Re: Proposal: Retiring the Geronimo Project

Mea culpa, so let's write it for october on my side ;) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn

Proposal: Retiring the Geronimo Project

The "Geronimo" project is getting long in the tooth and has very few maintainers. It's been teetering on the edge of what could be considered active ever since I've been involved (I believe more than 5 years now.) The project has seen many parts of its portfolio go unmaintained or deprecated.

Re: Proposal: Retiring the Geronimo Project

Thanks for your feedback Romain, but if you read carefully what I wrote, I exactly suggested doing the adoption process before doing any retirement. I'm glad you agree with that part. Ray On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 1:00 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi Raymond, > > Guess before retiring we

Re: Proposal: Retiring the Geronimo Project

Hi Raymond, Guess before retiring we should find a home for all residents (Geronimo by itself is not dead and we have several subprojects which should stay somewhere) so -1 as of today even if I agree with most of what you said and the high level idea behind. My blind guess is that we should at

Re: Moving Mail, Activation, Transaction and Connector to Apache TomEE (was Re: [DISCUSS] Move microprofile impl to Apache TomEE)

FYI here's my +1 w.r.t. the move. Best of luck On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 5:08 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > If it helps: the package is not a big deal for javax -> jakarta concerned > bundles but can be for the one already migrated. A note is that the OSGi > compliance should probable be kept