+1
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020, 3:34 PM Stephan Erb wrote:
> With a heavy heart:
> +1 (binding)
> On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 08:15 +0900, thinker0 wrote:
> > +2
> > 2020년 2월 5일 (수) 오전 2:22, Mauricio Garavaglia <
> mauriciogaravag...@gmail.com>님이작성:
> > > +1
> > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 8:27 PM Dave Lester w
0.0-rc0.tar.gz.md5
> > > >
> > > > The signature of the release candidate can be found at:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/aurora/0.10.0-rc0/apache-aurora-0.10.0-rc0.tar.gz.asc
> > > >
> > > > The GPG key used to sign the release are available at:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/aurora/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > Please download, verify, and test.
> > > >
> > > > The vote will close on Fri Nov 13 12:30:00 PST 2015
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Aurora 0.10.0
> > > > [ ] +0
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Aurora 0.10.0 because...
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Zameer Manji
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Zameer Manji
> > >
> > >
> >
>
--
John Sirois
303-512-3301
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 2:38 PM, John Sirois wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Bill Farner wrote:
>
>> -1
>>
>> Build fails on OS X 10.11 (which is also true of master). It's not
>> critical that we build on OS X, but it will be great to f
Thu Dec 3 8:00:00 PT 2015
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release these as the deb packages for Apache Aurora 0.10.0
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
> >
> > I would like to get the voting started off with my own +1
> >
>
--
John Sirois
303-512-3301
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:01 AM, John Sirois wrote:
> -1 nonbinding
>
Fix proposal here: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40757/
> Although I can successfully run via the test Vagrant environment, creating
> the www-data/prod/hello job, I find:
>
> vagrant@vagrant-ubuntu-trusty-
gt;
> I would like to get the voting started off with my own +1
>
+1 nonbinding
Tested via the test/deb/ubuntu-trusty vm.
--
John Sirois
303-512-3301
...' than
changing this text for every package release.
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 12:54 PM, John Sirois wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Bill Farner
> wrote:
> >
> > > I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb
> >
I’ve experimenting on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-987 for
the past few weeks and I’d like to ask for feedback on the direction I’d
like to head. If you’re interested in the evolution of the Aurora REST api,
read on.
--
AURORA-987 aims to create a first-
data
> access. So fewer, more-powerful endpoints that support complex queries.
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:16 PM, John Sirois
> wrote:
>
> > I’ve experimenting on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-987
> for
> > the past few weeks and I’d like to ask for
t; So yeah, I feel like the API should be more generic with regards to data
> > access. So fewer, more-powerful endpoints that support complex queries.
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:16 PM, John Sirois
> wrote:
> >
> >> I’ve experimenting on https://issu
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:21 AM, John Sirois wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Igor Morozov wrote:
>
>> We had very similar concerns here at Uber in regards of Thrift and
>> newer REST API that is coming to Aurora scheduler. It feels like
>> having a ge
grating aurora scheduler
> > with internal deployment system so more questions are coming ;) )
> >
> > Thanks for asking!
> >
> > -Igor
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:21 AM, John Sirois
> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Igor Morozov
as attacking the problem based on my current
strengths, which favored fixing the glue and worrying about the shape as a
detail after. The big assumption being the core entities were in fact
modeled well and ~correctly by the existing thrift enums, structs and
unions.
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at
ponse getJobs(1: string ownerRole) (method="GET",
returns="GetJobsResult")
swagger schema aid:
https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-core/blob/master/modules/swagger-annotations/src/main/java/io/swagger/annotations/ApiResponses.java
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:0
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:37 PM, John Sirois wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Bill Farner wrote:
>
>> >
>> > Well, just to give additional context to that ticket. The ticket
>> mentions
>> > /apibeta which was literally just a HTTP + TSim
gt; The GPG key used to sign the release are available at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/aurora/KEYS
> >
> > Please download, verify, and test.
> >
> > The vote will close on Tue Dec 22 15:18:55 PST 2015
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Aurora 0.11.0
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Aurora 0.11.0 because...
> >
>
--
John Sirois
303-512-3301
close on Wed Jan 6 20:00:00 PT 2015
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release these as the deb packages for Apache Aurora 0.11.0
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
> >
> > I would like to get the voting started off with my own +1
> >
>
--
John Sirois
303-512-3301
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 2:14 PM, John Sirois wrote:
> -1 non-binding
>
> Tested using new installing guide in Vagrant image using 'ubuntu/trusty64'
> against mesos 0.24.1.
> Everything worked after 2 tweaks:
> 1. sudo apt-get install libcurl4-nss-dev
> 2. $ diff /
ackage or we can fix our packages to list this
> > dependency.
> > > I'm not sure on how packages should behave, so I am not sure on what we
> > > should do here.
> > >
> > > Maybe we could amend the guide for now, release these debs and figure
> out
&
; Loading [22m [9D [0K* Try:
> [1m> Loading [22m [9D [0KRun with
> [1m> Loading [22m [9D [0K [1A [9C [1m--stacktrace [22m
> [1m> Loading [22m [9D [0K [1A [21C option to get the stack trace. Run with
> [1m> Loading [22m [9D [0K [1A [62C [1m--info [22m
> [1m> Loading [22m [9D [0K [1A [68C or
> [1m> Loading [22m [9D [0K [1A [72C [1m--debug [22m
> [1m> Loading [22m [9D [0K [1A [79C option to get more log output.
> [1m> Loading [22m [9D [0K
> [1m> Loading [22m [9D [0K [31mBUILD FAILED [39m
> [1m> Loading [22m [9D [0K [1A [12C
> [1m> Loading [22m [9D [0K
> [1m> Loading [22m [9D [0KTotal time: 4.179 secs
> [1m> Loading [22m [9D [0K [0merror: Bad exit status from
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.zyiWa6 (%build)
>
>
> RPM build errors:
> Macro %MESOS_VERSION has empty body
> Macro %MESOS_VERSION has empty body
> Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.zyiWa6 (%build)
> make: *** [rpm] Error 1
> Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
> Skipped archiving because build is not successful
>
--
John Sirois
303-512-3301
> > -vmodule
> > > > -use_glog_formatter
> > > >
> > > > Instead of these, we can allow users to customize logging via
> standard
> > > > java.util.logging inputs (e.g. logging.properties). We could explore
> > > using
> > > > an alternative to java.util.logging, but i suggest we retain that
> > backend
> > > > for now (since it's what we're currently using).
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Text by Jeff, typos by iPhone
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Text by Jeff, typos by iPhone
>
--
John Sirois
303-512-3301
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 5:05 PM, John Sirois wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Jeff Schroeder <
> jeffschroe...@computer.org> wrote:
>
>> Primarily it is faster, uses less memory, and annotates tracebacks with
>> package versions. The last one seems
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 5:18 PM, John Sirois wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 5:05 PM, John Sirois wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Jeff Schroeder <
>> jeffschroe...@computer.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Primarily it i
.util.logging, but i suggest we retain that backend
> > for now (since it's what we're currently using).
> >
>
>
> --
> Text by Jeff, typos by iPhone
>
--
John Sirois
303-512-3301
800
> >
> > Fix anchor links in installing.md.
> >
> > commit 9326fa6
> > Author: Bill Farner
> > Date: Mon Dec 21 12:21:37 2015 -0800
> >
> > Link to install guide from docs/README.md
> >
> > commit f8e59a4
> > Author: Bill Farner
> > Date: Mon Dec 21 12:12:56 2015 -0800
> >
> > Fix formatting issues in installing doc.
> >
>
--
John Sirois
303-512-3301
mh
> :pmdMain
> :pmdTest
> :test
> :jacocoTestReport
> Coverage report generated: file://<
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Aurora/ws/dist/reports/jacoco/test/html/index.html
> >
> :analyzeReport
> Instruction coverage is 0.8883578431372549, but must be greater than 0.89
> Branch coverage is 0.8169089929994615, but must be greater than 0.835
> :check
> :build
> :api:assemble
> :api:compileTestJava UP-TO-DATE
> :api:processTestResources UP-TO-DATE
> :api:testClasses UP-TO-DATE
> :api:test UP-TO-DATE
> :api:check UP-TO-DATE
> :api:build
> :buildSrc:compileJava UP-TO-DATE
> :buildSrc:processResources UP-TO-DATE
> :buildSrc:classes UP-TO-DATE
> :buildSrc:jar
> :buildSrc:assemble
> :buildSrc:compileTestJava UP-TO-DATE
> :buildSrc:processTestResources UP-TO-DATE
> :buildSrc:testClasses UP-TO-DATE
> :buildSrc:test UP-TO-DATE
> :buildSrc:check UP-TO-DATE
> :buildSrc:build
> :commons:assemble
> :commons:licenseMain
> Unknown file extension:
> commons/src/main/resources/org/apache/aurora/common/net/http/handlers/
> thrift.st
> Unknown file extension:
> commons/src/main/resources/org/apache/aurora/common/net/http/handlers/
> logconfig.st
> :commons:licenseMain UP-TO-DATE
> :commons:licenseTest
> Unknown file extension:
> commons/src/test/resources/org/apache/aurora/common/util/templating/
> template.st
> :commons:licenseTest UP-TO-DATE
> :commons:license UP-TO-DATE
> :commons:compileTestJavaNote: Writing <
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Aurora/ws/commons/dist/classes/test/org/apache/aurora/common/args/apt/cmdline.arg.info.txt.2
> >
> Note: Writing <
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Aurora/ws/commons/dist/classes/test/META-INF/compiler/resource-mappings/org.apache.aurora.common.args.apt.CmdLineProcessor
> >
> Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API.
> Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details.
> Note: <
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Aurora/ws/commons/src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/common/collections/Iterables2Test.java>
> uses unchecked or unsafe operations.
> Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
>
> :commons:processTestResources
> :commons:testClasses
> :commons:testBuild timed out (after 120 minutes). Marking the build as
> failed.
> Build was aborted
> Recording test results
>
--
John Sirois
303-512-3301
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 10:36 PM, John Sirois wrote:
> Looking into this ... pretty sure its the zk rev bump commit due to some
> hand-wavy recollections of similar issues at Twitter in the past.
>
A bit of a shot in the dark that looks like the right thing to do anyw
y: org.apache.aurora.common.zookeeper.Group$JoinException:
Interrupted trying to ensure group at path:
/twitter/services/puffin_hosebird
at
org.apache.aurora.common.zookeeper.Group.lambda$ensurePersistentGroupPath$31(Group.java:288)
at
org.apache.aurora.common.zookeeper.Group$$Lambda$97/1807633296.get(Unknown
Source)
at
org.apache.aurora.common.util.BackoffHelper.lambda$doUntilSuccess$2(BackoffHelper.java:87)
at
org.apache.aurora.common.util.BackoffHelper$$Lambda$4/1776514610.get(Unknown
Source)
at
org.apache.aurora.common.util.BackoffHelper.doUntilResult(BackoffHelper.java:104)
at
org.apache.aurora.common.util.BackoffHelper.doUntilSuccess(BackoffHelper.java:86)
at
org.apache.aurora.common.zookeeper.Group.ensurePersistentGroupPath(Group.java:282)
at org.apache.aurora.common.zookeeper.Group.watch(Group.java:519)
... 48 more
Caused by: java.lang.InterruptedException
at
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquireSharedInterruptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1302)
at java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch.await(CountDownLatch.java:231)
at
org.apache.aurora.common.zookeeper.ZooKeeperClient.get(ZooKeeperClient.java:391)
at
org.apache.aurora.common.zookeeper.ZooKeeperClient.get(ZooKeeperClient.java:327)
at
org.apache.aurora.common.zookeeper.ZooKeeperUtils.ensurePathInternal(ZooKeeperUtils.java:132)
at
org.apache.aurora.common.zookeeper.ZooKeeperUtils.ensurePath(ZooKeeperUtils.java:127)
at
org.apache.aurora.common.zookeeper.Group.lambda$ensurePersistentGroupPath$31(Group.java:284)
... 55 more
>
> 197 tests completed, 1 failed
> :commons:test FAILED
>
> FAILURE: Build failed with an exception.
>
> * What went wrong:
> Execution failed for task ':commons:test'.
> > There were failing tests. See the report at: file://<
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Aurora/ws/commons/dist/reports/tests/index.html
> >
>
> * Try:
> Run with --stacktrace option to get the stack trace. Run with --info or
> --debug option to get more log output.
>
> BUILD FAILED
>
> Total time: 6 mins 41.194 secs
> Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
> Recording test results
>
--
John Sirois
303-512-3301
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:22 PM, John Sirois wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Apache Jenkins Server <
> jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote:
>
>> See <https://builds.apache.org/job/Aurora/1316/changes>
>>
>> Changes:
>>
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 2:23 PM, John Sirois wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 2:14 PM, John Sirois wrote:
>
>> -1 non-binding
>>
>> Tested using new installing guide in Vagrant image using
>> 'ubuntu/trusty64' against mesos 0.24.1.
>>
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:36 PM, John Sirois wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:22 PM, John Sirois wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Apache Jenkins Server <
> > jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> See
gt; > jobs = [
> > > > Service(
> > > > name = 'logstash',
> > > > ...
> > > > instanceParameters = { "volume" : ["foo", "bar", "zaa"]},
> > > > instances = 3,
> > > > container = Container(
> > > > docker = Docker(
> > > > image = 'image',
> > > > parameters = params
> > > > )
> > > > )
> > > > )
> > > > ]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Something like that, it would create 3 instances of the tasks, each
> one
> > > > running in a container that uses the volumes foo, bar, and zaa.
> > > >
> > > > Does it make sense? I'd be glad to work on it but I want to validate
> > the
> > > > idea with you first and hear comments about the api/implementation.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mauricio
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
John Sirois
303-512-3301
tural diff of the thrift for the
Tasks to keep the log dedupe optimizations in-play for the most part; ie
store Task0 in-full, and Task1-N as thrift struct diffs against 0. Maybe
something simpler like a binary diff would be enough too.
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:20 PM, John Sirois wrot
y
in-effective. IIUC its values-equals based denorm, I'd think we'd need
diffing in a cluster using, for example, ceph + docker ~exclusively.
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:54 PM, John Sirois wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Bill Farner
&
ete example of this part of the
> > change:
> > >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/41804
> > >> >
> > >> > This is roughly the same amount of overhead for declaring arguments
> as
> > >> the
> > >> > current scenario, with the addition of a very obvious mechanism for
> > >> > swapping the source of parameters. This allows us to isolate the
> > body of
> > >> > code responsible for supplying configuration values, which we lack
> > today.
> > >> >
> > >> > The remaining work is to bridge the gap between a command line
> > argument
> > >> > system and Parameter interfaces. This is relatively easy to do with
> > >> > dynamic proxies. I have posted a proof of concept here:
> > >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/42042
> > >> >
> > >> > Regarding (c), i have done some analysis of libraries available and
> i
> > >> > suggest argparse4j [3]. It has thorough documentation, no
> transitive
> > >> > dependencies, and is being actively developed (last release Dec
> 2015).
> > >> > However, i would like to emphasize that i think we should minimize
> > >> coupling
> > >> > to the argument parsing library so that we may switch in the future.
> > >> > Argparse4j has a feature that makes the non-critical feature (d)
> > >> possible.
> > >> >
> > >> > With that, what do you think? Are there other goals we should add?
> > Does
> > >> > the plan make sense?
> > >> >
> > >> > [1]
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/aurora/tree/master/commons-args/src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/common/args
> > >> > [2] https://github.com/twitter/commons
> > >> > [3] https://argparse4j.github.io/
> > >>
> >
>
--
John Sirois
303-512-3301
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:02 PM, John Sirois wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Bill Farner wrote:
>
>> In the log, tasks are denormalized anyhow:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/api/src/main/thrift/org/apache/aurora/gen/storage.th
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Riccardo Poggi
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anybody know what the ExecutorConfig.data json, in the thrift API, is
> supposed to loook like?
>
I'm not sure if there is an easier way to do this - I could only find
`aurora` client commands that ingest the json format, n
--
John Sirois
303-512-3301
On Jan 14, 2016 6:16 AM, "Riccardo Poggi" wrote:
>
> Thanks John,
>
> very nice way to inspect!
>
> If I understood correctly
>
> >>> jobs[0].json_dumps()
>
> will dump the Job Struct, is that what actually goes int
engaged in the meat of the API proposal that is needed assuming no one else
has dived in.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bill
>
--
John Sirois
303-512-3301
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Bill Farner wrote:
> Folks,
>
> As we approach completion of work for the 0.12.0 release, i would like to
> identify a release manager. If nobody is able, i am happy to take this on
> myself. However, i think it's a good process to share if only to advance
> too
t; host OS) or to target a different hardware offering (e.g. GPUs). In
> other words, only those jobs that explicitly opt-in to participate in
> an experiment or hw offering would be landing on that slave set.
>
> Thanks,
> Maxim
>
> [1]-
> https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/ee
t; releases[1] while Mesos does not[2].
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dmitriy.
> >
> >
> > [1] https://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/
> > [2] http://archive.apache.org/dist/mesos/
> >
> > --
> > Zameer Manji
> >
> > <http://archive.apache.org/dist/mesos/>
>
--
John Sirois
303-512-3301
ial
> > > release cut.
> > >
> > > This is purely an RFC as I could not find other Apache projects doing
> > > nightlies, though I found that some projects eg Zookeeper provide alpha
> > > releases[1] while Mesos does not[2].
> > >
> > &g
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Bill Farner wrote:
> Oh wow, apparently you ask me! John - would you like access?
>
Yes - as noted here I'd be happy to self serve:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1589
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:18 PM, John Sirois wrote:
see how jenkins deals with the
distribution name clobbering.
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:23 PM, John Sirois wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Bill Farner wrote:
> >
> > > Oh wow, apparently you ask me! John - would you like access?
> >
Context: Aurora uses the official Apache Thrift compiler today plus a
home-grown python code generator [1] for immutable "entity" (I*) wrappers.
The proposal is to switch from using the Apache Thrift code generator to a
home grown generator. The proposal comes with a concrete example in the
form
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 8:47 PM, John Sirois wrote:
> Context: Aurora uses the official Apache Thrift compiler today plus a
> home-grown python code generator [1] for immutable "entity" (I*) wrappers.
>
> The proposal is to switch from using the Apache Thrift code gener
--
John Sirois
303-512-3301
On Jan 27, 2016 6:08 PM, "Maxim Khutornenko" wrote:
>
> I am +1 to making immutable thrift objects solely based on perf numbers.
>
> My biggest concern though is maintenance of a pretty intricate codebase,
> especially when it comes to upgrad
All,
I propose that we accept the following release candidate as the official
Apache Aurora 0.12.0 release.
Aurora 0.12.0-rc0 includes the following:
---
The NEWS for the release is available at:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora.git&f=NEWS&hb=rel/0.12.0-rc0
The CHANGELOG for the
> > > we
>> > > > > have less errors in our code. If I understand correctly, the
>> ProtoBuf
>> > > > > format does this by default, so there some precedent for this
>> style
>> > of
>> > > > cod
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:26 AM, John Sirois wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:45 AM, Jake Farrell wrote:
>
> > +1 to making this apart of Thrift, i'm happy to help shepard this on the
> > Thrift side and get it in as soon as its ready
> >
>
> I've fil
at 2:49 PM, Bill Farner wrote:
>
> > (moved off private list)
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Successfully verified using
> > ./build-support/release/verify-release-candidate 0.12.0-rc0
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:21 PM, John Sirois
> wrote:
>
Noting here that the new RC will be RC2, RC1 was burned on technical
release-process issues.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:23 PM, John Sirois wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Joshua Cohen wrote:
>
>> Changing my vote to -1. We just found a critical bug with Maxim
All,
I propose that we accept the following release candidate as the official
Apache Aurora 0.12.0 release.
Aurora 0.12.0-rc2 includes the following:
---
The NEWS for the release is available at:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora.git&f=NEWS&hb=rel/0.12.0-rc2
The CHANGELOG for the
Circling back to close this vote in the - I think - appropriate way.
This vote has failed. Vote summary:
+1 votes: 3 binding
+0 votes: 0
-1 votes: 1 binding
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:21 AM, John Sirois wrote:
> All,
>
> I propose that we accept the following release candida
This vote has failed. Vote summary:
+1 votes: 0
+0 votes: 0
-1 votes: 1 binding
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 5:01 PM, John Sirois wrote:
> All,
>
> I propose that we accept the following release candidate as the official
> Apache Aurora 0.12.0 release.
>
> Aurora 0.12.0-rc2 incl
Didn't quite do it right, adding binding vote apache ids.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 2:24 PM, John Sirois wrote:
> Circling back to close this vote in the - I think - appropriate way.
>
> This vote has failed. Vote summary:
>
> +1 votes: 3 binding
> +0 votes: 0
> -1 vot
Adding appropriate apache id's to email to make this official.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 2:30 PM, John Sirois wrote:
> This vote has failed. Vote summary:
>
> +1 votes: 0
> +0 votes: 0
> -1 votes: 1 binding
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 5:01 PM, John Sirois wrote:
>
o Apache Thrift. Once that is complete and released,
I'll circle back and re-do an RB like 3/3 (
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42756/) that flips over the codebase to the
new apache thrift gen.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:08 AM, John Sirois wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:26 AM
Although the last blocker raised for the 0.12.0 RC series has been resolved
[1], it looks like resolution of several issues related to rolling back to
0.11.0 are required to cut the next RC:
1. "Scheduler fails to start after rollback":
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1603
2. "Add a fl
gt; * New/updated
> > > * Deprecations and removals
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/NEWS
> > > [2] https://aurora.apache.org/blog/aurora-0-11-0-released/
> > >
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> >
>
--
John Sirois
303-512-3301
t 0.12.0.
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 7:03 AM, Joshua Cohen wrote:
>
> > I'd only consider item 1 to be a blocker to 0.12.0, but 2 and 3 should be
> > relatively quick so in general this sounds like a reasonable plan of
> action
> > to me.
> >
> > On Tue,
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Bill Farner wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Please join me in welcoming Stephan Erb, who is now an Aurora committer and
> PMC member! I'm sure anyone paying attention has noticed Stephan's
> involvement in the community and commitment to improving Aurora!
>
> Welcome aboard,
.com/facebook/codemod
> [2] https://github.com/facebook/jscodeshift
>
--
John Sirois
303-512-3301
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:58 AM, John Sirois wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Maxim Khutornenko
> wrote:
>
>> +1 to having 1603 and 1601 as blockers. I am planning to work on 1603
>> today.
>>
>> As for 1605, I don't believe it's
r both seem to me to
be important to provide to support this selling point.
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 8:10 AM, John Sirois wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:58 AM, John Sirois wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Maxim Khuto
All,
I propose that we accept the following release candidate as the official
Apache Aurora 0.12.0 release.
Aurora 0.12.0-rc3 includes the following:
---
The NEWS for the release is available at:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora.git&f=NEWS&hb=rel/0.12.0-rc3
The CHANGELOG for the
#x27;ll close out this vote.
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 11:10 AM, John Sirois wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I propose that we accept the following release candidate as the official
> > Apache Aurora 0.12.0 release.
> >
> > Aurora 0.12.0-rc3 includes the
Due to a new backfill issue found by Maxim [1], I'm cancelling this vote.
I'll start a new release when that issue is resolved and we've all had time
to re-assess RC status.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1610
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:10 PM, John Sirois wrote
All,
I propose that we accept the following release candidate as the official
Apache Aurora 0.12.0 release.
Aurora 0.12.0-rc4 includes the following:
---
The NEWS for the release is available at:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora.git&f=NEWS&hb=rel/0.12.0-rc4
The CHANGELOG for the
mind, should we block
> >> instance removal in the updater and let an explicit killTasks call be
> >> the only acceptable action to reduce instance count? Is there any
> >> value (aside from arguable convenience factor) in having
> >> startJobUpdate ever killing instances?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Maxim
> >>
> >> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/2smaej5n5e54li3g
> >>
>
--
John Sirois
303-512-3301
I'd like to kick-off voting with my own +1 (binding).
./build-support/release/verify-release-candidate 0.12.0-rc4 is green for me.
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 3:14 PM, John Sirois wrote:
> All,
>
> I propose that we accept the following release candidate as the official
> Apa
clients or custom clients.
>
I guess that's true. I concur.
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 3:17 PM, John Sirois wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Maxim Khutornenko
> > wrote:
> >
> > > We have had attempts to safeguard client updater command with a
I'd like to propose a breaking change in both the java generated service
code and in supporting library code. This change would change
parametrization and use of clients to be symmetric with servers in the java
async stack.
Today the situation is as described in comments in
https://issues.apache.
Sorry folks - wrong list! Please disregard.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:35 PM, John Sirois wrote:
> I'd like to propose a breaking change in both the java generated service
> code and in supporting library code. This change would change
> parametrization and use of clients to be
can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/0.12.0/apache-aurora-0.12.0.asc
The GPG key used to sign the release are available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 3:14 PM, John Sirois wrote:
> All,
>
> I propose that we
The main 0.12.0 release has just been made and docs/distributions will soon
follow.
Though we've barely begun work on it, I'd like to line up a release manager
for 0.13.0.
I'll be happy to help with pointers and advice. I have a few document and
script edits still to come to help smooth out the p
ee <https://builds.apache.org/job/aurora-packaging-nightly/194/>
>
>
--
John Sirois
303-512-3301
r/lib/docker/aufs/mnt/2bf3bb359dec47586c324e03f190404b312fa6237618c36d23d935105d1b6172/dist:
> no such file or directory
>
Yes - exactly - the aufs overlay missing is the error I see happening alot.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:56 PM, John Sirois wrote:
>
> > I would l
;>
>> Is there a way we can help out here?
>>
>> Best,
>> Stephan
>>
>> From: John Sirois
>> Sent: Monday, February 8, 2016 23:47
>> To: dev@aurora.apache.org
>> Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 RC4
>>
>>
ith
> strong
> > > > community engagement. We have placed deliberate effort to build
> > release
> > > > notes as we iterate towards future releases, which has received
> > positive
> > > > feedback from users.
> > > >
> > > >
03 AM, "Bill Farner" wrote:
>
> IIRC site changes aren't blocked on binaries. I believe the only link is
the bintray button, which automatically tracks the latest bintray version.
>
> https://aurora.apache.org/downloads/
>
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 8:10 AM, John Sirois
I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb
packaging for
Apache Aurora 0.12.0.
https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/ubuntu-trusty/
https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/debian-jessie/
The Aurora deb packaging includes the following:
---
The CHANGELOG is
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:02 PM, John Sirois wrote:
> The main 0.12.0 release has just been made and docs/distributions will
> soon follow.
>
> Though we've barely begun work on it, I'd like to line up a release
> manager for 0.13.0.
> I'll be happy to help with p
ing in the 2 respective
aurora-packaing test/deb/ environments.
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 8:00 AM, John Sirois wrote:
>
>> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb
>> packaging for
>> Apache Aurora 0.12.0.
>>
>> https://dl.bintray.c
e
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:39 PM, John Sirois wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:02 PM, John Sirois wrote:
> >
> > > The main 0.12.0 release has just been made and docs/distributions will
> > > soon follow.
> > >
> > > Though we&
I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official rpm packaging
for Apache Aurora 0.12.0.
*https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
<https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/>*
The Aurora rpm packaging includes the following:
---
The CHANGELOG is viewa
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:00 AM, John Sirois wrote:
> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official rpm packaging
> for Apache Aurora 0.12.0.
>
> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
> <https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/>
old flat namespace is replaced with one level
of nesting by target platform, see:
https://apache.bintray.com/aurora/ubuntu-trusty/
https://apache.bintray.com/aurora/debian-jessie/
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:00 AM, John Sirois wrote:
> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the offic
Pinging this VOTE and noting that the close is Monday at 11am Mountain time.
Please test!
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:03 AM, John Sirois wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:00 AM, John Sirois wrote:
>
>> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 3:32 PM, John Sirois wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Jake Farrell wrote:
>
>> I'm happy to step in and take the rm role for .13 if no one else is
>> interested
>>
>
> Thanks Jake. If no new-releaser (it would be
ed to load native Mesos library from
> /usr/lib;/usr/lib64
> I was able to fix this by removing ;/usr/lib64 from
> -Djava.library.path='/usr/lib;/usr/lib64', alternatively by removing the
> library.path setting and exporting LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib.
>
> Happy to pitch
-i/yum
install/. This is enough to invalidate the release though and I'll get out
more fixes to the test docs.
My install procedure was exactly:
version=0.12.0
pkg_root="https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/";
for rpm in \
aurora-scheduler-${version}-1.el7.centos.aur
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:09 AM, John Sirois wrote:
> My sanity may be partially restored, although several things are wonky.
> More below on my morning experiments, all after vagrant destroy for sanity
> sake in the test/rpm/centos-7 dir of the aurora-packaging repo:
>
> On Sa
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:09 AM, John Sirois wrote:
> My sanity may be partially restored, although several things are wonky.
> More below on my morning experiments, all after vagrant destroy for sanity
> sake in the test/rpm/centos-7 dir of the aurora-packaging repo:
>
> On Sa
I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official rpm packaging
for Apache Aurora 0.12.0.
*https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
<https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/>*
The Aurora rpm packaging includes the following:
---
The CHANGELOG is viewa
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Joshua Cohen wrote:
> I've gone ahead and filed some tickets breaking down the work involved in
> this effort. They're all contained within this epic:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1634.
>
> I agree that we should assess our plans re: containers a
g instructions starting here:
> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/test/rpm/centos-7/README.md#released
>
> and
> pkg_root="https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/";
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:10 PM, John Sirois wrote:
>
>> I
ime for folks to vote. As such, unless someone is aware of conflicting
policy, I'll extend this vote until we get a binding +1 or any -1.
Please test if you can find the time!
[1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:19 AM, John Sirois wrote:
> I&#x
nd https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1647 to fix these.
>
> Packages in general are fine, so we can leave those two issues for another
> day.
>
> From: John Sirois
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 14:25
> To: Bill Farner
> Cc
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
