Since filter may execute its methods in different threads, first of all we
cannot use thread local to pass the information. Because of this, this
leads us no room but method parameters, in this case, they are invoker and
invocation, to store and extract the extra info when necessary. Based on
Hello Dubbo Community,
since the last release of hessian-lite, some issues have been fixed, so
I suggest to release version 3.2.5, the branch is:
https://github.com/dubbo/hessian-lite/tree/3.2.5
release note:
https://github.com/dubbo/hessian-lite/releases/tag/v3.2.5
what do you think?
HI Dubbo Comunity:
There is no authorization or authentication in the current version of
dubbo-ops and it's open to all users,
so I'm planing to bring authorization to dubbo-ops[1] for the sake of security,
here is my thought:
1. provide a simple authorization implementation(for example
Forwarding to Dubbo dev mailing list.
Early investigation on JDK 12 support for Dubbo could be started if
someone is interested.
-- Forwarded message -
From: Rory O'Donnell
Date: Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 7:50 PM
Subject: JDK 12: First Release Candidate available
To:
Cc: , Dalibor
thanks for your interesting, Dubbo OPS do need an authorization for service
governance and service test, I think your advice is fine, please feel free
to send a pr
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 2:06 PM 柯振旭 wrote:
> HI Dubbo Comunity:
> There is no authorization or authentication in the current
It happens but I believe it's rare. If it does happen, I agree with the
ideas Huxing proposed.
Regards,
-Ian.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 5:39 PM yuhang xiu wrote:
> Totally agree with huxing.
> In addition, we may be able to remind the authors of the two prs that their
> pr is repeated.
> This
Totally agree, the schema MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH is common sense.
-Ian.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 5:30 PM Huxing Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 4:11 PM Minxuan Zhuang
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Dubbo Community,
> > The first dubbo ops has been released with version 0.1, usually the
>
+1. I agree with Xiaobo and Jason.
-Ian.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 9:29 AM Jason Joo wrote:
> +1
>
> Methods with no arguments or little possible values of arguments should
> not be applied `ConsistentHashLoadBalance`. Or requests can not be smoothly
> distributed when nodes change.
>
> best
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 1:25 PM Mercy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>Sorry about the unannouced release that is a re-deploy caused by the
> incompatible issue of Maven, and it will appear again.
Can you explain this issue a bit more?
Will this re-deploy cause change to the source files?
I checked
Hi,
I remember I've seen this kind of issue before.
>From my point of view, I prefer the following precedence:
- check the implementation, the code quality requirement should be satisfied.
- if the quality looks more or less the same, I usually check if
he/she is the first time contributor. I
+1 for March 23rd
+1 for Nanjing
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 2:41 PM jun liu wrote:
> > Can we make it Mar 23rd? As our venue is available on that day.
>
> +1 for Mar. 23th, any time is ok for me.
>
> +1 for hosting in Nanjing.
>
> Jun
>
> > On Feb 12, 2019, at 12:20 PM, 王蓉(涂南) wrote:
> >
> > Mar
Congratulations!
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 5:11 PM Xianjun Ke wrote:
> Congratulations
>
> Imteyaz Khan 于2019年2月18日周一 下午3:54写道：
>
> > Congratulations
> >
> > On Monday, February 18, 2019, 柯振旭 wrote:
> >
> > > Congratulations!!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 在 2019-02-18
+1 for Nanjing
And any weekend is fine for me.
Minxuan Zhuang 于2019年2月18日周一 下午5:49写道：
> +1 for March 23rd
> +1 for Nanjing
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 2:41 PM jun liu wrote:
>
> > > Can we make it Mar 23rd? As our venue is available on that day.
> >
> > +1 for Mar. 23th, any time is ok for me.
这是个顺序问题。check 的引入是为了保证 consumer 的启动不会依赖 provider
的启动，尤其是存在循环依赖的时候强制检查导致无法启动的现象出现。
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 3:19 PM LiZhenNet wrote:
> dubbo.registry.check . 是启动时候监测注册中心是否存在。
> dubbo.reference.check=false 用的会比较多， 会在启动时判断服务提供者是否存在，如果是true，当服务提供者列表为空时
> ，会报错提示。 false 则不检查。
>
> 一直以来
Hello Dubbo Community,
The first dubbo ops has been released with version 0.1, usually the
apache project releases follow the format: MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH, so I suggest
to use version 0.2.0 for the next release.
Congratulations
Imteyaz Khan 于2019年2月18日周一 下午3:54写道：
> Congratulations
>
> On Monday, February 18, 2019, 柯振旭 wrote:
>
> > Congratulations!!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 在 2019-02-18 14:00:59，"Chen ZhiGuo" 写道：
> > >Congratulations！！
> > >
> > >在 2019/2/18 13:40，“xxz” 写入:
> > >
> > >
+1
If the pr introduce new feature or modify origin logic, the unit test should be
considered!
-- Original --
From: Huxing Zhang
Date: Mon,Feb 18,2019 5:28 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: how to deal with two pull requests to solve the same issue
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 4:11 PM Minxuan Zhuang wrote:
>
> Hello Dubbo Community,
> The first dubbo ops has been released with version 0.1, usually the
> apache project releases follow the format: MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH, so I suggest
> to use version 0.2.0 for the next release.
+1 to use
We should make it public every time when we publish artifacts to the public
repository, even there's nothing change from the source but other
irrelevant problem like maven issue.
Thanks,
-Ian.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 5:08 PM Huxing Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 1:25 PM Mercy
Congratulations and welcome!
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:12 AM Huxing Zhang wrote:
> Hi Community,
>
> On behalf of the Dubbo PPMC, I am pleased to announce that Zhongming Hua,
> a.k.a. CrazyHZM[1], has been voted in as a new Dubbo committer.
>
> Please join me to say congratulations to him!
>
>
I am confused, why fescar needs to depend on dubbo-registry-nacos.
> because fescar 0.2 has been
released and supports nacos as a registration and configuration center.
It looks like you should depend on nacos directly.
-Ian.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 11:07 PM 季敏 wrote:
> When will the 2.7.1
+1 to the proposed time and location.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 5:56 PM victory wrote:
> +1 for Nanjing
> And any weekend is fine for me.
>
> Minxuan Zhuang 于2019年2月18日周一 下午5:49写道：
>
> > +1 for March 23rd
> > +1 for Nanjing
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 2:41 PM jun liu wrote:
> >
> > > > Can
Finally we have it :) It is a strongly demanded feature. Thank you Mercy.
-Ian.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 4:12 PM Mercy wrote:
> Hi community,
>
> The Apache Dubbo(incubating) team is pleasured to announce that the
> Apache Dubbo Spring Boot Project (Incubating) 2.7.0 has just been released.
>
>
Yuhang,
Why it's a bad idea to use invocation#attachments to store the temp data?
Thanks,
-Ian.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 2:55 PM yuhang xiu wrote:
> Hi, everyone
>
> Recently, I found that dubbo does not handle the data generated during the
> call process when it is asynchronous.
>
> For
Hi,ian
Several reasons:
1. It seems that the attachment is based on the convention. We need to put
the information other than the rpc parameter into the attachment. We need
to ensure that the information and the temporary information (start in the
timeoutFilter) do not overlap.
2. The attachment
25 matches
Mail list logo
