Re: [jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-821) Failing to write lastId to ledger directories should not fail startup of bookies

Reporter: Jia Zhai Assignee: Jia Zhai Fix For: 4.3.1 Attachments: BOOKKEEPER-821_no-prefix.patch Original Estimate: 5h Remaining Estimate: 5h At the startup of bookie, the bookie constructor would call setLastLogId() as this trace: Bookie

Re: Problems with the repo?

I had a try just now, It works good for me, no connection issue. On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Flavio Junqueira fpjunque...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Is anyone else having issues accessing the repo server https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/bookkeeper.git

Re: Subject: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.2.4 Release Candidate 0 [ACTION REQUIRED]

a release candidate the better, as you don't have to be a committer to find a problem with a release. Regards Ivan On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Jia Zhai zhaiji...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ivan, I am a rookie here, I think this vote is for committers only, right? Is there anything that we

Re: Subject: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.2.4 Release Candidate 0 [ACTION REQUIRED]

Hi Ivan, I am a rookie here, I think this vote is for committers only, right? Is there anything that we could help on this as a rookie? :) Best regards. -Jia On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Ivan Kelly iv...@apache.org wrote: There's only one vote so far, but I guess it got missed due to the

Re: Subject: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.2.4 Release Candidate 0 [ACTION REQUIRED]

really appreciate if we could have more developers on this list testing the RCs. -Flavio On Monday, January 12, 2015 2:51 PM, Jia Zhai zhaiji...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ivan, Thanks for your explanation, That sounds good. I will try it tomorrow. Best Regards. -Jia On Mon, Jan 12

Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.1 Release Candidate 0

P.S. the JIRA number is: 1. Bookkeeper https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER 2. BOOKKEEPER-838 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-838 On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Jia Zhai zhaiji...@gmail.com wrote: According to Ivan’s reply, I did a check of the build

Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.3.1 Release Candidate 0

According to Ivan’s reply, I did a check of the build history. Seems recently failing is with this stack: java.io.IOException: Unable to delete directory /tmp/bkTest3561939033223584760.dir/current/0. at org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils.deleteDirectory(FileUtils.java:1337) at

Re: GitHub Integration & Contribution workflow

That is more convenient. :) Thanks for this. On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Here is the new jenkins job against PRs : > https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-master-git-pullrequest/ > > - Sijie > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 1:16 AM, Flavio Junqueira < >

Re: Improve Write performance with Relax durability.

> > property. >>> > > >>> > > But, biggest doubt in my mind is - this changes something >>> fundamental. >>> > LAC. >>> > > Are we allowing sparse ledger? in failure scenario? Handling read >>> side >>> > may

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New BookKeeper Committer: Jia Zhai

12:02 AM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: > > > The Apache BookKeeper PMC recently extended committer karma to Jia Zhai > and > > he has accepted. Jia has been involved in the community since 2014. He is > > active in code contributions, discussion and code rev

Improve Write performance with Relax durability.

Hello all, I am wondering do you guys have any plans on supporting relax durability. Is it a good feature to have in bookkeeper (also for DistributedLog)? I am thinking adding a new flag to bookkeeper#addEntry(..., Boolean sync). So the application can control whether to sync or not for

Re: Improve Write performance with Relax durability.

+ distributedlog-user For more input and comments. :) Thanks. On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > I am wondering do you guys have any plans on supporting relax durability. > Is it a good feature to have in bookkeeper (also

Re: Precommit test failures

Got it Flavio. Thanks a lot. On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Flavio P JUNQUEIRA <f...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Jia, > > I think this is the queue you want to look at : > > https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/bookkeeper-master-git-pullrequest/ > > -Flavio >

Re: Precommit test failures

Oh, There was BOOKKEEPER-876 trys to fix the pre-checkin issues. But I didn't have enough time to fix it, sorry for that. Will look into these errors and try to help on them. And seems we still not keep enough pre-checkin build history in Jenkins, there was only 2 build logs(979,944):

Re: Improve Write performance with Relax durability.

dinate such a sync > > > > Does making ensemble size equal to ack quorum size work here? > > > > At the moment for my projects is not very urgent but I think that it > could > > be an useful feature > > > > Enrico > > > > Il Gio 9 Giu 2016

A bookkeeper DCOS/mesos package

Hi Guys, There is a PR against bookkeeper DCOS package, this is a very first version, I will enhance it while using it. welcome comments on it. https://github.com/mesosphere/universe/pull/797 There is also an example PR there for how this package should be used:

Re: A bookkeeper DCOS/mesos package

olive...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Great! I hope it will give more visibility to BookKeeper! > > > > > > Thank you Jia > > > Enrico > > > > > > Il mar 8 nov 2016, 18:52 Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> ha scritto: > > > >

Re: Is there a page like "who is using BK/DL"?

; - what areas are you working on or interested in > bookkeeper/distributedlog? > > > > - Xi > > > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 3:49 AM, Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Here is a draft content(referenced other project) for BookKeeper, Would &

Re: Is there a page like "who is using BK/DL"?

a! Let's create one for that purpose. > > > > Sijie > > > > On Dec 5, 2016 6:00 PM, "Jia Zhai" <zhaiji...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Yes. That is what I mean. By it, we may get more direct info about who > > is > > > intresting and want to

Re: Is there a page like "who is using BK/DL"?

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> wrote: > Got it. I will open a ticket on Jira first. > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Khurrum Nasim <khurrumnas...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 for this idea. >> >> - KN >&g

Re: Next Community Meeting?

> > wrote: > > > > > >> Yeah it will be awesome if Jia can present. But I am going to miss. > :( I > > >> will ask someone at Salesforce to record it. :) > > >> > > >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Enrico Olivelli < >

Re: Is there a page like "who is using BK/DL"?

n we open a > dummy github issue for people to comment to register themselves? > > - Sijie > > On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > I found that in project RocketMQ, there is an open issue: > > https://gi

Is there a page like "who is using BK/DL"?

Hi guys, I found that in project RocketMQ, there is an open issue: https://github.com/alibaba/RocketMQ/issues/1 , in which a lot of user / developer registered themself. This may bring benifit of connecting between usr, developor and community. Is there a need for us to have such a similar issue

Re: BP-11: New BookKeeper Website

dback: > > - installation refers only to building from sources, I think we should > talk > > about downloading the binaries and checking the checksums, ofter people > who > > deploy software do not want to use "maven" as it is a "dev tool" >

[Draft] bookkeeper board report - August 2017

Hi all, Here is a draft for our August report, Please help review and comments on it. Thanks a lot. -Jia == ## Description: BookKeeper is a distributed, reliable, and high performance logging service. It has been used as a fundamental service to build high available and replicated

Re: Release Notes 4.5.0

It contains so many features, maybe we could release smaller and more frequently in the feture. On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Sijie Guo wrote: > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:50 AM, Enrico Olivelli - Diennea < > enrico.olive...@diennea.com> wrote: > > > Il giorno mer,

Re: bookkeeper ci job failed to push to gitbox repo

 On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Somehow it seems the problem went away - > https://builds.apache.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/ > bookkeeper-postcommit-publish-website/detail/bookkeeper- > postcommit-publish-website/74/pipeline > > It seems the gitbox

Re: Docker images

gt; wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 3:47 AM, Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks Sijie for raising these good topics up. > > > > Regarding 1) official image, the Flink one is similar as Zookeeper one, > > which we have discussed before. If the cur

BookKeeper docker image is avaliable under apache now

FYI. BookKeeper docker image is avaliable under apache now: https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/bookkeeper/

Re: [DISCUSS] move github notifications to other mailing list

``` We can possibly move "jekins", "jira" and "git" related emails to a separate mailing list like issues@. for the mention emails, you might just create a filter rule to categorize them. ```  This seems enough to me. On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > I

Re: Bug releases on Github

Fix Milestone: 4.6.0* > > *Would you like to update github issues with these labels? (y/n): y* > > > *-* > > Any thoughts? > > - Sijie > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:12 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Il v

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 4.6.0 and 4.5.1

Hi, I would like to have a a try on 4.6.0. On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > 4.5.0 is out. Although we haven't reached a conclusion whether we want to > adopt "Time Based Release Plan" yet, I would still like to start the > discussion on the next releases.

Re: BookKeeper docker image is avaliable under apache now

Good, happy to finally see it in docker hub! Thank you all! > > > > On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 03:59 -0700, Sijie Guo wrote: > > > > Awesome, Francesco and Jia! > > > > Nice work! > > > > - Sijie > > > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 3:53 AM, Enric

Re: Bug releases on Github

The work flow sounds great. Currently, One problem is that contributor do not have permissions to change the Assignees, Labels, projects and Milestone for both issue and PR. It would be better if contributor could do that. On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: >

Re: BeWeekly Community Meeting

Thanks for the minutes. sorry for not able to join in because of network issue 2017年7月14日 上午12:03，"Enrico Olivelli" 写道： This is the link to the minutes https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/ 2017-07-13+Meeting+Agenda Thank you to every one who attended the

Re: Official Bookkeeper Docker Image

usy recently :-) > > I'll do my best to push the centos image and reply comments to the PR by > the end of the week, if I will not succeed, I will push anyway what I've > done and let you take over the issue. Could this be a good fit? > > Francesco. > > _______

Draft Agenda for Bi-weekly meeting at 2017-07-13

Hi all, :) I would like to put a draft Agenda here for 7/13's meeting, this is just limited from my point of view, Please feel free to add anything you want to discuss. *Agenda:* - Status of 4.5

Re: [DISCUSS] BookKeeper - A High Performance and Low Latency Storage Service

 On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 2:07 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Thank you for your feedback, Flavio. > > On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 3:10 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > > > I like the idea of updating the characterization of the project. It makes > > sense that the project

Re: Git protected branches

gt;> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Other thoughts? > > >> > If there is no objection I would like to enable the force push > block. > > >> Next > > &

Re: Draft Agenda for Bi-weekly meeting at 2017-07-13

t; > Thank you Jia, > > Maybe we can talk about code-coverage > > > > 2017-07-11 11:49 GMT+02:00 Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Hi all, :) > > > I would like to put a draft Agenda here > > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluen

Re: [ANNOUNCE] JV Jujjuri joins the Apache BookKeeper PMC

Congrats, JV! On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > Congrats, JV! > > -F > > On 07 Jul 2017, at 00:11, Charan Reddy G wrote: > > Congrats JV! > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > >>

Regarding the configuration in BK docker image # PR 197

Hi, Thanks a lot for @caiok 's PR for BK docker image. While in the review there was some concern related to the configuration things, and it is some kind of fundamental for docker image, it may be worth to have some discuss here to get some feedback. :). In PR 197

Re: BookKeeper website menus not working

verified on chrome, safari and firefox, "https" not work, while "http" works well. I would like to have a try on fix this. On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Yes. We might just change 'http://' to '//', so it will take whatever > protocol you are using to

Re: BookKeeper website menus not working

A jira ticket for this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1101 Now https tabs could work: https://bookkeeper.apache.org On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> wrote: > verified on chrome, safari and firefox, "https" not work, w

Re: New BookKeeper homepage on GitHub

, Thanks Sijie and Enrico for this. :) On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi, > we have a new "homepage" on GitHub !!! > > see > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/ > > > Enrico >

Draft Agenda for Bi-weekly meeting at 2017-07-27

Hi all, :) I would like to put a draft Agenda here for 7/27's meeting, this is just limited from my point of view, Please feel free to add anything you want to discuss in this meeting. *Agenda:* - Status of 4.5

Re: [DISCUSS] Slack Channel for BookKeeper

 It is great to have a slack channel. It make things more effective and smooth. On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 8:11 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Hi all, > > What do you guys all think about having a dedicated slack channel for > informal discussion for the community? There are a handful

Re: [Discuss] Release DL 0.5.0

an continue the tests with DL + BK 4.5 > > > > It is a good way to look for regressions on 4.5 > > > > -- Enrico > > > > > > > > 2017-07-26 3:17 GMT+02:00 Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Hi All, > > > Because DL

Re: BookKeeper repo has been moved into gitbox

tant change !! > > >> > > >> Do you now what will happen if any committers uses > > >> git-ws-us.apache.org as usual ? > > >> is there any chance to break things ? > > >> > > >> we should immediately update the wiki page >

Re: Git protected branches

Agree to have them protected. Currently, seems these branches are not protected, at least master branch is not. The merge button is still available even "Jenkins: Maven clean install — Build finished." in some of PRs We may first need to make the test

Re: BookKeeper and CheckStyle

+1 for current PR not including bookkeeper-server, And as Enrico suggested, may be we could do bookkeeper-server changes at the end of 4.5.0 or beginning of 4.6.0. On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Those modules are fine, they are rarely touched any way. >

Re: Official Bookkeeper Docker Image

18:25, Francesco Caliumi - Diennea < > francesco.cali...@diennea.com<mailto:francesco.cali...@diennea.com>> > wrote: > > I realized that in the PR there is an error. I will re-file ASAP the > correct PR (with probably the centos build in dir "4.4.0"). > > Sorry f

Re: [DISCUSS] BookKeeper - A High Performance and Low Latency Storage Service

Agree, BookKeeper is far more than a WAL system, and maybe even more than "a High Performance and Low Latency Storage Service (that optimised for immutable/append-only data)", since the persistence and consistences. >From my view, to us engineers, WAL may be a good point, It means a lot of

BookKeeper repo has been moved into gitbox

Hi All, Thanks to the help from INFRA team, now bookkeeper repo has been moved into gitbox. The new URL (on our side) is https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/bookkeeper.git For committers, please go through the setup at https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/ Thanks.

Re: BookKeeper repo has been moved into gitbox

; we should immediately update the wiki page > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/Patch+Sumission > >> > >> let's wait for Sijie acknowledge > >> > >> Thank you > >> -- Enrico > >> > >> > >> > >> 2017-06-28 1

Draft Agenda for Bi-weekly meeting at 2017-08-10

Hi all, :) I would like to put a draft Agenda here for 8/10's meeting, this is just limited from my point of view, Please feel free to add anything you want to discuss in this meeting. *Agenda:* - Status of 4.5

Re: Time Based Release for onwards releases.

+1 to adopt it. All the benefits seems reasonable. On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Hi all, > > First thanks everyone who contributed to 4.5.0 in the past year, and > especially thanks JV for spending time doing the release. The first release > candidate

Re: bookkeeper website from cms to git

 Cool. reported 2 small bugs 416 and 417 , regarding the view. On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 5:52 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Now we are on the new website!

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.5.0, release candidate #0

+1 (non binding) - Built from source package success; - Run local bookies success with built binary and downloaded; - Verified md5, sha1 and asc for both src and bin tgz, all success; - Run the binary in Docker environment and tested with 3 bookies deployment and tests, all success. Also created

Re: Time Based Release for onwards releases.

past year (last 3 > releases) to latest release > > - Schedule for next 4 releases: > > - August 2017 - November 2017 > > - November 2017 - February 2018 > > - February 2018 - May 2018 > > - May 2018 - August 2018 > > > Any thoughts? > > - Sijie > &

Re: Slack Channel

The links works well. I am updating the documentation for slack channel. https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/341 On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Hi all, > > The slack channel https://apachebookkeeper.slack.com is live now. If you > have emails

Re: bookkeeper board report

I would like to have a try. :) On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 7:57 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Hi all, > > We have a board report due in August. We have a pretty good progress in the > last 3 months. Anyone is interested in drafting a board report for August? > > - Sijie >

Re: bookkeeper board report

g%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > This was the last board report draft. It should be a good example to > follow. I can help you to grab the numbers. > > - Sijie > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I would like to have a try. :) > > &g

Re: [Draft] bookkeeper board report - August 2017

M, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thank you Jia, > > comments inline > > > > 2017-08-01 9:59 GMT+02:00 Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Hi all, > > > Here is a draft for our August report, Please hel

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Four DistributedLog PPMC members joins the Apache BookKeeper PMC

 Welcome Henry and other experts. :) Thanks for the helps and contributions to BK ecosystem. On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Thanks for the warm welcome, Sijie. > > Thank you for having us, Apache BookKeeper PMCs. > > - Henry > > On Wed, Aug 9,

Re: BP-12: Improve documentation

I would like to help on the docker deployment part. Thanks. On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il mer 9 ago 2017, 07:47 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > > > (/cc dev@distributedlog for calling for contributions) > > > > Hi all, > > > >

Re: Draft Agenda for Bi-weekly meeting at 2017-07-27

cker..we are on the good way!! > > >> - checkstyleI hope we could move forward, not blocker for 4.5 for > me > > >> - code coverageI will go on, not blocker for 4.5 for me > > >> - we pushed Jenkins Job Builder, I am going to convert all the jo

Re: BP-11: New BookKeeper Website

Awesome On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 6:04 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote: > Looks great :D. This has been long overdue. > > My one piece of feedback is that perhaps the font is too big on the > documentation. It means that there isn't much content on the page > before having to scroll (See

Re: [Draft] bookkeeper board report - August 2017

Thanks for the input of Flavio, Enrico and Sijie, updated a new version here: == ## Description: BookKeeper is a distributed, reliable, and high performance logging service. It has been used as a fundamental service to build high available and replicated services in companies

Re: Relax durability

, looking forward to see the BP. On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi, > I am working with my colleagues at an implementation to relax the > constraint that every acknowledged entry must have been successfully > written and fsynced to disk at

Draft Agenda for Bi-weekly meeting at 2017-08-24

Hi all, :) I would like to put a draft Agenda here for 8/24's meeting, this is just limited from my point of view, Please feel free to add anything you want to discuss in this meeting. *Agenda:* - BP - 14 Relax

Re: [VOTE] Merge DistributedLog as the subproject of Apache BookKeeper

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Stevo Slavić wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > > > (dropping general@) > > > > - Sijie > > > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Sijie Guo

Re: BP-9 - Github issues for Issue Tracking

Hi Enrico, Sijie And Flavio, Thanks a lot for the great comments on this. the BP have changed following the comments. ``` I think the labels/milestones can work as you described, but maybe we can consider to use composite labels like component/server or type/improvement. ``` < == seems "server"

Re: BP-9 - Github issues for Issue Tracking

Thanks Sijie and Flavio, will add above workflow part into the BP. On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Enrico, Sijie And Flavio, > > > >

Re: Official Bookkeeper Docker Image

Regarding push docker images into apache account, there was an update in our bi-weekly-meeting notes, which including example of others. >From my view, the first step is to have a "docker" dir, which is mentioned by sijie, in bookkeeper repo, to contains Docker Build related files. We could do it

Re: Publish SNAPSHOT artifacts on Maven Central

FYI. Here is the wiki page from INFRA Jenkins: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Jenkins On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > 2017-06-06 9:28 GMT+02:00 Flavio Junqueira : > > I have used Jenkins extensively, but not the

Re: Official Bookkeeper Docker Image

as docker experiences can > review it. > > - Sijie > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com<mailto:zh > aiji...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > Regarding push docker images into apache account, there was an update in > our bi-weekly-

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Bookkeeper Website from CMS to Jekyll (or other static generators)

This is great to have a unified documentation place. On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > FYI. I created a BP for this - > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=71012301 > > - Sijie > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Sijie Guo

Re: Improvements to GitHub templates

Seems to me, it is not a big problem to have these lines there. :) If we decide to move these lines, I would prefer solution 2) or 3). On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi, > with the new templates it is very common to leave these lines in the PR >

Re: Netty 4

 On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:26 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Here it is! > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/ > apache/bookkeeper/ > this is the pom with netty4 > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/ >

Re: [VOTE] Use Github Issues for Issue Tracking

+1 The simpler the better. On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Ivan Kelly wrote: > +1 from me. Always good to reduce barriers to participation. > > -Ivan > > On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 12:29 AM, Matteo Merli wrote: > > +1 > > > > Having issues and PR in one tool is

Draft Agenda for Bi-weekly meeting at 2017-06-15

Hi all, :) I would like to put a draft Agenda here for next meeting, this is just limited from my point of view, Please feel free to add anything you want to discuss. *Agenda:* - Discuss Docker Image -

Re: BP-9 - Github issues for Issue Tracking

FYI. created bookkeeper [issue]( https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/191) and [PR]( https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/192)， We could try them out to see what permissions we have now under Apache’s mirror github. On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com>

Re: GitHub permissions

Hi Sijie, Flavio and Enrico, I prepared a BP for this "Github issues", would you please help comment on it? And seems I did not have write permission, Would please help add it in https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/BookKeeper+Proposals ? If could get the permission, it is

BP-9 - Github issues for Issue Tracking

Hi all, I've put up a proposal on how to use Github issues, try to start with very simple steps. Any thoughts? Best Regards. -Jia

Re: Draft Agenda for Bi-weekly meeting at 2017-06-15

Updated the meeting minutes <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/2017-06-15+Meeting+notes>, if there is anything missing, please help add it. Thanks a lot. On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, :) > I would like to

Re: [DRAFT] [REPORT] BookKeeper - May 2017

+1. Looks good. Thanks a lot for this. On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 12:29 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Hi all, > > We have a board report due this month. Here is the draft. > > Let me know if anything else that I need to add. > > --- > > ## Description: > > BookKeeper is a distributed,

Re: Agenda for community meeting at 2017-09-21

 On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Hi all, > > I am not sure if there is any BP or topics to discuss this week. I've put > up an agenda for it. > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/ > 2017-09-21+Meeting+Agenda > > BP-17 was already

Re: [DISCUSS] BP-17: define BookKeeper public http endpoints

i <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > 2017-09-13 10:31 GMT+02:00 Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com>: > > > >> Thanks a lot for your time Yiming and Enrico. :) > >> > >> Regarding the security, we could do it in a separate BP, an

Re: HerdDB a distributed JVM-embeddable database built on Apache BookKeeper

 On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri < jujj...@gmail.com> wrote: > Congratulations!! > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 7:24 AM, Matteo Merli wrote: > > > Very nice! > > > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 6:02 AM Enrico Olivelli > > wrote: > >

Re: Agenda for community meeting at 2017-09-21

to: > > > > > Perfect! > > > Thank you Jia > > > Enrico > > > > > > On gio 21 set 2017, 17:58 Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> Drafted the meeting notes for today's meeting, Please help edit

Re: Meeting Notes - 2017-10-05

 On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 4:42 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Hi all, > > Here is the meeting notes : > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/ > 2017-10-05+Meeting+Notes > > Please point out if I missed anything we discussed at the meeting. > > - Sijie >

Re: Draft Agenda for Bi-weekly meeting at 2017-08-24

is link. Is this open? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Ed > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On mer 23 ago 2017, 02:57 Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmai

Re: [DISCUSS] BP-16: remove zookeeper dependency from bookkeeper client

This blog: https://bitworks.software/blog/en/2017-07-12-replicated-scalable-commitlog-with-apachebookkeeper.html, which also refer a little the limitation of zookeeper in bookkeeper On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> wrote: > . Thanks a lot for the su

Re: [DISCUSS] BP-17: define BookKeeper public http endpoints

ch could > > change the bookie state or trigger some heavy workload. These APIs looks > a > > bit risky to me if we don't have any authentication enabled (in Twitter). > > > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] BP-16: remove zookeeper dependency from bookkeeper client

Any thoughts or comments :) Thanks a lot. -Jia On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> wrote: > This blog: https://bitworks.software/blog/en/2017-07-12-replicated- > scalable-commitlog-with-apachebookkeeper.html, which also refer a little > the limitati

Re: Porting DistributedLog utilities to BookKeeper

How about make class OrderedSafeExecutor extends OrderedScheduler. then all the old reference in bk will not need change, and in future dl will also survive? On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > 2017-09-27 16:14 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo

Re: Docker images

5, 2017 at 12:38 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com > <mailto:eolive...@gmail.com>> > wrote: > > > > Il mar 15 ago 2017, 09:16 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com<mailto:guo > si...@gmail.com>> ha scritto: > > > > On Aug 14, 2017 11:18

Re: Relax durability

I second that! Thanks Enrico for starting and holding this productive discussion. Thanks Enrico, JV, Sijie and other guys to make this consensus. Looking forward for the design. On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 12:53 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri wrote: > Hi all, > > It has been a

Re: Votes on tags vs docker hub requirements

I remember that, Do you mean we do bookkeeper docker following zookeeper and flink's way? On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 6:19 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > I think it is better to change the docker image process, leaving tag > untouched. I have raised the discussion about official docker

  1   2   3   4   >