = j)) { /* any event besides wakeup pipe? */ >> +if (nres > 0) { /* any event besides wakeup pipe? */ >> +*num = nres; >> rv = APR_SUCCESS; > > Shouldn't we set

Re: svn commit: r1838963 - /apr/apr/branches/1.6.x/poll/unix/port.c

2018-08-24 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 1:39 AM Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:13 PM wrote: > > > > -if ((*num = j)) { /* any event besides wakeup pipe? */ > > +if (nres > 0) { /* any event besides wakeup pipe? */ > > +*num = nres; > > rv = APR_SUCCESS; > > Shouldn't w

Re: 1.6 release?

2018-08-24 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:42 PM Nick Kew wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:16:54 -0400 > Eric Covener wrote: > > > Starting a new thread as potential RM's may be filtering bugzilla > > emails. > > > > There are a lot of reports of PR62644 from solaris users of httpd, can > > anyone RM? > > You'v