May I get access to edit pages as well?
username: rajanik
--
Thanks,
- Rajani
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.commailto:chip%20childers%20%3cchip.child...@sungard.com%3e
Reply-to: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin
--David
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Rajani Karuturi
rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
Thanks for the wiki alena and rajesh.
Can this be moved to docs?
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/latest/service_offerings.html#network
/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin
--David
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Rajani Karuturi
rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
Thanks for the wiki alena and rajesh.
Can this be moved to docs?
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/latest/service_offerings.html#network
I was thinking that Rayees would commit the fix as the bug is reopened. Will
wait for him to comment.
~Rajani
On 03-Jul-2014, at 6:43 pm, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 3, 2014, at 11:10 AM, Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hi Sebastien,
while rebasing
I believe this has nothing to do with nonoss. If I understand it right, nonoss
modules are required for cloudstack to work with certain 3rd party stuff.
This one is just a helper to create a windows installer. It chose to use a mvn
command to create the installer instead of shell/bat script. It
,
Hugo
[1] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x
On 8 jul. 2014, at 12:57, Rajani Karuturi
rajani.karut...@citrix.commailto:rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
I believe this has nothing to do with nonoss. If I understand it right, nonoss
modules are required for cloudstack to work
In my first email, I mentioned a youtube url[1] which is a google tech talk by
Laura Wingerd [2] of Perforce Software
I recommend watching it as well. (its a 55 min video).
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJ-CpGsCpM0
[2] http://www.perforce.com/blog/author/lwingerd
~Rajani
On
Hi Hugo,
Does this make sense? Do you still think it should be part of noredist profile?
~Rajani
On 09-Jul-2014, at 10:44 am, Rajani Karuturi
rajani.karut...@citrix.commailto:rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Hugo,
Even in case of windows installer, mysql-connector-java is mentioned
Hi Hugo,
Does this make sense? Do you still think it should be part of noredist profile?
~Rajani
On 09-Jul-2014, at 10:44 am, Rajani Karuturi
rajani.karut...@citrix.commailto:rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Hugo,
Even in case of windows installer, mysql-connector-java is mentioned
: cloudstack-git
Description
---
Fixed coverity reported issues in UserVmManagerImpl
Diffs
-
server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java dac4acf
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23550/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Rajani Karuturi
://reviews.apache.org/r/23550/#review47889
---
On July 16, 2014, 12:37 p.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r
/23603/diff/
Testing
---
manually tested register template on lxc
Thanks,
Rajani Karuturi
://reviews.apache.org/r/23550/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Rajani Karuturi
/cloudstack/utils/template/TemplateUtils.java bad94de
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23603/diff/
Testing
---
manually tested register template on lxc
Thanks,
Rajani Karuturi
I think “Cloudstack on Windows” was only on master which would be 4.5
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6105 has fix version as 4.5
@Damoder can you comment?
~Rajani
On 23-Jul-2014, at 8:17 am, Pierre-Luc Dion
pd...@cloudops.commailto:pd...@cloudops.com wrote:
release-notes
What did you add to the PATH? did you miss M2_HOME/bin??
FYI,
This came on the first page when googled for “cygwin maven windows”
http://www.mkyong.com/maven/how-to-install-maven-in-windows/
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Setting+up+a+CloudStack+dev+environment+on+Windows
...@gmail.com wrote:
I followed the same steps added variable M2_HOME and specified the path
as C:\Apache Maven\apache-maven-3.0.5. %M2_HOME%\bin is added to to PATH
variable but still I'm getting the same error
Regards
Priyanka
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Rajani Karuturi
rajani.karut
and back
into
develop….etc
Please read [1] it's a good read.
And let's discuss,
[1] http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/
-Sebastien
On Jun 2, 2014, at 11:58 PM, Rajani Karuturi
rajani.karut...@citrix.com
wrote:
There is also the problem of cherry-picking
if you will.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Rajani Karuturi
rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
I agree with mike. I think we should start 4.5 from where master is now
Also create a develop branch from master and continue future work for 4.6
there.
I am not clear on how the release branches
It makes sense to me now. +1 from me
one minor thing i would like to add is git-flow doesn’t force you to its naming
convention. You can choose any and stick to it. But, it makes sense to use the
defaults.
~Rajani
On 24-Jul-2014, at 2:52 pm, Leo Simons lsim...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
On
in the sockets page
Thanks,
Rajani Karuturi
should be
done on the 4.5 branch.
~Rajani
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Rajani Karuturi
rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Daan,
here is what i propose:
1. rename 'master' to 'develop’
2. branch a new 'master' from '4.4’
3. branch 'RELEASE-4.5' from the develop
4. merge
/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23915/#comment85476
please log a message incase rec is null
- Rajani Karuturi
On July 25, 2014, 6:10 a.m., Damodar Reddy Talakanti wrote:
---
This is an automatically
/templates.js e12927c
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23922/diff/
Testing
---
manually tested register template
Thanks,
Rajani Karuturi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23915/#review48719
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Rajani Karuturi
On July 25, 2014, 9:12 a.m
On July 25, 2014, 10:11 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote:
Ship It!
commit 0a5940c9a80cfff827c469f92640a70b9037829a
Author: Damodar damoder.re...@citrix.com
AuthorDate: Fri Jul 25 14:40:21 2014 +0530
Commit: Rajani Karuturi rajanikarut...@gmail.com
CommitDate: Fri Jul 25 15:34:20 2014
?
Second, can you commit behind HEAD? You don't want the 4.4.1 release
instead of 4.8.0 to be HEAD
Someone might have good solutions to this, but if not I would propose to
keep the release branches for future bugfixes.
Erik
25. juli 2014 06:02 skrev Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com
/
---
(Updated April 23, 2014, 9:20 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Jayapal Reddy, Rajani Karuturi, Rajesh
Battala, and Santhosh Edukulla.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
With multiple java processes writing to the same
Hi Daan,
commit 2ab7bcade2f37cb17e071a6154fdae1d80e4ff99
Author: Rajani Karuturi
rajanikarut...@gmail.commailto:rajanikarut...@gmail.com
Date: Fri May 23 15:50:06 2014 +0530
Fixed CLOUDSTACK-6756: usage id is not being returned for an ip in
deleted ip range
This is same
4. Then, conflict would happen when you merge release/4.4. branch to
release/4.5. Since the version number changed to 4.4.1. You need to deal
with version number conflict every time when merge to upper release.
one empty merge with git merge -s ours after the version change and git would
not
For the git flow:
1. We agreed to follow git-flow explained here
http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/
2. This is the proposal for first cut
2a. rename 'master' to 'develop’
2b. branch a new 'master' from ‘4.4’ and update tags with release/4.4.0
2c. branch ‘release/4.5' from the
you gave; these are reviewer guidelines for my
part not requirements to a work flow.
In general I am +1 on putting this to vote.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Rajani Karuturi
rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
For the git flow:
1. We agreed to follow git-flow explained here
http
I updated the wiki
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Git#Git-Gitflow
~Rajani
On 31-Jul-2014, at 2:47 pm, Sebastien Goasguen
run...@gmail.commailto:run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 31, 2014, at 4:46 AM, Rajani Karuturi
rajani.karut...@citrix.commailto:rajani.karut
discussion on other threads?
On 31-Jul-2014, at 11:17 am, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 31, 2014, at 4:46 AM, Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
to start using git-flow from 4.5+, we need to have the latest stable version
which can be master and I assumed
Hi All,
We had long discussions on the git flow.
I tried to capture the summary of it @
http://markmail.org/message/j5z7dxjcqxfkfhpj
This is updated on wiki @
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Git#Git-ProposedGitflowbasedCheck-inProcess
and is up for a vote:
Can you share
with the branches in the CloudStack
git.
It’s is a good thing in my book, but we need to be clear what the expected
result is when this vote has concluded in 72 hours.
Cheers,
Hugo
On 31 jul. 2014, at 12:28, Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi All,
We had
@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] git workflow
+0
While this protects master with only commits which are merges from release
branch and keeps it clean but the issues that we have shift to develop branch.
-Original Message-
From: Rajani Karuturi
to this.
Sebastian/Daan/Hugo
Can we start on following this and make the necessary git branches?
Thanks,
~Rajani
On 31-Jul-2014, at 3:58 pm, Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi All,
We had long discussions on the git flow.
I tried to capture the summary of it @
http
Hi Leo,
Thanks for the detailed wiki.
shouldn’t we use git flow support for LTS releases?
http://stackoverflow.com/a/16866118/201514
~Rajani
On 04-Aug-2014, at 7:29 pm, Leo Simons lsim...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
Hey folks,
Since Daan volunteered me to do some docs, I’ve updated
AM, Rajani Karuturi
rajani.karut...@citrix.commailto:rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Leo,
Thanks for the detailed wiki.
shouldn’t we use git flow support for LTS releases?
http://stackoverflow.com/a/16866118/201514
~Rajani
On 04-Aug-2014, at 7:29 pm, Leo Simons
lsim
/CLOUDSTACK/Validating+check-ins+for+your+local+changes%2C+using+Simulator
I think the flag should be required_hardware=false
- Rajani Karuturi
On Aug. 5, 2014, 6:25 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e
I am creating a develop branch on the latest master commit
cc725e53e304781148a6bf077e05d844fe88207c and will update in a minute.
please wait for my next mail and push all the commit to develop branch there
after.
~Rajani
pm, Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
I am creating a develop branch on the latest master commit
cc725e53e304781148a6bf077e05d844fe88207c and will update in a minute.
please wait for my next mail and push all the commit to develop branch there
after.
~Rajani
AM, Rajani Karuturi
rajani.karut...@citrix.commailto:rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
Daan,
I think we should do the branch related changes[1] and make the switch. Are we
waiting for a RM for 4.5?
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Git#Git-Movetogit-flow
~Rajani
will continue checking
into master and others to develop.
Can anyone comment if we can put a git hook to drop pushes on master with
help from ASF infra folks?
On 05-Aug-2014, at 11:43 am, Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com
wrote:
develop branch is created as of commit
I deleted the develop branch and will be recreating it in 48hrs.
As per the new git flow which we agreed, all the next release work should move
to develop branch and there shouldn’t be any direct commits on master.
Please make sure you go through wiki @
, Rajani Karuturi
rajani.karut...@citrix.commailto:rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Daan,
I created develop branch on commit cc725e53e304781148a6bf077e05d844fe88207c and
pushed it.
I am trying to create the 4.5 branch. For this, I need to change the version
number in develop branch
~Rajani
On 05-Aug-2014, at 4:15 pm, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hi Rajani,
On 05-Aug-2014, at 12:35 pm, Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com
wrote:
The switch to the new git flow is postponed to 7th aug.
Thanks for that, this means you’ll do it again on 7th
On 05-Aug-2014, at 4:47 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
1. Can we enable a git hook to prevent the commits to master post the
switch?
It’s possible theoretically but to do that in less than 48
For a proposal which got all +1’s[1] what are the next steps to do?? It was
made clear on the voting thread that required branching changes would be done
if the vote passes[2]
Though the content in the document changed, the original proposal hasn’t
changed. Its still the same.
It is explained
...@gmail.commailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
That sound good to me
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Rajani Karuturi
rajani.karut...@citrix.commailto:rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
On 05-Aug-2014, at 4:47 pm, Daan Hoogland
daan.hoogl...@gmail.commailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 12:45
I am just wondering if the shift to a new develop branch is causing the
problems. Its a simple branch shift and should be no different from the current
master.
may be we should leave the master as is and create a ‘stable' branch which
would act like master in git-flow ?
ie)
ACS master -
Since we have seen some activity and -1s on the [vote thread], I planning to
postpone this activity until we agree.
[vote thread] http://markmail.org/message/3qq7ihq6pg3ii7bu
~Rajani
On 05-Aug-2014, at 3:59 pm, Rajani Karuturi
rajani.karut...@citrix.commailto:rajani.karut...@citrix.com
Hi all,
post git flow related branching changes, we need to change the jenkins jobs
which run on master to the new unstable branch(develop)
everything under master tab @ http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/ should change
to the new branch.
looking for volunteers who can help with this. Anyone?
--
with the simulator and the regular builds
when we create the develop branch. We don’t need to change the master
build, just add another pipeline for develop.
Cheers,
Hugo
On 6 aug. 2014, at 13:39, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
post git flow related branching changes
actually, I was planning to delete this branch after the fix passes build
and is committed to master. it has 3 or 4 coverity fixes in it.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Let's consider gitflow and the number of prefixes it suppprts.
biligual
and then decide on a next phase/vote.
makes sense?
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Rajani Karuturi
rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
For a proposal which got all +1’s[1] what are the next steps to do?? It
was made clear on the voting thread that required branching changes
would be done if the vote
below mail landed in the wrong thread. wanted to post on the git flow vote
thread. Will post again on that thread for the folks following it.
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote:
I am not advocating that we should follow git-flow.
If you see my original
I am not advocating that we should follow git-flow.
If you see my original [proposal], it has no mention of git-flow. I just
felt that we are abusing git and put some points which could help us
improve.
Git-flow is something which I liked and felt that it would make us treat
git well.
I am okay
Hi Rohit,
Thanks for the proposal.
I do not agree to the third point that RM should keep merging to master. We
could do that at the end of the release with a single merge.
That said, its definitely better than what we currently do and hence a +1
from me.
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Rohit
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
On 07-Aug-2014, at 11:23 am, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Rohit,
Thanks for the proposal.
I do not agree to the third point that RM should keep merging to master.
We
could do that at the end
Hi Daan,
I moved 5724,5744, 5753, 5910, 5975 to 'Future'
I am working 6634. However, this wont affect the release cycle as this is a
doc bug. I see that around 30 in the filter are also documentation bugs.
You might want to filter them out.
I will try to take a look at few more over the weekend.
A git workflow change will not solve the quality problems we have. They
have to be dealt with independently. Just because we are changing the way
we commit the code doesnt mean we wont have any quality issues introduced
by the commits. It just ensures that issues/fixes are properly transferred
to
Hi,
Was the issue resolved? Can you send all the records in usage_job?
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 12:47 PM, 李栋 li_d...@travelsky.com wrote:
cloudstack version is 4.2.1
于 2014/8/7 15:02, 李栋 写道:
*hi all:*
*We followed the document
Hi Mike,
copying the changed files to generated-webapp and restarting jetty worked
for me.
In our jetty config, we set the scan interval to 0 and hence it never scans
for files changes.
Also, our jetty version is too old 6.1.26 while the latest is 9.2.*
from the [docs]
As of Jetty 6.2.0pre0 a
://reviews.apache.org/r/24571/#comment87992
though null check solves the NPE, to get the record removed project you can
use findProjectByProjectAccountIdIncludingRemoved.
- Rajani Karuturi
On Aug. 11, 2014, 7:29 p.m., Luis Henrique Okama wrote
Anybody else see any issues if we comment out the 1st section above with
respect to tomcat6/tomcat7?
once we move to tomcat7, this file would no longer be relevant for tomcat6
right?
~Rajani
+1 for merges(no-ff) from stable to unstable.
There are pros and cons of ff and no-ff. I prefer no-ff.
-1 on frequent merges in RC stage.
IMO, we shouldn't cut a release a branch until we are reasonably sure that
we have a stable branch. Which would mean everyone working on the release.
once we
Hi pdion,
Thanks for taking care. I closed the pull request. Can you check the
formatting for the default value of ldap.username.attribute? I think it has
gone to a new line.
Also, I see the new doc only for 4.4[1]. where as master[2] and 4.3[3]
still has the old one. Why is it so?
[1]
?
- Rajani Karuturi
On Aug. 21, 2014, 4:15 p.m., Damodar Reddy Talakanti wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24936
On Aug. 22, 2014, 4:39 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote:
client/tomcatconf/server-nonssl.xml.in, line 29
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24936/diff/1/?file=666191#file666191line29
Aren't we loosing the jmx support on tomcat6 by commenting this?
Damodar Reddy Talakanti wrote
Two new tests started to fail since the last 3 runs. They are failing in
the setup stage. But,on my local they dont fail. Can anyone take a look
please?
Test Name | Duration | Age
nose.suite.ContextSuite context=TestDeployVmWithAffinityGroup:setup | 0
ms | 3
nose.suite.ContextSuite
Hi Hugo,
Is it possible to add more info to the build failure emails?
probably, test cases that failed and commit delta involved.
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/simulator/job/simulator-singlerun/
~Rajani
Looks like the new failures are gone.
testcase
integration.smoke.test_vm_life_cycle.TestVMLifeCycle.test_09_expunge_vm is
failing from the past 100+ builds. But, it is successful on my local dev
setup.
stripped output:
=== TestName: test_09_expunge_vm | Status : SUCCESS ===
This is command I
Can you check java and javac version?
Both should be 1.7.x
~Rajani
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Ezaul Zillmer ezaulzill...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all
I'm trying to compile in 4.4 cloustack cubieboard2 ARMv7
'm encontrondo a difficulty to compile apidocs FAILURE
post here the result of
We are discussing on the CI infra and the tests/hardware required. It is a
much needed discussion. Its something which everybody agrees that we
require.
Can we take a step back and look at out existing jenkins setup?
No CI system would help us if we dont look at it.
We have [simulator-singlerun]
build failure emails are bothering me.
I am ready to help fix it if we agree to give it some attention after each
checkin.
If not can we at least disable the job?
~Rajani
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote:
We are discussing on the CI infra
If force push is disabled, feature branches wont be able to rebase on
master directly unless they create a temp branch or do a merge.[1]
Moving tags aren't recommended. see discussion on Re-tagging in git-tag
man page [2]
[1]
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25243/#review52020
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Rajani Karuturi
On Sept. 2, 2014, 9:37 a.m
On Sept. 2, 2014, 10:37 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote:
Ship It!
commit c200ada863dd4a7d5659538e4378c77a3e89d597
- Rajani
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25243/#review52020
The right way to do this is to do commit to commit migrations and use some
db versioning tools like liquibase or flywaydb which will execute the new
change sets. We discussed this before and IIRC, someone started working on
it.
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 20:58 PM, Rohit Yadav
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Will Stevens wstev...@cloudops.com wrote:
@Rajani
I am not entirely sure which technology is being used for the db upgrade
paths, but I think it is probably something like liquibase already. I
would have to check on the technology, but this is already in
be
at a stage one would realise it was not the right way.
Anyways, thanks for the gyan. I would stay away from any such discussions
in future.
~Rajani
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
On 02-Sep-2014, at 5:40 pm, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote
=c468228fe807c621decc5919dadae9bcbb38c753
May we should move this to a common file like setenv.sh and use it
everywhere.
- Rajani Karuturi
On Sept. 3, 2014, 6:25 a.m., Rayees Namathponnan wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17532/#review52436
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Rajani Karuturi
On Jan. 30, 2014, 11:48 a.m
On Sept. 5, 2014, 10:10 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote:
Ship It!
commit: 5d389b1a711bff0a2c7959a824e28d54b56f9e89
- Rajani
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17532/#review52436
+1 based on the minimal testing I did to launch a VM and the LDAP
integration.
~Rajani
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:21 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.3.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
While fixing a doc issue, I added *.po and *.mo files to the merge ignore
list(see .gitattributes file) and merged from 4.3 to 4.4 to master.
If we could follow this, it would be really helpful.
Basically, fix in the lowest possible version and merge upwards. The merges
would be very trivial as
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sep 10, 2014, at 3:04 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote:
While fixing a doc issue, I added *.po and *.mo files to the merge ignore
list(see .gitattributes file) and merged from 4.3 to 4.4 to master
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25476/#review52841
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Rajani Karuturi
On Sept. 9, 2014, 1:47 p.m
On Sept. 10, 2014, 10:07 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote:
Ship It!
commit 75cd79a2382486385b5ae901c5b5c45cbd1505fc
- Rajani
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25476/#review52841
Congratulations Pierre-Luc!!
~Rajani
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:24 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote:
Thanks guys!
PL
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Congrats, Pierre-Luc! :)
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
Congratulations Ian!!
~Rajani
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Congrats, Ian, good job! :)
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org
To:
please fix this as per the
discussion on the other thread? RR: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25289/ mail
thread: http://markmail.org/message/eun6jlgd4c27km3b
- Rajani Karuturi
On Oct. 7, 2014, 4:06 a.m., Rayees Namathponnan wrote
: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20652/diff/
Testing
---
Manually tested.
Thanks,
Rajani Karuturi
the router in
case of command failures. Also added alerts for failures.
Diffs
-
engine/orchestration/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java 6d18f86
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20652/diff/
Testing
---
Manually tested.
Thanks,
Rajani Karuturi
Hi Daan,
Can you cherry-pick the following two commits from 4.4-forward to 4.4?
f7f84fba89cf9eea856075d45bf623ff9ed7a632 checkstyle fix for commit
8e2e8e5e8ab492fa40dedc0788c0ac61f912487b
8e2e8e5e8ab492fa40dedc0788c0ac61f912487b improved ldap logging. added
stacktrace in debug level incase of
+1
Tested the username password support and works fine. This is very useful during
development.
~Rajani
On 25-Apr-2014, at 5:42 am, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 5.1.0 release of CloudMonkey, with the following artifacts
up for a vote:
/accountsWizard.js 6b4907c
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20703/diff/
Testing
---
manually tested. added unittests whereever possible.
Thanks,
Rajani Karuturi
:27 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com:
8e2e8e5e8ab492fa40dedc0788c0ac61f912487b
picked
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Rajani Karuturi
rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote
1 - 100 of 655 matches
Mail list logo
